К.А.Кобраков
К.А.Кобраков
Константин Александрович Кобраков родился в 1977 году 05 августа. После распада СССР в стране происходили экономические и политические реформы и люди были вынуждены, заботится самостоятельно о себе, чтобы выжить.
Моя политическая деятельность началась в 1991 году когда я ещё подростком помогал своим родителям в предвыборной компании расклеивал листовки, раскидывал в почтовые ящики агитационные материалы , в последствии ходил, собирал подписи, а также помогал подготавливать помещения к выборам , а после прохождения выборов, приводил в порядок помещения . Особо запомнились выборы 2000 года.
1993 году я вынужден был пойти работать, чтоб помочь своей семье в то тяжёлое время. Работа меня закаляла в свободное время разгружал вагоны, ходил по наёмным работам связанные со строительством, находясь на самой работе . Я не боялся тяжёлой работы и пошёл работать на стройку, подсобником, после 6 месяцев работы подсобником, был направлен на курсы учился и осваивал профессию столера , сразу присвоили столяр 2 разряд, через 7 месяцев освоил профессию столяра и получил 3 разряд, через 9 месяцев был направлен предприятием в учебный комбинат на стропальщика , и параллельно в вечернее время после работы получал профессию водитель категории В, С,. К концу 1995 года имел профессии , плотника 4 разряда, столяра 4 разряд и стропальщик, а также водитель категории В. С.
Также с 1993 года постоянно участвовал в работе Укрупнённого жилищного кооператива, а именно расклеивал и распространял объявления, помогал заготавливать мётлы для уборки территории, был ответственным лицом за сохранность инвентаря в данном кооперативе, проработал на безвозмездной основе помогал людям до 1997 года.
К середине 1995 года скопил финансы и смог купить оборудование для будущего бизнеса.
1996 году открываю Частного предпринимателя и в том же кооперативе где работал арендую помещения и начинаю производить осветительные приборы (люстры, бра, торшеры) и сувенирную продукцию вазы, подносы, фруктовницы. В 1995 году был впервые подвергнут гонению, давлению со стороны власти 1996 году повторно власть пыталась сломить мое желание жить достойно, но я стойко перенес все тяготы, невзгоды, так как для меня – цель в жизни добиваться успехов своим трудом.
Наша семья 1998 году открывает семейный бизнес по реализации продуктов питания, открываем точки, строим павильоны, и в тоже время я самостоятельно открываю резку стекла и производство торгового оборудования.
В конце 2000 года начинаю подготавливать документы , чтобы баллотироваться в депутаты, а также подготавливаю документы на создание фонда в начале 2001 года многие люди проникаются моим рвение построить достойное государство и работать на благо народа. Мы начинаем создавать структуру, где могли бы вести диалог все организации страны, оппозиции в стране и тем самым начать вести мониторинг власти народом, но в начале 2001 года происходит сильнейшее давление на нашу семью и мы вынуждены отказаться от наших начинаниях.
Оправившись от издевательства и давления власти над нашей семьёй в начале 2005 года мы начинаем семейный бизнес в строительстве, где я имея опыт, навыки и профессии занимаюсь строительством , параллельно продолжая отстаивать правовой перегиб в стране и вести переписку со структурами об изменении законодательства , соблюдения прав человека, но долго власти не дали нам работать, заниматься бизнесом и в 2007 году мы были лишены строительной фирмы с лицензиями и без долгов. Мы хотели работать и жить честно по закону, но в России – это невозможно пока власть игнорирует права человека. Мы всегда помогали по возможности людям, да и сейчас помощь, благотворительность наше кредо жизни.
С 2007 года я начинаю писать книгу о строительстве, чтобы наглядно показать, как самостоятельно строить дома. Начинаю строить в реальную величину объекты из своих эскизов, для будущей книги, чтобы показать наглядность самостоятельного решения труднейших проблем в строительстве, снижения расценок для самостоятельного планирования и строительства, также параллельно продолжал вести политическую борьбу по отстаивании прав граждан в стране. После нескольких лет переписки и нежелания власти решать проблему сообща, было принято решение в 2010 году 9 марта создать общественную организацию, где меня К.А Кобракова избрали Председателем Правления МУДРЕЦ и до сих пор им являюсь.
В 2011 году открывается общественное движение, где меня избирают Председателем правления, так как я имею опыт работы в выявлении недоработок властью, а также имею представление работы на руководящей должности и эффективной работы организации. Но 2012 я сам лично попросил, чтоб меня освободили от этой должности, так как я видел, что Общественное движение уже самостоятельно функционирует и я стал заместителем Председателя правления, кем и являюсь до сих пор . Также в 2012 году я стал реализовывать проект доступного жилья в России , где стоимость кв. м. не превышала 12 тысяч. После этого заявления власть просто обнаглела и стала просто преследовать меня, создавать провокации всеми известными способами, чтоб меня дискредитировать, опорочить , очернить в глазах тех, кто в меня верит и знает, что я живу и работаю ради народа.
В 2015 для углублённого подхода в сфере произвола в России открываю юридическую фирму , а также в 2015 открываю своё СМИ где являюсь главным редактором , чтобы показывать, рассказывать о произволе власти и бороться с произволом в стране.
Наша цель создать новую Россию, путем народного смещения неэффективных управленцев в стране. Только мы народ сможем мирным путём заставить уйти тех, кто нас с вами обделяет законом, правом. Лишает нас достойной жизни, обрекая наших детей, внуков на невыносимое существование в будущем. Вся моя борьба с беспределом в Росси научила меня не сдаваться и идти дальше. Сейчас мы всеми доступными способами боремся в рамках закона, чтоб права народа исполнялись
В начала 2016 года зарождается Народная Оппозиция . Руководитель проектов Народная Оппрозиция , что примыкают общественные организации и Движения , а также граждане , что готово начать вести организованно борьбу против произвола . После проработки работы и противостояния властному беспределу мы смогли заявить от Народной Оппозиции только в начале 2017 о создании новой политической партии, что зарождается и находится на стадии создания СДПС Социал Демократическая Партия Свободы Руководитель координационного совета в партии СДПС , путём постоянных акций протеста , митингов в Москве и регионах, но на данный момент каждый, кто желает помогать нами бороться с произволом, может к нам примкнуть . Как один из основателей Народной Оппозиции в России ,вхожу в Координационный совет по выработки дальнейшей борьбы с произволом , продолжаю бороться . Головной офис Народной Оппозиции в г.Тула тел 8-999-781-7009. Сейчас нас поддерживают СМИ, Межрегиональные представительства , Движения , юр компании –но нас должно быть больше . Мы ждём всех во всех частях страны . спрашивайте и мы вам подскажим .
А также Координатор-аналитик в МОО Ростовской обл. Координатор-аналитик в МОО Воренежской обл,.. Ждём всех сайт МУДРЕЦ.РФ
Формат 60×90/16. Гарнитура «Times New Roman».
Аргументация
Наследия Истории
Тамги Сакральной Идентичности
Сама работа, труд, книга называется не просто так, и суть названия раскрывает её смысл. Хотя хотелось назвать по-другому «Тяжкий труд жить а доказать правду ещё тяжелей», но я решил, что раз я это пишу, то можно отыскать и сказать, значит не так тяжело.
Аргументация даёт возможность убедить собеседника понять или принять ту точку зрения, что излагаешь, само слово происходит от латинского слова argumentatio, что означает «приведение аргументов». Включает тезис, суждение, истинность которого обосновывается с последующим доводом, проявленным в исходном факте или теоретическом положении, с помощью которых обосновывается тезис. В последующем — демонстрация логической связи между аргументами и тезисом. Дедуктивное заключение выводится из аргументов по правилам логического вывода или отношением логического подтверждения, которое включает индукцию, аналогию и некоторые другие виды рассуждений. Недемонстративная суть делает правдоподобными или вероятными заключения, которые имеют частично обоснованный и неопределённый характер. Контекстуальная — ставит в основу исторические традиции, мнения авторитетных деятелей, интуицию, здравый смысл и подобные доводы, которые нуждаются в дальнейшем анализе.
Наследие является самобытным, культурным бытом людей из известных прежних времён, выраженное в культурном наследии, что заключено в материальной и духовной культуре, созданной прошлыми поколениями в материальном наследии: здания и сооружения, образцы инженерных и технических решений, градостроительные объекты, памятники архитектуры, исторические и культурные ландшафты, археологические памятники, монументы, скульптурные памятники, мемориальные сооружения, уклады жизни в устройстве мира народов, народностей, этнических групп.
История, события, архивные документы, памятники — это свидетельства минувших эпох, рассказывающие о цивилизациях в культурных образах прошлого, отдельные здания, сооружения, территории (церкви, колокольни, часовни), призванные напоминать об историческом событии, изучением которой является человеческое прошлое.
Тамга даёт понятие в языках, культуре. Применяется название в простом смысле в славянских языках: «семья», «род» — корень rod- (род-). Древнегреческая лексема yévoç. patra — «семья», οικογένεια («икогения») происходит от древнегреческих корней οίκος («икос») — «дом» и γένος («генос») — «род, происхождение», «Племя» (англ. tribe, франц. tribu) происходит от латинского tribus — «часть народа», в античном Риме — «род» (gens, мн. gentes). У русской знати Рюриковичей на протяжении раннего средневековья тамга использовалась как определение родоплеменного состава и его вертикаль. У ногайцев «тамгъа» и обозначает «печать», «отпечаток». У кипчаков «кос-алип» — «два алипа» У казахов — «ойък». Адыгейцы — «тамыгъэ». Кабардинцы — «дамыгъэ». Таким образом, тамга — это, можно сказать, фамилия или более упрощённое понимание ИНН.
Сакральное — обладающее особой ценностью, запрещённостью или трансцендентным содержанием. Символика сакрального часто интерпретируется как скрытое знание или концентрированная энергия, доступная через специальные методы и знаки.
Идентичность — чувство принадлежности к социальной группе или индивидуальной идентичности. Исторический подход опирается на анализ того, что выделяет, например, этническую — через знания, язык, культуру, территории; национальную — как самоидентификацию гражданскую сообщества граждан в определённой форме, принадлежность к историческому прошлому и исторической памяти, отражение в историческом сознании, коллективной идентичности, осознание своей принадлежности к истории концептуальных систем, которые кажутся более приемлемыми, высказывая разные точки зрения связать прошлое с настоящим и будущим. Создавая условия в одних случаях, историческая идентичность поддерживает субъектов развития, а в других случаях — консолидацию общества с последующим развитием.
Каждый человек желает знать, кто он есть в этом сложном и многообразном мире, проложенный через множество понятий и критериев. Какова твоя личность во всём многообразии? Можно иметь множество специальностей, дипломов, степеней, но как разобраться в своём наследии — вопрос, и очень сложный. Хотя, вы знаете, наследие имеет не только материальное значение, оно гораздо шире. Я, например, наследием называю умение что-то хорошо делать, понимать. Вот, к примеру, я ставлю свои заслуги в живописи, архитектуре, поэзии и др. как основу моих генетических возможностей, проложенную через века, сотворённую в её практикоприменительном формате именно моими предшественниками по родоплеменной структуре за счёт их развития стремиться учиться, познавать, практикоприменять, да вообще жить в этом, общаясь в разных науках.
И когда я себе закладываю новый дом, я его полностью с нуля придумываю сначала в мыслях, вспоминая разные архитектурные формы, затем разрабатываю проект на бумаге, просчитываю все основные узлы для нагрузки при распределении массы с последующим погашением избытка энергии веса. При этом строю сам, в одиночку, рассчитывая только на себя, на свои силы и умение, не беря в расчёт сторонние силы или помощь, получая удовольствие от процесса созидания из натурального материала (приближаюсь к природному началу), бетона с различными архитектурными формами, статуями, художественной лепкой и мозаикой (что сам также делаю для усложнения задачи самому себе), создавая сказочные идеи в реальности для последующего воплощения задуманного как реализации себя в пространстве своих мыслей, реализовывая самого себя, что делает меня удовлетворённым.
Отстаивая свои права, начиная изучать, вы совершаете ошибки и с последующем получением информации начинаете понимать основы. С последующей передачей позитивной энергии в этот мир через архитектуру, красоту, юриспруденцию, литературу, историю как основу коммуникации себя и своей реализации, защиты. Всё лежит в наших руках, возможностях, это может сделать, каждый было бы желание. Знаете такую пословицу: «Лишь тем орудием владею, что бог вручил в награду мне умение использовать свои возможности»?
Таким образом, когда я не занят написанием своих изысканий, книг, картин и борьбой с несправедливостью, коррупцией, защищая обездоленных правом, я погружаюсь в творческие архитектурные замыслы, граничащие со сказочной мечтой, погружаюсь в прекрасное фантазийное пространство, чтоб сделать мир красивее, добрее, лучше, проще, оставить отпечаток прошлого в настоящем, совмещая, используя современные знания. Люди, проходящие мимо, видят моё творческое воплощение в реальность, всегда радуются, даже меняют привычные маршруты, ходят с друзьями, родственниками, показывая красоты в архитектурном выражении, фотографируют, чтоб увидеть необычные красоты, выражая стилистику и образы задуманного из камня в прекрасную структуру с чёткими линиями, формами подчёркивая воздушность, элегантность, неповторимость и роскошь. А роскошь — синоним индивидуальности, созданной человеческим замыслом через геометрию, черчение, математику, физику, материаловедение, флористику, ландшафт, художественное преобразование, трудолюбие, упорство в воплощении рук человека с желанием создать, дойти до конца, проверяя свою крепость духа.
Такие возможности даны природой не просто так, это дано из прошлого: унаследовал от своих многочисленных родственников в прошлом через многочисленные науки, изучая и совершенствуя, многократно встраивая свои возможности в ваш код идентичности не как человека разумного, а как Humanae cognitionis, «человека познающего». Я считаю, это новый этап эволюции самого вида. Родные оставили отпечаток моего изысканного подхода ко всему за тысячелетия эволюции множеств поколений, прежде чем я появился в этом прекрасном, ярком, позитивном мире со своим взглядом практикоприменительных возможностей для последующей передачи в будущее. Никакая трудность, страдание не могут уничтожить красоты, созданные природой, буйство красок, неповторимость всего. Показывают нам такие возможности, что мы не можем даже себе их представить, придумать. Вся наша жизнь созидает — это самое прекрасное, что можно только вообразить человек, и его скрытые возможности, заложенные преобразовать этот мир.
Здесь я хочу поделиться этим со всеми, кто желает создать мир будущего уже сейчас, научить жить в гармонии с самим собой, природой, социумом, создавая красоту и позитивную энергию вокруг вас. Но чтобы это научиться делать, вы должны познать себя, познать вашу внутреннюю сущность и один из способов лицезреть себя во всей природной действительности. Ваши изменения даёт понятие вами вас самих.
И начнём с простого: поговорим о фамилии и самой идентичности того, что вас определяет и идентифицирует. Но не буду совмещать в единую структуру описания обо всём в глобальных понятиях, оставлю размышление о мире, его возможностях, наших возможностях и как их использовать для другого умозаключения в чётких проявлениях, в научных изысканиях накопленного человечеством. Но об этом во всех его понятиях, проложенных через философию, теологию, физику, биологию и т. д., — в другом моём труде с наглядным пониманием в практикоприменительном духе.
Читая разные книги, например, «Антисемитизм в древнем мире» Соломона Лурье (впервые издана в 1922-м и издавалась в Германии, России, Израиле), стараюсь понимать, рассуждать, думать, применять, вести разговорную речь с вами, переходя на исторические события для развёртывания смысла. Конечно, трудно передать то, что я чувствую внутри себя, но постараюсь вместить всё, что, считаю, создаст картину излагаемых событий.
Скажу сразу, я не имею докторских степеней, так как не защищал диссертацию и не представлял научному совету свои размышления, на которых возможно получить такую степень, когда входишь в определённую структуру, признанную структурами контроля. Я формировал всю информацию всю свою сознательную жизнь, десятилетиями для возможности понять, сделать выводы и, самое главное, начать помнить, отбросить непонимание и конфликты. В доступной, простой, сжатой форме исторических событий , структурированных в едином смысле, связанных между собой, для понимания любому не осведомлённому в истории человеку сути происходящих событий, чтоб воспринимать их, понимая, о чём идёт речь. Работу свою решил предоставить широкому кругу людей для их оценки, включая научные круги, — именно мои умозаключения, построенные на исторических фактах, семейных рассказах, документах, протянувшихся сквозь века и гущу событий.
Каждый может себя проявлять в разных аспектах жизни и его исторического уклада в самой жизни, что отображает нас в работе, семье, заботе о здоровье через спорт, выражая свои доводы через научные изыскания. Как пример, я с вами общаюсь в данном материале или других моих работах, не только на русском, но и на английском, немецком — специально для родственников моей жены (вот некоторые работы: Сборник сказок и стихов, К. А. Кобраков. ББК 83.8, УДК 087.5, К55, ISBN 978–5–4492–0960–3).======================================================================================== Или научный подход в виде книги, или стихи, которые я планирую опубликовать, юридические перипетии, архитектурно-строительные изыскания и т. д. как книгу. Бесплатно размещаю свои работы на сайте «Мудрец.рф», так как главное — давать возможность познакомить как можно больше людей с информацией для всеобщего развития. Деньги я беру за свои книги, только когда человек хочет иметь мою книгу с моей подписью как автора в своей библиотеке. Плюсов напечатанной версии много: я лично индивидуально подпишу каждую книгу, оставив не просто автограф, но, если вы пожелаете, текст разборчивый, нравственный и благопристойный. Но не больше ста пятидесяти символов (не включая моих данных), предоставленных вами.
Но что именно писать из вашего текста присланного, остаётся за мной, если вы его пришлёте. Вся информация, присылаемая вами на другом языке, не на русском, обязательно указать, какой язык вы использовали для возможности его перевода на русский (обязательно). Только на электронную почту rf.pravo@mail.ru (что в книге указана, дублирующаяся на сайте «Мудрец.рф»), приложив ксерокопию квитанции об оплате и число, время отправления на счёт с указанием цели перечисленных денег и от кого. Счёт указан только на сайте «Мудрец.рф», цены могут меняться в зависимости от качества книг: мягкий переплёт, твёрдый, с кожаным переплётом, с золотым тиснением и др.
Книга будет выслана по почте на указанный вами полный почтовый адрес с индексом и кому; почтовые затраты, а именно пересылка книги, ложатся на вас; стоимость почтовых расходов индивидуальна и зависит от почты, ко мне это не относится. Если вы её не получите, то повторно по этому адресу высылается с дополнительной оплатой за работу курьера и погашением затрат почты. Сама книга с автографом бесплатная как подарок, стоимость 3000 руб. именно курьерской доставки до почтовой службы в индивидуальном характере за работу, именно 3000 (три тысячи рублей) за курьерские услуги до почты. Цену за книгу уточняйте на сайте «Мудрец.рф». Сама цель — донести информацию, а продажа книги второстепенна. Личное общение, приём, телефонные консультации только по предварительной договорённости, смотреть только на сайте «Мудрец.рф», как всё происходит.
Друзья, в России есть доменная структура, где расположен сайт «Мудрец.рф», и поисковики других стран с трудом выдают этот сайт для других стран. Лучше забивать в поисковике mudrec.rf kobrakov, так вы выйдете на мои каналы и сможете перейти в зону ограниченных возможностей, так как российская платформа не передаёт всю информацию в глобальных возможностях на русском языке. Также есть мой сайт в доменной зоне com, там также сможете перейти через http://kobrakov.com на все мои каналы и «Мудрец.рф» и связаться со мной. А вот читать все мои работы должны бесплатно в интернет-пространстве на моих платформах.
Можно много приводить подходов, которые мы формируем сами, но есть одна важная суть понимания себя как идентичность через фамилию, и этот аспект надо искать в глубине истории и её трактатах жизни вне зависимости от вас, полагаясь не только на прошлое, но и на реальность настоящего для последующего формирования будущего. Тем самым понять, что значит история фамилии, что это такое, и что она обозначает, и откуда взялась. Мало кто интересуется, принимая как обычное состояние или составляющую, но представить, какие трудности связаны с её розыском и разные факторы вас коснутся, люди даже не представляют. Многие задавались этим вопросом, но как только всё упирается в годы, деньги, знания, поиск, желание понять, кто вы есть, ваше цель быстро меняет приоритеты.
Чем вы можете помочь своей жизни для процветания своей фамилии и почитания предков, если узнаете основы вашего родоплеменного значения? К каким бы вы племенам, союзам ни относились в прошлом, не имеет значения в настоящем, так как расовое деление путём сегрегации осталось в прошлом. Но ваша родовая история имеется в настоящем. Так что смотреть в прямую часть неписаного глупо, надо исходить из смыслового значения, что несёт само написание, и что изменится в вашей жизни, если вы узнаете о своих предках исключительно в определённом написании, — это вопрос. Помнить их, пусть и не поимённо, но нести их родовую тамгу, родовой фамильный знак, печать, что ставилась на родовое имущество идентификаторами племени, клана или семейства предков, и добавлять к ней дополнительную часть либо видоизменять её и отыскать начало становится трудней с каждым витком поиска.
Да и с какой целью вы хотите знать свою историю, также зависит от вас. Многие недалёкие люди начинают смеяться, когда кто-то начинает искать свою историческую принадлежность, говорят, зачем, лучше колбасы купить. Но вы понимаете, понятие, образование у всех разное и ценности у всех разные : кому-то нужна колбаса, кому-то — должность, не понимают, что происходит вокруг. А есть люди, что ценят не только себя, но всё, что окружает человека. Поверьте, я много слышал, видел жестов и усмешек от недалёких людей, что не знают историю, не обладают знаниями, даже примитивными, но при этом чувствуют себя в этой жизни, занимая разные должности. Как говорится, наличие должности не говорит, что имеется восприятие, чтобы понимать, что им говорят. И я привык игнорировать, так как у нас в России умный человек всегда считается недалёким, так как у него нет «портфеля», а «портфель» главнее всех умных людей, так как они смотрят только свою выгоду, прикрываясь своим положением, и часто путают свою шерсть с государственной. Обработать полученную информацию дано не всем, и это опять заслуга эволюции — понимать, что такое разного рода труды умственного характера. Если отбросить тех, кто не понимает, зачем вообще история, то остаются трудности в определении информации, понимания, поиска.
Вот смотрите, последние сто лет, как менялось название территории с народом: Российская империя, Российская Республика (1917 год), Российская демократическая Республика (1918 год), РСФСР (с 1918 по 1922 год). В 1922 году — Союз Советских Социалистических республик (СССР). 5 декабря 1936 года из состава Российской СФСР была выведена Казахская АССР, ей был придан статус союзной республики под названием Казахская ССР. В 1939–1940 годах территория УССР была увеличена благодаря присоединению Западной Украины и Северной Буковины, в 1945 году — Закарпатской Украины, и т. д. 25 декабря 1991 года образована Российская Федерация. И это не считая, что всё это время были республики, а теперь есть СНГ — Содружество Независимых Государств. Не считая различных союзов политических, экономических, военных, к примеру, ШОС, ОДКБ, БРИКС.
Представьте, если мы начнём с чем-то из них что-то ассоциировать, то по истории мы можем увидеть, что Казахстан (Байконур) отправил первого человека в космос, вышел в космос, отправил на Луну и т. д. Одним словом, прямо космическая держава, если отбросить СССР. А если посмотреть на название фронтов во Второй мировой войне, то основную победу ковали Белорусский и Украинский фронт, а Россию защищали совершенно другие воинские формирования. Некоторые из за малограмотности думают, что она не участвовала в войне 1941–1945, и войны в этот период разные, а что говорить а прошлом, где время ушло далеко и очевидцев событий просто нет.
А если посмотреть, что близкие родственники стали носить разные фамилии, уехали не просто в другое государство, а на другой континент, стали излагать свои мысли на другом языке или приняли другую веру? Связать родство крайне затруднительно. К примеру, был такой огромный род, наследие Аттилы, сына Мунздука из рода Баламиридов, чьи просторы родоплеменной связи были во всех родах прошлого, так как для укрепления союза всегда скрепляли родственной тамгой, семейным браком, и это никак в дальнейшем не освобождало от нападения на своего родственника. Скажу вам честно, родственники находились в смертельной опасности, если они каким-то образом могли претендовать на территории, власть. И чтобы себя спасти, со своим малым войском уходили подальше от мест, где их могли убить. И таким образом шла миграция, присоединялись к другим родам, но это не значит, что когда становились сильней, не шли войной на обидчиков. Или становились купцами в далёких странах, защитниками, или просто как отец Ахиллеса прибыл на остров Эгина, подчинил островитян и стал править, хотя Ахиллес (Ахилл) родился в Фтии в Сароническом заливе (др.-греч. Φθία) — город и область на юго-востоке Фессалии в Греции использовался как база для своей безопасности, обучения своих воинов и размещения. Многие пользовались данной армией в своих целях, к примеру, об острове упоминается в гомеровской «Илиаде» как о родине мирмидонян,
В общем, в прошлом для именитых детей быть из рода — знак опасности. Моё мнение — хорошо, что порядок всё-таки какой-никакой есть. Всё прямо как и у нас: родственники воюют за недвижимость, наследство, невзирая на свою связь, да и именитый род может представлять угрозу укладу больших стран по мнению правителей или тех, кто управляет правителем. В общем, вы сами видите, как можно напасть на любую страну или защитить её.
Сейчас много в истории говорят о разных народах, что формировали суть настоящего, но где они в реальности? Либо исчезли, либо остались в минимальном значении и охраняются как малочисленные народы. Тем самым тот, кто помнит историю народа, и его нет на бумаге, не говорит, что он исчез. И вновь появиться может по суду в стране, а забота государства о его сохранении становится первоочередной.
Например, территорию современного Смоленска населяли народы, населяли несколько этнических групп, характеризуясь сложным взаимодействием балтских, славянских, финно-угорских и других этнических групп, что отразилось в культуре, традициях, которые оставили след в топонимике и этнографии региона.
Балты заселяли днепро-двинские Верхнее Поднепровье, балтские племена. От них славяне заимствовали речные названия: Сертея, Вопь, Надва, Гордота, Угра, Каспля и др. К X веку балтское население было окончательно поглощено в формулировку как славяне.
Финно-угры. которые занимали верховья Западной Двины, Днепра и Волги.
Славяне-кривичи. На рубеже VI–VIII веков на территории Смоленщины появились славяне-кривичи, которые пришли с севера, с территории Псковщины. Они образовали единую субэтническую общность с восточной Белоруссией, «кривичи» не славянское, а произошло от балтского «криева».
Радимичи. В конце I тысячелетия на востоке от кривичей лежали земли летописных вятичей, южнее их — земли радимичей и северян.
Таким образом, история заселения Смоленщины и топонимики региона очень разная, но к малочисленным народам государство не относит ввиду сложностей становления самого древнего государства. Таким образом, древние коренные народности в Смоленщине есть, и в своей работе я указываю, что государству нужно пересмотреть основные критерии и признать определённые обстоятельства в историческом формате.
Вот и в древности много было родов, но в глубине они все родственники так или иначе. Возьмём Аттилу. В европейских источниках известен в разных названиях, один из них как Мундзук, в венгерских легендах — Бендегуз (Bendegúz), потомок великого библейского царя Нимрода, упомянутый в Танахе Иордана, как Мундзукус у Феофана Исповедника, у Приска Панийского как Μουνδίουχος, у Кассиодора как Мундиукус, во многих агадических преданиях и легендах Ближнего Востока. По родословию, приведённому в Книге Бытия, Нимрод, сын Хуша и внук Хама, упоминается в разных источниках, например, в разных трудах. что является одним из трёх сыновей Ноя, брат Сима и Иафета, а Ной — сын Ламеха, внук Мафусаила, потомок Сифа, от рода Каина по женской линии от третьего сына Адама.
Таким образом, все мы братья и сёстры. История запутана намеренно или не намеренно, но мы пока не будем смотреть так глубоко, а посмотрим род Аттилы. Правил огромной территорией, ходил с военными походами на современную территорию Франции или Древний Рим, Грецию, Византию, в его государство входили тюркские, германские, славянские и другие племена. У Мунздука через одного из сыновей Атиллы один из правнуков — Хан Кубрат, Булгарский царь, патриций, что правил на территории нынешней Украины, России, Северного Кавказа, Болгарии, что ему досталась по наследству. Как правило, в прошлом родоплеменная структура имела родовое правление на земле с последующим делением на обособленные родовые общины. Выкидывать кого-то из родовой принадлежности глупо и несправедливо. У Кубрата в прошлом был своеобразный семейный знак в виде креста и разных символов, знаков, объединённых в единую систему, обозначающих как его личное направление от основной семьи, но с добавлениями.
Таким образом проявление своей идентичности показывает в простом понятии, с кем вы имеете дело, что за человек, и что несёт данная личность, опираясь на свою родоплеменную структуру. Само понятие очень интересное во всех аспектах понимания. Начнём с того, что определяет родоплеменную составляющую в её историческом, культурном, социальном, биологическом, показывает наследственную информацию во всей её красе. К примеру, в нашем роду Кобраковых есть такое поверье. Если предать общественности, показать, выставить на обозрение всем свою тамгу (знак родовой) другим, и её примут, то после этого будешь править сорок лет, и она должна отображать не только то, что написано предками в виде знака, но и любое проявление идентичности.
В прошлом этим знаком свыше считалось падение метеорита, затмение, отметка на теле. Неправильный деформированный череп в прошлом мог являться символом божественного происхождения. Мотивы — социальный статус, относящийся к элитному слою или определённой касте, этническая или племенная идентификация определённому племени, красота и благородство, религиозная или мифологическая связь с культом бога, с миром духов, так что не надо осуждать людей в прошлом их понимании. В современном понятии, к примеру, знак доллара указывает на деньги американские, пять колец — на Олимпиаду, герб — принадлежность к стране. А вот, к примеру, Емельян Пугачёв своим сторонникам показал знак на груди, белые пятна в виде орла. Сейчас мы не будем спорить, что это, от ожога или нет, я просто привёл пример, но, конечно, знак — это нечто правдоподобное, что не ставится под сомнение его происхождения.
Показываешь атрибут сакрального, отметку некой силой, или просто знак, или знамение, но и какой-то скрытый знак, что несёт эту информацию, и это должны увидеть другие наблюдатели. Только тогда имеешь право на то, что тебя принимают, соглашаются с твоим истинным избранным высшим статусом, знаком главенствующего рода по отношению к другим. После исчисления сорока лет нахождения на высшем посту передаёшь другому из рода и становишься старейшиной, то есть мудрецом, а на шее повязываешь материю жёлтого цвета или специально изготовленный в виде полумесяца из металла, как говорят, жёлтого цвета, то есть золота, и указывается символ родовой. Такого человека чтят, уважают и почитают. Так что сказать, что ты тот, кто должен прийти, помочь, объединить всех, не так просто, как нам хочется, просто сказав, думать, заявить в интернете, что ты главный или тот самый, которого ждали. Прямо как и в государстве, все или большинство должны согласиться, что один человек будет стоять во главе родовой структуры.
Вот, друзья, знакомьтесь с моей родовой тамгой, что передавали одному из рода, чтоб не было вражды. Мне передал отец, ему — дед, прадед и так далее. Пусть их знак, а теперь мой и не был широко известен в исторических сводах, документах, как великая могущественная династия, но, думаю, теперь он будет известен многим, даже если и не имеет столь значимого аспекта в широком круге определения моего рода. Но всё же я попробую показать, что может нести ваша современная фамилия на своём примере со всеми структурами глубоких изысканий и семейной информации.
Конечно, две пересечённые основные, они не ставятся под сомнение, а вот точка или круг и та, что имеет изгиб… Меня будоражит сомнение, как писать, точку или круг? И пересечённая нижняя линия, она имеет овальную чашу или в виде галочки? Я думаю, это не столь важно (суть, основу передаёт и имеет информационную структуру самого изображения) с учётом, что сейчас основой является достижение самого человека, что чтит историю своего рода, но при этом проявляет себя как личность. Самоидентичность знака с моей тамгой нашего рода я так и не нашёл — именно конкретно такого формата, что я вам показываю, но некие сходства есть, но чётко выраженного не вижу, а подгонять под что-то я не желаю. Да и сама работа, что вы читаете, построена передать основы, не углубляясь во все сути понимания каждых описанных мной фактов, доктрин как неотъемлемая рассудительная часть в работе или в принятой истории — это даёт вам возможности увидеть альтернативы, если захотите.
Все тонкости исторических перипетий вам теперь понятны, имеют информацию в простой основе, а для меня указание всех тонкостей привело бы к увеличению самого понятия обобщения данного материала на сотни, если не на тысячи страниц, что создаст затруднения понять основную суть на первичном этапе самой сути. Если будет необходимость, можно написать более углублённый труд во всех тонкостях, нюансах и о том, что я не стал писать сейчас. Конечно, такая работа может принести мне не как работу, а уже более большее в определённом статусе.
Таким образом, друзья, всегда есть время подумать и мне, и вам. А пока обращаюсь к вам: если сможете разъяснить происхождение именно понятия этой родовой тамги Кобраковых, почему была в изоляции от исторических событий в нашем мире, а также ваши комментарии, заметки, критику, да и просто ваше восприятие о прочитанном прошу писать на электронную почту rf.pravo@mail.ru или посмотреть на сайте «Мудрец.рф» электронную почту. Буду признателен, если вы выразите свои соображения, поддержку или отрицание на моих каналах, страницах в соцсети.
Как я люблю говорить о знаниях: «Век учись, век живи, всех знаний не узнать, но стремиться надо». А сообща можно выстроить более серьёзный научный труд для всеобщего восприятия истории как полноценную основу жизни. И многие со мной не соглашаются, что глупо ковыряться в истории, не имея статус профессора, научного сотрудника, что-то рассказывать, не согласовывая с правящей структурой, менять принятые парадигмы истории, не согласовывая, о чём-то говорить с чьего-то разрешения — это для формальности. Но у меня другое понятие: «Тот, кто не интересуется историей, у того нет истории в будущем». А власть имущим не нужны новые развороты, им нужно спокойствие и принятые ими же свои координаты их спокойствия, сидеть на своём месте до старости.
Тем самым наша с вами кровь несёт информацию как материал для генетических исследований, но передача генетической информации через кровь не даёт описания фактов исторической сути, если вы не имеете значимую фамилию, всё расскажет и содержится в ДНК. Метод основан на сравнении генетических маркеров между предполагаемыми родственниками — более дальние родственные отношения. Чем выше индекс, тем более вероятно наличие родственной связи между участниками, зависит от того, какие хромосомы они унаследовали от общих предков. Таким образом, это действующий способ, но надо знать, с кем сравнивать и дадут ли вам это сделать. Ваши рассуждения о связи становятся под вопросом. Что действительно действует — это, например, если кровь человека была обнаружена в строении, например, на полу, стене. Банальное убийство комара на потолке даёт чёткое показание того, что интересующий объект был в этом месте. И, даже если тщательно смыли, применяют люминол — порошок из кислорода, азота, водорода и углерода. Когда он вступает в реакцию с гемоглобином, то начинает светиться голубым. Иногда даёт ложные реакции и может светиться не только от крови, но и при контакте с медью, мочой или даже соусом из хрена, пусть и пройдут годы. Но вы должны понимать, что это не всегда возможно.
Обратиться к поисковой структуре, что конкретно занимается поиском родовых знаков в истории, может позволить не каждый, так как это очень дорогое удовольствие, определяющее за конкретным индивидуумом очень сложный, долгий процесс розыска информации ваших предков, но беззаботный, если есть много денег. Впоследствии самим наблюдателем определяемая его принадлежность, берущая начало от определённой личности, изначального хода событий, помноженная на годы, проложенная через время в исторических реальностях. Создаются возможности будущим поколениям развить собранную информацию в энергию и преобразовать в прогресс человечества как основа фундаментальных изменений и преобразования в общественном пространстве. Но чтоб это сделать, надо знать, что вам дано по природе. И зная основные направления ваших предков, вы с лёгкостью решаете те проблемы, с чем ваши предки уже когда-то справлялись Таким образом, фамилия дополняется вашим именем и подчёркивается отчеством. Рассказать родословную и отследить взаимодействие фамилии и личности с личностями — такой информацией владеет не каждый, и она даёт огромные возможности, главное уметь применять практикоприменительные действия ваших знаний.
Происхождение фамилии от латинского familia — «семейство». Фамилия не сразу закрепилась в нашем быту, и были просто структуры родоплеменной составляющей с огромным количеством людей, и в большинстве идентичность размывалась. Изначально имели только высокопоставленные особы прошлого как атрибут власти и семейственности, указывающий на род, со временем получили приставку к своему прозвищу как определяющую, к кому относятся по родоплеменной собственности. И сначала называли имя, а потом говорили, из рода (к примеру, Аттила — имя, а род — Дуло, с которым также многие историки трактуют). И, таким образом, фамилия закрепилась как понимание родоплеменной знати и принадлежности в письменах, указанное писцами в своих интересах — территорий, собственности, рабов, зависимых людей от могущественного рода.
Сама современная фамилия в прошлом определяла само понимание, несущее информацию к имени, обозначение, к примеру, «знатный род», «воин», «ремесленник» или просто «собственность». Состоит из корня, основы. В дополнение появились приставки для увеличения понятия фамилии, а в последующем — суффиксы, окончания. К примеру, в России к XXI веку получило повсеместное прикрепление фамилии как наследственно-семейное именование к личному имени. А вот как оно появлялось, можете представить с учётом, что отменили крепостное право в России 19 февраля 1861 года по старому стилю, а по новому стилю 3 марта. Все, наверно, помните, что жить по новому времени мы стали с 1 июля 1918 года. Декрет предписывал по новому (григорианскому) стилю в скобках указывать число по старому (юлианскому). И тем самым мы с вами с лёгкостью пера властных полномочий изменили само понятие «времяисчисление», что тут говорить о какой-то фамилии определённой личности или рода. Император Александр II подписал манифест «О Всемилостивейшем даровании крепостным людям прав состояния свободных сельских обывателей» и «Положение о крестьянах, выходящих из крепостной зависимости». Так что немногие могут найти свою родовую принадлежность в глубине веков.
В большинстве корень фамилии даёт обозначения в простоте ответа для непосвящённых, так как информация фамилии несёт иногда угрозу раскрытия неудобной информации тем, кто не желает показать истинную историю, что скрыта за толщей вековых неразберих в угоду меркантильным интересам в прошлом и нежеланием показать в настоящем в географическом понимании принадлежности народов и территорий, что нередко противоречит официальной исторической хронологии в угоду политической конъюнктуре, главенствующей структуре в пространственной сути нахождения. Таким образом, фамилия раскрывает родоплеменную хронологию и является противоречащим фактором установленной исторической последовательности.
Вот давайте попробуем порассуждать для начала, и как вы начнёте воспринимать информацию, что я скажу. Вы знаете, что любая дата символизирует событие и в конце чисел всегда ставят либо сокращённое понятие в виде буквы «г», означающее год, либо целиком слово «год», указывающее на дату, состоящую из цифр и букв. А давайте представим, что сам год как понятие указывали не сзади, как принято сейчас, а спереди даты, что не противоречило в прошлом, но вызывает недоразумение в настоящем. И тем самым можно трактовать число из трёх цифр события с приставкой спереди определённой закорючки, со временем можно интерпретировать как четырёхзначную цифру, подменяя ценности и информацию в угоду определённым индивидам, что приведёт к искажению информации во временном пространстве, но и даст описание.
Так и исчисление времени разными царствами также создаёт разное летоисчисление Христово 1704 г., грузинского 392 г., татарского 1116 г., запись одних и тех же событий может неоднократно. Вы скажете, да так не может быть, но я вам как пример ваших пониманий и недалёкого прошлого указал принятие закона об отмене крепостного права, где был один стиль исчисления времени, а стал другой, а вывод делать вам. Может быть подмена с исчислением и указанием года спереди или в конце. Много разных действий мы знаем, и изменения есть факт нашей жизни.
Вот возьмите, как указывают, из латинского языка произошёл испанский язык как ветвь диалекта в V веке (указывается как разговорная), а письменность разрабатываться только начала в XIII веке, а португальский как старогалисийский язык начиная с III века до н. э. повсеместно используется. И что самое интересное, слово «кобра» происходит от португальского языка, где cobra означает «змея». Широкий смысл кобры как змеи отметили португальцы, когда прибыли в XIV веке на корабле мореплавателя Васко да Гамы впервые в Индию. Назвали Cobra de Capelo, что в переводе с португальского означает «змея в шляпе», именно современную змею кобру. Конечно, шляпа пропала. Формирование языков в той местности шло от протоиндоевропейского, протоитальянский, латино-фалискские языки, старая латынь, латинский, романские языки — как всё меняется и становится непонятно, как понимать.
Читать язык этруссов могут славяне с его сходством, хотя создали задолго до создателей. Братья Кирилл (Константин, 827–869, умер в Риме), младший в роду, Мефодий (815–885, умер в Велеграде, Моравия) старший в роду, — творцы старославянской азбуки и церковнославянского языка. 863 год — дата появления первой славянской азбуки, алфавит из 38 знаков. Святые православной и католической церквей родились в византийском городе Фессалоники (современные Салоники, со славянского — Солунь).
Сама азбука славянская была, взято за основу греческое уставное письмо, и спор до сих пор в учёном круге есть, какую именно азбуку создали Кирилл и Мефодий, кириллицу или глаголицу, но со временем кириллица везде вытеснила глаголицу. Переведены Псалтирь, Евангелие, Апостол. Место создания предполагается Микульчице — укреплённое городище, где, по некоторым представлениям, находилась столица государства Великая Моравия (правитель в 863 году — князь Ростислав). В современной истории там вели раскопки и обнаружено около тысячи могил с богатым содержимым. Известный сейчас район Гадони вблизи реки Моравы. Микульчице 738 — Валы между Луженец, Тынец, Йосефов на границе Чехии и Словакии, с юго-запада Вена, столица Австрии, или железнодорожная станция Лузице.
Вы знаете, когда начинаешь копать, много чего попадается, главное структурировать. Если верить византийскому историку Менандру Протектору, можно много почерпнуть, как боролись со славянами и что происходило у славян. Так что история, как я понял, у всех своя со своим уклоном. Вот к примеру ещё кое-что, запомните и подумайте, а потом сопоставьте. В Ватикан ранее болгар и русских не пускали в зал этруссов, а связано с тем, что они свободно читали то, что там написано, и понимали. Одна буква может значить как слово, так и слог. Да и букв в азбуке в то время было больше. Реформа русского языка сыграла с нами злую шутку в части истории: мышление стало не таким гибким, а перешло к плоскому пониманию, отбросив смысл и глобальность понимания. В таком формате есть коптский алфавит , схож с кириллицей 32 буквы .
Углублённое изучение истории даёт много того, что трудно объяснить сразу и понять деление мира на разные влиятельные структуры, особенно когда происходит деление империй, огромных стран. Возьмите СССР, что получилось после его распада? Вроде бы один народ стал обособленным в своём государственном формате. Так и в прошлом происходили процессы деления, становления династии (от греч. δῠναστεία — «власть, господство»). Возьмите правление рода Агилольфингов, слияние с герцогом Алемании (нем. Gunzo; VII век), а также Химильтруду, Павел Диакон называет её «благородной девушкой» из рода Каролингов.
Монограмма Карла Великого
Получили в итоге. Гильом I Благочестивый, герцог Аквитании, в начале 910 года основал, построил монастырь Петра и Павла. В современном понимании с юга Леон, с востока Женева, с северо-запада Корбиньи, округ Кламси, Бургундия-Франш-Конте, и зажато между рек Сона и Луара, построено в долине, можно сказать, посередине, но маленькие реки Медасон, Грона помогали для жизни. Но с чего такое решение сделано в прошлом, побудило герцога? Всё просто — это окраина великого прошлого государства гуннов. Аттилы влияние, возможности остались и опыт, который увидели в разрушении влиятельного религиозного города. Сделал свои выводы, но знания, возможности остались.
Мы видим, что постройка огромного по тем меркам здания… XI век, и люди строят такие колоссальные постройки! Подумайте, что это. Знаете, когда государство, такое как Российская империя, перестала существовать, сколько активов осталось за пределами Советской России? Много, и кто-то ими пользовался. Так и тут. Герцог — это изначально должность, а потом статус появился в Римской империи в начале II века н. э. и представлял собой должность государственного чиновника, отвечающего за границы империи.
Это говорит не только о знаниях, богатстве, но и о сакральном значении самой постройки. Да, церковь постоянно перестраивали, но основное строение начали в 1063 году и к концу 1125 года освятили, и дальнейшие пристройки уже не несли огромного значения. Как обычно, всё, что мы видим на данной картинке, не сохранено, и имеется только маленький кусочек сбоку. Одним словом, можно смотреть в глубину и не видеть ничего, а можно смотреть и видеть много чего, всё зависит от того, что вы можете понять, а не то, что понимаю я.
Но сама моя работа не в том, чтоб углублённо рассказать, как создавали, применяли, использовали в истории фамильные возможности, а рассказать, как по своей фамилии вы сможете создать чёткую реальность прошлого, своё древо генеалогическое, происхождение и родоплеменные связи, узнать историю и дела тех, от кого вы берёте своё начало с пониманием установленных фактов, для понимания сути. Для простоты понимания, и чтобы не возникли юридические последствия за распространение информации, что принадлежит человеку, мне не известному, чужому, постороннему, я возьму свою фамилию и своих родственников с их согласия, но полные их данные раскрывать не буду. И на своём примере наглядно расскажу, как вам создать своё древо и увеличить возможность общения со своими близкими и родными, выйти за горизонт обычных тётя-дядя, но и заодно увидеть, какие факторы оказывают на становление событий, конечно, если они сами захотят с вами общаться.
Что же, друзья, позволю вас так назвать, приступим. Родился я в 1977 году в год Змеи (когда символ Огненной Красной Змеи) с четвёртого на пятое августа. Прямо без восьми минут двенадцать (полночь) первый глоток в этом мире, и в тринадцать минут первого ночи я освободился от материнского тела, вошёл в свет божий как настоящий Лев в городской больнице города Смоленска. Сейчас я проживаю официально в городе Туле последние лет двадцать своей жизни, город оружейников, как принято считать. А зовут меня Константин, что дали мне мама и папа при рождении.
Так как мои родители были муж и жена, отец имел фамилию Кобраков, состоящую из восьми букв, а мать — Куликова, также из восьми букв, но жена в браке берёт мужскую фамилию, и дают отчество отца рождённому ребёнку, так принято в полной семье. И не возникло вопросов, какую фамилию мне присвоить, а у нас сейчас принято передавать по мужской линии (Салический закон, по которому передача титулов происходила по мужской линии). И я при рождении получил Константин Александрович Кобраков, где имя определяет меня как личность, отчество даруется от создателя по мужской линии, а фамилия передаёт мою родоплеменную принадлежность. Таким образом, я получил свидетельство о рождении, где указаны мои отец и мать, но это не означает, что родоплеменная составляющая по матери прерывается, отнюдь, это не так, она остаётся в тени бумажного фактора, но не человеческого фактора знаний и почитания других родственников. Как вы знаете, родоплеменную ветвь у нас считают по мужской линии, и если эта ветвь прекращается по мужчине, говорят, она пресекается. Так было в истории, но всегда есть но.
К примеру, во Франции, Бельгии, Швеции, Италии, Дании, Пруссии в прошлом женщина имела право на престол. Как пример, в Испании в 1500-х годах женщины имели право наследовать титул, землю независимо от мужа. Но позже эти права были отменены Салическими законами, которые ввели, чтобы запретить дочерям Изабеллы I Кастильской наследовать наследство в Арагоне. А сейчас вернулись к равенству, всего лишь прописали в законе. Сначала шведская система престолонаследия, которая была впервые введена в Швеции в 1980 году, а затем и с 1980 года действует в Нидерландах, Бельгии, Норвегии, Дании, Люксембурге.
С 2011 года в Великобритании приняли на законодательном уровне для разрешения проблем у монарших особ в будущем, а до этого конституционный кризис изменил королевскую историю и заставил Елизавету (в дальнейшем Елизавета II, родилась 21 апреля 1926 года в Лондоне, в резиденции графа Стратмора) стать королевой. 2 июня 1953 года в Вестминстерском аббатстве она была коронована как королева Елизавета II. А что предшествовало этому? Ведь она не должна была вообще иметь права на титул. 20 января 1936 года скончался Георг V, и королём Великобритании стал дядя Елизаветы — Эдуард VIII, но он задержался на троне всего на несколько месяцев. 11 декабря 1936 года Эдуард официально отрёкся от престола, и корона перешла к его брату, Георгу VI — отцу Елизаветы. 6 февраля 1952 года король Георг VI умер в возрасте пятидесяти шести лет после продолжительной болезни.
Таким образом, принадлежность того или иного рода на наследие — решение тех, кто стоит у руля написания правил для управления обществом и правил, по которым жить. А как же истинное, предначертанное жизнью? Этот вопрос выходит за скобки, тем самым общение обеих сторон родителей, как правило, уходит и более глубже, перенося контакты на двоюродных, троюродных и так далее. При этом может быть, что десятки разных фамилий объединяются в одну немыслимо большую родоплеменную структуру, что может приниматься или не приниматься, навязывая истину, ту, что видят те, кто решает.
И тут вы, если не имеете понятия, какую фамилию вы носите, вы обращаетесь к родным, так как ваши предки (отцы, деды, прадеды и т. д.) не рассказали или не знали, что, и кто, и откуда ведёт начало ваша фамилия. Вам в этом случае придётся писать запросы в архив города, страны, в зависимости на какой вы стадии поиска. Это очень хлопотно и трудно, сопряжено со временем, официальными документами и некими суммами денег, где архив примет от вас только официальные документы, подтверждающие ваше родство по чёткой ступени (от меня к матери или отцу) с подтверждением справок о браке, рождении и, как ни прискорбно, о смерти.
Невозможно перескочить или обойти, но могу сразу вам сказать, что в России трудно найти чёткую архивную справку вашей фамилии, так как вам скажут, что была война, революция, Наполеон, Пётр Первый… И все эти события носили угрозу несохранения данных. Но из опыта раскрою вам основной предел, куда вы дойдёте в поиске своего рода. Это XIX век (с 1800 до 1900), дальше вам скажут, что было гонение на церковь и сами книги висят под вопросом, они есть или нет, и дадут ли ответ. Назывались они за годы, века по-разному, к примеру, основные для всех — Метрическая книга или Троечастная книга, так как она состояла из трёх частей: «О родившихся, бракосочетавшихся, умерших».
Но помните, что данные книги начали создавать только в 1722 году, после смерти Петра I. Тут тоже есть о чём задуматься. 1917 год расправлялся с приходами, церквями, одним словом, религия была опиумом для народа, и в огне горели не только храмы и иконы. Это я вам рассказываю, в частности, для народа, где искать, так как люди определённого уважаемого, знатного рода в истории до революции в разные времена печатались. Писались Боярские книги, Синодик опальных Ивана Грозного, Бархатная книга, Акты служилых землевладельцев, Записные вотчинные книги, Поместного приказа, Самовернейшие списки, Родословные росписи конца XVII века, Родословная книга князей и дворян российских и выезжих, Дворянские роды Российской империи, Общий Гербовник дворянских родов Всероссийской империи, Списки титулованным родам и лицам Российской империи, купчие грамоты, кабальные грамоты, духовные грамоты, законы, указы, прошения, челобитные. «Муж честен» («дивный муж», «муж знатен») — титул, бывший в ходу с 1300 по 1600 год. «Государев родословец» (1555–1556) и многие другие. И такие книги всегда хранят уважительно даже во время революций. Видимо, нужная, выгодная высокопоставленная знать остаётся всегда знатью, и их переписывают, хранят, так как их фамилия несёт историю событий. Собрать в единую структуру смогли на новый лад историки. Фёдором Ивановичем Миллером и Анисимом Титовичем Князевым были поднесены Екатерине II (1784 год).
Но вы должны сразу понять, что причисление вас к великому, именитому роду никак не повлияет на ваш карьерный рост, продвижение по службе, почёт и уважение со стороны действующих высокопоставленных лиц или государств. Как правило, происхождение от сильных мира сего, что уже такими не являются, наоборот, играет на пренебрежение, отрицание вас как личности, так как сильных людей в реальности люди боятся, ваших предков и потомков хотят оскорбить, выражая свою возвышенность и пренебрежение через вас к сильным мира сего (прошлого), показывая своё превосходство в настоящем, но на деле они меняют своё мировоззрение. Как только человек из именитого рода в прошлом начинает достигать вершин в настоящем, всё тут же меняется и пренебрежение сменяется почитанием, уважением, пока вы остаётесь нужным человеком. Лицемерие — двигатель реальности, особенно в холопской душе, что привыкла лебезить и преклоняться, такое трудно вывести из генетического слоя холопа, продиктованное веками. А в большинстве люди, знающие историю, просто относятся с уважением и пониманием, что генетика или родовой отпечаток остаётся в вас, и вы сможете проявляться сами, имея силу в генетике. И ваши отпрыски в угоду генетическому преобладанию определённых генов, усовершенствованных за века, остаются силой, угрозой и реально серьёзным противником во всех стычках, баталиях.
Таким образом, я вам вкратце рассказал, как обычно люди ищут свои корни через примитивную поисковую структуру, не имея понятия, кто вы есть. А вот второй способ познания исторических событий, который вам передавали от отца к сыну, носит информацию фундаментального понимания вас и кто вы есть, на что вы можете рассчитывать в судебных перипетиях и жизненных трудностях, имея возможность применить опыт, накопленный предыдущими поколениями.
Сейчас только начинают понимать, что такое генетика, вмешиваясь в структуру, пытаясь её изменить, ускорить процессы, создав что-то совершенное. Но в вашем случае это было сделано естественным путём через селекцию временем, помноженную на возможность проходить сквозь трудности, закаляя саму родовую структуру через трудности, внося генетические преобразования, имея впоследствии преобладание, возвышаясь над своими потомками благодаря их умению приспособиться, эволюционировать во многом. Определяется темпераментная и характерологическая особенность, помноженная на умственную изворотливость, практикоприменительное действие в критических ситуациях, оставляя холодный расчёт и уверенность в своих действиях, придавая уверенность своего поступка, решая проблемы в будущем, минимизируя потрясения до минимума.
Это не в шахматы играть, где вы бездушно участвуете в игре, не прикладывая душевных, физических, материальных потерь при неправильном исходе партии. Как говорится, жизнь прожить — не поле перейти. Но вот разобраться во всех перипетиях исторического хаоса очень трудно, отматывая процесс разложения, имеющий фактор человеческого влияния в исторической цепочке событий. К примеру, процесс разрушения дома мы можем видеть по разному, как его намеренно разрушают.
К примеру, 14-й корпус Кремля был снесён в 2016 году, намеренно снесли. В данном корпусе работали такие люди, как Б. Н. Ельцин, В. В. Путин. Почему снесли, это другой вопрос. Могу описать в случае необходимости, но я думаю, это многим неинтересно углубляться, да и ни к чему об этом говорить. Я думаю, и власть понимает, что от этого только выиграли все, там ведь тоже раскопали исторические части. Ранее на его месте был Малый Николаевский Ддворец, Чудов и Вознесенский монастыри, которые были снесены в 1929–1930 годах. Со сносом, конечно, мы что-то потеряли, но что-то выиграли.
А вот, к примеру, другое здание. Межсоюзная тюрьма Шпандау, располагавшаяся на территории Берлина, британского сектора, в ней было сразу четыре директора одновременно. С 1947 по 1987 год в ней содержались:
Бальдур фон Ширах, заключённый № 1 — бывший руководитель фашистского молодёжного движения «Гитлерюгенд» и гауляйтер Вены, приговорён к двадцати годам тюремного заключения, освобождён из тюрьмы по истечении срока заключения 1 октября 1966 года;
Карл Дениц, заключённый № 2— бывший командующий подводным флотом, главнокомандующий военно-морским флотом Германии, с 1 мая 1945 года преемник Гитлера, приговорён к десяти годам тюремного заключения, освобождён из Шпандау по истечении срока заключения 1 октября 1956 года;
Константин фон Нейрат, заключённый № 3 — бывший министр иностранных дел Германии, имперский протектор Богемии и Моравии, приговорён к пятнадцати годам тюремного заключения, освобождён по состоянию здоровья в 1954 году;
Эрих Редер — бывший главнокомандующий военно-морским флотом Германии, адмирал-инспектор военно-морского флота, приговорён к пожизненному тюремному заключению, освобождён из тюрьмы по состоянию здоровья в 1955 году;
Альберт Шпеер — бывший личный архитектор Гитлера, министр вооружения и военной промышленности Германии, приговорён к двадцати годам тюремного заключения, освобождён из Шпандау по истечении срока заключения 1 октября 1966 года;
Вальтер Функ — бывший советник Гитлера по экономическим вопросам, министр экономики, генеральный уполномоченный по военной экономике Германии, приговорён к пожизненному тюремному заключению, освобождён по состоянию здоровья в 1957 году;
Рудольф Гесс, заключённый № 7 (26 апреля 1894 года) — бывший заместитель Гитлера по партии, написал с ним книгу, приговорён к пожизненному тюремному заключению. Страдал подагрой и артритом в течение многих лет, из-за которых его пальцы были покрыты узлами, и он не мог самостоятельно одеваться. Покончил жизнь самоубийством в девяносто три года в саду тюрьмы Шпандау 17 августа 1987 года на шнуре от лампочки.
Можете посмотреть на то место и предположительную лампу и порассуждать о его возможностях в самой тюрьме и не только. Пять раз подавал прошение об освобождении. Три стороны (США, Франция и Великобритания) были готовы их удовлетворить. Но каждый раз СССР накладывал своё вето. После 1966 года он остался один из заключённых, имел право свободно ходить по коридорам тюрьмы, заказывать себе любые книги, смотреть телевизор и читать прессу на выбор, хорошее питание дважды в день, разрешали гулять в тюремном саду и не ограничивали в свиданиях с родственниками. Обслуживали пятьдесят девять человек: дворники, истопники, повара, санитары, четыре медика — по одному от СССР, США, Британии и Франции. Охраняло его двадцать семь человек. После данный объект полностью снесли, не оставив даже воспоминаний о самой постройке, а тело кремировали
А вот когда на глазах разрушается никому не нужное здание, и за десятилетия от дома остаётся одна куча мусора и некоторые фрагменты, только напоминающие элементы, утратившие былую красоту, из кучи хлама воссоздать, не имея фактов, фотографий, чертежей, зарисовок, рассказов людей, становится невозможным. И если этого нет, то реконструировать практически невозможно, либо восстановить сможете только фрагменты того, что уцелело. Но если вы знали, как здание выглядело приблизительно, от людей: высота, объём, цвет, материал, отделка — это говорит и показывает, что дом восстановить можно. Точно так же обстоит и с фамилией: если родные вам рассказали основу, то для вас цепочка точных дат роли не играет с учётом, что они могут разниться, перенося одно и то же событие в разные годы.
Как пример разбирательства, как всё просто и в тот же момент запутанно, но факты истории говорят сами за себя, и для этого эксперимента возьмём меня, посмотрим мою фамилию Кобраков от слова «кобра», змея такая ядовитая. Прощу не путать с ударением, так как я был разным по звучанию в разных структурах, и произнести правильно мог один из десяти человек. В качестве примера, как искажают вашу фамилию, вы, наверно, и сами знаете и сталкивались со своей фамилией.
Начнём с простого. То, что думаю я, и то, что говорят предки, и что передали отец, дед, прадед и далее другие родственники. Всегда говорили, что наша фамилия из древних, относится к великим властителям, как они говорили, князья, цари, полководцы, властители. Сразу начинаем думать, почему все в семье говорят повально всё это, но реально не видно в истории, что были такие Кобраковы в истории. Значит, не так просто найти, что за князь, что за полководцы, властители.
Посмотрел, что означает моя фамилия, — «кобра, змея». Смотрю, что обозначает на уровне государства и аллегории, что змей олицетворяет зло, врага, и с ним идёт борьба на всех уровнях, борьба со змеем в гербах, религии, истории. Прямо ужасный человек должен быть, если носит такую фамилию, змей, чуть ли не дьявол, присланный на землю, и все, кто борются со змеем, защищают православных. Только знаете, когда я копнул глубже, оказалось, что изначально вместо змея был крокодил.
Гор в образе римского всадника пронзает копьём крокодила, олицетворяющего Сета, чтобы отомстить за смерть отца (Египет, IV век н. э.), хранится в Лувре (Париж).
Вообще схожих сюжетов много, вот ещё древней. В шумеро-аккадской мифологии есть сюжеты о борьбе со змеем. Тиамат — женское олицетворение первобытного океана-хаоса солёных вод, из которого родилось всё. Предположительно изображалась в виде дракона или гидры с семью головами. Или бог Нинурта, вооружённый молниями, поражает чудовище Анзуд, похитившее Таблицы судеб. Зарисовка рельефа из храма в Кальху. А вот Георгий, побеждающий змея, появляется в христианской культуре только в конце X — в начале XI века, то есть воин, борющийся со змеем («Чудо Георгия о змие»), на родине Георгия — в Каппадокии, современной Турции, пронзил змея копьём, прижал его к земле, а конь попирал змея ногами. Перед этим приказал царевне связать змея поясом и вести его в город, словно смиренного пса. И далее стали тиражировать этот символ во многих городах Византии и разных народах. В Древней Руси появляется с распространением символа Ярославом Мудрым, а первые изображения внедряет на княжеских печатях именно Мстислав Владимирович в 1130 году. Запомните дату, ниже я к ней ещё вернусь.
Иногда в жизни я говорю такую пословицу: «Одной рукой дарует жизнь, а другой её отнимает». Но на всё есть политические интриги, ситуации, но внутри кошки скребут, и они всегда пытаются их хорошими делами завуалировать. Всё, что я сразу нашёл в официальной истории именитых фамилий прошлого более схожее, — это хан, князь Кубрат. Помню из истории школьной программы побольше. Посмотрел, нашёл информацию.
Кубрат. Предполагаемая могила Кубрата найдена близ деревни Перещепино Полтавской области в 1912 году. У болгар данную фамилию или прозвище трактуют с таким смыслом: Кубрат, Курбат, Кробат, Курт, Куртъ, Кроват, Коврат, а у греков — Χουβρατις. Вы скажете, что-то много разных названий одного человека, и я вам приведу, как пример, название страны Иран. В современном персидском языке слово Īrān (ایران) происходит от среднеперсидского Ērān, появившегося в III веке и первоначально означавшего «принадлежащий ариям». Обозначало земли, населённые ариями, имело производные формы, употребляемые на разных языках в разное время (Иринья, Орина, Ириния, Ярина, Ерина, Арина, Иринка, Рина, Ириша, Ира, Ируня, Ируся, Ируша, Ирена, Рена, Ина, Инуля, Аринка, Ариша, Арюха, Арюша). И я не беру название Персия. Теперь вам понятно, как всё интерпретируется.
И, как бы ни искал, не получалось найти прямой фамилии Кобраков, просто невозможно. Так же узнал, что Кобрин (или Кубрин) был и учился с Михаилом Васильевичем Ломоносовым (в церковно-приходской книге как Михайло, сын Василия по прозвищу Ломонос, так как его отец выходил первым в море, когда ещё не сходил лёд, и он ломал льды, и считался горячим, отважным, бесстрашным) в подготовительном классе «Фара» в Спасском монастыре на Никольской улице вблизи Кремля Москвы. Так что сказать, что такая фамилия не была, трудно, и это дало мне ещё больше уверенности для размышлений. Надо понимать свою фамилию не как конкретно написанное сейчас, что наводит на мысль, что либо её создали намеренно и что-то в ней заложено, как глубокий смысл самой фамилии для будущего, либо она была изменена под натиском изменений в языковом применении самого языка через разного рода реформы. Но в любом случае всё может быть едино: и то, и другое. Тогда кто-то обладал очень большими умственными возможностями и титаническими знаниями. Не всё так однозначно и просто.
Стал смотреть, что можно найти, читать и, конечно, тридцать лет назад уткнулся в стену, чтоб свои знания из семьи подкрепить знаниями в документах. Потом опять начал искать и так всю свою жизнь не мог всё собрать в единую головоломку. Годы шли, информации становилось всё больше, но у меня было знание, от чего отталкиваться и что в каком направлении искать, как всё увязать и соединить. Очень трудное дело, но я не сдавался. Хорошо, что я знал основы и в открытых источниках стал всё больше находить династий, городов, фактов. Косвенно, как казалось на первый взгляд, а на деле имеет глубокий смысл.
Много разных значений, примеров, справок. К примеру, Кубра, распространённое среди древних славян. В переводе на современный язык имя означает «храбрый». Также существует фамилия Кубрин, которая, по одной из версий, произошла от прозвища Кубра. В новгородских говорах так якобы называли шалуна, но эту версию я не стал рассматривать сразу, так как в моей родословной по материнской линии были разные фамилии: Морозовы, Романовы… И Шалун, так как сама фамилия говорит, что людей веселил и радовал. И подгонять данную фамилию равносильно что брать город Холмогоры от слова «Холмгардия». Абсурд, так что не будем играть в крючки. Ещё есть мнение, что фамилия Кубрин могла быть «географическим» прозвищем, которое закрепилось за уроженцем деревни Кубрино в Тарском районе Омской области, но это всё новодел (недавно созданное), созданный в угоду современному пониманию, уходя от истинного толкования великой фамилии. Так как если Кубрат жил в VII веке и имел территории, что сейчас занимают десятки современных государств, включая Россию, то тут есть о чём задуматься.
И я понял: надо смотреть глубже! Мне попались такие фамилии, что имели знатные происхождение, титулы, и каждые берут в своей основе от большой родовой линии древнего царского рода Кубрата или далее Аттилы. Кстати, у последнего были сотни жён, и ему все известные рода V века стремились отдать своих дочерей в жёны. И сколько родилось детей, можно представить. И все из известных родов, так что междоусобица — это всего лишь укрепление главенства одной родоплеменной ветви в угоду другой, пусть в разных народах, странах.
И, таким образом, если рассматривать генеалогически или передачу генов, то наследники Аттилы дали такую великую ветвь, как Кубрат, что была при верховной власти того времени. И остались единицы по именно его ветви, а вот как семя, переданное Аттиловским родом, настолько огромно, что я боюсь вам даже сказать, что все известные вам сейчас дворы Европы, и не только имеют кровь Аттилы, значит, и Кубрата. А если предположить, иметь его версию происхождения, тогда приходятся далёкими родственниками, представьте, сколько там соединилось родов за время, о котором мы говорим! Двоюродные, троюродные через троюродных дядей, тётей, дедушек, прадедушек… И перечислять не буду, просто приведу незначительные примеры, как формировалась известная родовая структура, у которой были возможности влиять на ход истории и имелась возможность её вписывать своим участием через родовые структуры, города, постройки, инциденты и т. д.
Теперь вам стало понятно: если у вас есть деньги, сплочённый коллектив, желание, а в современной системе ценностей — научные степени, то вы сможете менять структуру понимания как в прошлом, так и в настоящем, что приведёт к крепкой устойчивой принятой доктрине (лат. doctrina — философская, политическая либо правовая теория, религиозная концепция, учение, система воззрений, руководящий теоретический, политический принцип, принимаемое без доказательств, положенное в основу какой-либо теории. Направляет процесс принятия решений и действия в определённых сферах официальных государственных положений в стране).
Так что и моя современная фамилия может иметь или не иметь признание, всё зависит, как и в прошлом, от сильных мира сего или всеобщего признания народа. Посмотрим на небольшое количество тех, кто имеет основу названия от хана, князя Куброта. Как они строились — это другой вопрос, как законнорождённые от данной ветви или незаконнорождённые (в простонародье — байстрюки). Возьмём Бобринских — русский графский и дворянский род, который ведёт начало от Алексея Григорьевича Бобринского, внебрачного сына Екатерины II и Г. Г. Орлова. Видите, её фамилия до замужества София Августа Фредерика Ангальт-Цербстская, после замужества — Романова. И Орлов, а почему Бобринский? Непонятно, на что ставили в последующем, имея возможность заменить букву Б на К. И тем самым получим Кобринских. Имеется огромный исторический след, что на тот момент прервался, как желание иметь древнюю корневую систему, излагаемую, было бы желание и возможность в нужное время при определённых обстоятельствах. Рассуждать о том, кто где есть и где был, — это всегда вопрос политики того времени. о чём идёт речь.
Курбатовы — русский дворянский род, известен в Астрахани (1675).
Корбутовский Стефан Иванович прибыл на службу Речи Посполитой в полк Смоленской шляхты и пожалован поместьем в 1661 году.
Кобяковы — русский дворянский род, из бояр великого княжества Рязанского.
Курбские — угасший княжеский род, отрасль князей ярославских, Рюриковичи.
Кобринские — княжеский род династии Гедиминовичей. Происходили от великого князя литовского Ольгерда.
Саксен-Кобург-Заальфельд ведёт от 1680 года.
Альберт Саксен-Кобург-Готский, который женился на королеве Великобритании Виктории. Её первый представитель на британском престоле в 1901 году.
Город в Белорусии (бел. Кобрын) — город в Брестской области Беларуси, административный центр Кобринского района на стыке рек Кобрынка.
Город Кубрат (болг. Кубрат) — город в Болгарии. Находится в Разградской области, входит в общину Кубрат.
Населённый пункт Кубратово (болг. Кубратово) — село в Болгарии. Находится в Городской области Софии.
Кобра — село в Даровском районе Кировской области, год основания села принят 1701-й).
Одним словом, все данные современного сословия с фамилией Кобраков, как потом понял, я бы и не нашёл, так как изменения, преобразования происходили задолго до становления современной письменности, истории. Всё уходит в древность, и тут надо помнить потрясения: в 1917 году была революция и к власти пришли рабочие и крестьяне, а все из правящей элиты были преданы гонению и уничтожению, как ненужный пласт в новых исторических реальностях. Соответственно, и ваши предки могли быть преданы гонению или забвению, но помнить, говорить о них запретить в семье не могут ни одни законы. Тогда, взвесив все за и против, и вы начинаете поверхностно интересоваться в открытых общедоступных книгах по истории. Вы знаете: Воронцовы, Василевские, Потёмкины — да, великие фамилии, но вас там нет, и становится непонятным, почему все родные говорят, а в истории не видать. Конечно, руки не опускаем, смотрим глубже и понимаем, что все в основном князья либо очень молодые по сравнению с самим понятием «князь» или не хватает углублённых знаний. Да и в книгах современных после Петра I, как я называю, всё переписано на новый лад под созданную империю, а не какие-то родоплеменные аспекты, что составляли страну до Петра, нет, указывают на фрагменты, куски прошлой истории или передела мира.
Но можно ли считать и как трактуют их сейчас работы итальянца Иована де Рубертиса? В статье «Славянские поселения в Неаполитанском королевстве» сообщает, что в 1468 году н. э. славянами были основаны следующие города в Италии: Монтемиро, Санфеличе, Тавенна, Серителло. Читаем, думаем. Стал всё глубже интересоваться и косвенно посмотрел Италию. Следы рода Аттилы привели меня к Венеции, что в принципе и создавалось под влиянием уже брата Куброта. Первые исторические сведения о поселении на месте нынешней Венеции датируются 452 годом: несколько домов, не представляющих конкретное поселение. Его возникновение связано с вторжением в Северную Италию полчищ гуннов под предводительством Аттилы.
Заодно просмотрел Италию. Нашёл племя обров, с латыни — авары (ср. греч. Άβαροι; лат. Avari; обры — др.-рус. обърѣ, ед.ч. объринъ), и увидел: либо что-то с летоисчислением, либо кто-то не хочет что-то сказать, но я и не буду, а просто продолжу: «Умный не скажет, дурак не поймёт». И находил описание, что «Великобритания» создалось из слов «вели обры». «Италики», «италийцы»… Вообще Италию сформировали племена сабины, оски, пицены и умбры, схожие с обрами, потомки этруссов.
Или другая версия. Великие народы обров и италийцев осели на острове, что создало всеобщее понятие племён брит. Как мы все знаем, земли, населённые бриттами, состояли из множества неустойчивых территорий, подвластных различным племенам (катувеллауны, корнови, кориелтаувы, коританы, добунны). Впервые описал данную страну Пифей около 325 до н. э., исследуя побережье, но оригинального текста его работ не сохранилось. Фрагменты, перефразированные или взятые из сочинений других классических авторов. Впервые само слово «Великобритания» было официально использовано в 1474 году — в письме с предложением о браке между Сесили, дочерью Эдуарда IV из Англии, и Джеймсом, сыном Джеймса III из Шотландии. А в государственных официальных документах — только в 1604 году, когда король Яков VI провозгласил себя «Королём Великобритании, Франции и Ирландии». А вот слово «Англия» впервые упоминается с Альфредом Великим (871–899). Знакомая дата, но смотрим далее. Явился освободителем и устроителем государства и первым королём Уэссекса, стал называть себя королём Англии. Происходит от немецкого племени англов — были выходцами с полуострова Ангельн, расположенного в восточной части Ютландии в районе Кильской бухты (ныне — германская земля Шлезвиг-Гольштейн).
Этимологи оспаривают в лингвистике предположение, что происходит от формы полуострова Ангельн, схожей с углом. Много можно сказать, когда имеешь какую-то степень или признание. Впервые было упомянуто в конце IX века на древнеанглийском языке в трактате «Церковная история народа англов» Беды Достопочтенного. А современное написание топонима «Англия» (England) установилось лишь к 1538 году. И тут мы видим: Британия. Добавили приставку Великая, ведь никого не напрягает, что она сама себя так называет, а почему нет, если история говорит, что ранее, особенно в западной части Европы, названия давалась от племён к местности.
А как поделить племена обров и италийцев? Взяли и объединили, ведь никого не настораживает, что была Киевская Русь. Стали русскими, и даже море было Русское. Можно предположить, что тут много чего, о чём можно подумать, но я не стал сильно лезть в эту сторону, так как мой вопрос найти свою фамилию не от начала времён, а хотя бы в глубину формирования нашей исторической части. Вернёмся к более современным размышлениям в исторической плоскости.
А давайте посмотрим времена Рюрика, княгини Ольги, но будем помнить, что говорили мои родственники. Мы поймём, что князь имел более серьёзное понятие, нежели чем перед революцией 1917 года. И вы скажете: «Ну загнул!» И опять я посмотрел, где же всё-таки жили все мои предки, как родовое гнездо Кобраковых последнее время, и тут я опять увидел, что мои предки правы, что действительно какие-то серьёзные политические изменения, преобразования отбросили наш род в тёмное время забытия, так как мой дед его отец, прадед и т. д. родились и выросли в Смоленской области, регионе, губернии, уезде, княжестве, царстве и т. д. (в разные времена название) в деревне недалеко от старой Смоленской дороги, на перекрёстке водного узла реки Днепр «из варяг в греки» и старой Смоленской дороги — тракта, что соединял запад с востоком в населённом пункте под названием Сухоруково рядом с Гололобово — деревня в Кардымовском районе Смоленской области России. Входит в состав Нетризовского сельского поселения (очень редкое название). В те времена имело ключевую возможность или в 21 км от Никольской башни Смоленского кремля.
И спрашивая у родных, что делали, чем жили, узнаёте, что после революции стали раздавать земли и прадед переехал в Сухоруково на пару километров от своего места рождения, села Гололобова, где и жили до этого, то есть весь род жил в Гололобово, и стали разъезжаться, и от былого крупного центра осталось совсем мало. И по всей стране и миру можно увидеть много разных людей, что указывают: рождение — село Гололобово. И фамилия у них Кобраковы, что показывает, что род интересный.
И, конечно, первое, что я начал искать, — что обозначает само название Гололобово? Понятий много, но главное, на что я обратил внимание, — «голый лоб». Вроде как всё просто, если бы не некоторые факты, что я понял потом. И тем самым, забегая вперёд, передали нашему роду место, где жить, плодиться под неусыпным контролем, а само название дали в назидание. И в тот же момент, чтобы понимать, о ком идёт речь в определённых кругах, как голый лоб, то есть человек, живущий без предмета на голове или без того, что потеряли. Как пример, короны, которую забрали силой.
Конечно, мы понимаем. Как говорил Иван Грозный: «Помолись сам знаешь за кого» своему патриарху, когда расправлялся со своими оппонентами за убиенных им, о которых и говорить нельзя было, но и предать забвению нельзя. И всегда найдутся те, кто ослушается приказа и спрячет с глаз долой неугодных. На случай или преднамеренно, сейчас трудно ответить, но факт есть факт, и огромное спасибо тому человеку или людям.
Да и сам город или его территория под другим названием, но сейчас знаем как Смоленск, очень известный город всем. Можно сказать, современные ключевые войны последних веков показали его значение: Наполеон, Вторая мировая война. А если смотреть в глубь веков, относился к территории Аттилы и отца Мунздука, находился в середине империи того времени, что датируется 390-434 годами. Маленькая ремарка: самый короткий путь из Чёрного моря в Ладожское озеро действовал задолго до формирования Киевской Руси, но эти события не принято говорить, почему. Или до формирования Киевской Руси жили глупые люди, не умели торговать, писать, как весь мир в то время? Такое даже трудно представить, тем более поверить. Зачем тогда Аттила, Мунздук держал эти территории в середине своего царства и ценил? Контроль торговых путей именно в районе Смоленска был не только ключевым объектом и жемчужиной, контролируя север, юг, а также запад, восток.
Как пример, в современном понятии всем известны, на слуху Ормузский пролив, Гибралтар, Суэцкий канал, Панамский канал — они обеспечивают баснословную прибыль и геополитический контроль. Так вот, в прошлом, как мы знаем, «из варяг в греки» имел такое же понятие и значение, но и имел религиозное значение, управленческую структуру самой древней империи. То, что родственники вечно не могут поделить имущество, вы и сами знаете, как это бывает. Позже распалась и территории попали под влияние современного Смоленска к литовцам, полякам. И самостоятельное царство или независимое княжеское государство до вхождения в состав Руси может оказаться намного древней территории, нынешней части территории, входящей в современный Смоленск.
Как город, сам город Смоленск впервые упоминается в событиях 862 года. Князь Олег Вещий совершил поход на Смоленск и включил его в состав Древнерусского государства (из летописи «Повести временных лет», написанной в начале XII века, — киевский летописный свод, приписываемый монаху Нестору Летописцу). В Радзивилловской (Кёнигсбергской) летописи упоминается, что в 882 году Смоленск был захвачен князем Олегом Вещим. И в 863 году в Устюжском летописном своде Смоленск упоминал византийский император Константин VII Багрянородный, написал трактат об управлении империей в наставление наследнику Константина — Роману II Младшему.
Милиниск (греч. Μιλινίσκα) — Смоленск (905–959) располагался на месте Гнездова, в 12 км ниже по течению Днепра. Топоним был представлен скандинавскими словами namas (numas) — «семейный дом, усадьба» и gardas — «ограда, город». Таким образом, значение Немогард (Νёμογαρδος) —«ограждённый, укреплённый дом (замок, родовая усадьба, удел)». Или «гнездо» на разных языках, если смотреть этимологически в современном понятии. Русский — «гнездо, гнездиться», белорусский — «гняздо, гнездавацца», украинский — «гніздо, гніздитися», польский — gniazdo, словацкий — hniezdo, словенский — gnezdo, болгарский — «гнездо», чешский — hnizdo, хорватский — gnijezdo, сербский — «гнездо». Если брать однокоренные слова (корень Г-Н-З, значение «хранить»): грузинский — shenakhva («сохранять»), ирландский — choinneail («хранить»), армянский — khanayel («сохранять»), хинди — ghonsala («гнездо»), древнееврейского «нэот» («пристанище, обиталище»), латынь — nidus («гнездо; место, где развиваются споры или рассада»), английский — nide («гнездо»), французский — nid («гнездо»), древнеиндийский — nīdás, («место отдыха, стоянка»).
Таким образом, можно трактовать один и тот же город по-разному: тот, что уничтожили, и который стали называть люди. Кстати, по версии правящей структуры, на четыре года младше Новгорода (859 год) по первому упоминанию города в поздней Никоновской летописи, написанной в XVI веке. В «Повести временных лет» — в 1110-х годах.
На правом берегу, а на левом — Рюриково городище, на Сиверсов канал. Кстати, между Гнездовым и Смоленском были убиты в 1015 году на реке Медынь первые святые на Руси Борис и Глеб (могут быть князьями Волжской Булгарии, как вам такое?). Оба князя — сыновья крестившего Русь Владимира и византийской принцессы Анны. Этот брак был седьмым у киевского правителя. На месте гибели Глеба начали строить в 1072 году деревянную часовню, а в 1101 году заложен деревянный храм по инициативе Владимира Мономаха и только в 1191 закончен, в 1195 году — церковь из камня. Непонятно, почему так поздно, до настоящего времени не сохранился.
Рядом прямо напротив, чуть в сторону, если переплыть реку Днепр, есть исторический значимый объект Гнёздово — объект культурного наследия народов РФ федерального значения. Это следует из постановления Совета Министров РСФСР от 30.08.1960 № 1327 «О дальнейшем улучшении дела охраны памятников культуры в РСФСР» и статьи 64 Федерального закона от 25.06.2002 № 73-ФЗ «Об объектах культурного наследия (памятниках истории и культуры) народов Российской Федерации». В 2015 году администрация Смоленской области выдвинула предложение включить археологический комплекс в число объектов всемирного наследия ЮНЕСКО. На данный момент пока не внесено, но, я думаю, после моей работы мировое сообщество рассмотрит более углублённо статус Гнёздова. В последнее время получил новую известность по некоторой информации, сделанной современными учёными.
В середине X века часть древних курганов в археологическом комплексе Гнёздово под Смоленском была целенаправленно разрушена. Учёные предполагают, что это произошло по приказу княгини Ольги — убрать из памяти древних властителей, навязать новые порядки и уклады в жизни населения и знати, которая в то время жёстко объединяла земли вдоль пути из варяг в греки под властью Рюриковичей. Цель таких действий — символическое уничтожение «священной связи» местной знати с землёй. Это был способ ликвидировать память о прежних властителей и право их потомков на данную территорию. В поверьях связь предков и реального мира, придание символизма передаче правопреемственности.
Далеко ходить не будем и посмотрим, что стало с царской семьёй в доме Ипатьевых (17.07.1918), что в наше время в ночи Екатеринбурга снесли. Именно указом Ельцин Борис Николаевич, будучи руководителем Свердловской области в 1970-е, дал добро на снос «нежелательного памятника истории» — Дома Ипатьева, в котором произошла хладнокровная расправа. Вот список тех кто принимал участие, какие получили особые заслуги перед советской страной, и что стало с участниками выгодного на тот момент действия:
Юровский Яков Михайлович (40 лет) — комендант дома Ипатьевых особого назначения, член коллегии Уральской областной ЧК, товарищ комиссар юстиции Уральской области, председатель Следственной комиссии Уральского областного ревтрибунала. Умер в 1938 году в кремлёвской больнице от прободения язвы. Спустя годы его семью настигло: троих его детей не стало в 1970–1980-е годы. Следующее поколение — все внучки Юровского умерли ещё во младенчестве, а внуки трагически погибли, оборвав линию этой семьи: скончался за рулём автомобиля, один задохнулся в огне, другой разбился, упал с высоты;
Никулин Григорий Петрович (23 года) — помощник коменданта ДОН, начальник Летучего отряда УОЧК. За хорошую работу получил большую квартиру в центре Москвы. поработал управляющим трестом «Мосгаз», заведующим Мосжилотделом… Перед войной назначили начальником Восточной водопроводной станции. Его неоднократно избирали депутатом Моссовета, членом Мосгорисполкома. А после смерти в сентябре 1965 года заслуженного коммуниста похоронили на самом престижном кладбище — Новодевичьем;
Ермаков Пётр Захарович — военный комиссар Верх-Исетского завода, а после в тюрьме. Из-за его малограмотности построить впечатляющую карьеру не удалось. До конца работал при Свердловском областном музее революции, и в итоге спивавшегося поместили в обкомовскую больницу, которая располагалась как раз напротив дома Ипатьева. Так что смерть наступила в 1952 году — смотрел на дом, в котором он убивал;
Медведев-Кудрин Михаил Александрович — член коллегии УОЧК, помощника начальника 1-го отделения отдела Особоуполномоченного НКВД СССР. Дослужился до звания полковника, в старости даже отправил запрос в архив Свердловского обкома с просьбой подтвердить его непосредственное участие в расстреле бывшего царя Николая II и его семьи. Незадолго до смерти зимой 1964-го завещал передать в качестве подарка главе государства СССР Никите Хрущёву свой браунинг № 389965, из которого он якобы убил царя. Тоже похоронен на Новодевичьем, неподалёку от Г. Никулина. При Хрущёве получил большую персональную пенсию. Похоронен на Новодевичьем кладбище с воинскими почестями;
Медведев Павел Спиридонович — начальник охраны ДОН. Умер в 1919 году в тюремной камере от сыпного тифа;
Кабанов Алексей Григорьевич — член УОЧК, начальник пулемётной команды ДОН. Работал на партийных, юридических и хозяйственных постах в Крыму (в частности, служил прокурором Феодосийского округа), заведовал Хабаровским трестом столовых. Умер персональным пенсионером республиканского значения.
Таким образом, я вам показал исторические течения, понятие и определённую конъюнктуру для того времени, как решается задача теми, кто у власти, и способы реализации, а что говорить о тяжести вековой истории.
Предлагаю далее посмотреть, как наша семья знает историю, что родные из поколения в поколение передавали. Я не настаиваю на её официальной версии, у меня же нет доктора истории, и я не защитил диссертацию, чтоб её признали как одну из официально признанных, — да, именно так создаётся правда на уровне государства. Я ещё вернусь более глубже про другие события, что хранила наша семья через меня как единственного наследника правды, переданной для её сохранения.
Киев был основан приблизительно в 634–641 годах. Кубрат велел в дополнение к Гнездовскому городищу. И так же на правом берегу, а не на левом, как стоит Смоленск, для контроля великого перехода из варяг в греки возвели укрепление Башту (значит «башня»), Золотые Ворота. Возвёл Башту и возглавил его младший брат Шамбат, носивший также прозвище Кый, поэтому позднее крепость именовали Кыем. Имелось всего лишь укрепительное сооружение, а вокруг селились люди и понимали, что если берут дань, имеется контроль, есть военные, то и их жизнь не будет подвержена набегам, а набегать могли не только большие армии, но просто собрались, напали, ценности забрали и ускакали, а река давала кордон.
Так вот, в 634–641 годах образовался город Кый — современный Киев, но он был мал и незначителен для широкого понимания, основной интерес возникает только в 880 годах, и становится основной структурой в 882 году с желанием изменить упоминания Гнездовья (родового гнезда), убрав из памяти тех народов, что помнили и веровали. А вот, к примеру, официальную дату города Киева, что неотъемлемо входил в исторические события того времени, указали на основании уже современных доводов политической элиты СССР. «Основан в 482 году и составляет 1500 лет» — так утвердил советской Украины Владимир Щербицкий. Как вспоминает Валентин Арсентьевич Згурский (Герой Социалистического Труда, доктор экономических наук, профессор, академик Академии экологических наук Украины), Борис Евгеньевич Патон предложил компромиссную дату между 2200 и 1100 лет. Пришли к компромиссу.
«К 1980 году я успел побывать на празднованиях Дней города нескольких столиц: Еревана, Берлина, Киото (древней столицы Японии), Праги. А у Киева не было своего юбилейного праздника. Мы были на большом подъёме после Олимпиады-80 в Москве. В Киеве созревала мысль о том, чтобы такое подобное устроить и у нас».
А в «Повести временных лет» упоминается Киев под 854 год (Нестор Летописец). На месте Киева до сих пор не обнаружено ничего ранее X века. И то, что обнаружено, даже посёлком назвать сложно. Это я указал вам к пониманию, как формируется история.
Отрывок из «Повести временных лет», где есть упоминание о Кие, Щеке и Хориве: «Была суть 3 братья, Кий, Щек, Хорив, иже сдѣлаша градоко сь, и изгибоша, и мы сѣдимъ, родъ их платяче дань козаром. Аскольд же и Дир остаста в граде семь, и многи варяги съвокуписта, и начаста владети». Если перевести, звучит: «Были три брата, Кий, Щек и Хорив, которые построили город сей и сгинули, а мы тут сидим, их потомки, и платим дань хазарам. Аскольд и Дир остались в этом городе, собрали у себя много варягов и стали владеть землёю полян».
Перевод говорит сам за себя, но, мне кажется, мы здравые люди и понимаем, что если те, кто ушли, и их ждут, я думаю, что 400 лет ждать никто не будет. Тут тоже есть о чём поразмышлять, но я не буду, а продолжу показывать, как и что есть история. Вот, к примеру, Смоленск. В основном о древности Смоленска не сильно рассказывают даже в современном мире, как я предполагаю, из-за того, что Смоленск и территории рядом со Смоленском хранят очень серьёзные исторические знания. Даже раскопки в Гнёздове полномасштабные были прекращены. Почему? Может, по каким-то важным историческим фактам, что могут по-другому нам дать взглянуть на историю. Да и сам Смоленск и его история трактуются в разных государствах по-разному. С чем связано, не могу сказать, может, определённая конъюнктура самих изложенных фактов.
Таким образом, вы поняли, что есть история, как её трактуют. Но теперь возвращаемся к Смоленску и его названию, пониманию, а само название говорит о многом в историческом ключе. По одним, более принятым, название Смоленск произошло… Множество гипотез, перечислю признанные и ту, что я укажу под № 7, как говорилась в нашей семье:
Торговый путь «из варяг в греки». Жители занимались смолокурением.
Название реки — Смольня.
О. Н. Трубачёва. с этническим названием людей, занимавшихся в древности подсечно-огневым земледелием, расчищающих таким образом земли.
Географический термин «смол(ь) — вид почвы, чёрная, болотистая земля».
Версия иеромонаха Шупинского. Название города возникло от имени его основателя — Смолига.
Религиозно-культовая. В языческие времена находилось особо почитаемое местными племенами капище, где приносились жертвы и совершались совместные моления, молились, то есть «сомоления».
В древности один князь решил завладеть территорией, так как в Гнёздово (так раньше именовалось родовое место, почитаемое) высокопоставленных людей, наместников бога, что подчиняли всё и вся, обманом убили, а тела сбросили в реку. А само поселение уничтожили, как, к примеру Суздаль стоит на месте после уничтожения старого города. И возвели новое с новым названием, и это никого в то время не смущало и было признаком обычных дел.
Так вот, после убийства могу предположительно рассказать, как это было, основываясь на том, что мне рассказывали с детства. Обманом снарядили по Днепру ладьи для перехода, все силы были кинуты на речной проход, а в этот момент с суши было сделано нападение на верховную власть, основанную на религиозном понятии того времени. В языческом подтексте углубляться не буду, могу рассказать, если будет у вас такое желание, более подробно. На Руси старались не давать детям имена умерших мученической смертью: боялись повторить судьбу и гонения тех, кто хотел убрать историю. Люди, что были в уничтоженном городище, некоторые уцелели и переместились на 12 км от того места в маленькую деревушку, что ранее обслуживала Гнездово, именно на правой стороне, и там стали почитать, молиться за убиенных царей великого рода. Так и пошло в народе: «Откуда идёте?» — «С смоленья по царям, невинно убиенным». Со временем стали трактовать смоленье. И стало со временем и название, и город Смоленск, что прирастал населением именно на правой стороне, и на левой стекались люди и оставались. Со временем всю основную постройку как города перенесли на левую сторону, и так пошло.
Конечно если ваш род знает такое, есть о чём задуматься, и ставить под сомнение рассказы ваших предков сомнительно, если умеете читать, а углублённое размышление о своей фамилии, помноженное на рассказы предков, становится вопросом чести разыскать и понять. Кстати, подняв документы, я увидел много походов на Смоленск. К примеру, когда один брат сидел в Новгороде с 879 года, как Олег Вещий, и в 882 году пошёл на Смоленск, и ввёл в состав древнерусского государства, и также новгородский князь Олег захватил в 882 году Киев (что оба стоят на реке). Днепр в то время был судоходный полностью, кстати, Гнёздово также на берегу Днепра.
Значимость места в прошлом говорит об уважении и почитании, в современном смысле Гнёздово тоже имеет символизм, но в других проекциях исторической реальности. Там разбился «борт номер один» с польским правительством и президентом. Катастрофа Ту-154 в Смоленске произошла 10 апреля 2010 года. Самолёт президентской делегации, 88 пассажиров и 8 членов экипажа. В числе погибших — президент Польши Лех Качиньский и его супруга Мария Качиньская, а также известные польские политики, почти всё высшее военное командование, и общественные, и религиозные деятели.
До этого свыше 4000 польских офицеров, доставленных в Гнёздово, были впоследствии найдены убитыми в катынских могилах. Впервые сведения о том, что сотрудники НКВД расстреляли польских офицеров в Катынском лесу под Смоленском, появились в 1943 году, спустя два года после оккупации немецкими войсками Смоленщины. А в 1944 году после освобождения Смоленска, Катыни, расположенной в 14 километрах к западу от Смоленска, в районе железнодорожной станции Гнёздово впервые были обнаружены массовые захоронения военнопленных советской группой «Специальная комиссия по установлению и расследованию обстоятельств расстрела немецко-фашистскими захватчиками в Катынском лесу военнопленных польских офицеров».
После эксгумации и опроса свидетелей комиссия установила, что расстрелы производились в 1941 году немецко-фашистскими захватчиками. Также в одном километре от Гнёздова была построена штаб-квартира фюрера «Медвежья берлога» — немецкий бункер, построенный организацией Тодта под Смоленском во время Второй мировой войны. Строительство велось с октября 1941 по август 1942 года. Планировалось, что бункер будет использоваться как полевая штаб-квартира Гитлера, и параллельно велись раскопки древних курганов известной структурой «Аненербе» (нем. Ahnenerbe — «Наследие предков»).
В советское время также вели раскопки, но по каким-то причинам все раскопки прекратили, когда стали находить большое количество берестяных грамот. Это показывает на высокообразованность поселения и наталкивает на рассуждение, кто там был, кто правил или что там находилось, что столько грамотных людей и грамотность была повсеместно, что могло показать на более древнее происхождение Гнёздова. А если это не просто старый град, а капище? Неисследованными остались 1500 курганов, а всего насчитывалось около 5000. Вы можете представить такое захоронение знати? Что может говорить? Такое количество немыслимо, это место как основа, где принималось решение, кому быть каганом и на сколько лет, и каким городам сколько дани платить. Одним словом, центр принятия решения и захоронения. Оставлю для вашего понимания. В прошлом гнездо родное стало использоваться уже почти в современном мире (а до этого оно не использовалось и было не в чести), заменяя родовые, заповедные и майоратные, государственные, удельные, войсковые (казачьи) имения.
Так что понять прошлое возможно, понимание их ценностей, а может, и знания хранились великие, что могли сравниться с библиотеками прошлого: Египта — Александрийская, Месопотамии — Ашшурбанипала, Древней Греции — Аристотеля, Рима — Веспасиана, Ульпийская.
Таким образом, становится понятным: вели раскопки, находили большое количество берестяных грамот. Но берестяные грамоты, найденные в Гнёздове, не экспонируются в музеях. Вопрос, почему и почему в Гнёздове вблизи Смоленска развернулась такая баталия, что запретили копать и бросили все силы в Новгород, выше по пути из варяг в греки? Кстати, чтоб вы понимали, Гнёздово, Гололобово, Сухоруково находятся также на правом берегу р. Днепра, а вот сам город Смоленск изначально построен на левой стороне. Понимаете разницу того времени? И Гнёздово располагается в 12 км от Смоленска, а Гололобово — 21 км. Но не надо смотреть в цифры, что они дают? Цифру в сложении 3, и имеют туда-обратно одно понятие. Никакого смысла, я думаю, тут нет.
А вот по прямой от Гнёздова как раз проходит через Смоленск, даже дом, где я раньше жил, учился в Смоленске, Сухорукове и в Гололобове по стечению обстоятельств, на одной прямой, так что подтекст интересный. Вы скажете, и что тут такого? Я не против, но историки, археологи проводят такие параллели, житие каких-либо народов. Вот, к примеру, карнакская культура, связанная с доисторическими памятниками в регионе Карнак и окрестностях залива Морбиан во Франции (провинция Бретань). Крупнейшее в мире скопление мегалитических сооружений. Большой сломанный менгир — провинция Бретань, Франция. Имел некогда высоту около 20 м. Табль-де-Маршан дольмен (фр. La Table des Marchand, брет. An Daol Varchant) — крупный дольмен во французской коммуне Локмарьякер[, департамент Морбиан. Название происходит от семьи Маршан, с которой связана данная местность. Гаврини́ (фр. Gavrinis, брет. Gavriniz) — небольшой остров в заливе Морбиан, Бретань, Франция. Достопримечательностью Гаврини является мегалитическая коридорная гробница эпохи неолита, богатая памятниками мегалитического искусства. Все эти памятники истории стоят на одной линии и несут смысловую суть, но всё же смотрим дальше и вникаем в глубины, не берём косвенные совпадения.
Смоленск упоминается в 862 и 863 году. Само городище Смоленск относится к старейшим городам современной России. Вот, к примеру, список самых старых городов для сравнения и понимания истории приведу вам в противовес своих суждений. Продолжим список старых городов России. Дербент (Дагестан), основанный в 438 году н. э., Керчь ( Пантикапей в VII веке до н. э.). В 862 году именно в Старую Ладогу, что находится в нескольких километрах от Ладожского озера, был приглашён варяжский князь Рюрик. Далее следуют старейшие города. Новгород (859 год), который был образован как новый город (перевожу). Можно предположить, что построен на старом городе, как и Суздаль. Новгород описывается как призвание Рюрика в Софийской первой летописи, в Новгородской первой летописи, и в Повести временных лет, но опять же самим государством, что само провозгласило впоследствии Великий Новгород (прямо как англичане).
Духовным центром домонгольской Руси считался вовсе не Киев с его Софийским собором и Печерским монастырём. Возможно, совпадение, возможно, нет, но Смоленск упоминается во всех значимых описаниях в прошлом другими государствами и в значимых местах Кремля Москвы. В 1820 году Земляной вал полностью снесли, а на расчищенном пространстве образовалась площадь, названная Смоленской. В 1524–1525 годах в центре монастырского двора Новодевичьего монастыря в Москве возвели Собор Смоленской иконы Богоматери, Спасской иконы Всемилостивого Спаса Смоленского, водружённой на фасаде со стороны Красной площади, имени иконы Спаса Нерукотворного, помещённой в 1658 году в киоте над проездными воротами главной башни Московского Кремля. Даже возведение МИД на Смоленской площади имеет подсмысл, в Петербурге Смоленское поле — на Васильевском острове, на кладбище была построена Смоленская церковь.
Почему столицы государства так чтят историю, но не вдаются в истину Смоленска — тоже вопрос, как вы думаете? Но тут я посмотрел, и во мне проснулся углублённый интерес к истории своего города, меня подтолкнул уйти в сторону от фамилии и заодно почитать, зная историю, что мне рассказывали. И увидел, что окраина владения князя Куброта именно проходила по территории Гнёздова, с правой стороны реки Днепр был их город, что контролировал речной переход из варяг в греки. И можно предположить, что расправа была не со Смоленском, а с гнёздовскими наместниками (если сопоставить, сколько раскопок сделали в Киеве и в Гнёздове, то в Гнёздове, например, монет того времени, VIII век, найдено в десять раз больше, нежели чем в Киеве. Это так, к справке, которая может показать уровень и статус тех, кто там бывал), а потом уже описан город Смоленск ровно после взятия и исчезновения Гнёздова как город, имеющий основу прежнего царства.
Ещё одна странность: сам Смоленск построен слева. При Ростиславе возведены укрепления Смоленска (1130-е годы) все, включая храмы, крепости поселения, а вот три церкви — за пределами города. Церковь Петра и Павла на Городянке (Петропавловская церковь) — самая древняя церковь Смоленска, (ул. Кашена, 20) построена в 1146 году при смоленском князе Ростиславе Мстиславиче. Князь Смоленский, Новгородский, Киевский строит за пределами города на расстоянии от ближайшей части укреплений того времени около 2 км. И при этом разделяет река Днепр. Построена сама церковь из тонкого плоского кирпича разного размера, форм. Изначально храм служил княжеской резиденцией, но в конце XII века был преобразован в приходскую церковь.
Смотрим далее. Вторая церковь — Архангела Михаила на Пристани (Парковая ул., 4А, Смоленск, Свирская церковь). Каменный столпообразный православный храм (1180–1197 годы) в честь Архангела Михаила, построенный в конце XII века за пределами крепости, находится в 2 км от Смоленской крепостной стены. Городская стена Смоленска протяжённостью 6,5 км состояла из 38 башен, была построена из камня только в 1595–1602 годах. Кстати, одна часть крепостной стены проходит через укрепления в виде звездообразного сооружения, сейчас эта часть скрыта очень искусно, и если не знать, где она, вы не сможете найти, но кто разбирается в картах, сможет с лёгкостью найти, так как несколько её частей отлично видны, но многие даже этого не знают. Смоленский кремль — один из крупнейших из сохранившихся кирпичных крепостей мира, и народ Смоленска жил в самой цитадели, но каменную церковь построили в 2 км от охраняемого города.
Третья церковь — Иоанна Богослова (1160–1180-е годы), храм Иоанна Богослова на Варяжках, на Вражке (ул. Большая Краснофлотская, 15А, стр. 1). Я её помню как заброшенную, сам лазил в ней и видел частично утраченную роспись. И тоже стоит за пределами крепости, и опять строят за пределами самого Смоленска от крепостной стены. Все построены в южной части старого Смоленска или по направлению к Гнёздову, одним словом, сами церкви, что были построены, они должны были давать отсыл к трагедии и почитанию гнёздовских властителей. И раскрою вам ещё одно: сами церкви дают букву Г и показывают направление именно на Гнёздово, не на могилу Глеба, она намного ниже. Это я так, о скрытых символах. К примеру, можете посмотреть, как выглядел Смоленск в прошлом на картах старых, даже там дают отсыл на три церкви в нижнем правом углу. Что имели в виду, скрытый смысл те, кто создавали град? Думать, решать вам. Но всё-таки подумайте, почему такое огромное строительство каменных церквей за пределами самого города?
Вот ещё одна, что также сохранилась. Спасо-Преображенский Авраамиев монастырь, построенный между 1210 и 1219 годами (Смоленск, ул. Маршала Жукова, 24). Первоначально назывался Богородицким, поскольку первая церковь в нём была освящена в честь Положения ризы Пресвятой Богородицы, построен внутри крепости, расположен вблизи крепостной стены между Авраамиевской и Заалтарной башнями с другой стороны крепости от всех трёх церквей. Не буду проводить параллели, это оставлю вам для размышления, почему в то время строили из камня в таких количествах и значениях, как символичность чему.
Но давайте уточним про жизнь и смерть Олега из рода Рюриковичей в русской летописи «Повесть временных лет», где меня опять насторожило, что умер он от укуса змеи в 911–912 году. Странно, но рок Змея присутствует в нашей истории. Посмотрим дальше. Кстати, Олег и Ольга — это парное имя для мужчины и женщины. Со скандинавского мужское Олег — Helgi, а с древнерусского — Вольг или Вольга. Есть и тут о чём задуматься. О том, что делала Ольга и Олег, но историю не переписать, а подумать есть о чём для размышления.
Но вернёмся к змею, что укусил, как говорилось. После истребления Гнёздова (или гнездовья) уцелел, скрылся от недругов сын Кан Караджара (змея, что являлась символом от рода, происходящего от древних) и впоследствии расправился с Олегом. Тут я подумал: «Странно, а у меня фамилия змеиная, кобра». Кстати, друзья, кобра именно с португальского переводится как змея, я вам уже выше писал. Таким образом, мы имеем первое — фамилию, второе — историю, что передавалась из уст в уста, третье — населённый пункт и четвёртое — исторические события, схожие с версией моих предков, но расплывчатые. Всё сходится, но такого мало, нужны факты, и это не означает конец поискам — это начало. Значит, смотрим глубже и удостоверяемся в правоте своих родственников, что сообщили мне как историю нашего рода.
Смотрим, что означает фамилия Кобраков. Поискали и увидели, что окончание -ов в фамилии — это современное деление, прямо как в прошлом, на определённую этническую группу, что разделили в СССР, но в современной привязке -ов у русских, а у белорусов, к примеру, оканчиваются на -ич, -ук, -ик,
-ски, -ка. Таким образом, я вам шаблонную структуру, примеры всего подводить не буду, а показываю смысл формирования современной фамилии и её понятия, если вам понятно, то приступим дальше.
Так вот, продолжая о структуре фамилии Кобраков, мы отбросили приписанное окончание -ов из современного лада и получили фамилию Кобрак. Прямо пугает и кажется, что это какое-то прозвище, а нет, Кобрак звучит и читается в современном звучании, но ранее звучал по-другому, как Кобрат. Просто со временем писцы, что пишут на звук, безграмотность или ещё что… Но мы сейчас в паспортных столах видим, какие опечатки очевидные делают люди, пишут не те буквы, хотя мы живём в современном мире. А представьте лет так лет на сто назад или триста, да и просто не так прочитал при свече (в древности электричества не было и освещение оставляло желать лучшего), а если корявым почерком написано? В общем, изменить окончание с Т на К очень просто, случайно или намеренно — невозможно установить.
Ниже изложу факт, как можно излагать недостоверность в наше время, такие случаи имеют место, и рассуждать, не думая, что нет ошибок, — заблуждение. Я приведу только две фамилии и опять моих родных, возьму родного отца моей матери, Павла Ивановича Куликова, и родную сестру отца моего отца. Родная сестра деда — получим двоюродную бабушку. Была Надежда Александровна Кобракова по рождению от 1923 года, уроженка Смоленской области (Кардымовский район, д. Сухоруково), была награждена, по одной информации, Орденом Славы III степени (09.08.1944 год, 312 сд 3 Белорусского фронта. Фонд ист. информации: 33. Опись ист. информации: 690155. Дело ист. информации: 5255), Орденом Отечественной войны II степени (дата документа: 01.06.1945, № 53/н от 01.06.1945. Издан: 61 ск. Информация об архиве. Архив: ЦАМО. Фонд ист. информации: 33. Опись ист. информации: 686196. Дело ист. информации: 5417. Дело: шкаф 40, ящик 21).
И давайте посмотрим, как изменилась информация после смены фамилии на государственном уровне. Замужество с другой фамилией по мужу: была Кобраковой, стала Галеева Надежда Александровна. Документ в юбилейной картотеке уже не отображает её все награды. Но на деле они есть, и как доказать что это неверно — лишать в документах в истории заслуги? Не проще писать девичью фамилию и ту, что носит после замужества, или и там, и там указывать все заслуги? А нет, это никому, видимо, не надо. Смотрите далее и сопоставляйте: даже ящики хранения разные, что говорит о полном неуважении или путанице.
Дата рождения: __.__.1923.
Место рождения: РФ, Смоленская область, Смоленский район.
Наименование награды: Орден Отечественной войны II степени.
Номер документа: 74.
Дата документа: 06.04.1985.
Информация об архиве.
Архив: ЦАМО.
Картотека: юбилейная картотека награждений.
Расположение документа: шкаф 9, ящик 10.
Наглядно показывает искажение в полвека, но вы скажете, так бывает.
А теперь посмотрим моего деда родного. То есть моей матери отец, мой дед Куликов Павел Иванович прослужил всю войну в разведке. Которого просто размножили, как в «Матрице», превратив во множество независимых Куликовых. Дата рождения: 1921 год. Место рождения: РФ, Смоленская область, Кардымовский район, деревня Любково. И сопоставьте, что я узнал в поиске. Делал журналистский запрос, так как я гл. редактор СМИ «КнязЪ Кобраков» (ЭЛ. № ФС 77–64118, дата регистрации: 18.12.2015, доменное имя http://www.kobrakov.com).
Кстати, в архиве в Подольске я тоже был и не один раз, и там полная неразбериха, фотографировать нельзя, только после передачи документов в специальную комнату, по немыслимым ценам. А в карточке, что мне выдали на моего деда, находился наградной документ на Орден Славы совершенно другого человека. Подогнали под Ф. И. О, а где родился, не имеет для них никакого значения. Я искал Орден Славы, вот он есть. Я спросил, как такое может быть. Просто забрали и ушли, а в ответ сказали: «Зачем ездят, ищут. Дома не сидится?» Так что в поисках вы поймёте, что такое искать правду, как её преподносят, что получите в сухом остатке.
Далее я забиваю в интернете, чтоб узнать, что пишут официально: «Куликов Павел Иванович, г. Смоленск, Кардымовский район». И вот что выходит.
__.__.1921. Место рождения РФ, Смоленская область, Кардымовский район.
Место призыва: Кардымовский РВК, Смоленская обл., Кардымовский р-н.
Воинское звание: гв. мл. лейтенант; гв. лейтенант; лейтенант.
Воинская часть: 3-й гвардейский стрелковый полк 4-й гвардейской стрелковой дивизии, 3-й гвардейский стрелковый полк, 31-й гвардейский стрелковый корпус.
Награды: Орден Отечественной войны II степени (2), Орден Красной Звезды (2), Медаль «За победу над Германией в Великой Отечественной войне 1941–1945 гг.», Медаль «За взятие Будапешта» (2).
В дополнение очень ярым борцам со мной. Вот вам ссылка: https://pamyat-naroda.ru/heroes/person-hero81975588/.
А вот то, что я нашёл, когда углубился в реальности.
Учётно-послужная картотека, если искать, отображает множество моих дедов Куликовых П.И. 1921 года на бумаге, а в реальности он один, но это же надо соединять, что было или надо ли это кому-то, но вот зачем им это было делать, мы можем догадываться. Смотрим, что вышло.
Дата рождения: 28.09.1921. Везде по разному, может без даты или месяца. Место рождения: РФ, Смоленская область, Кардымовский район, деревня Любково, Лыбково, где просто Лю(...). Везде по разному, где указан Первомайский с/с, к/з Новая жизнь, где просто к/з Новая жизнь, а где нет вообще названия. Дата поступления на службу: __.01.1940, а где 05, где 10, а где-то и вовсе ...10.1941. Полная безответственность в архивах и на сайте pamyat-naroda.ru, что берёт из архива МО РФ, но содержится на наши с вами деньги, государства. Воинское звание: где без звания, где красноармеец, где ефрейтор, старшина, младший лейтенант, гвардии младший лейтенант, где лейтенант или гвардии лейтенант, где служил в штабе СК ВО, где в 180 азсп, где в 814 сп, где 1137 сп, 339 сд, где 589 стрелковый полк 216 стрелковой дивизии, 180 армейский запасной стрелковый полк или воинская часть: 3 гв. сп, 22 опрос и т. д. Дата окончания службы: 11.11.1946.
Наименования наград также разнятся, да и наград не хватает в послужном списке, наград, что разбросаны по разным архивным карточкам, например, и Орденов Славы, что вручали простым солдатам, но не офицерам. Да, такое возможно было: разведчику прийти служить рядовым, а уйти в запас офицером. Смотрим архивы, где его заслуги хранятся, я не пишу к каждому пункту всё перечисление Ф. И. О и т. д., как вверху со своей бабушкой, перейду сразу, где хранится информация об архиве.
Источник информации: ЦАМО. Фонд ист. информации:
а) 7803. Опись ист. информации: 72089с. Дело ист. информации: 1;
б) 7237. Опись ист. информации: 27757с. Дело ист. информации: 5;
в) 8472. Опись ист. информации: 19164. Дело ист. информации: 67;
г) 33. Опись ист. информации: 686196. Дело ист. информации: 3498. Информации: 3096;
д) …информации: шкаф 48а, ящик 2, награды, Орден Ленина от 20.01.1943, д. 1;
В другой карточке также ссылаются на информацию: шкаф 48а, ящик 2. Орден Красной Звезды, Орден Отечественной войны 2 степени, Орден Красной Звезды, медаль «За победу над Германией…», медаль «За взятие Будапешта»: шкаф 48а, ящик 2.
Когда я запросил в кабинете Подольского архива, мне работница сказала, что я должен принести орденские книжки и то, что я должен подтвердить, что мой дед — Герой Советского Союза. Не могу сказать точно, что мой дед — Герой Советского Союза. Дед говорил, что у него ребёнок, что держал на руках, играл с орденами, и самый дорогой для него — в виде звезды, как говорила моя бабушка (на солнце блестел). Я предполагаю: «Да, Герой». В ответ сказали, что Орден Ленина даётся Герою Советского Союза, но раз нет орденской книжки, ничем помочь не могут.
Дед мой умер от ранений, будучи инвалидом в 1979 году, мне было 2 года. Выплаты за Героя СССР стали ежемесячно давать с 1967 года, когда впервые были установлены в размере 20 рублей в месяц. Для справки: мой дед получал в 1968 году как бригадир самое малое 200 рублей. И как говорил, что его знают: «Ценят, дрова дают, технику для нужд дают. Дом новый построил, лес дали, руководство приезжает ко мне, останавливается с ночёвкой, на разные мероприятия в Смоленск приглашают. Значит, знают, что больше суеты, чтоб утраченную награду восстанавливать». А после 1970 года, когда выплаты были увеличены и стали 50 рублей в месяц, когда платили 250, он уже умер. Даже если бы и хотел заняться восстановлением, здоровье стало подводить, столкнулся с массой справок, запросов, подтверждений. Нужны были поездки, а четверо детей, работа… Это не сейчас: забил в интернете расписание, сел в такси и поехал.
Таким образом я, как наследник не могу знать, как мой дед защищал страну, государство не посчитало нужным после его смерти оставить о нем память в полном объёме. Может после этой публикации власть поймет что надо уметь ценить и сохранять память в едином целом , а не собирать родственникам по кусочкам.
Шли годы, и в итоге к 1979 году он не добился концов поисков справедливости, умер от ран, полученных на войне в ходе разведывательных действий (беря языков, добывая информацию, меняя историю хода войны). Сами знаете, что такое жить в деревне в 1970 годы СССР. Живя в деревне, много не сделаешь. Сейчас деревня Любково вообще не существует, и там уже давно никто не живёт: поля, болота и деревья. Делать вывод вам, но я показываю, как идёт работа тогда, как сейчас. Мне не ордена нужны из золота, а справедливость историческая. Если власть хочет, я оплачу стоимость всех его орденов по рыночной стоимости и передам их в музей, только не надо правду комкать.
Смотрим дальше. Самое интересное: наградные листы указывают конец 1944, 1945 года, что ранее наград нет. Хотя от 20.12.1944 он уже гв. младший лейтенант, но якобы наград не было с учётом, что на войну пошёл служить по призыву рядовым красноармейцем в 1940 году и стал разведчиком с первых дней войны. И по ранениям видим, что тяжёлые ранения были как раз в тот период, когда его награждали, и то, что он был старшиной в 20.01.1943 и награждён Орденом Ленина. Молчат. Круто! Никто и не вдаётся в то, что они были ранее, и лечился на сочинском побережье от тяжёлой раны. Смотрим в другой архив, где он опять под пунктом е), и остаётся найти, где его награды Героя СССР, в какой кубышке или архиве;
е) Указ президиума Верховного совета от 20.01.1943. Орден Ленина. Фонд 682525, единица хранения 4, № записи 12049339. Место службы всё то же: 3 гВ сп, 4 гв, сд 68, ск 3, Укр. Ф.;
ж) шкаф 111, ящик 3;
з) 33. Опись ист. информации: 690306. Дело ист. информации: 1875.
А сколько я не знаю о своём дедушке? И почему мне, внуку, с подтверждением родства не дали никакой информации, не просто вопрос. Зато потом говорят, что я не люблю свою страну, хотя просто рассказываю правду, неудобную для той же страны и тех, кто при власти. Им же надо статистику хорошую рассказать, а тут опять Кобраков требует закона, правды. Конечно, президент определённым личностям вручает награды, лично тем, кто проливал кровь за родину и светлое будущее, а тут не то чтоб награду передали, тут и в списках нет, и выкинут на историческую свалку, как ненужный элемент. Неужели это мне месть?
Это я вам наглядно показал, как формируются списки, документы, и я рассказал только малую часть несостыковок. У меня сделаны ксерокопии ещё разных Куликовых, Куликов и т. д. в Любково, Лыбково, но все об одном человеке. Это если вдруг государство под названием Российская Федерация захочет со мной судиться или привлечь за оскорбление власти. Как мне всегда говорят, я всегда готов, не впервой отстаивать свою честь и достоинство, хоть и понадобилось время понять, что если ты сам за себя не постоишь, государство просто тебя сотрёт в порошок, очернит, замажет грязью, как инакомыслящего, мешающего в их интересах, забывая о тех, кто сделал или делает.
Вспомните годы массовых политических репрессий, особенно Приказом НКВД СССР от 30 июля 1937 года № 00447 сколько невинных расстреляли, отправили в лагеря. У нас в стране с лёгкостью достают всю грязь на человека и расстреливают, а после извиняются, как с белорусом, что невинно расстрелян был за Чикатило. Пришёл работник к матери расстрелянного невинно и говорит: «Ошибочка вышла, извините», а она в ответ: «Отца немцы убили, вы по ошибке расстреляли, а кто картошку копать будет?»
Я думаю, что Соловецкий камень должен был побольше стоять, и из него выбивался огонь вечный, как крик невинно замученных, их голос, выплеск в мир страданий. И упокоение в окружении гигантских скульптур невинно замученных с размером как был Дзержинский. Вот тогда бы в назидание и память именно тем, кто на Лубянке и в государстве сидит, не просто напоминала, как они работали и что творили, имея власть. Должны ежегодно приходить и цветы всей Лубянкой и не только носить. Может, в будущем по моему проекту построят такой памятный мемориал и руководство страны наберётся смелости, начнёт признавать свои ошибки, создавая условия их помнить более масштабно, как неотъемлемую часть истории в широком понятии, но как осознавшего деяние и предостережение для будущего.
А вот «Стена скорби» в Москве должна быть дополнена инсталляцией уже немедленно для полной картины и всеобщего понимания, как жить, где день и ночь должен говорить и рассказывать о страшных временах диктор, а на экранах показывать их фамилии, лица, фрагменты ужаса. Вот тогда мы будем помнить, что натворила власть.
И с такими предложениями я напишу Путину после того, как опубликую свои работы и пошлю ему свои книги, чтоб было всестороннее понимание проблем общества. Я не сдаюсь никогда. Правда, она сильней всех. Видимо, гены говорят. Вот и моё дело в ООН (RE: CCPR case № 4417/2023) будет рассмотрено на сессии в 2026 году. Также тяжкий труд борьбы в стране за свои права. Если надо, напишу книгу о том как борюсь за свои права что обязаны соблюдаться властями по Конституции, если народ захочет читать мои работы. Но я всегда говорю, вы готовы отстаивать своё имя или нет, выбор за вами.
Договариваться власть не желает, нужны реальные шаги, мы же никто, а они всё, им видней. Может, после опубликования об участниках Второй мировой их память начнут помнить, что-то изменится. Кстати, и самое интересное. В самом Кардымове, где мой дед проработал всю жизнь, был и председателем колхоза, а с укрупнением стал бригадиром, в том колхозе, что расформировали и укрупнили, в наше время есть Книга памяти Смоленской области, очень сильно разрекламирована в сети. Но мой дед — герой, разведчик, что с первых дней был в разведке и, как он говорил, всю войну на пузе прополз, и менял исходы сражений. А они, руководители, в мирное время после войны разваливали страну. Кинул в лицо партбилет, что кровью заработал, когда сопляк-руководитель парткома сказал, что они в первую очередь защищают партработников, а не народ. И это уже в семидесятые годы, когда раны не давали спокойной жизни и годы были не те, чтоб противостоять произволу. Но не забрали партбилет, а с извинениями принесли обратно, так как награды и известность, пока был жив, не давали что-либо сделать с моим дедом.
И, видимо, кто-то помнит правдолюба Куликова, раз даже в Книгу памяти Смоленской области, состоящую из пятидесяти одного тома, состоящую из четырёх разделов, в книгу «Солдаты Победы» по Кардымовскому району не внесли в общие сведения. Я изучил все четыре раздела. Видимо, чтят выборочно или для статистики, хотя есть такая надпись на 65 стр. в разделе буквы К. гласит из книги «Солдаты Победы». Под № 903 в этой книге можете сравнить награды и где служил, с вымышленным человеком. Скопировано из книги в интернете. Обратите внимание: сержант, но ни слова об орденах, хранящихся. Особенно в шкаф 48а, ящик 2 и фонд 682525, единица хранения 4, № записи 12049339. Место службы всё то же: 3гВ, сп 4 гв, сд 68, ск 3, Укр. Ф. сержант. и тем боле о звании истинном.
КУЛИНОВ Павел Иванович, 1921 г. р., д. Любково Кардымовского р-на Смоленской обл. Призван в 1940 г. Служил: 4 гвардейская дивизия, сержант. Награды: Ордена Отечественной войны II ст., Красной Звезды, медали «За взятие Вены», «За взятие Будапешта», «За победу над Германией».
Правда в том, что Куликов Павел Иванович войну закончил офицером. До сих пор в архиве Подольска под грифом «секретно». Мне как внуку, предоставившему все обязательные документы, не дали, сославшись на секретность. Я ведь должен был понимать, приезжая в Подольск, что я не известный руководитель в стране. Мне просто всё стало понятно, что то, что говорят по телевизору и реальность всего лишь разные понимания. Видимо, слава и почести моего деда кого-то так тяготят до сих пор. Или, может, виной я? У правдолюбов не может быть достойных предков. И кстати, в деревне Любково, где он родился и жил и родилась моя мать, таких людей КУЛИНОВ, как в Книге памяти, не было никогда. Вообще маленькая деревушка была, да и кому это надо, в дозваться в историю какого то человека , который когда-то жил, он же не из тех кто на верху восседает.
А теперь скажите мне, опечатка К и Н в фамилии. Куликов и Кулинов — и разные фамилии. Незначительная, соглашусь, если бы только в фамилии. А звание? Разница — рядовой и офицер. А награды? Я сам лично звонил в военкомат, и там поднимали карточки, где указано, что он офицер с неполным списком наград по личному делу. Жаль, не всё про моего деда указано, он же не из власти, к тому же мёртв, да и я оппозиционер, что борется с произволом. Зачем показывать, что Кобраков, по духу и совести неся указы прошлых поколений, исполняет? А жена моего деда Куликова, моя бабушка Александра получала пенсию, проведя такие же боевые действия в мирное время с коррупцией и произволом, что помнили правдолюба-деда.
Вот вам ответ, как трудно найти информацию, хотя всего-то прошло с момента смерти 06.10.1979 в деревне Любково Кардымовского района. Совсем чуть-чуть пожил с паспортом, когда паспорта дали. 28 августа 1974 года Совет Министров СССР принял постановление № 677, согласно которому всем колхозникам начали выдавать паспорта. Полная паспортизация сельских жителей началась 1 января 1976 года и завершилась 31 декабря 1981 года. Где туалет на улице, вода в колодце и печное отопление… И 2-ю группу инвалидности дали незадолго до смерти. Сами, наверно, знаете, как это бывает, особенно тогда. И моего деда забыли меньше чем за пятьдесят лет, выкинули из памяти страны героя-разведчика. Кстати, все архивные справки о ранениях, болезни его уничтожил архив. Также делал запрос, почему стирают его память, непонятно. Надеюсь, после этой работы им стыдно станет, и порядок наведут, найдут награды, заслуги везде.
А теперь представьте, что такое фамилия, особенно если она Кобраков, и к кому она относится, и что значит. Я намеренно показываю, что правда не всегда в официальных источниках правдива. Мы слышим слова, когда говорят, что переписывают историю, а что сделала страна победителей конкретному человеку и его родным, вывод делать вам. Самое интересное в том, что и жену моего деда, мою бабушку родную… Куликова Александра Устиновна( в девичьи Петрова) жила также в Кардымовском районе, в д. Любково, где проработал мой дед. После смерти мужа так же тяжко жилось, и писала жалобу: ей неправильно начислили пенсию. Пожаловалась в райсобес Кардымовский, что неправильно насчитал. Безуспешно. Пошла выше она, в областной собес. Тоже безрезультатно. Год жила без пенсии, а после написала в «Человек и закон». В 1981 году был скандал, когда «Человек и закон» разъяснил партийным структурам, опубликовав это в самом журнале. Позор на весь СССР! Ей пересчитали и выплатили. А в 1983 году уехала на Украину в Одессу, так как жизнь стала невыносима, ведь правдолюбов никто не любит.
Я пишу не просто статистику, а реальность жизни людей, что радеют за свою страну, невзирая на строи и времена. Но знаете, в чём самое интересное? При жизни моего деда приглашали на разные мероприятия. Официально торжества Победы во Второй мировой не было, но в узком кругу, в верхах, всегда было, и вот в таких мероприятиях, где чествуют героев, мой дед Куликов Павел Иванович, которого приглашали на такие партийные мероприятия в самом Смоленске, познакомился с Егоровым Михаилом Алексеевичем, именно с тем, кто водрузил знамя над рейхстагом. Кстати, в деревни были люди и по званию старше, и награды разные, Красного знамени и иностранных государств, например, сосед моего деда, почти одногодка, также ушёл рядовым, пришёл офицером (Алексей К.), но их не приглашали, а моего деда за один стол сажали с Егоровым, что говорит о многом в его заслугах на фронтах Второй мировой. Но, как я вижу, это было тогда, он был нужен, сейчас его нет, и его выкинули из истории. Но в то время дружба, близость.
Двоюродная сестра моей матери Куликова Дина познакомилась с сыном Игорем родной сестры Егорова и стала на фамилию Б. Не буду раскрывать данные. И так случилось, свадьбу провели 26 июля 1975 года, совпала с днём поминания гибели самого М. А. Егорова. Он разбился на машине (не хочу вдаваться в трагические события), спешил, такое случается. Это сейчас легко отменить, а раньше отменить свадьбу, что планировали чуть ли не за полгода, сложно. Так что осуждать не надо: жизнь, она есть жизнь. Жена М. А. Егорова поздравила и сообщила, что помины мужа и отца, дочери М.А. Егорова пришли, поздравили и ушли, всё-таки отец есть отец. Такое часто в истории бывало: 17 (6 по старому стилю) мая 1727 года императрица Екатерина I скончалась, а через неделю 23 мая царевич Пётр II женился на дочке Меньшикова.
Так что сказать, что моего деда не знали, и он был рядовой человек из деревни, не скажешь, да и те ордена, что у него были, почему-то стали исчезать в архивах, в официальных документах. Если тут нет информации, может, данные сохранились в полном объёме на Украине, так как бабушка моя уехала жить в Одесскую область от бесправия, с которым столкнулась, и получала военную пенсию как вдова офицера.
Потом кто-то в судах говорит слова «холуи, подонки, коррупционеры, жулики», и такие слова трактуют как оскорбление, неуважение, не относящиеся к делу, не вникая в смысл сказанного, направленного определённым личностям, что безнаказанно нарушают закон, нравственное, моральное, этическое, служебное, профессиональное действие и т. д. Но всегда есть но, и закон в виде Фемиды должен независимо принимать решения, а не просто любой ценой закрыть рот правде неудобных нигилистических фактов, используя власть суда.
Таким образом, я вам наглядно показал, как устроено информационное поле, которое строится на официальной информации с человеческим фактором во всех проявлениях и не берётся с неба. Уклад современной жизни нам ясен, перейдём в углублённые формы, более глубокое понятие и рассуждение о моей фамилии Кобраков (и придираться ко мне с пониманием в моей фамилии буквы К в суффиксе, изменённой с Т). Как один мне человек, что рассуждает об истории, говорит, что мою фамилию с буквы Т на К изменили намеренно, якобы кобра переводится «змея», К символизирует «князь, каган, каан» («великий хан»): скрыть и сохранить род Кобраковых тем, кто до сих пор помогает и оберегает меня, как наследника великого рода. Конечно, звучит лестно, но я привык аргументировать фактами и стал интересоваться дальше, беря во внимание все аспекты из истории и расценивать свою фамилию неким знаком борьбы за правду для меня.
И вы скажете, а это тут при чём, и вот тут начинается новый виток. Т и К, мы уже поняли, либо опечатка, не разобрали в темноте, либо намеренное изменение скрыть принадлежность или наоборот, недвусмысленно акцентировать знающих людей на определённую информационную направленность. Вы получили довод с моим дедом, как меняют буквы, звания, награды, и т. д., и с тем, как могла буква стоять намеренно, как символ определённого властного человека.
И идём дальше.
Кубрат и Кобрак, Кобрат имеют одно и то же понятие. Вы скажете, как такое может быть, вторая буква У и О, и общего быть не может. Тут никак нельзя что-либо поставить в противовес, это не может быть одним и тем же. И я бы с вами согласился, если бы не но. В 1748 году появился трактат об орфографии Василия Тредиаковского, в котором автор установил первые нормы русского произношения, и букву У стали в словах заменять на О. И Михаил Ломоносов привнёс изменения. Приведу вам немного примеров, чтоб вы поняли смысл трактования и пояснения. Так, была Булгария — стала Болгария, фронт, фронтовой — устаревшие «фрунт, фрунтовой», были русские — стали россияне, банкрот — устаревшее «банкрут», номер — устаревшее «нумер», эксплуатация — устаревшее «эксплоатация». Изменения касаются и произношения горловых, носовых факторов.
О. Трубачёв, в том числе и по вопросу чередования О/У (Трубачёв О. К истокам Руси. М., 2013, С. 65). Ю. Д. Акашев: аргументация, касающаяся чередования О/У в корнях слов в славянских языках (ковать — кую, строгать — стругать, строганина — стружка, стопа — ступня, мошка — мушка, приводятся в качестве равноправных в употреблении варианты слов «муравей» и «моравей», «мурoванный» и «морованный», «морошка» и «мурошка». Владимир Даль, характеризуя наречия русского языка, отмечал, в частности, что в Тверской губернии вместо «ховать» говорят «хувать», в Костромской губернии говорят «ут» вместо «от», «удеяло» вместо «одеяло»; в Рязанской — «уставили» вместо «оставили», «ухота» вместо «охота», «углобли» вместо «оглобли». Ю. П. Миролюбов отмечает, что в Антоновке, на юге России, говорили иногда «скот», а иногда «скут» (Акашев Ю. Д. История народа рос: от ариев до варягов. М., 2013, С. 96–102).
Одним словом, вы теперь понимаете, что Кубрат и Кобраков (в последующем разложении показал) — это одно и то же, и никто не может сомневаться в пояснениях. Вы опять скажете, загнул, где жил Кубрат, а где я живу. Сейчас я живу в Туле постоянно, до этого жил ещё в Ростове-на-Дону, Смоленске, Москве и много ещё где. Вот, к примеру, побуду месяц в Таганроге, еду в Тулу или в Смоленск, и так лет пятнадцать мотался в год по тридцать раз туда-сюда. Слава богу, мы всегда жили в достатке. Вот до этого в детстве, юношестве жил в Смоленске, в советское время у нас было две кооперативных квартиры в одном доме, что мы сами купили, где жила вся элита того времени, исторические личности или их родственники. Соответственно, те, кто знают нашу фамилию и помогают веками, всегда протягивают руку помощи, ценят и чтят, и, конечно, есть противоположность в виде завистников, неудачников, не уважающих историю. Всегда были, не буду переходить на личности.
Посмотрите на мою жизнь, и вы увидите, как боятся нашу фамилию трусы и подлецы. Пытались сломать наш род, но всех карает божественное провидение, так было всю нашу жизнь — дедов, отца, меня. Но я с вами, и правда победила — значит, испытания пройдены. Конечно, многие, кто пытались причинять нашей семье вред, заканчивали плохо, кто-то даже на себя руки накладывал по схожим обстоятельствам или погибал в разных происшествиях. Как пример, решил один сотрудник ГАИ, ещё в СССР, одноклассник моего отца, которого отец в школе не замечал, из-за злобы и возможности решил прав лишить: не мог пережить, что жил в кооперативной квартире, имел «Жигули», хотя ему было восемнадцать лет. Представьте, что это значит в 1973 году — ездить на «копейке» новой! А медик, что проверял днём на наличие алкоголя, имел рядом с нашим гаражом свой. И знали, что отец не пьян, денег хотели. Так вот, участнику, что активно делал липу, сказано было: «Чтоб ты вдохнул и не выдохнул». И в ночь, не прошло и полдня после событий, тот медик, что говорил: «Все пьяные», повесился: кара быстро настигла. Мне не жалко тех, кто живёт и нарушает закон: они должны быть наказаны. И десница божья всегда настигает их. Если ещё и помогаешь в разоблачении таких, то правда всегда восторжествует. Правда, пути не всегда исключительно в законодательстве. Конечно, разобравшись, отцу права вернули. И я могу рассказать о таких случаях, их много, но не будем портить книгу, они не достойны, чтоб их вспоминать.
Вернёмся к нашим доводам про расстояние. То, где я жил, вам не довод, вам это не доказательство в глобальных просторах. И приведу куда более серьёзный пример,как может судьба вести к определенным действиям . Мой дед, Павел Куликов в Австрии жил с немкой до 1946 года, пока не мобилизовали, остались дети или нет, не знаю. Моя бабушка Вера, родная сестра Бабушки Александры в девичьи Петрова, жена моего деда Павла Куликова, когда началась война и оккупировали Смоленск, вышла замуж в 1941г. за немца, военного и уехала в германию, подняла их семейную сыроварню во время войны, так как бабушка Вера великолепно готовила сыр в СССР, была технологом на сыроварне до войны. Но её мужа немца убило в середине войны и она уехала обратно в СССР из Германии , хотя новая родня немецкая, предлагали остаться, у них был еще сын, но судьба распорядилась по другому. К стати не кто её не посадил и власти лояльны были, как стой стороны так и с этой, с чем связанно не знаю. У меня есть жена, её фамилия Филатчева по отцу, а по матери — Вебер, она из немцев. Получилась так, что была Вторая мировая война, и после Второй мировой родной дед моей жены Вебер Альберт Емельянович там в лагерях Якутской АССР создал ячейку, и родилась мать моей жены. А прадед после Второй мировой войны оказался, как принято говорить, случайно по семейным обстоятельствам в Канаде в г. Винипеге, там он безбедно жил и умер, чувствовал себя прекрасно, имел яхту, загородный дом, секретаршу. Так развела история одну семью по разные континенты, не говоря уже а странах.
Мы не будем говорить о том, кто был моей жены дед и прадед во время великой войны народов (Второй мировой), пусть КГБ свои архивы смотрит. Ведь прадед Емельян Вебер, находясь в Канаде в г. Виннипег (приказ МВД СССР № 00576, изданный 24 июля 1953 года и разрешавший переписку с родственниками и получение посылок и денежных переводов осуждённым военнопленным и интернированным, а также иностранным гражданам, осуждённым военными трибуналами), с 60-х годов переписывался со своим сыном Альбертом Емельяновичом Вебером, живущим в г. Туле. Прадед слал посылки своему сыну и внучке с другого континента, Канады. Повторюсь, Лубянка всё это может проверить и выяснить, если затронет их беспокойство. Но то, что Москва разрешила бывшему из лагеря с немецкими корнями вблизи Москвы жить в те времена, говорит о многом. Нужен был рядом. И г. Тула, кстати (имеет схожее с «Обществом Туле» нем. Thule-Gesellschaft — немецкое оккультное и политическое общество в рамках изучения германской древности, нем. Studiengruppe für germanisches Altertum), подошла очень хорошо. В противном случае так и жил бы в Сибири или на Урале — в этом есть выборочный подход, когда надо жить вблизи Москвы. Из «бывших» — выдали квартиру… Говорит о многом.
Есть разные схожие люди по фамилии Вебер в период режима нацистов. Один даже руководил отделом «Аненербе» (нем. Ahnenerbe — «Наследие предков», полное название — «Общество по изучению древней германской истории, наследия предков»), и после попадания его сына в плен его отстранили от данного проекта. Повторюсь, кто был дед и прадед, не будем рассуждать, но могу просто вам сказать, что Веберы произошли из древних племён свебов, что была в германских племенах очень распространённая фамилия.
Вставлю некую ремарку. В прошлом хан Аттила получил себе в жёны дочь по имени Галия или Галиена (Galiena означает «возвышенная» или «благородная», и использовалось редко) представителя свебов для укрепления дружественных связей за счёт родства, родоплеменных отношений. И Вебер, если смотреть перевод, переводится «ткач». Но не всё так просто, как хочется всё упростить. Например, «князь» с немецкого можно перевести как «кнехт» (Knecht), «холоп», и в таком случае можно легко запутать суть. Тут надо подходить сугубо не с переводной части, а с трактования того языка, на котором звучит понятие.
Свебы, свевы — население полиэтничной Восточной Германии, включавшее преимущественно древнегерманские племена: буры, семноны, гермундуры, квады, маркоманы, алеманны (швабы) и другие. Свевы сыграли существенную роль в этногенезе современных европейских народов: австрийцев, немцев, испанцев, португальцев, западных славян. Область Швабия (Schwaben), которое, по мнению некоторых исследователей, происходит от свебов. Известны на территориях: в I веке до н. э. — II веке н. э. свевы занимали бассейн рек Эльбы, Майна, Неккара, а также верховья Рейна. Таким образом, носит генетически кобры и свебов, свевов. Впервые описаны Юлием Цезарем, который в 58 году до н. э. нанёс поражение свевам во главе с Ариовистом, перешедшим около 71 года до н. э.
Это я вам к тому, как переплетается структура перемещения и становится понятной родоплеменная составляющая генома, что вы носите. Но почему в России так трудно что-то доказать, найти правду, истину, справедливость, остаётся догадываться. Я думаю, вы и тут скажете, это не важно, но я вам наглядно показал, как можно раздвинуть континенты и иметь возможность двигаться в разные географические направления. Что ж говорить о прошлом передвижении людей, живших свободными и независимыми.
Продолжим конкретизировать и разбирать. Кубрат, если перевести на другие языки (это тюркское происхождение), — «благородный», «объединитель» на территории современной Европы и Азии. А с иранского означает «сильный», «храбрый». И это тоже верно, но вы забываете, что всегда, чтоб выявить того, кто есть истинный, надо не одно слово, а глубокий смысл в самом слове.
Тут я вам поясню что в летописи византийского монаха Феофана Исповедника, составленной в 810–815 годах, можно прочитать углублённо, но вам нужны доводы. И принадлежность Кобракова и Куброта была показана выше, а заложение змеи в фамилию и обозначение фамилии как того самого — это работа, созданная в прошлом умными людьми, что сумели сохранить ветвь добра, истины.
И опять уходим чуть в прошлое, к прадеду Кубрата, Аттилы, Айбата. Связь Аттилы (в тюркской традиции известного как Айбат) с образом змея или дракона уходит корнями в мифологию кочевых народов и средневековые легенды, основные причины этому — тотемизм и родословная. В тюркской и монгольской мифологии змея (или дракон) часто выступала как тотемный предок. Значит, предводители, великие правители ведут свой род от сверхъестественных существ. Образ змея символизировал мудрость, землю и тектоническую силу. Также на штандартах, знамёнах использовали (draco) полые чучела змей из ткани, которые развевались на шестах, издавая свист на ветру. Для европейцев, видевших эти знамёна, вождь гуннов буквально шёл под знаком змея. А в преданиях имя Айбат связывают с понятием величия и грозности, что в степном эпосе нередко переплеталось с образами могучих рептилий, охраняющих свои земли.
Я думаю, скрытый смысл, вложенный во все понятия, даёт вам широкий спектр узнать, что правда не всегда лежит на поверхности открытой, и её надо найти и взять. В Европе, напротив, змей имеет отношение к человечеству, но занимает не главенствующую роль, а побудительную, искусительную в угоду своим приоритетам. И выделение с отдалением от праиндоевропейцев. При этом достоверно известно, что Европа не являлась местом зарождения человечества. Но как хочется некоторым выделяться, отказавшись от общего прошлого, в титульное общество и ничего не делать!
Таким образом, те, кто понимают, что Змей принёс добро, всегда будут стоять на страже благополучия и развития людей, а сохранить идентичность, узнать того, кто несёт истинное зерно правды, будет проще, так как схожесть фамилии корнем не даёт понимание всей картины. И только тот, кто сможет показать много разных принадлежностей к единому, сможет показать: пришло время взглянуть на мир новыми глазами, где мудрость приведёт человечество в новый мир добра, творя красоту и мир бесконечных знаний. А этап забвения Змея, Кобры в истории — это этап становления и преобразования для будущего, уйти от пережитков неосознанности своих возможностей как человека, способного жить в добре и понимании. Мы вернём эпоху расцвета человечества через знания, уважение, добро, мирное существование — это основа благополучия народа. И рассуждать об истории, вырывая из контекста, становится неуважительно к будущему, так как тот, кто не ценит историю, не имеет будущего.
Мы видим, что есть примеры, где вы, люди, почитаете тех, кто приводит вам корень -куб- из великого имени Кубрат, не видя многих знаков у другого. И это ваше право, я считаю, что вы должны решать, что и кто вам нужен, а моя задача — вас проинформировать, так как информацию надо понять, осмыслить и только потом сделать вывод. А пока вы будете размышлять, я приведу вам ещё довод, как иногда, просто имея одно совпадение, меняется мышление, и с этим соглашаются многие.
Смотрим Кубрат по генеалогическим древам. Выходит, с приставкой куб- (или как привёл пример своей принадлежности к своей фамилии), беря такую приставку, любой, кто имеет, может претендовать на наследие российской и другой исторической структуры. В таком случае, зная просто историю, даёт логическое пояснение своей принадлежности, родства с династией Рюриковичей, хотя многие оспаривают, и не соглашаются, и считают, что его принадлежность не подтверждена авторитетными источниками по монаршей генеалогии. Но мы ведь понимаем, как монаршие особы писали свою ветвь, как стали монаршими особами, и понимаем, как восходят на престол, к примеру, Романовы, как всё происходило.
И в итоге народ сам решает, кто достоин, а кто нет, и какая фамилия или человек может представлять своих предков. Как возможность раскрыть потенциал людей на благо человечества, так как развитие мира не останавливается на титулах и принадлежности родоплеменной составляющей, но даёт возможность тем, кто может поделиться с людьми, создать условия нового развития человечества, а не просто указывать на свою титулярную личность, хотя это тоже нужно для проявления рекламной возможности, придать статус задуманных инноваций в развитии человечества в полной мировоззренческой парадигме общественного пространства. И тем самым любой с приставкой куб- может заявить права чуть ли не на всю историю. Вряд ли получится это, так как вы не глупые, наивные люди, вы умеете читать и мыслить, и сходство корня приводит к большому количеству людей с такими корневыми фамилиями.
Взгляните, я укажу их малую долю из возможных: Куба, Кубагушев, Кубагушева, Кубадров, Кубадрова, Кубаев, Кубаевская, Кубай, Кубайкин, Кубайкина, Кубак, Кубаков, Кубалев, Кубалов, Кубальска, Кубальский, Кубан, Кубариков, Кубаркин, Кубаркина, Кубаров, Кубарскал, Кубарская, Кубарский, Кубартов, Кубарь, Кубас, Кубасский, Кубась, Кубаськов, Кубасов, Кубатов, Кубе, Кубеев, Кубель, Кубик, Кубиков, Кубин, Кубис, Кубко, Кублевский, Кубликов, Кублицкий, Кубрин, Кубринский, Кубряк, Кубриков, Кубраков, Кубратков, Кубратиков.
И это не предел, их тысячи, а если переводить на языки, то ещё больше. Представьте, все они заявят, что они потомки, наследники, станет поистине хаос, неразбериха. Вот для этого в фамилию того, кто носит, закладывают множество свидетельств того, кто несёт основу. В 2020 году суд г. Красногорска отказал в эксгумации останков царя Ивана IV Грозного (покоятся в Архангельском соборе Московского Кремля). Кубарев в требованиях просил провести процедуру доказательства его родства с царём на генетическом уровне. Даже можете посмотреть его работу по указанию древа, как он считает, его принадлежности к именитым фамилиям прошлого. И я его не осуждаю в стремлении предать общественности исторические факты, взятые из истории.
Моё мнение, что одного корня -куб- недостаточно для выражения на что-либо. Его правоту можно принять или отвергать, но рациональное зерно в поисках показывает на историю в открытом виде. Но какой бы вы фамилией ни обладали, требовать что-либо от власти сейчас крайне некорректно, тем более заявлять на всё, что имеет в распоряжении нынешнее государство под названием Российская Федерация и не только оно. Кремль и многое другое, что досталось нам после исторических событий, показывает, что всё, что имели древние цари, князья, должно принадлежать народу, а не одному человеку или фамилии, тем более Кремль, что охраняется не просто в РФ, а в международной структуре ЮНЕСКО. Давайте не будем делить, тревожить, а просто будим чтить свои корни, приумножая наши с вами возможности жить для будущего, созидая в настоящем и будущем.
Я не стремлюсь к всеобщему признанию меня царём или всевеликим князем, патрицием каких-либо территорий, я стремлюсь к истине, правде, заботе о людях, природе, исполнению законов. И не мешать созданному порядку. И устройство власти во всём мире как стабильное процветание человека. Надо создавать революционное видение человека и эволюционный скачок в понимании самого себя, человека. Пришло время именно использовать историческую идентичность великого рода как собирательную возможность в единую мощную основу человеческой сути общества для разрешения многих ключевых проблем, с чем сталкивается население Земли в планетарном масштабе. Создание возможностей человеку защитить себя от произвола, безнаказанности определённых индивидов, что смогли узурпировать возможности всего вида человеческого в интересах незначительной группы, нежелающих развивать человеческое преобразование правды, верховенства закона, добра повсеместно. А история, как никто другой, показывает принадлежность возможностей, имея связь с поколениями, и возможность использовать как возможность для всех, а не только для себя.
Но вернёмся к Куброту (Кубрат, Курбат, Кробат, Курт, Куртъ, Кроват, Коврат, Кубер , Кувер, греч. Χουβρατις). Его захоронение у с. Малая Перещепина, Полтавская область. Жил за 200 лет от становления Смоленска. Но самое интересное: Кубрат — сын Албури из кыпчакского рода Дулу. Предки Кубрата: дед — хан Аскал, внук хана Масгута, правнук хана Ирника, который был сыном Аттилы.
Таким образом, история показывает значение моей фамилии. Далее я приведу пример, относящий себя к Кубрату с корневой системой -кубар-, и это всех устраивает, как его сторона. Но, повторюсь, судить вам, народ, а не мне. Мне показалось, что Кубара мало для того, чтобы что-то требовать и заявлять. Я в противовес привёл факты связи Кобракова с древним родом, и я пошёл дальше смотреть и переместил свой взгляд к западным просторам в Белорусии. Там есть город Кобринск, схож с моей фамилией, как некогда Кобрин (Кобрынь) упоминается в духовной грамоте волынского князя Владимира Васильковича, год 1287, где данный город завещает своей жене Ольге Романовне.
Кстати, совсем упустил принадлежность княжества и города: относилось к князьям Кобринским из династии Гедиминовичей, что показывает, что если рассматривать фамилию Кобраков в современной интерпретации и переложить на информацию, собранную мной за долгие годы в единую структуру, получаем, что Кобраков имеет исторический подтекст своей фамилии в полном объёме. И непризнание этого факта с точки зрения научного довода ставит понятие доказательств в разряд выборочной доктрины управления и повиновения, а не субъективной картины обобщённого факта. С разных сторон доказывает полную принадлежность и намеренное искажение великой династической фамилии в угоду в прошлом: в преобразовательные процессы имущества, славы, истории в фрагментальные кусочки тех, кто разрушил созданную трудами многих миллионов людей структуру мироустройства в исторической парадигме прошлого общества.
Тем самым могу предположить, что развал мироустройства прошлого привёл к мировым потрясениям и трагическим событиям. Но пришло время менять, преобразовывать общество не потрясениями, а разумными целенаправленными действиями самого народного изъявления в понимании жизни и её возможности. Таким образом, установленный миропорядок должен поддерживать курс всеобщего развития и благополучия, но параллельно с великой фамилией, что способна дать новые основы мироустройства, опираясь на знания и опыт прошлого. Только в таком симбиозе способны общество и мир стать на новый формат развития как вида человеческой расы в глубоком её разнообразии.
Таким образом, понимание вами, что Змей, Змея, Кобра несут сакральный смысл. Не путайте мою фамилию и не коверкайте, она произносится от слова «кобра» — змея такая ядовитая, Но в истории встречается и молодой род, не более 400 лет по сравнению с глобальной историей. Например, Змиевы для внесения неразберихи, закладывая путаницу в будущем, как говорится. В России есть русский дворянский род, он был известен и внесён в VI, II и III части дворянской родословной книги Московской, Воронежской, Рязанской, Смоленской, Тульской, Ярославской губерний (Гербовник V, 91 и VII, 14). И официально принимают написание данной фамилии, правописание в истории разнообразно: Змеевы, Змеивы, Змеиовы, Змеовы, Змеивы, Змиовы, Змеиовы, Змиовы, Змеиевы в официальных документах.
Это я опять вам сопоставил, как одна фамилия с одного корня с подтверждённым фактом имеет разное правописание в исторической структуре родоплеменного начала с последующей трансформацией, но в тот же момент подчёркивает одно целое. Тут есть о чём задуматься. Сама фамилия ставится в противовес истории, той, что неудобна, но в тот же момент имеет косвенный показ принадлежности к другому роду, кто со временем либо не знал, либо что-то слышал, но не точно. И тем самым такая фамилия успокаивает. А почему не относится, да потому, что данная фамилия (Змеивы) хоть и считается, что от поляка, но у поляков такого рода нет, но в России есть. Странно, вам не кажется? Род польский, а сословия нет.
Я понимаю, в прошлом после разгрома и перераспределения территорий нужна новая знать, и им надо давать за проявленную службу должности. А какие тогда были награды? Титул, земля, за которые они потом будут сражаться. И неизвестные люди становятся известными с лёгкой подачи правящей династии, что претендует на новые территории после передела. Как пример, вспомним Петра. Бывшие князья и мурзы из числа татар-мусульман, которые при Петре I после ликвидации татарско-мусульманского дворянства не пожелали сменить веру предков и превратились в крестьян. Такие же деяния, но раньше были и с теми, кто веровал не в Христа, а в славянское язычество (древнеславянское язычество — система славянских дохристианских представлений о мире и человеке, в основе которой лежала мифология, тотемизм, магия). Но и также преображение, если есть желание возвысить. Вспомните историю, может, которую изменят, и уберут с веками основу, и оставят нужное, трудно сказать, но посмотрите и поймёте, о чём это я.
Павел Иванович Ягужинский (Ягушинский) — российский государственный деятель и дипломат. Родился в 1683 году в Кубличах Полоцкого воеводства Великого княжества Литовского (ныне — Ушачский район Витебской области, Белоруссия). До того, как попал в милость царя, свиней пас.
Меншиковы — русский дворянский и княжеский (с 1705) род. Генерал-губернатор Петербурга Александр Данилович Меншиков, который грамотой (30 мая 1707) возведён в княжеское достоинство, до этого был сыном конюха.
Тепловы, жалованные поместьями в 1621 году (Герб. Часть VIII. № 52). Сын истопника.
Граф Кирилл Григорьевич Разумовский в детстве пас крупнорогатый скот в деревне Разумиха. И получением титула и звания гетман Украины был обязан старшему брату Алексею, который в 1742 году стал фаворитом императрицы Елизаветы Петровны.
Шувалов Андрей Семёнович был воеводой (1616), и упомянут при осаде Смоленска (1634). До этих данных ни о роде, ни о фамилии (как великий род) нет.
Высочайшим указом (22 сентября 1767) генерал-аншеф Пётр и действительный тайный советник Никита Иванович Панин, дипломат, императрицей Екатериной II возведены в графское достоинство Российской империи. А прадед его упоминается в истории, что Никита Панин нёс фонарь на третьей свадьбе Ивана Грозного (1572). Титул П. И. Панину выдан 23 декабря 1786.
Так что история помнит все разные перипетии современной истории. Или вспомните, кто был поваром, допустим, у В. И. Ленина. Чего-то добились или нет его потомки, и как чествуют в современном быту? Так что мне не надо говорить, как могут история и возможности переплестись в определённом направлении. Раньше надо было скрывать гибель нужного человека, договариваться и искать двойника, и он начинает ветвь, не имея родовой привязки, но имеет схожесть. Всё хорошо, везде спокойно. А сейчас путаницу с фамилией сделать трудней: есть ИНН. Но и тут можно что то нахимичить, подставить не того человека, но на время, для спокойствия. Слава богу, ушли от идентичности родоплеменной сути и человек проявляется по заслугам своим, а должности не передаются по наследству. Соответственно, верить надо написанному, но иногда на заборе написано, а там дрова. Как разобраться, и дадут ли? Трудно, но на всё есть желание или нет тех, кто может дать намёк.
Не буду утомлять и приводить примеры прошлого, так как цели другие, а задача одна — информировать вас, как история может быть изменчивой, словно капризная дама, в руках ловких и умелых, выражаясь в нужных, но конкретных делах, что могут проявить неконтролируемые события. И тут главное иметь понимание, и в тот же момент должна быть проявлена поддержка. Или разногласие может привести к проблемам, не нужным одним, но вполне выгодным другим. Жадность, недальновидность, как я считаю, приводят к плачевным событиям. Видимо, история самоуверенных не учит.
Сорок человек после переворота 28 июня 1762 года и прихода к власти Елизаветы II получили в дар почти 20 000 душ. За содеянное Орловы получили графский титул. Или вспомните 7 ноября 1917 года, 14 октября 1964 года, 26 декабря 1991 года, так что не будем о многом.
Новые дела дают новые возможности, и, соответственно, Кобраков не имеет отношения к Змеивым (идут из другой ветви). Из данного происхождения Змеивых относятся такие, как Беклемишевы, Щепотьевы, Щулепниковы, Княжнины, Орловы. Разбирать саму фамилию Змеевы я не буду, так как она для меня не имеет определённой отсылки на указание моей фамилии, и приводить аналогию здесь неуместно, цепляясь за название «змея». Но то, что в моей фамилии пересекается змеиное в чётком проявлении слова «кобра» (в переводе «змея»), а род Куброта продолжился рождением в знатном месте, что с одной стороны, уничтожено, с другой — построен новый град, прохождение прямой линии от места событий Гнёздова в Сухоруково-Гололобово с чётким пересечением места, где жил в Смоленске и учился…
Переданные знания предками, душевные и мысленные терзания отыскать правду не только для себя, что не говорилась открыто поколениями, подвергаясь гонениям… Поистине сложно дать сие объяснение в том, что пишу и высказываюсь, зная, что многим такое не по нраву, но то, что мы несли веками, я должен передать на сие обозрение. Кстати, не знаю, совпадение или закономерность — это решать вам, но везде в истории человечества всегда в знаковых событиях имела значение связь со змеёй. Вспомните: Адама и Еву змей искушал, Будда, что прозрел под капюшоном гигантской кобры, в Египте кобра на короне у фараона, а Амдуат, состояние существования до сотворения мира, символизировалось как свернувшийся во множество колец змей, из которого возник Ра.
Почитание змеи встречается в постройках древних городов Америки, например, в Теотиуакане, Чичен-Ице и Паленке. И происходило поклонение Кетцалькоатлю — Пернатому Змею, ему поклонялись ацтеки, майя, сапотеки, оахакив в древних городах Теотиуакане, Монте-Альбан Яшчилане, Паленке, Ушмале, Чичен-Ице. А у майя бог Кукулькан изображался как пернатый змей с человеческой головой. Даже в истории самой Руси князь Олег умер от укуса змеи, в сказках народов России огнедышащий змей летает. В христианстве, в иудаизме в Торе, в исламе «оживотворение».
В древнегреческой мифологии змея олицетворяет мудрость, обновление жизни, воскресение, исцеление. Например богиня Афина. В индийской мифологии змея (нага) считается полубогом. Согласно индийским поверьям змеи могут принимать человеческий облик, В скандинавской мифологии змея, кусающая себя за хвост (Уроборос), символизировала море как вечное кольцо. Радужный змей в мифах аборигенов Австралии — один из творцов мира, связанный с водой и землёй. Китайская богиня с телом змеи — прародительница людей, покровительница земли по имени Нюйва. В архаических космогонических мифах Евразии и Америки змей осуществляет разъединение и соединение неба и земли. Ёрмунганд (Мировой змей). Или Георгий Победоносец побеждает змея также в культуре, в геральдике. В контексте алхимии змея символизирует трансформацию и внутреннее преображение — и многие другие факты. Но я не провожу параллели, просто размышления о том, что есть и почему такое соединение во всём даёт зерно рассуждения. Можно расценить как знак понимания и всеобщего начала новой эры человечества в понимании.
Из моих трудов вырисовывается одна закономерность. Кобра, змей постоянно выплывает в мир, но спустя время элита снова убирает все данные о предназначении змея. Суть таких действий только одна — не желают преобразования всему человечеству, а хотят только управлять человечеством. Но кто дал право ограничивать остальных людей, пользоваться благами, созданными для всех? Конечно, змей — это табуированная тема, относящаяся в раздел зла, но, как я вам показал выше, всё, что было хорошее у человека, связано с змеем.
Кобра гигантская накрыла Будду от дождя и непогоды для проявления мудрости неземной. И вы скажете, это что зло? Нет, навязанные нарративы изменили сознание и восприятие в угоду шаблонности для простоты регулирования и управления. Но кто дал право лишать многогранного устройства, если основа знания приводит к процветанию и изменению общества в лучшую сторону? Много разных войн, переделов прошли за годы, века, но что самое интересное, люди, имевшие родоплеменную связь, раскинутую во временном понятии, шли друг на друга и всеми путями искореняли одну часть истории своей далёкой привязки в угоду возвышению своей.
Суть названий и фамилий на разных языках и трактовка истории с вырванными контекстами не меняет сам смысл, заложенный из прошлого в будущее. Но тогда, получается, мы видим древнюю фамилию с редактированной на новый лад, с сакральным заложенным смыслом, подчёркивая дань прошлого рода с указанием смысловой сути самого начала. И совмещение в единое целое понятия рода Куброта и мистического начала Змея, выраженное в едином целом в современной фамилии, показывает и говорит… Даже не знаю, как сказать, назвать, но попробую.
Может, легендарная хроника, основанная на мистической летописи, в современной суверенной саге, помня о фольклорной хронике, давая этнографической летописи, выстроив всю работу в мифотворческой истории, отображая суверенно-бытовую хронику, эпос, а может, просто мистико-исторический рассказ… Но в любом случае труды и знания, что мне переданы прошлыми поколениями, будут носить проявленный характер не только в разговорной речи из поколения в поколение, но и познакомят тех, кто не относился к нашей семье. Проявления справедливости или предначертанного находят выражение всегда. «Добро победит зло» говорит не просто о смене кого-то или чего-то, а интеграция нового в параллельном движении с действующей структурой указывает на возможность существования не только государства, религии, но движущего прогресса в научной структуре знаний в мировых масштабах как сакральных скреп самого быта и устройства человека на земле и не только.
А значит, Кобрак, Змей даёт возможность сообща выстроить столп, способный регулировать человеческое понятие через основы понимания и самоидентичность человека как общую структуру мирового развития. Только вы способны взвешенно подойти к новому конструктивному преобразованию себя и мира, но решение, надо вам это или нет, остаётся за вами. Создание с нуля на обломках прошлого даст нам силы и возможности. Ибо невозможно построить на лжи и убийстве истину, так и идёт рок бунтов, нападок. А сама суть Змея заложена в справедливости, объединении, собирательстве, создании условий улучшения жизни человечества. Мы видим на всём протяжении жизненного отрезка человечества, через что проходит человечество, и ужасаемся от пережитого и равнодушия от исторического восприятия.
Вы можете высказать как поддержку, так и критику. Узнать, как связаться, можете на http://kobrakov.com: ссылки на все мои каналы и «Мудрец.рф», где меня можно сопоставить по фотографии, видео с той информацией, что размещена на обложке книги, в самой книге и в просторах интернета, забив мою фамилию, имя. Или, например, Youtube-канал «Новости оппозиции, Константин Кобраков», тысячи аудиофайлов. Кстати, на сайте «Мудрец.рф» размещены все мои социальные сети и все сайты, а также мои работы (пока в бесплатном формате).
Цель данной работы — рассуждение и пояснение истории, той, что знаем, — должна привести к пониманию, сближению в спорящих вопросах. И самое главное — примирение именитых фамилий нынешнего с именитыми фамилиями прошлого. Перестать предавать забвению факты, что были, но неудобны, и за действия в прошлом другими именитыми людьми ожидая поддержания своих интересов в угоду попиранию истории других. История — неотъемлемая часть нашего прошлого и познавательная часть настоящей жизни, которая отобразит поступки в будущем. Значит, пришло время сказать, что история не должна прятать одни факты в угоду другим, что приводит к трудностям в понимании, объяснении самой истории.
Я должен не просто стоять на страже правды, но и быть гарантом, что никто не посмеет исказить историю в угоду своим личным интересам. В таком формате и подходе это не просто даст гарантии в обществе исторической справедливости, это значит, что энергия прошлого найдёт покой, перестанет будоражить настоящее своими желаниями проявить свою негативную энергию на тех, кто желает продолжать утаивать трагические действия, совершённые в толще вековых перипетий, которые не дают покою ни живым, ни мёртвым.
У нас с вами есть возможность начать новый этап, где власть, историки, народ смогут воссоединиться в новую форму жизненных возможностей, проявленных в концепции понимания самих процессов, как неизбежное действие в моменты эволюционного процесса самого социума в безграничных просторах в прошлом понимании человеческого развития. Осуждать и показывать пальцем на процессы становления любой из действующих структур власти в далёком прошлом не принесёт должного развития, так как временные процессы сумели перевернуть в некоторых городах, странах за этот длинный, если переводить на жизнь человека, но в тот же момент короткий с точки зрения исторических исследований, не одну форму правления и собственности. Ибо алчность не просто порок, а порабощающий вирус жадности, ненасытности, жестокости, меняющий мышление и понимание своей предназначенности в этом мире меркантильным интересам в угоду одного, создавая невыносимые условия другим.
И такое понимание себя как личности не приведёт к дальнейшему преобразованию людей, такое понимание будет тормозить и откладывать развитие общества для всеобщего прозрения, где ценности, богатства не имеют значения, а имеют лишь возможность для создания ещё лучших удобств и больших возможностей развития человека. Меня можете называть князь, хан, царь, властитель — это ни в коей мере не поменяет моё человеческое нутро, я так и останусь простым человеком, как все остальные люди на земле, из плоти и крови, наделённым мозговой деятельностью для всеобщего понимания и развития самой жизни. Возможность, что дана нам свыше, даёт шанс всему здравомыслящему пласту населения земли использовать такую возможность для благотворной жизни, деятельности, для эволюционного развития, и если это так и вы с этим согласны, так давайте не будем терять время для создания поистине райских условий в этом прекрасном, но в тот же момент жестоком мире для улучшения жизни, развития всего человечества, в котором труд будет мыслящим процессом неотъемлемой жизни, преобразования когнитивных возможностей.
Одним словом. друзья, вам решать, что вам надо в этой прекрасной жизни, где каждый из нас должен приносить пользу не только себе, но общественному пространству, социуму для всеобщего упрощения самого процесса жить и наслаждаться жизнью. Я могу только стать центром сближения, дать возможность коммуницировать любому, кто желает видеть новый прекрасный мир, что мы с вами сможем реализовать, что не будет иметь границ, языковых и религиозных барьеров — только истинность, которая способна объединить, примирить, создать условия всеобщей радости и любви. Энергия добра, понимания творит чудеса не только с человеком, но и миром, так что, я думаю, прозрение и понимание того, что я пишу, показывает искренность, а пока мы будем реализовывать наши цели.
И для этого есть платформа для общения «Мудрец.рф», не имеющая границ. Жду всех, пишите, мы создадим всеобщую память, выраженную в правде, способную привести нас в свободный, чистый мир настоящего, что даст залог процветания в будущем. Взглянем в свою сущность, в глубины истории, раздвинем границы правды, черпнём из недр забвения истину и справедливость для тех, кто рождал и создавал условия для процветания народов в единую целую структуру управления, на благо народов и возможностей, чьи заслуги вычеркнуты из памяти человечества необоснованно.
А к вам, друзья, обращаюсь за помощью. Я не умею читать линии по рукам, хиромантией, гаданиями не занимался, по внешнему виду ладони ничего не пойму. И прошу вас, что означает моя ладошка на фотографии? Можно детально рассмотреть. Может, расскажете о моём мире, заключённом в руке? Что говорят линии? Мне было бы интересно узнать, что знает народ о линиях, сами знаете, любопытство — порок всего человечества, и я не исключение.
Я думаю, после опубликования данной работы в стране в мире обратят внимание на то, что происходит, где справедливость историческая восторжествует, и забытый великий город в прошлом, Гнёздово, войдёт в список ЮНЕСКО, и историки в Российской Федерации с подачи президента страны Владимира Путина начнут глубинное понимание формирования Киевской Руси, беря во внимание все аспекты, не подходя выборочно к становлению самобытности прошлого в угоду политической конъюнктуре и развитию современного общества.
Тяжкие времена, гонения, междоусобицы, войны, репрессии, бунты — часть нашего прошлого. Дать возможность знать историю, ценить, понимать для предостережения новых поколений в ошибочных действиях к народам, что населяют великое государство. Современная Россия и не только несёт куда древнее происхождение, чем мы, люди земли, обладаем сейчас. В противном случае после исчезновения СССР Российская Федерация должна была начать своё исчисление с 1991 года, но мы видим, что ссылаемся на СССР, на Российскую империю, Киевскую Русь. Так объясните, почему не хотят рассказывать историю до 800-го года, 400-го года и так далее, чего боится страна, указывая на те факты, что хранит мир?
Мы давно живём в многонациональном государстве, многоконфессиональном, и не говорить о далёком прошлом просто кощунственно к самой истории. И то, как вы её цените, говорит о вашем отношении к самой стране, которая построена как самостоятельное государство, основываясь на той же истории. Так объясните, почему история становится выборочным инструментом, а не парадигматической основой жизни? Смута, непонимание всегда будут, пока не успокоятся прошлые поколения, что не могут найти себе место в исторических формулировках, описаниях, уважении, что дали возможность сформироваться будущему, жить благодаря им, но забвение выкинуло их, разорвав цепь событий для всеобщего благополучия в последующих событиях.
Со своей стороны я уже действую как руководитель Межрегиональной организации МУДРЕЦ («Международное управление делами русскоязычных евроазиатского центра»). С уставом можете ознакомиться на сайте «Мудрец.рф» в разделе «Общественная организация МУДРЕЦ» (без юридического лица помогает работать без финансовых отчётов, так как содержу за счёт своих средств, и 10 лет после подачи документов в Минюст России в Тульской области работает безупречно). В контексте данной организации и обсуждались вопросы правового характера с ныне покойным Андреем Владимировичем Бабушкиным (российский правозащитник, общественный и политический деятель, поэт, писатель, публицист). Он был председателем правозащитной организации «Комитет за гражданские права», членом Экспертного совета при уполномоченном по правам человека в Российской Федерации, членом общественного экспертного совета при уполномоченном по правам человека в Москве и других организаций. Приглашал на совместные обсуждения, и в части своих структур, и в московской Общественной палате решали насущные проблемы общества.
Но не все такие дальновидные люди, что думают о благополучии страны, государства и общества. Так и многократные подачи заявки на проведение митингов в Москве для решения насущных проблем в обществе, но мэрия Москвы постоянно отказывала, за исключением одного раза, и то по каким-то причинам станция метро была закрыта и митинг в полной мере не состоялся. Не буду перечислять разного рода действия, нацеленные на понимание в правовой системе отношения к обществу, но не надо забывать исторические события в прошлом, что играют ключевую роль в настоящем.
Готов открыть более направленную структуру именно в историческом направлении для консолидации граждан, общества, государственных структур и всей деятельности в данном направлении с юридическим лицом, где государственные структуры разных стран обратят внимание на проблемы исторической идентичности и выработки единого подхода к историческим преобразованиям. Но всегда находятся те, кто не хочет правды, консолидации. Ранее уже писал и президенту В. В. Путину о финансовой поддержке, и было направлено письмо из администрации президента в Минюст России с решением данного вопроса, но человек по фамилии Улюкаев отверг предложения своей недальновидностью, и мы видим, что судьба с ним поступила заслуженно за его деяния, раз он думал только о себе. Было время поработать в библиотеке, подумать. Думаю, он понял смысл, что прошлое не даст покоя тем, кто игнорирует вызовы в настоящем.
От совместной работы выиграют в большей мере государственные структуры, и промедление, понимание отразится на тех, кто не видит решение застаревшей проблемы как усугубление в будущем разного рода процессов в общественном сознании. Надеюсь, государство прислушается и поймёт, что проблема, что накапливалась тысячелетиями, и надо находить решение. В моём лице как гаранта всеобщего покоя… Не могу остаться безучастным в консолидации мира и стабильности. Как человек, что чтит и почитает наследие родоплеменного фактора, готов поставить точку, если в лице различных государств будет найден компромисс в делении истории, что принадлежит всему многонациональному народу, как в информационном поле, так и материальном, так как историей торговать нельзя. А государство, то, что есть в настоящем, как никто другой справится с сохранением наследия лучше всех, в совместном мониторинге многих вопросов, в решениях сможет послужить для консолидации в трудном, но вполне разрешимом деле. Как привыкли говорить, мяч на стороне государственных структур и президента страны.
Возможно, совместное решение всех насущных проблем через меня, Константина Александровича Кобракова, даст новые возможности, связи, объединения. Умение работать совместно в трудных вопросах приведёт к благополучию народов в целом и укреплению внутриполитических устоев. Консолидация общества, государств создаёт огромные возможности в нашем многонациональном мире для реализации самого человека, как фундамент для будущих возможностей самого человечества, а познание и почитание природы мира, в котором мы живём, есть основной постулат каждого. Формирование среды возможностей лежит в вас, осталось сплотиться, взяться за руки для консолидации энергетических, исторических возможностей, преобразовывая саму жизнь в упорядоченную суть, что лежит в простом понимании и вере в нечто огромное под названием Вселенная, что аккумулирует, формирует всё и вся. Нам остаётся только начать сплочённо подходить к любым вызовам негативного влияния на нас и нашу жизнь. Законодательство РФ позволяет создавать религиозные объединения. Они могут быть в форме религиозных групп и религиозных организаций на добровольное объединение граждан для совместного исповедания и распространения веры, которое не регистрируется в качестве юридического лица. Или религиозная организация — объединение, которое регистрируется в качестве юридического лица. Деятельность религиозных объединений регулируется Федеральным законом от 26.09.1997 № 125-ФЗ «О свободе совести и о религиозных объединениях».
Так что, друзья, если у вас есть взгляды глубже обычного существования, тут есть о чём задуматься. Но думаю, что будущее у нас есть. Желание жить в своей самобытности, законы имеются, а как поступите вы, я, примем решение в будущем. Сейчас я в поисках места для реализации общества будущего на основе свободных городов прошлого и равенства перед законом, что открывает огромные возможности жить счастливо в этом прекрасном мире.
Как обычно. закончу свою работу своими стихами.
История огромна и трудна в понятиях глобальных изменений,
Даёт узнать, какие были времена и кто несёт ответ
За сделанные в мире хорошие дела и ужас разрушений.
Любой захочет рассказать, но суть истории —
Не применить основу заблужденья,
Всю правду разъяснять через года, не разделяя нужные этапы.
Но вот скажите мне тогда, зачем не говорить всю правду
До конца в подборе нужных слов,
Когда народ желает знать, что происходит,
Какова история была, где факт откроет нам глаза?
Познать, кто мы, создать для мира новые блага,
Поднять на новый уровень себя,
Всё то, что создавали предки за века для процветания любых народов.
Наш дом — Земля, делить историю нельзя.
Откроем правду и глаза,
Почётом вспомним пережитые народом времена,
Для мудрости истории сорвём запреты правду говорить,
Увидим, вспомним нашу суть и с честью предкам поклонимся.
Открыв врата для истины народов в едином смысле бытия,
Единорог для мира дарит чудо, придут навечно золотые времена.
Сознание, душа найдёт покой в народном смысле торжества.
===================================================
Пользуясь возможностью хочу познакомить с каналами моей дочки, а также мой сайт WWW. МУДРЕЦ.РФ Буду рад всем
Заказать мои работы, книги можно только на сайте Мудрец.РФ, либо на официальных сайтах распространения книг, которые также указанны список только на сайте мудрец.рф. Счет в банки Российской Федерации для заказа моих книг с автотрофом, репродукций моих картин с автотрофом, открыт на мою жену Светлану Николаевну Филатчеву, вот её расчетный счет для перевода в рублях и в валюте уточняйте по телефону 7 999 781 7009 и только на неё ни каких других людей я не уведомляю на представительство моих интересов. Как поверенный и единственный кто может от моего имени продавать, реализовать мои работы. Связь со мной, получение аудиенции для помощи в разборе вашего внутреннего мира через расшифровку ваших жизненных информационных потоков, каналов, для средств массовой информации также только через Светлану Николаевну Филатчеву.
Виду работу в создании ИИ, роботостроение, экологической возобновляемой энергетики, разработка, внедрение современного доступного жилья, разработка и внедрение юридических механизмов защиты от коррумпированности, семейственности. Также всех желающих совместно развивать город будущего со всеми направлениями жизнеустройства пишите на электронную почту ( кратко) также только на сайте мудрец.рф. Желание в инвестиционном участие на данный момент ограничено и рассматривается индивидуально. Инвестиции будут в двух формах «привилегированная» - это когда инвестиция на долгий срок и «именные» инвестиции, что выкупаются( возвращаются) ежегодно и заново рассматривается участие инвестора. Обо всем вы сможете узнать на моих ИНТЕРНЕТ площадок, что указанны только на сайте МУДРЕЦ.РФ где озвучиваю только я, во избежание мошеннических действий третьих лиц, так я защищаю от влияния и обмана тех, кто желает будущее себе и окружающим.
По такой основе работает BlackRock, Inc. («БлэкРок») — американская международная инвестиционная компания . Моя цель и задача создать аналог со штаб квартирой в России если власти не будут мешать созданию проекта будущего. Для общения планирую создать внутренний мессенджер , так что друзья планов масса есть желание будем вместе создавать своё будущие
Также вы можете вступить в Межрегиональную организацию МУДРЕЦ как наблюдатель, впоследствии как член организации, по желанию можете оказать финансовую поддержку добровольно пожертвование , а членских взносы согласно устава на уставные цели но всё уточняйте.
Для удобства заказа книг К.А.Кобракова вот вам счета что указанны ниже в валюте что вас интересует или посмотрите на сайте МУДРЕЦ.РФ через Филатчеву Светлану Никалаевну
====================================
Получатель: ФИЛАТЧЕВА СВЕТЛАНА НИКОЛАЕВНА
Номер счёта: 40817156066000006550
БИК: 047003608 ИНН: 7707083893 : Для переводов в валюте ЮАНЬ ¥
Beneficiary name: FILATCHEVA SVETLANA NIKOLAEVNA
Beneficiary account: 40817156066000006550 Russian Federation
----------------------------------------------------------
Получатель ФИЛАТЧЕВА СВЕТЛАНА НИКОЛАЕВНА
Номер счёта: 40817933266000000294
БИК: 047003608 ИНН: 7707083893 : Для переводов в валюте BYN,
Beneficiary name: FILATCHEVA SVETLANA NIKOLAEVNA
Beneficiary account: 40817933266000000294 Russian Federation
============================================
Получатель: ФИЛАТЧЕВА СВЕТЛАНА НИКОЛАЕВНА
Номер счёта: 40817978466000019503
БИК: 047003608 ИНН: 770708389 : Для переводов в валюте €
Beneficiary name: FILATCHEVA SVETLANA NIKOLAEVNA
Beneficiary account: 40817978466000019503 Russian Federation
=============================================
Получатель: ФИЛАТЧЕВА СВЕТЛАНА НИКОЛАЕВНА
Номер счёта: 40817810166007069448
БИК: 047003608 ИНН: 7707083893 : Для переводов в валюте ₽
Beneficiary name: FILATCHEVA SVETLANA NIKOLAEVNA
Beneficiary account: 40817810166007069448 Russian Federation
===========================================
Получатель: ФИЛАТЧЕВА СВЕТЛАНА НИКОЛАЕВНА
Номер счёта: 40817840466000029029
БИК: 047003608 ИНН: 7707083893 : Для переводов в валюте $
Beneficiary name: FILATCHEVA SVETLANA NIKOLAEVNA
Beneficiary account: 40817840466000029029 Russian Federation
===========================================
Получатель: ФИЛАТЧЕВА СВЕТЛАНА НИКОЛАЕВНА
Номер счёта: 40817398466000000260
БИК: 047003608 ИНН: 7707083893 : Для переводов в валюте KZT
Beneficiary name: FILATCHEVA SVETLANA NIKOLAEVNA
Beneficiary account: 40817398466000000260 Russian Federation
нотация встовлять в книгу данные слова что на русском данное предложение не надо это чтоб было понятно вам
The theory of my vision expresses the conception of the human being and their latent capabilities — through the interaction of science and currently unexplained processes, with the potential for practical application in a broad sense, via in‑depth cognition and systematisation into a unified structure to simplify interaction with the source of knowledge.
This book unites various fields that converge at the intersection of science, philosophy, psychology, neuropsychology, quantum physics, energy, information, cosmology, and the theory of consciousness. It explains the processes of thinking and the perception of reality, drawing on an understanding of the human capabilities inherent by nature — and going beyond the limits of current scientific explanation. By grasping the essence and depth of cognitive capabilities and understanding the practical application of one’s own possibilities, this becomes a straightforward guide for a person’s adaptation within society. It uses humanity’s accumulated potential and the synthesis of knowledge as the foundation for the development of both the individual and society.
Currently, there is no unified scientific framework that expresses and integrates this new direction in human development. In this way, these innovations will lead to the systematisation of knowledge and the simplification of its retrieval, through the classification of a new scientific direction. Terms such as Humanae cognitionis (“the knowing human”), M.L.R.D. — МAN’S LANDSCAPE: RATIONALISING THROUGH DIDACTICS. Here, the human landscape within the individual, through rationalising didactic capabilities, explores how the environment surrounding a person — both the physical space and the conceptual space for thinking, activity, or the existence of a system, society, or management object — is formed, understood, and transmitted through the scientific and educational system. This occurs in conjunction with human values, beliefs, and social structures, all aimed at simplifying life. The metaphor signifies personal development and a person’s worldview in the use of their capabilities.
“simulation virtualisation” (S‑V) will enable the global community to search for the necessary information within the global structure of accumulated knowledge.
Man’s Landscape: Rationalising through Didactics
K. A. Kobrakov
«By recognising reality as a programme,
one becomes an independent programme within reality».
You can draw conclusions from what you’ve read, but remember that it’s impossible to realise your intentions without a scientific mindset. Only through the generation of knowledge and human capabilities, multiplied by desire, will eventually grow into a new kind of evolutionary human. In my reflections, I spent a long time thinking, applying and studying what kind or subspecies should reflect the reality of the new era in all its manifestations. I found nothing better to fundamentally justify my choice than Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing human”, who leads a philosophical view through the lens of objectivity. This approach uses the subject interacting with the object of cognition through its innate need to seek answers in curiosity, the ability to doubt and verify through generating new ideas, and passing knowledge on to others with adjustments based on what has been learned. All of this can be justified by obtaining information through the primary senses and hidden ones, followed by retention and practical application with analysis. This will enable the creation of new mental images based on experience to acquire new information — and so on, in an upward‑spiralling path towards self‑knowledge and understanding the world. The role of language as a tool of generalisation will create a supporting foundation in shaping thought within this new perspective of the human being — one that has evolved from Homo sapiens, the group of hominids of the genus “human” described by Carl Linnaeus in his 1735 work Systema Naturae as “the smart, reasonable human”, to Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing human”.
You might ask, who am I to make such a claim? It’s quite simple. At some point, someone has to make the decisions. And previously, man was ‘Skilled Man’ (Homo habilis or Australopithecus habilis), then ‘Working Man’ (Homo ergaster), followed by ‘Georgian Man’ (Homo georgicus), then ‘Upright Man’ (Homo erectus), then ‘Pioneer Man’ (Homo antecessor), then ‘Heidelberg Man’ (Homo heidelbergensis), followed by ‘Denisovan Man’ (Homo denisovensis), then ‘Neanderthal Man’ (Homo neanderthalensis), and finally ‘Thinking Man’ (Homo sapiens).
Thus, it is possible to integrate a new subspecies classification of humans into the new form of understanding the human being — based on their capabilities, knowledge, achievements, etc. Of course, this decision led me to introduce a new concept: Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing human”. This is because we are already embedded in a new epoch called the Anthropocene (from Ancient Greek ἄνθρωπος — “human” + Ancient Greek καινός — “recently appeared”). The term originates from the work of the Italian scientist Antonio Stoppani, who proposed the concept of the “Anthropozoic” in 1873. The American biologist Eugene Stoermer introduced the notion of the Anthropocene in the late 1980s, and the term gained widespread recognition thanks to the Dutch chemist Paul J. Crutzen, a Nobel Prize laureate, in 1995. In 2000, he popularised the new Anthropocene period. Following the global recognition of this concept, in 2016 the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) recommended officially recognising the Anthropocene as an epoch, with its beginning set at 1950.
You see, the idea of defining a specific time period or epoch is not mine. I am merely identifying a generalisation of the essence of events and applying research to a new distinguishing term in human perception — as a natural process of development. The main factor here is the impact on the environment where humans reside (the biosphere, atmosphere, hydrosphere, and lithosphere). This influence manifests in nature through human activity, expressed in its consequences: a sharp rise in population, increased resource consumption (plastics, fossils, trinitite, abhurite, etc.). Accordingly, we humans leave a footprint through our waste — amounting to 30 trillion tonnes — which shapes the technosphere. All these facts place us within new frameworks of understanding, responsibility, realisation, and so on — in life itself, for everything and everyone.
Thus, the new term for defining the human — Humanae cognitionis (“the knowing human”) — can well take its place as a continuation of our designation on Earth, in accordance with the changes of epochs and the prevailing conditions on the planet. As a result, we arrive at the new epoch, the Anthropocene, where the human Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing human” — masters an integrated system of scientific conclusions and accumulated knowledge, expressed in M.L.R.D. — Man’s Landscape: Rationalizing through Didactics. Here, the human landscape within the individual, through rationalising didactic capabilities, explores how the environment surrounding a person — both the physical space and the conceptual space for thinking, activity, or the existence of a system, society, or management object — is formed, understood, and transmitted through the scientific and educational system. This occurs in conjunction with human values, beliefs, and social structures, all aimed at simplifying life. The metaphor signifies personal development and a person’s worldview in the use of their capabilities.
But don’t forget the main point: when you are able to develop your brain and your capabilities, you will have to face what lies within yourself — and how it will affect you, not to mention those around you. If you are ready to make a choice, then go ahead — but remember that you will no longer be able to remain who you were before you started looking at the world more deeply. The work itself provides an opportunity to acquaint as many people as possible with the processes that surround us. It is available in electronic form in a completely free version for public reading on certain platforms that have their own audience, following agreement with me, for a specific period of time specified by me, the author.
All I can do is share my experience, knowledge, and skills. This effort is aimed at helping others master new things and fostering a more stable, culturally educated community. You can call it mentoring, volunteer‑based training, online classes, or coaching — whichever you prefer. Local initiatives for comprehensive support of others reduce social barriers, accelerate adaptation, increase trust levels, and build a culture of mutual aid. Inspired by the fulfilment of personal duty, they create conditions of accessibility for a wide range of people — and, most importantly, for older adults — who can thereby improve their daily lives and overall well‑being.
I am also preparing an audiobook for release in the online space, but it will be distributed on a paid basis via online platforms. I will announce the details later on my channels and on the website Mudrets.rf («Мудрец.рф») for Russian‑speaking audiences. As for the printed version without an autograph, no major platforms have yet made offers to publish it. It will be released only on an individual basis — for connoisseurs or collectors. You can purchase a book with a personal autograph — a real signature — and with an inscription indicating who the book is intended for. This will increase its value in any library. I am focusing on expanding the book’s reach online to make it accessible to a wider audience, so that the knowledge it contains remains with you forever.
There are many advantages to the printed version. I will personally sign each book individually, leaving not just an autograph but, if you wish, a message of no more than 150 characters (excluding my details) provided by you. The text should be legible, moral, and decent if you send it. For information sent in a language other than Russian, please specify which language you have used so that it can be translated into Russian. Send all requests only to the email address rf.pravo@mail.ru (listed in the book and duplicated on the website Mudrets.rf). Please attach a photocopy of the payment receipt, stating the date and time of the transfer to the account, along with the purpose of the transfer and the sender’s details. The account details are listed only on the website Mudrets.rf and at the end of the book. Prices may vary depending on the quality of the book: softcover, hardcover, leather‑bound, gold-embossed, etc. The book will be sent by post to the full postal address you provide (including the postal code) and the recipient’s name. Shipping costs — specifically, the cost of sending the book to you — are also borne by you. The cost of postage is individual and depends on the type of postal service selected.
In 2026, books can be sent via cash on delivery to Russia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Moldova, and Belarus. Payment is made upon receipt — this does not apply to me as the sender. If you do not receive the book, it will be resent to the same address with an additional fee for courier services. For other countries, please inquire about and add the shipping cost to the courier’s fee. The signed book itself is free of charge — it is a gift — but you can only receive it by placing an order via email at rf.pravo@mail.ru (this is duplicated only on the website Mudrets.rf) and by using a postal service with a minimum courier delivery fee of 3 000 RUB. This amount (3 000 rubles) covers the courier service to the postal office — specifically, the courier’s work.
Friends, in Russia there is a domain structure hosting the website Mudrets.rf. Search engines in other countries have difficulty displaying this site. For users outside Russia, it is better to search for mudrec.rf kobrakov in your search engine. This way you will find my channels and be able to access the limited‑access zone — since Russian platforms do not share all information in global reach in the Russian language. I also have a website in the .com domain. You can access all my channels, Mudrets.rf, and contact me via http://kobrakov.com . All my works are available to read for free in the online space on my platforms. Personal meetings, appointments, and phone consultations are available only by prior arrangement. Please check the process for communication, conversations, and consultations on the Mudrets.rf website.
The foundation of M.L.R.D. does not impose views, judgments, or reflections. If you have no desire to learn something — there is no need to do so; as the saying goes, “love cannot be forced”. But if there is a desire, it leads to reasoning, reflection, and logical actions at the right time — to achieve goals and complete set tasks. This improves daily life, the standard of living, and the surrounding environment. Of course, this is difficult for most people due to a weak thought process, unwillingness to make an effort, and inability to use acquired knowledge — compounded by a lack of implementation of one’s plans and multiplied by the difficulty of expressing oneself as an individual. A person remains in the shadow of their own potential and of society as a whole. The blurring of personality promotes a generalised approach to life and to all of society’s problems — including those affecting you personally. As a result, there is fear in one’s actions and decisions, with the majority often yielding to the minority — which affects social movements in society. This pattern leads to the entrenchment of corruption, nihilism, fear, laziness, and the fear of expressing oneself as an individual — in defiance of the moral principles laid out in the postulates. Consequently, societal degradation becomes inevitable, leading to the loss of rights, freedoms, desires, opportunities, freedom of mind, spirit, and conscience.
Being true to oneself and being an individual within society — this kind of reflection is not given to everyone to understand, let alone to answer for oneself, or to build around oneself a rational core of informational opportunities. Here, the pursuit of knowledge can help create better conditions in life itself. If you do not understand and have no desire to grasp what this discourse is about, do not think about it, do not strain yourself — if you are not ready. Go watch a boxing match, relax in the way you are used to, or do something else. You have clearly rushed into engaging with the reasoning presented here — and even more so into applying it to your own life, not to mention to the society you live in — as this information will leave a strong imprint on you. But if you understand the meaning of what was said at the beginning of these works — expressed in letters that carry meaning — this speaks volumes about your inner thought processes, which have no boundaries or fences. Are you ready to say who you truly are, how to realise yourself, to take the first steps towards your bright future — without wasting energy in vain? Are you ready to restore your inner energetic world, to understand the cause‑and‑effect relationship, and, as a result, to put the “new you” into practice?
Freedom of thought is the most powerful thing at the very core of our being, and the loss of such qualities will inevitably impact the system as a whole. While it is impossible to avoid the structural collapse of society in the long term, the weakening of the individual — in favour of developing the human capabilities of a certain group under the control of the ruling class — can progress at a gigantic pace. To maintain the thinking stratum amid the real context of ongoing events, discoveries, and achievements, this work has been created as an auxiliary tool for interaction and cognitive development — regardless of external challenges and influences on the individual, the observer, and the society of observers. I cannot say that validity will answer all the questions I raise — specifically for you — but reasonableness, concreteness, and practical applicability address all the issues under study. Here, the cause‑and‑effect relationship shows that reasoning and application have a justified expression across internal, external, substantive, and constructive criteria — whether in psychology, biology, or in physical and mathematical concepts. Creating conditions for change in one’s inner state translates to external aspects and principles, linking to the process of self‑construction and shaping the surrounding world through active knowledge. By exploring processes with practical applicability, we can interpret and forecast reality as part of self‑development. Opportunity is given to everyone, and each person has their own capacity for the thinking process within M.L.R.D.
And I, as a person living alongside you, was born on 5 August 1977, in a country that no longer exists — the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Since then, human opportunities have changed dramatically — not only in technological terms, but also in everyday life, moral values, social structures, and information access. Freedom of speech and attitudes towards sexuality have reached a new level of understanding — not to mention financial opportunities. In this context, each person carries their own framework of understanding everything, regardless of external circumstances, possessing only their own criteria for what is acceptable to the individual — irrespective of the public space.
Thus, the concept of what is intended and its realisation are expressed in what seem to us like random variations — but such judgments will not lead us to an answer. It is impossible to reveal the essence or explain the entire process. It was also impossible to find literature based on brain activity, and the development of knowledge about the brain was not widespread. However, since 1991 — when I began my personal development — it became possible to read foreign books, although they were still scarce. With the spread of the Internet, everything became easier, and I was able to supplement my observations with the works of others. Of course, the exchange of information is the key to humanity’s development. The next step is to learn how to process and assimilate it faster. I’m not sure how this is possible, but I was able to quickly grasp ongoing processes. Perhaps this is connected to the lack of available information: my brain started searching for hypothetical solutions out of curiosity, multiplied by laziness. This was due to the constant effort invested in any given action — where it became clear that these efforts could be reduced.
You might call me an innovator, but I did not change the system or come forward with proposals. I chose to observe and see what’s what — where things would lead and how they could be changed. Over time, I realised that I was simplifying some things, while others made life itself more complicated — and, by the way, this was directly related to my own actions, multiplied by their practical application in society as a way of expressing myself and my desires.
By the way, on 15 August 1977 — just after my birthday — something unimaginable happened on Earth: people detected a strong narrow‑band radio signal. Dr. Jerry Ehman received a code consisting of numbers and letters, described by scientists as “6 EQUJ 5”. The essence of this received signal carries great significance for us across time — but what exactly it means remains a mystery. The letters spark a vast range of assumptions, while the numbers 6 and 5 invite various theories. One might hypothesise that these numbers mark when human development began, or perhaps they point to a future year of great importance for human evolution — a moment significant on a universal scale. Maybe they indicate the year when an important person will be born, or was born. But we can only speculate — these are just numbers. Should we expect something? Should we rejoice at this event? Or is there something else? The essence remains the essence, and perhaps someday someone will reveal the meaning of this signal. Since it happened, we can consider this event a sign of informational nature for all humanity. It seemed extremely disrespectful to me not to mention this event — out of respect for the information itself, the event, and its potential implications.
If we are going to talk about informational opportunities, facts, phenomena, and incidents — since an event exists, we know it and are aware of it, but we do not understand its meaning. As a result, until we discover its true purpose, what is obvious will remain unclear to us. I have supported my conclusions and reasoning with the findings of more than a hundred outstanding individuals around the world — people who, subconsciously and indirectly, unknowingly participate in a system abbreviated as M.L.R.D., conceived as a global structure of all humanity. In what follows, I will decode this concept, provide an explanation and clarification of the name itself — for the new designation of the term M.L.R.D. in science, everyday life, and culture. I will explain why I chose this particular word, and what purpose it serves in the scientific community. It is an abbreviation, yet at the same time it functions as a full‑fledged, self‑sufficient word — one that is actively used not merely as an acronym. You will come to understand that without M.L.R.D., the further development of humanity is impossible in its full use.
I drew my insights into the depths from various written works and saw many different things. I noticed that, for example, Tengrism, Christianity, Buddhism, and Islam share many common elements — yet at the same time they are fragmented. I tried to understand science and religion, multiplied by my own capabilities. This led me to new perspectives — by generalising rather than singling out. At first, I did not realise how M.L.R.D. affects a person. You don’t notice this at school — everything there is simple: be strong, go compete for the school’s honour while everyone else is taking tests; join the pioneer organisation’s active group; participate in clubs like YuIDD GAI (the Young Inspectors of Road Safety) and amateur performances; meanwhile, go to DOSAAF (Army, Air Force and Navy Volunteer Society) for shooting practice, feeling grown‑up; improve your body through various martial arts and self‑defence skills; learn to paddle kayaks; master mountaineering and orienteering; join various technical clubs. This way, you are honoured everywhere, everyone knows you, you are at the top — but everything else is decided by your parents. However, when you enter the adult social circle, everything changes.
At 16, I got a summer job with a construction crew and acquired my first professions: carpenter, then joiner, bricklayer, and rigger. I realised that it’s good to be physically strong in your youth — everything is simple and solves all problems. This understanding, multiplied by knowledge and the ability to process it, laid the foundation for all my further transformations. At the same time, I had opportunities to interact with the opposite sex — I simply saw no obstacles. Fame, recognition, and reputation — even if not on a global scale — made me feel truly successful. And back then, I only knew the basic elements of M.L.R.D., without understanding its full depth. At 18, I became a private entrepreneur: I produced souvenirs and lighting fixtures. At 19, my life began to change dramatically — I never again worked for someone else just to get a salary. This gave me the opportunity to understand the underlying structures more deeply. At 21, I was the owner of a shopping unit, food stalls, and a commercial equipment manufacturing business. Thus, physical labour, communication, knowledge, and reflection lead to cultural development and self‑transformation. The ability to do things quickly, skillfully, and beautifully — without spending much time or financial resources — as well as the skill to organise and calculate everything, becomes second nature.
Anyone interested in me can see my home — which looks like a castle — on my YouTube channel, «Новости Оппозиции Константин Кобраков» (“News of the Opposition: Konstantin Kobrakov”). I’ll tell you that I built it entirely on my own in just one year, including the interior finishing. Also, on the website Mudrets.rf, there are various photos of my houses — which I also built single‑handedly — to help understand the meaning of labour and gather one’s thoughts. I tested how the M.L.R.D. system itself works in reality. In this process, not a single professional builder stepped onto the property. The electricians only brought the power supply to the utility pole, and the water utility company only extended the water line to the basement. Imagine doing all the work entirely on your own — without counting on anyone’s help — because you have deliberately chosen to put the M.L.R.D. work into practice. The house is 13 metres tall, with three full storeys — and all of this can be built by one person. At nearly 50 years old — in just 1 year! This is to illustrate how one can manage their own capabilities. This was taught to me by my understanding of M.L.R.D.
The pursuit of knowledge and the desire to understand — by going deeper — opens up more and more opportunities. Imagine this: at the moment, I have been living with my better half for a full 21 years. In December 2026, it will be 22 years — and out of those, I have spent 20 full years inseparable from her, constantly by her side, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We value and respect each other. After 17 years of living together — while enjoying each other’s company — we decided to have a child. Now I have an almost five‑year‑old child. We’ve travelled around the world. I am engaged in human rights advocacy: I fight against arbitrariness, take legal action against the authorities, and demonstrate the state of law enforcement. I point out corruption, failure to uphold the law, “telephone justice”, and the loose interpretation of legal norms.
Once again, all of this has been made possible by the knowledge I have gained. I have started writing more poetry, creating paintings, working on sculptures, and designing landscapes — as a hobby. I have also restored my health. As an example, I managed to get rid of two spinal hernias — at a time when I could not lift anything heavy — and much more. I have transformed my financial well‑being by harnessing the flows and managing the energy structure that surrounds us — and doing so in a way that practical application in one’s own interests does not harm others.
I am now nearly 49 years old — just a few months short of it — and it’s the year 2026. I see that life is just beginning, and everything I’ve lived through has simply been part of my development — preparing me for mature life. I write books, expressing my arguments through scientific research. For example, I am communicating with you in this very material. I also have other works — not only in Russian, but in English as well. Here are some of my works:
A Collection of Fairy Tales and Poems. K. A. Kobrakov, BBK 83.8, UDC 087.5, К55 ISBN 978–5–4492–0960–3;
The events are unfolding so rapidly: my daughter wrote a book and is now in contention to be recognized as the youngest author in the world — she wrote the book at the age of four, and in principle, she already holds that title; we just need to sell 1 000 copies, and the title is in the bag. I’ve had to add to the book that she’s also managed to start using M.L.R.D., and I’m helping her with that. This means the energy surrounding me is being passed on to others — it doesn’t just bear fruit, it actually works, if you know how to draw on that energy. Here’s her book — “Tales about GreBoRuk in Russian and English”. UDC 087.5, BBK 83.8, К55 V.–A. K. Kobrakova, co‑author K. A. Kobrakov. 2026. — p. 8. ISBN 978-5-4492-0998-6
«Аргументация Наследия Истории Тамги Сакральной Идентичности». К. А. Кобраков, 2026 год, ISBN 978–5–4492–0989–4;
The Argumentation of the Tamga’s Historical Heritage as a Sacred Identity. K. A. Kobrakov, 2026, ISBN 978–5–4492–0990–0;
МИР ЛИЧНОСТИ РАЦИОНАЛИЗИРУЮЩЕГО ДИДАКТИКОЙ К. А. Кобраков , 2026 год ISBN 978–5–4492–0991–7
I plan to publish poetry, legal intricacies, architectural and construction research, and more. I post my works on the website Mudrets.rf and other book‑oriented platforms, clearly indicating where each piece can be found — with specific references to Mudrets.rf. The goal is to make this content freely available to the public — for unification and shared growth. The main aim is to introduce as many people as possible to this information, to foster universal development, and to encourage its practical application. Whether you choose to do so or not is entirely up to you — it makes no difference to me. It’s your choice. In short, I’ve shown what one can achieve by leveraging the potential of M.L.R.D. — and I believe there are no limits to it. I continue to live and see what the future holds, how I can influence the environment I’m in, and how the world around us — and the people in it — shapes who we are by other selves. But don’t forget: if you step beyond common understanding, or grasp more than others do, you will always be under the watchful eye of the “big brother” — who stands guard over their own interests and seeks to assess your capabilities, financial well‑being, and so on. After all, anyone with the ability to stand out is always of interest to those who wish to control and understand society itself.
I won’t give many examples — you already know them anyway. For instance, Porfiry Korneyevich Ivanov will give you an answer: he shows how people in power have always watched and observed him, satisfied with studying him as a phenomenon. Let me say this directly to the skeptics: a new way of looking at the world reveals that society, on a global scale, tends to exclude undesirable people from the category of those worthy of respect — and begins to identify “deviations” in them through mental and physical measures. For example, an addictive deviance, when a person abuses alcohol or other substances, or a delinquent deviance: actions that violate the law — such as violence, fraud, theft, hooliganism. Asocial deviance: violations of moral norms, expressed, for instance, in vagrancy, prostitution, and many other behaviours. All of this is considered unacceptable — but the situation changes dramatically when those who have the power to manipulate the system at will engage in the same actions. Those who are supposed to uphold morality and enforce the law somehow become far less active. In this system, “deviations” are not attributed to the favoured ones — through mental and physical pressure — and this pattern repeats itself all the way up the vertical of power.
Each of you has seen trials of major corruption figures — and how those with status are punished. Take the case of Jeffrey Edward Epstein, as reported in the media. The approach is selective: if the person is favoured, the eyes are simply turned away. Is it corruption — or are they just too busy to deal with everything? Meanwhile, certain information must not be disclosed. How “caring” they all are! Yet a military conflict with real victims doesn’t raise any concerns — even if a missile hits a school and children die. But if you are unfavoured — and especially if you stand for truth, strength, and skill — you’ll end up like Ernesto Che Guevara. Then everyone rushes to act quickly, eager to report: “Everything is under control!” Or it goes like this: first, a person is deemed unfavoured, then declared guilty, then eliminated — and only later do people have an awakening, realising what was done to someone who carried the truth. Just as it happened with Jesus Christ, who expressed the divine path.
Now, think about this: we all understand and know everything — yet freedom remains restricted, out of fear of losing control over society and the ability to manage it. Recall the man who shot people in the Moscow supermarket “Ostrov” on Shipilovskaya Street. He didn’t just have status — he had the entire support structure behind him. And if it weren’t for the leaked CCTV footage, no one would know how the very narrative of what happened would have unfolded. We heard how, in his defence, they claimed he had had a quarrel with his wife. What a fine argument for justification — when you have the powerful on your side to save you! Or let’s recall Austria: the escape from the Mauthausen concentration camp. Later, we learned about the Mühlviertler Hasenjagd (the “Mühlviertel Hare Hunt”) — a war crime in which 410 people who had escaped from the camp were brutally murdered, while only 9 managed to survive. And some of those responsible for such acts — for hunting and killing — received just 1.5 years in prison, while others were even pardoned. Take a moment to reflect on life itself — not just on your own opportunities for personal gain.
At the outset, there is a generalisation of many facts, pieces of knowledge, and historical concepts — all aimed at achieving a global understanding, setting the right mindset, reasoning, weighing things up, and perceiving reality as it is, not as a fantasy. You should remember that life remains life — regardless of you and your desires. However, how you live it depends on your actions, the consequences that follow, and your awareness of everything you will have to face and endure — as a tool for opportunities that are meant to lead to your own awakening.
All those who are ready to immerse themselves in a world that is unimaginable yet obvious — a world accessible to only a few people, either due to their innate preparedness or through their own efforts — are those on the planet who are willing to transform themselves: not just their own selves, but also their surroundings and the very nature of understanding everything. They can provide a logical explanation, cultivate positivity, joy, and harmony — multiplied by health, happiness, and love — all supported by material blessings and financial independence. This creates a new individual, confident in themselves, or an observer. Far more people can unlock their abilities than we might imagine — but the very essence of understanding can only be grasped by you yourself. I can guide, suggest, offer advice, or simply provide support in this seemingly simple yet unique endeavour. To awaken is not the same as to understand, and to understand is not the same as to awaken. To awaken means to see something new, something previously incomprehensible. It takes time and effort to comprehend what has been seen, to grasp the very process unfolding before you, and to provide a reasoned description of its practical application.
Understanding what is actually happening is possible as an action and reaction — but the practical application does not allow you to grasp the structure of how things work, due to the inability to use what you perceive as possible, and due to a lack of knowledge about how to implement it. Learning to use understanding and application is the foundation of control and transformation — both of the physical (material) and the non‑material. Learn to control the logical chain of events in a spatial context, starting with small things. Learn to manage time in your actions, to receive and give back what you have learned. I am glad that someone has decided to pick up these hand‑crafted materials — created and shaped over years, woven through an entire lifetime — and to give you the opportunity to look at the world in a way that, in my view, may carry a meaning and representation in a form we thought we knew, but perhaps did not fully comprehend. It is possible to change your life — and these abilities lie within everyone who wishes to transform the state of things.
If you disagree with anything presented here, or if you wish for something more — and if you have the potential for growth — please feel free to share your thoughts on what you’ve read. I would greatly appreciate it if you could leave your feedback in the future on the website Mudrets.rf. The book is currently available there for free reading, and you can find the email address rf.pravo@mail.ru listed on the site. In the dedicated section, you can submit your opinion for comprehensive review — with a note at the beginning of your message indicating whether your comment may be published or not. You can also search for my information online (Konstantin Alexandrovich Kobrakov), which is featured on the book cover, inside the book itself, and across the internet. For example, the YouTube channel “News of the Opposition: Konstantin Kobrakov” contains thousands of audio files. By the way, all my official social media accounts and websites are listed on Mudrets.rf. If you come across a page, post, or channel online that is not listed on Mudrets.rf, it is not affiliated with me. Such accounts may be run either by well‑meaning individuals who wish to share my knowledge to expand the community of supporters, or by scammers trying to mislead you — aiming to deceive and exploit you for illicit purposes.
Let me repeat: all my official pages are duplicated only on the website Mudrets.rf, which belongs to my family (i.e., to me). This is the only place where I publish all my official online profiles. And most importantly — I never collect money and never ask anyone to transfer funds to me under any seemingly legitimate pretext. Please remember this. My books will always clearly state what I am doing, what’s new, and what my plans are. Only on Mudrets.rf you will find my social media accounts and the books I have written. I believe you will easily figure this out and protect yourself. The information about my identity and where I am officially present guarantees that you will not be scammed by fraudsters or unscrupulous individuals impersonating me.
Also, my dear friends — let me call you that for the sake of a comfortable dialogue — I have deliberately chosen not to go into depth about the works of other people I refer to. I summarise my work by informing you about their views and concepts (there are about 200 such people), adding my own simple and concise conclusions — specifically, what I have understood from their works. I support my arguments not only with my own reflections, but also with published works from outstanding individuals around the world over many years. This way, you can better understand the meaning of the work I have created — a work that exists independently of our understanding. However, structuring and bringing everything together is the main task: the labour that makes it easier to apply and comprehend everything I express in my texts.
The very essence of the thought embedded in the text — in my interpretation, the summaries of insights and possibilities I refer to — can be easily grasped by you in its condensed form. You will be able to verify that everything is real, and we simply failed to understand the obvious — what surrounds us and how fundamentally simple it all is. If, of course, you have any doubts or misunderstandings, you can freely build your own chain of actions and judgments. Having your own perspective is always important — but do not forget about the facts. This world needs those who share my view — to create a universal mind within a single shared space, grounded in research supported by scientific facts. And the more of us there are, the faster the evolution of the human species will occur. New cognitive spaces and information hubs of the universal mind will emerge, and a community of people will be established — one without borders, language barriers, religious divisions, cultural or political differences. For everything that is done on Earth is created through collective subconscious action.
We need to come together into a unified system of interaction, and we should create a spatial opportunity for establishing connections. I believe that the platform Mudrets.rf will take on this task: it will build the entire structure for improvement, secure communication, sharing information, development, and knowledge — creating good on a cosmic scale. If desired, it will also be possible to establish a physical centre — as a venue for temporary presence — to facilitate the process of creating opportunities and integrating them into a unified structure based on the past. In the past, there existed entire free cities dedicated to the advancement of scientific research, creative exploration, and spiritual development — all without harming generally accepted norms and beliefs.
Now you can see why I spent so long writing down my conclusions. I wanted to rely on those who thought the same way I do — but not just in words, which many people question. In a scientific framework, the concepts behind my ideas gain real support, recognised by the global community. This demonstrates the validity of my judgments, backed by scientific research. The similarity of people’s thoughts reveals a certain doctrine in a specific direction. It is about matching what has been proven in terms of applicability with effective action — for the benefit of the experimenter. Therefore, at the beginning of my reasoning, I wish to invite each of you: if you have or develop an understanding of the meaning and knowledge that you have rediscovered in this area, please go deeper into my ideas. Try, together and based on my conclusions, to collectively develop a deeper comprehension, to uncover the profound meaning that I may not have fully articulated, and to supplement my work with your own arguments. Then, together, we can find the keys to truth, create simplicity in life, and — while enjoying beauty, creating works of art, scientific works, and architectural marvels — immerse the world in love. We will delve into the depths of the universe, creating a new world and new global beauties through our constructive influence — in a decent, creative direction. We will embed meaning and knowledge into simple, accessible information.
Wishing to acquaint you with my long‑term observations — which have taken shape in the space of life — I have structured, understood, and supported them throughout my long life, dividing it into different stages: childhood, adolescence, youth, and now, at the peak of my 50th year. I have been able to formulate and complete everything I have collected over the past 35 years — based on meaning, knowledge, perception, and practical application. All this work follows a progression from the simple to the more complex. The cognitive load and the demands on perception grow more challenging with each new turn — and there are many such turns. A deeper understanding of everything emerges as a result. But remember: the essence of what is written here provides the foundation for perception and comprehension. It expands your horizon — which in itself elevates you in the thought process, helps you create new connections, and transforms you as a person. It offers the opportunity to delve deeper into the depths of thought — while the depth of understanding depends on your mental abilities and desires, and on how well you can motivate yourself.
Although the brain grows until the age of 32, this does not affect its internal connections after that age. The brain reaches its final form — but its internal connections remain flexible and plastic. The possibilities for application are virtually unlimited, provided you have the understanding and the desire to change yourself in the direction you have prioritised for your development. For many years, it was believed that the brain’s capabilities ended with its physical growth — a view I always considered mistaken, and one I strived to demonstrate to others, using myself as an example. But at the end of 2025, new discoveries emerged — discoveries I had not known about and could not have countered with my previous arguments, even by referencing qualified experts or established institutions. This once again helped me confirm my assumptions, which I have realised in my works and writings. I am also glad that I can reference such works — although it has required me to constantly revise my book over the course of decades. Read on — but do not rush to skim through the text or jump ahead. Sequentiality is the key to success, just like building a house: you cannot erect the walls if there is no foundation.
At the beginning of my conclusions, I decided to prepare your impatient mind for a simple yet unusual detail: I have included some of my sayings — though not all of them. If you read the statements that highlight my understanding of life — an understanding rooted in simplicity, describing a structure with deep meaning, supported by knowledge that provides answers to the subsequent material in a straightforward form — you will have time to reflect: do you even need to continue reading and developing, given your own views? Perhaps you already know all this, and my notes hold no value for you. As one proverb goes, only one person has a headache‑free head and a simple life. Who that person is, and who the saying refers to — that is for you to decide. My sayings will help you understand how I think and what I aim to express through my words. You could say this is a small test: it summarises the structure of inner understanding and comparison. Share your impressions of life and the practical application of reality — in relation to the depth of thought embedded in these sayings.
Do not fear mistakes: you cannot stop making them unless you learn from them.
Life becomes happy when we create it ourselves, regardless of all the difficulties.
Life is always a difficult test for us, but we should overcome every hard phase to grow stronger.
To understand the world around you, you should first understand yourself.
The most beautiful things arise from darkness and gloom — just like chernozem, the rich black soil.
Be grateful for every joy — it makes your life more beautiful and gives you a reason to live.
Listen to your heart, guided by your inner state, and you will always make the right choice in life.
The greatest love is the one we choose for our lives — the one without which we cannot live.
A successful life is one we shape ourselves, finding pleasure in what we do.
Life’s challenges help us understand life and avoid mistakes that could hold us back.
We spend our lives striving to create the conditions that will bring us freedom and independence.
Understanding how to live lies in everyday deeds, enriched by the wisdom passed down through generations.
You cannot be truly courageous without facing fear.
Every brave person should face the test of fear.
Past actions give us understanding of what we’ve done.
Those who love do not wait for a reward — they give to others fully.
Earthly happiness surrounds us everywhere, but each person chooses for themselves what will make them truly happy.
To be happy means to be in harmony with the natural balance that lies within you.
Finding happiness means uncovering your inner world — one that is ready to share with those around you.
Living means diving deep into every hidden corner of the challenges that lie ahead.
Enjoy life now — don’t postpone living.
Finding your soulmate is like starting a journey — one where every minute is meant to be savoured.
We cannot alter the events that come our way, but we can embrace them — balancing what unfolds with a warm heart and a clear, rational mind.
Any actions taken in the past give us understanding of those circumstances, helping us weigh the outcomes and insights we gain in the present.
K. A. Kobrakov
Naturally, many everyday expressions carry deep meanings that can be elaborated upon in treatises, works, and writings. The perfection of humanity is not far off — it already lies in the foothills. The path that humanity is following remains largely hidden from society itself, yet it is quite obvious to those who seek a sacred understanding of existence. Personal development — with its vast potential — is a gift we receive at birth. Each person can embark on the journey of self‑realisation, cultivating their inner state through cognitive growth and mindful, practical action applicable to any life situations and challenges. Yet even in this context, we should not forget about good and evil. At present, evil has every opportunity for quick realisation, unlike good, which chooses a difficult, thorny path — but possesses a creative foundation for the subsequent multiplication of the global living whole. The foundation of human manifestation always lies within the individual themselves and shapes all subsequent expressions. At the core is always the success of the individual — in all forms of expression, demonstration, implementation, and realisation. It is present in everything that surrounds us, and there is nothing that can exist without success. We will always align our aspirations and desires with this significant word and concept.
Therefore, you and I will begin from this very notion of success — as a foundation for gradual self‑development, so that in the future we may grow into something vast, imbued with energy, knowledge, strength, and the ability to transform and conquer — by applying our capabilities in various fields where human understanding exists.
At the initial stage of self‑formation, as you ascend the ladder of enlightenment, you will find your own path. You will decide when you have had enough — and you will be able to shape your life, beautifully transforming the structure of your set goals and aspirations. However, such changes cannot immediately affect global spaces. To achieve that, one should go through a long journey of self‑knowledge and development — starting with minimal influence on the society in which you exist, a society that can eventually accept the new version of you. Yet the choice always remains with you — and this alone changes the conceptual approach to your worldview as an individual within society. Perhaps you have had a fleeting thought: where is the fact, the guarantee of the validity of the material described here? Is what you are reading truly applicable — and can it lead to real results? Such a conclusion should be supported by actual real‑world implementations — by information in the real space called «your life in society». Here, the reality of application and personal growth is expressed through constructive development in all senses — not through tautological reasoning.
Let me say this right away: if you truly wish to understand and apply what is written here, the results will not keep you waiting. But if you think you can skim through this book quickly and expect the results to come on their own, you will be disappointed. Most likely, either you are not ready — or you will simply return to the beginning and start reading the book all over again. The more times you read the material, the deeper you immerse yourself in the core meaning — understanding what you have already grasped and reinterpreted through your own perception of the world.
I will briefly describe my own life: like you, I wanted to change my future, realising that not everything is as people say — or that something essential is being left unsaid in the very essence of life. Trying to understand life without first understanding yourself — as a successful person — often leads to self‑confusion. This triggers a rebellion of consciousness, a refusal to accept the imposed structure of existence, which then manifests through new actions. The obligation to conform to outdated stereotypes — which lag behind reality due to the constant evolution of the system and the selective nature of society — exerts constant pressure on you and your place in the world. It creates inequality, and often you fall behind in all aspects of the information space. Growth and development are unique for each person. It is up to you to define and defend your peak of achievement. No one can tell you what you need — and even if someone does, you will question their conclusions. You will consider the judgments of those who tell you how to live as simplistic or inadequate.
In this book, I will not reveal everything to you. I have decided that many possibilities can weaken, corrupt, and tempt — causing harm not only to others but also to oneself. However, firmness or an inner core — based on inner strength, multiplied by rational interpretation — can either be innate or developed to comprehend this material. In the humanistic sphere, this may not have a strong influence in statistical application or formal education. But it does matter in physical realisation — when the ability to understand and implement is already present.
Other aspects, even with their flaws, bring satisfaction without causing harm — where the mind does not dwell on what is negative, unfavourable, inadequate, impossible, on inabilities or unnecessary things, but replaces them with what has been given to you. Where every person wishes to be recognised as an expert in their field, to be happy, to have children and raise them to be worthy members of society, to determine what level of income they would like to earn, and to develop a plan for achieving these goals. Or simply to be wealthy and successful, to paint pictures, write poetry, sing, write a book, see the world by visiting many cities and countries, understand their own feelings and those of others, manage their emotions, build more harmonious relationships with those around them, get a promotion, move up to the next level of the social or career ladder, improve their leadership qualities, become a mentor, make a positive change in another person’s life, be lucky and healthy. Or to restore their health, manage sexual satisfaction, control everything within their reach, understand sex and its pleasures, come to the essence of things, attain nirvana — a state of liberation from the dissatisfaction and anxiety inherent in existence — through understanding meaning, achieve emotional visualisation, clarity, and attention to detail. And emotions will help you focus on your possibilities, pushing uncertainty aside. You set aside obstacles, blocks, and prohibitions, constantly repeating what you want, what you strive for, what you wish to obtain and what you wish to possess.
And you will realise that everything that doesn’t come easily to you is a chance to become better. For example, my appliances burned out at home after a lightning strike. I ran around turning off devices until I reached the electricity meter and cut off the power. You might say, “You’re out of pocket,” but I say I’m glad it happened while I was there — and my house didn’t burn down in my absence. What was lost is just crumbs compared to what I could have lost. Later, buying new, modern appliances brought me joy. This is the principle of action — the ability to protect yourself.
In this way, you should understand what you want from life — a huge house or coziness? Remember that the choice always lies with you, and the conflict between you and your subconscious leads to a misunderstanding of your place in the world. And once you grasp the material, you will accept what you have created. It is possible to reshape or rewire your perception, but this requires introducing corrective data through explaining the fundamentals of practical application — in practical images and perceptions — while taking into account what you truly wish to understand. This will change the quality of growth in that direction. However, this is not always the case. What is the reason behind this, and how can you fix it on your own — gradually, reflecting on each step you take? You will find out if you are willing to immerse yourself in a newly constructed world where you can change the essence and the system itself, together with your place within that system.
Wanting something is not enough on its own, although motivation and correctly set goals — with their final embodiment in a real physical form — play a key role. Add to this the ability to process information, motivating yourself to take new steps in self‑development. Please do not confuse this with applying a formula or searching for knowledge that merely points to its own application. It is possible to get closer to your cherished dreams, but there is always a «but» standing in the way — something I also faced until I formulated a system for structuring everything I had understood. Conclusions supported by facts, spread out over time — over years — eventually formed a sequence and simplified everything I had come into contact with in my life. This allowed me to reshape the system of organisation in a way that was beneficial to me — one could even say, in spite of systems of control, inhibition, and negativity.
In turn, I will not recount my life story in this material. However, if the need arises — and if those who wish to compare reality, actions, and possibilities, or to understand how to change themselves, express such a desire — I will certainly be able to write and share that part in a new book, describing my life, all its twists and turns, challenges, joys, and opportunities. If you have the desire to get acquainted with it and reinforce what you have read, you will certainly be surprised and ask: “How is this possible?” You are in for a surprise. Do not hesitate — send your inquiries to the email address listed on the website Mudrets.rf. However, I believe there is no such need at the moment, as I am in the process of writing the book — especially since you have not yet fully appreciated or grasped the essence of the knowledge presented here. I will not rush to talk about my own capabilities, which I have not yet fully realised, as the experiment is not over. Meanwhile, the publicly available information about me on the Internet will give you the opportunity to learn what kind of observer I am — if, of course, you are interested in observing, understanding, and reflecting. Then, we will return to my life story. But I can assure you: all the most interesting is yet to come — and it will be revealed precisely through this material, expanding space, time, and horizons.
Let us return to the matter at hand — where a significant “but” affects everything, just like success. Yet, true knowledge is not merely the accumulation of information; it is also the ability to put it into practice, to change the very essence through fundamental processes that shape our development and, ultimately, our existence. Every person is a driving force of progress — which opens up new horizons for understanding the structure of the world, as well as one’s own inner world with its unlimited possibilities. There are conscious levels and unconscious capacities within each person that activate hidden potential — but to what extent this happens depends entirely on us.
For example, the rational and the sensual are simple to understand: they correspond to sight, hearing, touch, and smell — which provide various forms of knowledge through representation, sensation, and perception. The imaginative, the intuitive, and various other approaches allow us to understand the world subjectively. We maintain a connection with the external world, where sensation reflects the properties of an object: its shape, colour, scent, volume, height, pressure, cold, heat, and so on. Perception allows us to experience representations through the senses — via the sensory organs. This is made possible by a specialised anatomical and physiological system that, thanks to its receptors, ensures the reception and primary analysis of information from the surrounding environment, the world, and from other organs of the organism itself — that is, from both the external environment and the internal environment of the body.
Then, we form rational knowledge ourselves through the knowledge embedded in our individuality in the world, using our thinking. The imaginative provides a representation of a fictional picture of action or a rational vision of the future — not based on reality, but at that moment it is entirely subjective, grounded in actual action in the present and realisation in the future. But the most interesting is intuitive knowledge of truth — which lacks logical justification or arguments, yet is entirely correct, based on the hidden capacities of a person. Of course, we draw conclusions, form concepts, and make judgments in everything. But what kind of conclusions does the individual make — and subsequently, the society in which that person lives and exists? The search for information is the foundation of our life — what kind of information we wish to obtain depends on us, our capabilities, and desires. Built upon the rational and the imaginative, all of this leads to the way of life and the society in which you find yourself. There can be various interpretations of your knowledge. For example, practical life knowledge can be related to everyday matters: making scrambled eggs, surviving in war, climbing cliffs, putting out a fire, sailing alone across the ocean, or doing one’s professional work. One way or another, the scale of knowledge depends on the individual, and the degree of its productivity will be evaluated by society in the short or long term: the ability to apply practical, theoretical, and intuitive knowledge. The key is to ensure that this knowledge does not drift into the unscientific, pseudoscientific, or antiscientific.
The leading role of development is to expand horizons — relying on facts and ideas, making a contribution to society, and fostering personal growth; to build one’s own world and provide opportunities for those around you to create, not only establishing conditions but also providing tools; to be successful in all areas of life, having a firm foothold in the space of existence. Kenneth Gergen, a proponent of social constructionism theory, referred to the sociological theory of knowledge developed by Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann in their book The Social Construction of Reality. This treatise on the sociology of knowledge leads to an understanding of social perception and personal growth through linguistic and moral communication — expressed in actions and knowledge — which is understood as something obligatory and formally normative. From this emerges the objectivity of the existence of morality, justice, conscience, duty, dignity, patriotism, and evil in the public consciousness.
Normative ethics studies moral principles and norms and their justification, deeming them right or wrong. Metaethics analyses the nature of ethical judgments and concepts. Applied ethics examines specific ethical questions and dilemmas in various spheres of human activity, often leading to banal morality. This is inherently a collective perception of everything, which leads to a conventional space — a space of societal self‑organisation where participants are able to recognise not only their own interests but also common interests, and act in accordance with them. In such a space, there occurs a selection of necessary norms and rules that establish and condition the space of self‑organisation. This means that self‑organisation regulates itself, taking into account the judgments or images of transmitted information — which inherently expresses someone’s dominant personality. Thus, working on oneself becomes the main system of coordinates that a person has built in their mind. Special attention in life is given to the concept of the individual in contrast to society — due to the understanding of a person as an individual and society as a social entity: a statistical expression in simple numbers, generalising a superficial measurement of what is happening in society. This influences the establishment of approximate norms to suit public indicators — in order to maintain the masses and subsequently manage them.
Developing one’s personality in any individual is the foundation of future success for those who cultivate certain capabilities and adopt approaches to self‑development that affect the consciousness and subconscious of any reasonable person who wishes to develop themselves. Modern literature and educational materials — including classical works, Eastern knowledge, and so on — describe many concepts. But how does one understand what they truly need — what they are actually looking for? Success is rooted in your desire and in your ability to apply your skills as a person who has transformed themselves in the new format of Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing human”. The use of M.L.R.D. depends on you and your manifestation. You can introduce changes and adjustments into your essence and life arrangement — which can manifest in everything that surrounds you: career growth, spiritual growth, self‑realisation, self‑sufficiency, innovation, interpersonal relationships in society and in the family, health, sex, and sexual strategies for attracting the opposite sex. The assessment of any influence on you — through religion, science, culture, laws, and norms — includes a vast potential not only of knowledge but also of followers of this type of represented action. Anyone who comes into contact with you will either argue with hatred or grant universal recognition — either way, this places emphasis on the concentration of attention on your person.
Each follower of M.L.R.D. depends on the information they receive and process, on the knowledge they initially possess. They rely on what they already know, and their ability to interact with this knowledge pushes them towards a new perception. This, in turn, multiplies the power of possibilities for anyone who works on their inner world, intellect, and spiritual and moral growth. In this case, you should be able to withstand the challenges that arise — regardless of whether you possess the knowledge of M.L.R.D. or not (I will decode these four letters later). However, the impact of the knowledge you acquire through remote learning — without spiritual practice, but with the self‑teacher (i.e., this book) — will still affect you and continue to influence you after reading. It will lead you to develop independently, unconsciously, though in small proportions, in terms of understanding and perception.
If you do not penetrate the depth of meaning, do not be discouraged. Even in your fantasies, with your desire, the information gained here will make you better. Over the years, you will return to self‑knowledge and find it easier to turn again to this desk book that you once read — a book that has managed to lay the foundation and principles of your world in temporary application, having reworked the very essence through the years of your life. In such a case, understanding yourself and your capabilities can protect you from many attacks from society — not as a specific situation where you ask a question like you would a computer, but from the actions of individuals who have the ability to use life situations, applying them as a template approach to resolve various issues, relying on the knowledge of M.L.R.D.
The conditions for applying this knowledge involve, at the primary stage, establishing an understanding to create the necessary conditions — to become a sponge for processing the information flow that your brain absorbs with billions of neurons. This is what we aim to create at the initial stage: the ability to understand and recognise the value of your presence as an observer in reality, with all its consequences. You should support yourself and your environment, protecting yourself from state agencies in order to realise yourself as an individual — through a built‑up system within society that the state itself conceals. The goal is not to create a free‑thinking society with an individual outlook on various problems and the essence of what is happening — a society that should be negotiated with or simply granted indulgences and preferences, even in hidden forms and unspoken agreements. This means that such a layer in society is dangerous for life without control. Your personal development is capable of resisting everything that cannot be focused on the growth of the inner world — arguing only with a certain set of rules tailored for functioning, not for the development of society, but for visible control over the very essence and system. This system highlights only special individuals as a motivated impulse to please the structures — in order to achieve a certain status with the permission of certain people. These people, in fact, hold back the development of society worldwide in order to maintain their right to govern and develop everything under the control of the built‑up system of social management.
The foundations of personal freedom lie within each individual — and in everything one can imagine within their understanding, even when several people are involved. Society will always be driven forward by individuals who know M.L.R.D. in its very application — even if it goes by other names. Thus, it is useful to any person in any life situation. Those who know the fundamentals of applying this knowledge become dangerous observers for those who do not have such an opportunity.
But here is the question: what is your benefit from this material? If you cannot grasp the essence, the depth of the thought, do not be discouraged — it won’t click for everyone right away. In this way, you can gradually change everything in your life, while at the same time remaining yourself — but in a reworked form for those around you. In this state, you become unattainable, if only for a certain period — because nothing stands still. Everything will depend on you, your desires, and, of course, your capabilities. Many of you have encountered an acquaintance who went on vacation, on a business trip, or simply dropped out of your field of vision for an indefinite period. Upon meeting again, you realise that the person has remained the same — no changes. Or the person has changed, and you find them boring, unable to understand what they are trying to explain. Or, most importantly, the person has changed: they speak intelligent things, you want to spend more time with them, to emulate them, to become like them — to bring joy and desire, to be attractive; they are liked by everyone. This is a clear example of how M.L.R.D. works in relation to any person who has wanted to change themselves — whether they understand it or not. Development is always taking place, but the extent of the changes depends on the individual — and on when they say “enough” and begin to make use of what they have, until they realise that more is needed due to the growth of their inner space.
We will not examine cases where a person has achieved nothing — I believe this is clear enough: the person simply did not work on themselves. It is quite possible to lose life skills — everyone knows this as the degradation of personality. I will not dwell on this stage of life or go into detail, so as not to waste your time, since this is an obvious effect of the decline in morality, the loss of life’s meaning, and the unwillingness to strive for something better. Such people are satisfied with routine, opportunism, and a marginal lifestyle — with their own view of their existence outside of society, and so on. They build their own simple life, a life for themselves, thinking “blast it all!”. But their mistake is that society does not take them into account. Over time, they will understand this — but by then it will be too late. To be reborn anew requires strength and immense help, and this is much more difficult: to break oneself down and rise again. It is far better to develop gradually, with the opportunity to understand — even if it comes late.
Those who gradually adopt a philosophical approach throughout their life — multiplied by knowledge — will achieve constant development through the desire to learn more. This is because the individual has changed in relation to their peers. In this way, Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing human” — has moved far beyond even their own relatives, for example, their great‑grandfather. M.L.R.D. provides the opportunity for continuous development and to maintain a constant state of being out of reach of others — through new knowledge. This means that development and inaccessibility depend on you and on the application of your knowledge, on your ability to express what you have strived for — in order to create yourself as a new person who has undergone a “reboot”, with new approaches to solving any problems and questions within your life system.
It sounds interesting — as if you were an inanimate object like a computer, and some outsider is loading a program into you. But which program? And how many times has your life been changed? All of this remains unclear. But what if it’s just one program — yet self‑improving? Now there’s something to talk about, or simply to think about. Is such an action possible — considering that a human being is structured differently from a computer? Yet things are not as they seem if you take them literally. Of course, if you start thinking flexibly and abstracting yourself from the clichés created by society and by those who are unknown to you, a new perspective emerges. Self‑understanding comes to each person differently — it all depends on their desire and the potential they possess. Therefore, it is impossible to create a uniform template or program for everyone. This means that every person will be unique, inimitable to others — which enables the creation of a diverse society. And it does not matter how many times you have experienced failure or fallen into setbacks — these are all part of the past, a history of misrecognising who you truly are and what your purpose is.
M.L.R.D. will foster self‑development not only in the individual, but also in social groups formed around shared interests — including society as a whole. This will transform the social fabric and communication itself, introducing a new approach to solving various problems and tasks.
The essence of understanding M.L.R.D. can be seen in many fields that carry meaning and comprehension — based solely on a one‑sided mode of reasoning. For example: esoterics, psychology, philosophy, literature, poetry, music, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, and many other directions capable of manifesting their inner energy. This energy exists within every person — with their own way of seeing, perceiving, and learning. However, this does not unlock the full potential within you — due to a limited understanding of all the information, which has been taken out of context. This leads you into a negative state and a sense of unfulfilment in life — yet with the hope that everything will somehow change on its own. As an individual, you are wasting precious time for self‑formation and self‑knowledge — due to limited informational interaction. This interaction is structured in a sequence of time that you have set for yourself, in relation to your presence in the current moment — compared to the time that has existed during this period, regardless of your understanding. No one has restricted you — it is a choice of systemic perception, created for the sake of the system’s own stability and calm.
The approach to understanding oneself or another person is simple: you should understand yourself before giving a characterisation of someone else. We humans are accustomed to categorising people and assigning definitions for the sake of simplicity — and in this way, we simplify our understanding of our fellow human beings: their behaviour, lifestyle, expectations, and manifestations. In the initial framework, four main types emerge that behaviourally characterise what we know as temperament. People are divided into choleric, melancholic, sanguine, and phlegmatic types. Let’s look at these types and try to understand, more deeply than common notions, who they are, what drives them, and so on.
Choleric — quick, impulsive, impetuous, unbalanced, prone to sudden mood swings and emotional outbursts. Thus, standard pallid statistics — which do not delve into the essence or depth of a person — use terms like “unbalanced” and “prone to sudden mood swings” to describe the same underlying action: impulsivity. When viewed through the prism of characterising human actions as isolated manifestations, this becomes a misconception and is misleading. But what lies behind these words? Let’s look deeper and give a proper characterisation of this personality type. You will then understand how people are labelled — and what they are truly like — if we correctly interpret the terminology. Many fail to do so due to their limited education — even though they may hold formal documents confirming their level of acquired knowledge. As a result, people suffer from the prevalence of incompetent individuals and corrupt officials — and are forced to agree without argumentation, or even the most basic knowledge that is merely written on paper as proof of education. Illiteracy, when combined with holding certain positions, enjoying specific protection, and having the patronage of societal self‑control institutions — all in the name of societal control — leads to errors being shifted onto the scales of statistics: someone feels pressured, someone is dissatisfied, someone remains neutral.
The fast‑paced individual acts quickly — and this swiftness applies not only to physical actions, but also to the capacity of brain activity and the nervous system to make decisions rapidly. This reflects the ability of the nervous system and brain to interact: they transmit information through channels that have been developed via constant training and active engagement, enabling quick decision‑making in various situations. But what leads to this symbiosis? What enhances the conductivity of the nervous system, allowing for high‑speed transmission of mental impulses — processes that run faster and more intensely than in other temperament types? By the way, identifying a choleric person is quite straightforward: they speak quickly, confidently, clearly, and often louder than others, demonstrating a dominant stance. They often do not have time to analyse the situation. Due to short deliberation periods, they may sometimes say or do something inappropriate — they act decisively, but the higher their choleric traits, the greater the speed and accuracy of their decision‑making — provided, of course, that this person possesses the necessary knowledge. Yes, I said it on purpose: the “choleric traits”, because a person is influenced by other temperament types as well. In most cases, people have a mixed composition — but one type usually dominates. This is the very foundation for understanding a human subtype or temperament.
Impulsivity is merely a manifestation of specific features in the nervous system, which is expressed through temperament — reflecting processes of excitation in response to events with high activity and weak inhibition in the nervous system due to the speed of neural conduction. A more precise understanding can be found in the works of the physiologist I. P. Pavlov. When leveraging the body’s inherent features, a choleric person may exhibit a high speed of information processing, fast reaction time, strong energy output, and practical‑adaptive properties. The ability to exercise restraint also depends on the individual’s level of development. Everything hinges on the prefrontal cortex of the brain, which is responsible for self‑control: if this area is underdeveloped or deficient, we may observe atypical behaviour and rash actions. However, if a person is aware of and understands the extent of their capabilities, this enhances brain activity and positively affects the growth of cognitive abilities. Similarly, impatience is a key trait: choleric individuals act quickly, and the process of waiting disrupts their internal state, leading to lethargy and irritation. Vivid emotions are a side effect of the high speed and reactivity of the nervous system and brain — and this can manifest in both positive and negative ways. Everything depends on the situation, environment, outcome, and the individual’s ability to maintain control, as well as their level and degree of personal development. In cases of strong desire, a choleric person “ignites”: they give their all, regardless of available resources. Conversely, if there is no interest in a task, they “burn out”: apathy sets in, along with a loss of concentration regarding uninteresting processes. Overall, all these biological processes stem from the anatomical structure of the organism and are linked to elevated cortisol levels (the stress hormone), which explains their intense reactions. Adrenaline and dopamine are also produced more actively, driven by the sympathetic nervous system. The capabilities of choleric individuals can be artificially altered — either increased or decreased — through factors such as hunger, fatigue, sleep deprivation, or other external influences; these conditions can amplify impulsivity, demonstrating how external circumstances interact with innate physiological traits.
An impetuous or breakthrough disposition reflects leadership qualities in every aspect: the ability to lead, organise, and align others; a drive to move forward; the capacity to motivate and inspire; a willingness to take responsibility; and the skill to manage a team effectively — quickly assigning tasks. Such individuals perceive difficulties as a challenge rather than an obstacle. They propose unconventional solutions and approaches that others might consider impossible, thanks to their out‑of‑the‑box thinking. This enables them to find and make quick decisions in extreme circumstances.
By the way, loud speech in a person with an obvious innate choleric temperament reveals their emotions at the moment of intensifying them — expressed through the voice and “lived out loud” — as an energy release: an excess of energy or simply a fast speech tempo. This can also serve as the body’s protective mechanism against energy surplus, much like sweating helps cool the body down when it overheats. However, in most codes, laws, and regulations, loud speech — not shouting, not screaming, not shrieking — is often deemed a deviation from normative behaviour. Then the question arises: who exactly determines the acceptable volume of one’s voice? Is there a decibel‑measuring device that defines what is permissible and what is not? Moreover, when it comes to a loud, well‑projected voice, why is the issue of those it irritates so often glossed over? In fact, the problem may be greater for those who are irritated than for those merely raising their voice during a conversation. For example, hyperacusis is a heightened sensitivity to sounds that are perceived as painful or irritating; this stems from how signals are processed in the auditory system or the central nervous system. It typically occurs after: traumatic brain injury; use of illicit substances or excessive alcohol consumption; migraines; multiple sclerosis; infections (such as meningitis or inflammation of the meninges); certain medications (including antibiotics, chemotherapy drugs, and nonsteroidal anti‑inflammatory drugs / NSAIDs); generalised anxiety disorder (GAD); post‑traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); obsessive‑compulsive disorder (OCD); some forms of depression.
The conclusion is simple: the specifics of a conversation cannot grant a dominant position to an opponent who lacks argumentation for their stance or means of defence. Resorting to threats or invoking institutional codes and social norms to control society — while distorting their meaning to assert one’s own priorities in a dialogue, debate, discussion, and resolving a matter, thereby forcing the opponent out of their defensive stance by shifting the direction — reveals a scarcity of intellectual knowledge and society’s inability to establish proper norms for the practical application of the institutional system. This system should lay the foundations tied to public institutions — those officially established and affirmed in their public status by society itself. Instead, such practices highlight and even breed violations of law and human rights, fully reflecting the corruption of the system. With this example, I wanted to show how everything in this world is interconnected — and, as a result, all scientific conclusions are interwoven and united into a single system for comprehensive problem‑solving through M.L.R.D.
Please note that temperament is a characteristic that expresses a person through their inner world, manifested in innate traits, followed by upbringing, knowledge, life experience, lifestyle, and circumstances — and, most importantly, the ability to apply things practically through self‑control. This is what constitutes the highest understanding of oneself and respect for societal norms — where your freedom of behaviour does not infringe upon the freedom of another person or of society. As for the specific temperament types:
Melancholic — restrained, vulnerable, impressionable, prone to constant worries.
Sanguine — lively, energetic, easily shrugging off setbacks, and eager for change.
Phlegmatic — slow‑paced, reserved in showing emotions, calm, balanced, and finds it difficult to switch tasks or adapt quickly. I’ll leave room here for you to deepen your understanding of this type. Of course, a more thorough exploration would require a more detailed description — perhaps I’ll write about it later, or maybe we could do it together.
Everyone understands everything that surrounds them — where they are located. When you realise yourself as a person, within your own aspects of understanding, you reach a level where you believe that this is acceptable for you. This means that expanding your potential is not a priority — since everything seems fine to you at that moment. However, this state of affairs passes as soon as someone or something changes your priorities. You are faced with the desire to change what has disturbed your peace and current situation — but sometimes this becomes impossible, due to many circumstances. For example, old age: you will not be able to run a 100‑metre dash in a couple of seconds.
From life experience, every person knows that they solve problems as they arise. Only a wise person acts proactively — they change their status before certain problems occur, minimising the consequences of what is happening. They take into account the possible actions that may occur — actions created in the future by the very actions they take in the present. Let me repeat: when writing this material, I relied primarily on life experience — laid down over time and reworked through various scientific and educational literature. This was complemented by the correct direction of everything that humanity has accumulated. I will not write in detail about everything that people have done in our world. Instead, I will describe things indirectly — as a fact of my own correct reasoning, supported by scientific conclusions. After all, each person chooses for themselves what to read and what to use as an example for their own development. For instance, my way of thinking — combined with studying these materials — has helped me understand and expand the horizons of comprehension. Over time, it has allowed me to rebuild my entire inner world and learn how to change reality, to influence the material world — by using the inherent potential that exists within every person.
At the core of everything that touches our lives lies the ability to manage and change what is happening — one just needs to understand the foundations of what is and what occurs, and translate this into temporary action. In this way, you can arrange your life, relying on your desire and your capacity for realisation and resistance. Which approach is acceptable to you? That, again, is for you to decide. Who are you — an explorer, a patient, a doctor, a mentor, a student? The answer lies in your response to any given situation: who you are. And you yourself know best who you are and what you need. However, it is obvious that approaches are not constant — as are the foundations of understanding life’s processes. I, too, do not particularly favour pointing out dots and letters to my thoughts in non‑contact dialogue with a person. This approach is good when expressing a thought in a book. In real life, work and time provide the opportunity to comprehend what has been written — because face‑to‑face communication allows you to feel with your body, through scent, through natural presence, and through the ability to integrate into life. This immediately changes the spirit of the dialogue and so on — it gives the opportunity to connect on a subconscious level, taking into account the smallest body movements, the atmosphere, and the accompanying actions of you or those around you. These are capable of giving an impetus to certain actions — directed either towards someone else or towards yourself.
But time always plays a role here — the opportunities for subsequent contact that carry a productive outcome of the meeting. Considering even the worst‑case scenario, there is always something for one of the parties to emphasise. But do not rush to conclusions. One should multiply by time for the sake of comprehending what was said. The impact of the meeting always occurs immediately after the connection ends. The conclusions drawn from what was heard and conveyed will play their part — but when exactly? That is the question.
My calculation for future readers — and for those who are interested — is aimed at those who wish to achieve a certain level of self‑control, in the broad sense: an understanding of the structure of life through the pursuit of knowledge, self‑realisation, and maturity. Or to build within themselves a strong, independent personality. In other cases, this work may help one to reflect — so that later they might read it again and understand the essence of their aspiration. Or read it once more and come to an epiphany of hidden guides, towards the realisation of their capabilities. The M.L.R.D. system deals with the fundamental values of the individual and transpersonal experience of interaction with the vast world — where you are an unnoticeable figure, yet at the same time a significant person for yourself and for the world as a whole. This goes beyond your horizon of understanding and achievement, due to the global nature of what is happening to you — in the form of manifestation in which you find yourself. It does so without crossing the boundaries of common sense and its understanding in relation to society — without harming the foundations and morality in the global sense, as tested by generations.
But the realisation of yourself remains with you throughout your entire life. You can learn all this and more — and the most interesting part is that you are already gaining this knowledge with me, as you read and think about where the meaning of the book begins. You can become a person of a new format — growing like a sunflower, with the ability to turn yourself towards the flow of energy and to have a solid foundation. And even when everyone thinks you have withered, within you will remain the fruits of information and the ability to give rise to new likenesses of yourself — in a new interpretation of who you are. After reading, you should change and become a new person in your thoughts and spirit — to conquer the citadel of your hidden true purpose as a human being in this multifaceted world. Of course, if you have the desire to walk the path of enlightenment — multiplied by your will and time — you can create yourself as a transformed structure for managing your potential. This potential lies in the depths of your subconscious, accumulated by previous generations and passed down to you for further growth, preservation, and transmission. You will be able to achieve your set goals and objectives by relying solely on yourself and your capabilities. And the fear that may arise in you towards anything is the birth of self‑knowledge and a push towards new horizons. So why do you tell yourself “stop” when your inner world says “go ahead”? The key is to understand the boundary between what is possible and what is not.
Many gurus, mentors, healers, teachers, and philosophers set up beliefs and write works, trying to attract as many people as possible — but in short: they promise how one can achieve something quickly, without putting in any effort, resorting to various speculations. These ideas are interpreted in many ways: healing, enlightenment, achievement, transformation, awakening, growth, tapping into energy, connecting with the Universe, understanding God, and so on — yet in most cases, they yield no real results. One could add many more points, but I will tell you this: to some extent, even though they do not carry full awareness, these people are right in their desire to understand and change. However, they do not follow through to the end — even though they possess the potential, the innate abilities, the experience, and the aspiration, and they have much to strive for. Perhaps they will be able to integrate the missing fragments into their understanding — to complete the full picture — and thus expand their capabilities. This would bring only benefit and joy in the shared understanding of all that is, and not only in the direction of a unified, universal structure of comprehension.
But I refer to all of the above — summarising the entire potential that people bring to the masses — with a single abbreviation, quite different from what people are used to. In my understanding, everything is simple: it is captured in one word — like a teaching, an understanding. M.L.R.D. is a complete science and a global concentration of knowledge. M.L.R.D. itself provides an understanding of everything that is and everything that is essential — the vast, the universal. It gives everyone, without exception, the opportunity to begin to understand. Of course, you can call it whatever you like — what you do when you seek everything in everything, within the name itself. It will be extremely unclear and unacceptable to many without comprehending the essence within the letters and words — because it will be taken out of context, both of the name itself and of the understanding of all that you and I are trying to grasp. But to receive or convey all of this to others — to create a unified centre of development, without dividing or separating — gives enormous opportunities for the social development of society, for the energy of thought, and for all manifestations of how you perceive yourself. The decoding of M.L.R.D., in the depth of understanding, will be constant and gradual — where you will come to understand the depth of the progressive desire to replenish and to understand as a whole.
I believe that M.L.R.D. is an entire landscape. This means that this term must and should be present in scientific discourse — it should be used to simplify description, study, and the transmission of information. Thus, we understand the very essence — but we cannot do without the word “Landscape”. It is directly connected to us. We are a constituent part of the landscape in every sense of its understanding. What remains is for us to understand our or your landscape — the one embedded in each of us. And then our landscape gives us understanding. The worldly landscape of the very structure of the universe — of the landscape and of embedding your own landscape within you, through the landscape of society — leads to society’s understanding of your landscape, and of you. I can also add with certainty, in the understanding of “Landscape”, that it reveals the polysemic expression of many categories. As an integral system: the Earth, its inhabitants, existence, nature, knowledge, peace, matter, energy — in the earthly, universal understanding of space; time‑human‑space; the spiritual Landscape of M.R.D. Through your perception of yourself as an individual, your “I”, your living space — a subjectively significant part of the landscape that a person perceives in different ways, identifying it with themselves: family, beliefs, key passions. The division between “mine” and “foreign” regulates interactions with the external world — and these boundaries can be rigid or permeable.
Such a construction of one’s own perception resembles a landscape or a core, a home, a fortress — while everything else is public territory. And the attitude towards everything depends on you. The readiness for self‑sacrifice for the sake of ideals that are a priority for you — your life creed, your philosophical outlook on life, your connection with time and the endless depth as the mystery of the soul. External and internal landscapes — beliefs, fears, dreams — are projected outward, transforming the world around you to fit your vision. Zones of emotional fullness: love, inspiration, emptiness, apathy, grief. All of this is expressed through structures, personality, and space — within the context of the landscape: a complex and multifaceted concept that is examined in various scientific disciplines, helping to understand who you truly are.
An individual as a subject of relations and conscious activity of spiritual and bodily characteristics; a subject of social ideals, values, human activities and communication, and social relations; a simultaneous unity that has an individual expression and interpretation — a concept in the philosophy of personality; endowed with social qualities that they acquire, possessing a set of socially significant traits — an individual with specific knowledge, norms, values, and accumulated experience that constitutes a structure: temperament, character, abilities, motivation, values, a formed self‑image, self‑knowledge, the uniqueness of structural‑linguistic content, a set of speech skills, an innate communicative ability — as the Man’s L.R.D., while the rationalising observer enables a transition into any science — you, in one way or another, derive this from your own desire.
Of course, we understand the landscape as it is, and we also understand man in all its meanings — but the understanding of the “rationalising” person is a vast term with immense concepts embedded within it. The value of the ability to apply “rationalising” in life is such a capacious word that it encompasses everything — from your “I” to a multitude of things. I will try to list for you some connecting structures of words without their definitions — you can study them on your own — but you should understand that causality, indeterminism, paralogism, heteronomous ethics, immanence, hermeneutic circle, relativism, intentionality, everydayness, axiology, topological reflection, irrationalism, social constructivism, distinction, subjectivism, appearance, pluralism, apriorism, noesis, reductionism, dogmatism, formalism, discourse, determinacy, social determinism, objectivation, empiricism, antithesis, moralisation, contradiction, imperative, perspectivism, teleology, intersubjective approach, naturalism, reflection, intelligibility, dynamic approach, neo‑Freudianism, phenomenology, phenomenological reduction, objective idealism, rationality, thinking, social order, and so on — this is not everything that the rationalising action of a person encompasses, in order to simplify the deep concept of everything within our very understanding of a person or society in objective reality, which, under the influence of your choice and action, expresses the very essence of what is happening: M. R. Rationalising through D.
Also, didactics encompasses and explains your abilities to receive, reproduce, understand, and comprehend. As a means of education, the understanding of the learning model itself — or the art of teaching — was first defined as didactics by Wolfgang Ratke (Ratichius) (1571–1635) in his work. However, it was Jan Amos Komensky (Comenius) who managed to establish it as the foundation of an independent discipline. In his work The Great Didactic (1657), he teaches everyone everything and examines such issues as the learning process and the interaction between teaching and learning in their unified integrity. Didactics can be practical, theoretical, instrumental, normative, diagnostic, scientific, individualised; it involves accessibility, visibility, and so on.
M. L. R. Didactics — that is, information is transmitted independently: whether a smart person tells you something in a verbal conversation, a story, a lecture, an explanation, or a clarification; whether you read it in a book, heard it on TV or on a computer, saw a drawn plot or an illustration in class, encountered it in search‑based or practical knowledge, a demonstration, practical exercises in work, classes, lectures, research, or inquiries — you receive all this through space, specifically by you and through your desire to understand and convey it. Finding balanced conclusions and isolated pieces of knowledge gives the rationalising individual the ability to manage and systematise their actions.
Thus, in new forms of perception — even if not recognised as scientifically proven, yet at the same time divided into various directions that are already scientifically acknowledged — there is still no global understanding of the essence within the general concept of M.L.R.D. in a single, holistic work of universal orientation towards the development of personal rationalising understanding. Such a work could develop not only self‑awareness, but also social awareness as a common action that has become established in society as a whole through informative exchange. The unification of sacred knowledge thus contributes to self‑development, which in turn leads to the development of society — resulting in the evolutionary manifestation of humanity in a new format of perceiving oneself and the surrounding world. Otherwise, you would not need to read, watch, or listen — and you would receive all the information that exists everywhere without putting in any effort. Of course, we have understood some information ourselves by nature, or have “uploaded” it into our brains like a computer through a port, relying on the experience of others and our own mistakes. This is how enlightenment has come to you independently. But the core essence of knowledge you receive without practice — relying instead on theory that you have read, heard, seen, etc. — setting your thoughts in motion, derived from your own understanding. As a rule, we are always learning, even without formal instruction: it is practically impossible to gain knowledge of something without any learning process — this does not happen in human life. You always need to lay the foundations. For example, you cannot become a mathematician without having a basic understanding of numbers and their capabilities: addition, subtraction, division, etc. You will always have to acquire the foundations of knowledge and understanding remotely, while the implementation and processing of the received information will be carried out by you directly, personally. In this way, a personal rationalising perspective lays the foundations for understanding what is happening.
As a result, after understanding the words we study, we have arrived at the MAN’S LANDSCAPE: RATIONALISING THROUGH DIDACTICS — abbreviated as M.L.R.D. This, in turn, leads you to something close in sound and meaning: MILLIARD. A natural number created in the decimal numeral system as a unit with nine zeros — a thousand million, as Europeans and others consider it, abbreviated as “mlrd”. It is simply a huge number that is difficult to conceive in all its initial actions from beginning to end if you want to realise it as a whole action — which you have done, in a single word, in its deep meaning as a number, not as a named event. To say that you have created this number, you should not simply write “milliard” — you should show that you know it, can justify it as written, and express the depth of this number with all its main attributes, which include millions, hundreds of thousands, a beginning, and an end.
And even if you summarise the principles of composition and the meaning of the number, this will never give you the right to say that you have gone through it from beginning to end, put in the effort, and were able to express it — to count everything from start to finish, with the entire process from one to a milliard having been completed by you step by step. It is hard to imagine, and even harder to do, as it takes a long time: to begin and finish, to express your work by going through all the periods of ups and downs, fatigue, exhaustion, and joy. Likewise, in the concept of M.L.R.D., you should go through the entire path from start to finish — and many will not be able to complete it, to utter billions of words aloud or in their minds. To be able to say, “I have completed this path”, you would need to neither sleep nor eat, but only speak non‑stop for almost 32 years (31.7 years, to be precise) — provided that you pronounce one number per second. This is simply impossible.
But in any case, you will always be able to become an enlightened person — only more or less enlightened, like a glass that is half-full or half-empty: this does not really matter. You will already have made a leap in your personal development and will have given society positive fruits, calculated over time. In short, there are many people — and if we set up a scale where one person cannot count and does not understand numbers, another only knows numbers, and a third can count and knows numbers, they will all be able to find their own niche in society and bring benefit in any aspects, precisely according to their own understanding. The foundations of mental actions in the realisation of oneself will give the opportunity to understand oneself within society in a strictly personal format, place, or niche. But this does not mean that a person who cannot count will not learn, or that someone who does not know numbers will not come to know them.
In short, we all know the end of this action — the number billion — but no one, or almost no one, has gone through the actual counting process. This means that M.L.R.D. is akin to any human action: chopping down a tree, covering a stretch of road, raising a child until adulthood. Everyone acts, but few have a real grasp of the essence and the whole system: what it means to be a felled tree; what real effort is required to move a multi‑ton vehicle along a route; what it’s like to grow up under someone’s dictation; how the information you transmit is perceived by those you teach. The principle is the same everywhere: you perform an action, obtain a result, and learn about its consequences only after some time has passed. This means that for a felled tree you will receive money or make something from the wood; for travelling from point A to point B you will get the result of movement — joy, fatigue, reward, etc.; and from raising a child you will learn what awaits you in old age or in a difficult situation. And based on this, you will either tell the truth or not — but in any case, you still cannot change anything you already know, because a past action cannot be changed unless you go through it again, which is impossible. You cannot step into the same river twice, and it is currently impossible to calculate the consequences of a decision so far in advance.
In the current decline of knowledge, M.L.R.D. stands as the only valid designation — a kind of vessel that holds the foundation of human communication, especially when compared to the development of science across all fields. As a result, a clear imbalance emerges in society, leading to isolation, loneliness, and uncertainty. Thus, we know that many complexes, archetypes, sublimations, and projections can halt your development. Every person sets important goals for themselves — this is how they express themselves within the concept of identity and self‑development, leaving marks in the memory of the individual. For example, in your life, you know all the pros and cons, but according to your own will, you reshape the information to suit your needs, relying on a new template you’ve invented — based on your knowledge and capabilities — where everything will go well for you. This way, we cannot truly understand what we essentially represent in reality without fulfilled priorities, due to our self‑perception within the context of society — as an independent unit trying to present its image as unique and inimitable, merely to attract attention or draw focus to oneself, depending on the goal you have set. To achieve this, we need to develop and train our abilities hidden deep within us — our neurocognitive capacities, which we know about but do not know how to activate or what they will give us. After all, if we do not know what we will gain, our reluctance becomes the main priority — the basic understanding that “we do not need this”. Yet the brain and its neurons are capable of development, and cognitive abilities can be enhanced throughout one’s entire life.
The latest understanding of the brain — as of 2025. Gilles E. Gignac analysed nine factors related to life success and sixteen personality traits — the foundations of cognitive abilities that influence a person: extraversion, abilities, personality traits, emotional intelligence, financial literacy, emotional stability, openness, experience, etc. Mental abilities accompany us, developing over nearly half a lifetime, and then bear fruit if we have nurtured them correctly. As a result, at the age of 55–60, we reach a peak system of understanding our own capabilities within a generalised concept of averaged human potential. In any manifestation of brain activity, lifestyle plays a role: nutrition, sleep, the ability to rest, relax, switch tasks, the ability to find common dialogue and mutual understanding with loved ones you rely on. And, of course, your level of well‑being simplifies the perception of something new — it affects your psychological state and the mindset of your body. Take a young, middle‑aged, and elderly driver. Each has their own pros and cons that can help them at the stage they are in: knowledge, experience, reaction time, ability to switch focus, perception, opportunities, uncertainty, prudence, consequences, and actions. Even this could fill an entire book — but my point is that you should not stop, as is common among us, but keep moving forward toward the peak.
Thus, you understand that at any age, you can change yourself and the structure of your life. The limit of 100 years is merely a convention, caught in the grip of stereotypes and statistical summaries. And the capabilities at 55–60 years, I believe, are not a limit — this is a statistical record that has fundamentally changed the very understanding of the brain and its development in terms of potential for the benefit of society. Yet people remain largely in a phase of isolation. This zero understanding of life organisation provides the very foundation of all measurement — from a mathematical perspective, either by you or by society — where we either resign ourselves or try to change the essence of what is happening, but only when we understand or want to. Of course, it can also happen spontaneously, unconsciously. But in common understanding, a characteristic often has nothing in common with reality — whether stated by you or by society, which views the reliability of received information with great scepticism and puts it into doubt. Those around you and you yourself rely on your own knowledge and potential — one you have built yourself to increase your quasi‑potential, not based on anything external, but on your own worldview. This often gives rise to false understanding. Yet the perception of the fundamentals of life — both by you and by society — is quite sufficient to become the basis for agreement or disagreement, beyond true things, due to the lack of need for in‑depth study of what has already been expressed in words by someone else — unclear to you due to a superficial grasp of the depth of what was said, as the foundation of certain information.
To grow means to mature, to receive information, to learn, to realise oneself — and so on, higher and higher. This means we humans become different, differing more and more in every way. And Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing human” — shows that everything is within reach for the modern person, if they apply their skills correctly. The capabilities of M.L.R.D. provide the opportunity to focus on one’s own abilities, applying knowledge to increase the potential for meaningful action. It allows us to build a characterisation not based on primitive conclusions that hold no importance for others, but on a full approach to you as an individual — grounded in the actions you are capable of realising in the future, based on past actions that you have been able to evaluate in the present. By understanding the very essence, having gone through paths of insight expressed in a system of behaviour that causes no mental, moral, psychological, or physical suffering to the individual or to the surrounding society and environment — development in the right direction enhances everything around you. For the ability to share information allows you to detail the work done, so that it can be generalised by those who can contribute to solving what seemed unsolvable.
The foundation lies in subconscious perception and your interaction with the realisation of your desires. Each of you, in your failures and setbacks, blames everyone but yourself: your family, friends, envious people, karma, fate… And in this, you are absolutely right — because you are doing nothing for yourself. You have given up, surrendered to the mercy of the victor, and are sinking down to a place where ordinariness reigns: a standard life where you live on a minimal income, spend all your time on work you dislike, face problems at home and at work, and see no way out. Everywhere you look, they write: “We’ll help solve your problems — just pay, or take it now and pay later.” But none of it helps you. You hope in horoscopes, a star falling from the sky, buried treasure, the lottery, a lucky find, or a chance acquaintance that will change your ordinary life and lift you to the stars. But as always, you wake up in the same state — where reluctance is your usual condition. And did you think that you yourself created this system you’ve sunk into, isolating yourself from everything? At one point, this helped you — but it was a temporary state that caught you in a net of despondency. For you had a choice, and you chose what seemed right to you. You thought you could outsmart the system, deceiving everyone with your choice — by isolating yourself.
In reality, yes — this is exactly what very strong observers do: they simply divert attention away from themselves while using their capabilities to the fullest. For them, the “lower” level serves as a highly convenient environment for development and calm self‑work, since everything is in place to simulate the structure of ordinariness. Meanwhile, people trapped in eternal hustle and problems assume you’re a failure and tacitly try to prove they’re superior. Others believe they possess many things but don’t know how to use their blessings — they fail to understand what they actually have and how you obtained all that. They attribute your success to inheritance or some past random, sudden opportunities that “fell into your lap”, and again conclude that this doesn’t make you a true personality — clearly, they are “above” everyone they look down upon.
Individuals who have reached the top observe those “below” who nevertheless have certain opportunities to live colourfully and vibrantly, and to gain advantages without much effort. They don’t understand how these people manage it — and they fear that such individuals, being intelligent and having opportunities, could simply acquire even more once they enter certain social strata. All three examples demonstrate that everyone is already using M.L.R.D. — but not to its full potential, and without truly understanding how they’re doing it. The key difference lies with the fourth type — the one who consciously chose their own path. This person understands what they’re doing, precisely because being “at the bottom” provides complete safety for development. As they rise slightly higher, they face a turbulent life due to intrusive people who have slightly more than others — whose impudence, audacity, and overconfidence create endless hustle. Those at the very top realise that such a self‑aware individual simply hasn’t received due attention. They recognise the immense potential and don’t want this person to overshadow whoever first noticed them — so they try to keep this individual in the dark, away from others. In reality, once this fourth person truly understands themselves, they can soar like a meteor and shine brilliantly. But here comes the question: will they be able to shine — or, having overestimated their capabilities, will they fall like a star back down? There, they’ll have the strength to live an ordinary life while building up their potential once again — preparing to soar anew.
In short, you decide who enters your field of vision. Many say you “attract” people, but in reality, we move alongside each other — and this movement occurs across different layers. Think of a river: there’s the bottom, the middle, and the top — where it meets the air. Yet even in the air, there are layers: one where it touches the water and earth (where all around is just sky), and another where the sky meets space, and so on. Imagine how many levels and horizons of understanding exist! This means some may look up, others forward, backward, down, or to the sides. Pay attention to the one who begins to shine. There will always be a focus — but the degree of their brilliance determines how much attention others give to that light. Any problems you face in life stem from not grasping the essence of things and not knowing how — or where — to properly apply your skills and knowledge. You make mistakes time and again and learn from them, but at some point, you should say “enough” and start learning from others’ mistakes — gaining experience remotely: absorbing information and projecting it onto your own life experience. But to do this, you need knowledge — and knowledge should first be acquired, understood, and mastered for application in the environment where it works. In everyday life, everything unfolds over a long period. Take farming: you choose a plot, prepare the soil with special equipment, hire workers, purchase seed potatoes, plant them, tend the crop — and if the weather is favourable, your harvest will be abundant (or meagre). After harvesting, you should find storage space to make use of it — and so it goes, if you’re in agriculture. The most interesting part is that a person labours in the hope of eventual reward and benefit, consciously accepting hard work because they know grace awaits at the end. In short — motivation.
This is where M.L.R.D. operates fully: when a person understands what they’re doing, why, what lies ahead, and so forth. Ultimately, knowledge brings confidence in action and leads to solutions in one area of life — though it doesn’t free you from challenges in others. With broad understanding and solid knowledge, solving any problem becomes routine — provided you possess both the knowledge and the ability to apply it. Now you might be thinking: “I’ll just go buy potatoes — why take such a long route?” You can, of course — but that doesn’t mean no one grows them. If you don’t grow them, you’re engaged in another activity that you're being paid for. Perhaps you sell seed potatoes or transport them — and for that, you earn money to later buy what you can afford. This means you can’t always get everything you desire — because desires vary widely. Yet when viewed through the lens of realistic desires and aspirations, you can achieve what you wish — within the bounds of what’s attainable.
Having money, we believe everything can be obtained effortlessly — but here’s the question: by what means do you acquire that money, and how then should we understand the rationale of exchanging your labour for money? This reflects your position in society and your awareness of where you stand. I don’t want to resort to sarcasm, but it’s tempting to say: “Education is light, while lack of education means getting up at dawn to go to work.” Imagine this: you’re not working, but you have enough to live on. How much could you accomplish — and could you even stay productive at all? Wouldn’t you eventually fall into despondency, drinking, laziness, or illness? This is precisely where the system of self‑perception and self‑awareness comes in — understanding where you are and why you strive to gain certain advantages in life. You may visit fortune‑tellers, various gurus, or psychoanalysts — but you should know this: you can achieve anything; the key is having the desire to change yourself. How much time you’ll spend on this journey depends on you and your ability to apply knowledge effectively. Thus, your level — and how others treat you — ultimately depends on you.
At the core of any beginning lies the existing form for manifesting future action. For instance, an artist brings their vision to life through colours, using a brush as a tool, a canvas as the foundation, and an easel as a device for convenience in creation. However, one should also find the time, means, place — and, most importantly, the goal: the final outcome of the action undertaken, in short, a goal that brings satisfaction, wealth, fame, or oblivion. Right now, you’re focused on the result — but recognition of this work comes later. Through the canvas, you express your self‑sufficiency as it was at that time. Yet this no longer interests you if you’re no longer there; if you do receive this recognition, it gives you the opportunity to further express yourself — implementing your ideas as part of your evolution as a creator.
We, as individual beings, are alive and maintain a body temperature of around 36,6 °С, and throughout life we can vary this depending on our state — yet we can also change our mood and lifestyle. Life is an interesting, dynamic process — but we will always have two forms of self‑support. These are internal resources, based on knowledge, mental state, acquired skills, innate potential, and spiritual strength, as well as external resources, based on social relationships (family, friends, work, social structures, leisure, etc.) and material assets we create throughout life to address our needs — serving as tools to ease the life cycle itself. How does one make use of these two crucial resources? This becomes a highly complex task for most people on the planet. As a rule, these two groups are united by the meaning of life and basic needs. For example, love provides spiritual, physical, moral, material, selfish, tyrannical — and many other manifestations in the subsequent expression of the very essence of relationships. And how a person expresses themselves depends on who they truly are and on their potential — embedded through the genetic chain, capable of unfolding only through an informative system of knowledge accumulated throughout life, and through one’s desire to unlock it.
Many have attempted to create a template perception. A case in point is Marco Ezechia (Cesare) Lombroso — for some time his teachings were foundational, but time has put everything in its proper place, and no one measures skulls anymore to determine a person’s nature. Yet have you noticed how, in ancient times, certain traits were considered signs of divine foresight? A child born with an irregular skull was seen as marked by God and endowed with great intellect. Incidentally, even today during childbirth, one might hear midwives say that if a baby’s head is deformed, the child is beloved by God or will be lucky. In ancient times, people even deliberately deformed skulls — but over time, this practice ceased to be regarded as a sign of intellect or higher status.
E. V. Zhirov classified artificial cranial deformation and described four types: fronto‑occipital, occipital, sagittal, and round (circular). This allows not only to state conclusions but also to identify possibilities that originate in the womb — and to understand the very essence of subsequent brain development. Have you encountered cases where a person suffered a brain injury and afterwards began speaking multiple languages or performing various mental calculations? Thus, the position of the fetus may lay the foundation for a person’s future capabilities. But this raises the question of fetal positioning: why did it lie this way or that? What influenced it — the neural connection between the fetus and the carrier, or the physiological impact of the carrier? This points to various aspects of either a predictable future event or a random action with an unknown outcome.
Thus, we arrive at two types of events: future occurrences, through change, may lead to an astonishing event or an informational wave that sparks evolutionary change in humanity. Scientists have always been intrigued by the brain. For instance, the brain of the proletarian leader Vladimir Ulyanov (Lenin) exhibited unusual abilities. When neurologist Oscar Vogt examined his brain, it turned out to contain a cavity filled with cerebrospinal fluid — meaning pressure could have affected the brain differently. At the same time, it featured exceptionally large and numerous pyramidal neurons, a large frontal lobe relative to the rest of the brain, and a high percentage of cortex within the depths of the sulci. Ultimately, this resulted in an increased total size of the cerebral cortex. Incidentally, part of Lenin’s brain was illegally taken abroad for study. Of course, one can debate the nature of the brain endlessly, but the fact that external factors can influence it is possible. How to achieve this surgically remains unexplained — yet such influence through the power of one’s own desire and the efforts of the individual themselves is indeed possible, as confirmed by scientific circles.
One can find many basic definitions of relationships at all stages — but this in no way provides a complete understanding of the manifestations and processes occurring within you. Thus, everyone constantly thinks and generates thought processes. As René Descartes said: “I think, therefore I am.” The philosopher devoted great attention to thinking. In the Descartes's view, thinking is an attribute of the soul. Hence, the soul is your everything — although you may not even grasp the very concept of the soul due to its multifaceted interpretations, and identifying a single, definitive meaning is not feasible. The moment a person stops thinking, they die. This is why the brain is always active — in consciousness or subconsciousness — performing the function of expressing the soul through actions and deeds as a means of self‑expression as an individual. One might add: “I empathise.” But if you stop empathising, you become an egoist — capable of harming not only people but also the environment. This gradually erodes the ability to survive and suppresses those who cannot adapt — fully manifesting egoism and short‑sightedness. By denying the possibility to exist, you also deny the emergence of something new — and thus deprive people of the capacity for compassion. Compassion is a social feeling that motivates people to do everything possible to alleviate the physical, emotional, and spiritual pain of others and themselves — demonstrating sensitivity to the emotional aspects of others’ suffering. It primarily manifests in concepts such as honesty, justice, and mutual support. It can be considered partially rational in nature.
We have now come to the beginning. The concept of the inner world and the very picture of the world order can be built on scientific arguments: the origin of essence, evolution (methodology, cognition), as well as exoteric cognition — the description of the spiritual world, the mystical, and the numerological. All this is hidden deep within the human soul, consciousness, subconsciousness, and psychology — something a person tries to convey, encountering resistance from those who set their own foundation as the primary one. This means there is a great deal of truth and falsehood: an eternal struggle of reason takes place, which in turn fosters competition for building the best models of life organisation for the vast majority — bypassing individuality as an alleged inability to survive within the purely global servicing of what is happening. Only those who have created a solid foundation for self‑realisation can afford individuality in a generalised world.
Sorting through many intellectual works becomes difficult — this is where developed intellect is needed. Yet even without an in‑depth study of such works, we always have society, within which we build our way of life. Thus, it suffices to turn to the legacy of George Alexander Kelly (28 April 1905 to 06 March 1967), an American psychologist, therapist, educator, and expert on personality theory. He is considered the father of cognitive clinical psychology and is best known for his theory of personality — the psychology of personal constructs. In his works, Kelly outlined the idea that a person explores themselves and the surrounding world, its patterns, expressing themselves as an individual in the interpretation they have laid down as the foundation of their behaviour. The strive to understand human essence has accompanied all of humanity’s development — meaning human development is inevitable. But one question remains: how exactly will this development unfold? After all, any political doctrine leads to a specific structuring of society, directing its development along the path laid down by those in power and capable of governing.
For example, the period of the German Chancellor’s rule from 1932 to 1945 demonstrates a certain leap in scientific progress — but at what cost to humanity? From the standpoint of morality and physiology, it turned into a tragedy for those who became victims of resistance in the name of an illusion of future tranquility. All that remains is to unite all available facts and the foundations of our manifestation — to reduce them to the very essence of what is happening — in order to build a system capable of elevating humanity to a new level in the thought process and evolutionary development. Such a system would enable a calm transition to a new stage. The path we are to traverse is truly titanic — it stretches from the knowledge described in ancient times to the present day.
For instance, the wisdom of the ancients can still be useful in our time — the key is to understand the interpretation and comprehension of how it can be adapted to the modern way of life. If we look at world cultures, we can already glean much insight. The scientific knowledge humanity possesses already provides a foundation for understanding life organisation — and for adapting oneself as an individual within society and within one’s inner world. Understanding theory and practice is possible when we treat them as different developmental approaches that cannot yield a positive or negative result without each other. It is impossible to translate real‑life communication into purely theoretical discourse: in theory, one person will envision one thing, while another will envision something different. In science, it is possible to use theoretical calculations — but personal growth necessarily requires combining practice with theory. Many professors, gurus, and simply those who consider themselves reasonable people — basing themselves on documents that confirm their education — claim their theory is true in relation to anyone else’s, precisely because it is backed by an educational certificate. Undeniably, certificates and diplomas are needed: at least they let us understand what a person knows, and a probationary period helps reveal their practical skills in everyday life. Moreover, narrow specialisation limits the individual who lacks broad knowledge and the ability to make decisions in complex matters. It confines them to a specific field or a few fields — thereby directing them toward one or several areas while ignoring other aspects of life.
Thus, a degree or title provides an advantage throughout the entire chain of knowledge acquisition. The labour invested to achieve recognition in a narrow specialisation gives one an understanding and perception of the world order — because such expertise rests on an established foundation, and this is legitimate. However, at the same time, it also has a basis in formalism, which in everyday life is often seen as a form of rather primitive implementation (though not always). Still, for many people, this is sufficient. Each person has their own scale of values, taking into account that such actions lead to development and enrichment — albeit within a narrow spectrum of perception, based on the foundations in which they have managed to express themselves. At the same time, in their personal lives, such individuals may have achieved nothing in terms of family, finances, moral values, or social interaction — apart from a theoretical presentation of their knowledge. This knowledge is not grounded in work aimed at universal understanding; they simply hold a certificate or diploma. Yet it should be understood: such people also bring value to society.
Such approaches involve a fixation on a one‑sided notion of “life”. In reality, every person’s brain is unique, and understanding what one needs to achieve comprehension within society depends on the knowledge that a person already possesses. In short, what is needed is an evolution in scientific education. Higher education does not provide grounds for relying solely on acquired knowledge — in reality, such knowledge may only be applicable in rather basic spheres, failing to bring true success or happiness. In another scenario, an ordinary person may assemble complex devices, relying solely on a simple desire to do so — and the pleasure derived from the work may be overwhelming. The effectiveness of applying knowledge within M.L.R.D. depends on your desires and abilities to realise what you have conceived — specifically by you, personally. It is easiest to criticise someone else, leaning on one’s own knowledge and relying on a diploma in one field, while making arguments in another — trusting the education received at an institute. In such cases, no one will question “what is he saying?”. There are many gifted people — but is the individual themselves ready to work for the sake of the unknown, to uncover their own genius through their personal interpretation of knowledge? To discover something new is far more difficult — it is not given to everyone. It requires not sleeping at night, working tirelessly during the day, and enduring the inability to relax. This is the acquired taste — but in the end, it is through such efforts that great discoveries are presented to the world.
The cost of discoveries is great, but the essence of a harmonious, balanced approach lies in having room for inner self‑control. For example, Mikhail Vasilievich Lomonosov had the ability to achieve everything during his studies — precisely because he kept learning throughout his life. This applied to wealth, family, and his own needs: he engaged in scientific pursuits, found satisfaction, and — without fully grasping the essence of the universe — managed to understand the M.L.R.D. system without even being aware of its existence. He perceived his potential, which he was able to develop as a given natural endowment, and realised his aspirations in life — driven by simple curiosity. He was happy because he was engaged in what he truly loved, and this brought him satisfaction — which in turn gave him the opportunity to live and earn a living. In those times of society’s considerable backwardness — in terms of the then‑current understanding of M.L.R.D. — due to the scarcity of knowledge by today’s standards, he could not articulate his own potential and aspirations in the fields of science, life, and pleasure. Yet we do not stand still: we have the opportunity to understand and enable the use of knowledge for the greater good.
For instance, I always study people’s judgments and conclusions, and — like you — I form my own opinions. But I always highlight something new for myself, either in the correctness or in the rejection of the information and experience received. Thus, your judgments always remain your own — as long as they do not exceed universal norms of good and evil, and as long as they are driven by a strive towards creation, manifestation, and realisation. A person can manage external forces and act as a processor of information, while internal mental processes shape the very structure of the individual. Taking myself as an example: I began writing this book back in the 1990s, and the simplicity of my expressions reflected my limited knowledge at the time. I understood that expression should be deep, vivid, simple, clear, and concise in terms of meaning. Yet the essence I understood remained unchanged: I kept the expressions from all periods of description and only added new parts. My personal development and the way I communicate and express my thoughts have continuously grown, increasing my activity both in my inner world and in reality.
By studying all my habits and inclinations, a person uses their potential for their own convenience. But what do these habits say about your character in society? By changing the very structure of my thinking — based on the path I’ve walked — I have incorporated more and more new knowledge, which has no limits. The level of my knowledge and its application have transformed my spirit — and thus, changes in how you are perceived in society alter the stereotypes of your past and present self. This creates a multiplicative process: there are different versions of “you”, which sow confusion in society — people cannot grasp who is who, or whether it is really you. Of course, you put everything in its place, and others’ perception of you changes. Yet doubts torment them: how is this possible, and what is the catch? Where is my book heading? What is the purpose of my work and observations? I do not know — because everyone decides for themselves what they need. For me, it is a fully structured world in a unified understanding: a single whole, yet seen from different angles, sides, directions, and perspectives.
I will not claim that by reading this, you will understand everything and find a solution or a panacea for society — although I have stated many times that the book was written and I was ready to release it freely. Yet I always reconsidered whether it was truly ready, constantly putting the publication off. I kept thinking: what still needs to be reviewed, refined, changed, or reconciled? And, of course, there was my unwillingness to share information that was not fully prepared. In the end, it took me more than 30 years to complete it. After I write and publish it, people will say that I do not understand many things — and I will agree with you if you say so. As the saying goes, “live and learn” — one can never understand everything, even with my repeatedly supplemented completion of these works. They keep gaining deeper meaning, incorporating concepts from other sciences, and expanding knowledge and its application further and further. One could keep revising indefinitely — but it is better to state something and then look ahead together with others.
Let me tell you this: if you want to give people something that will help them develop, you should not think about fame, money, or universal admiration. Instead, think about how your work can give a boost to personal realisation — relying not only on yourself first and foremost, but by studying and testing whether it works for you and for society as a whole. Otherwise, all the time and effort you invest will bring disappointment to you and steer people in the wrong direction. In my case, time gave me the opportunity to hire an independent representative of M.L.R.D. productivity — a helper who, over the years, has put everything in its proper place through practical application of meaningful possible action. A mentor who tested my own judgment about the world order as a whole, applying all the arguments to myself. The realisation of self‑expression of meaning, manifested in the public sphere, came through time, natural intuition, and the desire to understand.
Take any athlete as an example. Will they reach the top without a coach who constantly says, “Endure, one more set, again”? Can they motivate themselves, endure, see and recognise their mistakes, and accomplish the impossible? Not everyone can do this. Yet brain training — like building up a bicep — happens over time. The activity of brain function can be increased. At the same time, your brain does not experience pain or feel fatigue when you are drawn into the all‑encompassing absorption of knowledge and the desire to be at the top of that knowledge — to understand the inner workings. But here it is crucial to know that switching tasks and resting are essential. For example, the ability to switch focus will help relax brain activity and provide protection. You just need to find that part of relaxation that can concentrate your neural capabilities in an instant.
I, for one, like to fantasise: I visualise architectural forms with colours, or a pond with fish and a fountain — imagining every tiny detail, reconstructing a complete 3D picture with all the colours. The images I picture are not like a full‑length film, but short 3D snapshots that I change in parts — each lasting 5–10 seconds. At the same time, I look at the real picture on my computer to help me find the right elements. I do this several times — and then make a quick sketch. After ten minutes, calmness and focus start to pay off, and the concentration work continues. But if the work drags on, or I have to strain my brain, thoughts, eyesight, etc., very hard, I simply need to stop — you’ll feel it yourself. Have a cup of tea or coffee, grab a snack, do a few pull‑ups on the bar — but don’t confuse this with a workout. As a result, I regain focus and order in my mind — and I’m 100 % ready to work again, so the work continues.
When I face a creative block or lack of inspiration, I understand it’s a kind of mental overheating — I need to collect myself. Physical activity has a direct impact on brain function. So, I might build a house or a gazebo, or simply lay natural stone — assembling flag stones into a single structure, placing stone upon stone (like a Tetris). I do it in my head too: I fit geometric shapes together, match lines on the ground and on the wall. In short, a complete switch of focus helps me reboot — a temporary shift into the physical world, some physical load on the body. At the same time, my brain itself starts to provide answers through physical action. The thought process begins to search for a broader horizon of possibilities. But this is only temporary: heavy physical loads and intense mental work are not compatible. The ability to alternate between them leads to brilliant results — both in creative work and in physical performance.
Let me repeat: Mikhail Vasilievich Lomonosov taught himself grammar, and his thirst for knowledge was so strong that at the age of 19 — despite all the prerequisites to assert his masculinity — he chose to embrace hardship, chaos, and the unknown, all for the sake of knowledge. This gave him far greater satisfaction, and satisfied his curiosity to tame the unknown. In the years that followed, he mastered many sciences. The malicious gossip of his time used to say: “Wherever you look, you’ll stumble upon Lomonosov”. But this was just envy — an attempt to hold back the development of science in a given country, to prevent many people from gaining insight. After all, a smart person is much harder to control.
I recall my own saying: “Whoever can convey their thoughts to the masses begins to govern the masses.” Thus, the masses should remain unaware of most knowledge — this is the lot of the ruling power, simply because it is easier to govern them that way. After all, an intelligent person is capable of outmanoeuvring society’s laws. It is like a game of chess: you make one move, and it sets off consequences for both you and your opponent. This means there will be counteractions to the very moves you initiated — and vice versa. A chess game may not end in your favour if you underestimate your opponent. At the core of a brainstorm lies knowledge multiplied by time, with social explorations added in — the collective inquiries of individuals within the public space. The result is a solution to the problem of transcending conventional social concepts — not by leaving society, but by rising above its usual frameworks. This gives you an advantage over those who do not understand or simply refuse to perceive it.
You may choose to accept or reject what the influential forces are trying to convey to you. But I recall another of my sayings: “The unconscious is not so significant at first, but it becomes fully assertive as perception grows — meaning it is entirely real and ultimately the only true thing.” This shows that the uniqueness of knowledge depends on your mental abilities and your needs. Humanity has stepped into a new evolutionary layer and has self‑defined a new type of human: Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing person.” Otherwise, it would be impossible to explain humanity’s colossal leap forward. This science, M.L.R.D., serves as a supportive tool for you — like a personal coach you can turn to at any moment. You can read it, draw strength from the power of words during moments of weakness, uncertainty, searching, or indifference. All that remains for you is to grasp the moment that gives impetus to your actions — to strengthen your capacity for rational thinking in whatever life situation you find yourself in.
When people read my works, each will take away something different. For example, imagine sending people who do not see the world with their eyes but perceive it through tactile sensations to a barnyard where identical horses are standing. Each person will form their own conclusion about the creature, based on their own worldview. The described being does not change in its structure or nature — which means they are all right in their own way. Many of the concepts described will simply fall away over time, giving rise to a cumulative body of knowledge and revealing the true purpose. Any judgment or theory can carry information — but only time and the universal tendency to seek truth can provide an answer or improve what has already been created. This is our evolution, progress, development, and self‑realisation. Through knowledge, you can improve your health, elevate your level of spirituality and self‑development, unlock your potential and hidden capabilities, and motivate yourself to pursue new opportunities. You will come to say what you can do and why you need it — and all of this leads you to a deeper understanding of knowledge.
The division between natural sciences and humanities provides a global understanding of the very sacral world of a human being. At the same time, it is important to realise that a humanities‑oriented person will always be able to proceed from theoretical action, while natural sciences are built to a greater extent on practical action. Humanity has managed to reach an agreement and divide the sciences — and this in itself is progress. It allows a person to recognise their place in life and find a dialogue with nature, where ethics and aesthetics intersect, along with natural science, politics, philosophy, economics, astronomy, chemistry, biology, astrodynamics, geometry, and drafting. All these fields unite into a genuine worldview‑based essence.
With every page, I embed an ever deeper meaning into our conception of life’s rules — and it becomes more complex with each new spread. The ending has not yet been written by me, but the path will be defined by you. The foundations of thinking for any person who engages with scientific inquiry in one form or another are invariably at a higher level than for someone who does not strive for scientific, cultural, or creative activities. Any science recognised by us — be it psychology, anatomy, biology, chemistry, and so on — represents, within the overall M.L.R.D. system, a generalisation of everything, yet in a strictly narrow focus. It is a generalisation of all things in all things, relying on the experience and knowledge attained within the complex system of human knowledge. Managing one’s own mind in life becomes a reality and an opportunity to express oneself. The world is arranged in such a way that it is easier to break things down and manage something small than to create a global understanding; one does not feel in control of everything without having the full spectrum of sequential actions and solutions for the tasks at hand. The problem may be so vast that one can only reason about a prospective solution in their own mind, without actually seeing the solution. Due to a lack of knowledge about the solution, one may create an illusion multiplied by time — though there are exceptions to this as well.
Let us consider the monk Pandito Khambo Lama XII Dashi‑Dorzho Itigilov (Buryat: Этигэлэй Дашадоржо) (13 May 1852 – 15 June 1927). He was a Buryat religious figure and the head of the Buddhists of Eastern Siberia in 1911–1917. With the permission of the highest Buddhist authorities in Buryatia, approximately 2 mg of samples were provided — hair, skin particles, and clippings from two fingernails. Infrared spectrophotometry showed that the protein fractions had characteristics typical of a living person. For comparison, similar samples were taken from living individuals — and they proved to be identical. Notably, the flesh exhibited no death smell either when the sarcophagus was opened or even now.
The examination was carried out by Viktor Zvyagin, head of the Department of Personal Identification at the Russian Centre of Forensic Medical Expertise, an Honoured Physician of the Russian Federation, and a professor. He argues that a temperature of 20 degrees Celsius is considered an absolute sign of death — which means the subject is “more dead than alive,” according to the judgment of someone versed in forensic medicine. However, according to Buddhist religious figures, the Teacher’s incorrupt body was solemnly transferred to the temple — which suggests that he is “more alive than dead” and remains in a state of meditation.
The concept of energy‑based perception of the world offers little explanation for a person, yet it reveals a great deal about inanimate objects and substances. As a result, approaching this issue from different angles yields markedly different conclusions — and each side can be right. We are able to rationalise how this is possible with our minds, but we cannot simultaneously experience all those states at once. If we translate this into the language of describing shapes like a circle or an oval, we might hear a whole range of terms: ellipse, circumference, silhouette, figure, outline, loop, ring, ovoid, egg shape, disk, sphere, two closed curves, basket curve, closed smooth convex curve, parabolic, hyperparabolic curve. These are the obvious labels. But what emerges from this that is non‑obvious, unconventional? We understand that an oval grows out of a circle — but seen from a different angle. And if we apply a radically revolutionary approach — one that is, at the same time, obvious to everyone who knows the basics but fails to connect them into a single whole? For example, what looks from above like a circle may in fact be a spiral — a spiral with a circular line that appears closed from above. In reality, it is a spiral that can move as an energy flow either upwards or downwards, in wave‑like terms, if we project it onto a plane. Thus, development and understanding lead us to something that is entirely obvious — yet not readily applicable. It opens the possibility to create a better world, where your potential is capable of changing the very structure of existence.
The tendency to perceive the scientific, cultural, artistic, and musical potential accumulated by humanity gives a significant boost to a person’s mental abilities and to their relationship with society. Of course, we should not forget the individual’s spiritual and moral world — the one they are born with and the one they shape over time. The manifestation of hidden phobias or secret desires does not always lead to positive development, whereas the use of one’s acquired capabilities leads in a wholesome direction. Meanwhile, accompanying immoral behaviour and the manifestation of negative traits in those who seek to draw closer to those currently capable of effecting change, although certain actions related to society—or rather, that section of society capable of carrying out such actions—remain a factor. There is a manifestation of essence in one form or another — but is the individual themselves capable of recognising the actions of those who are unable to create, while still having the capacity to consolidate benefits around them for the sake of others, not just for their own gain? After all, whoever consolidates the energy of a collective will, in any case, receive supportive effects from it. Variation and substitution exist everywhere; the choice is either to see them or to change them yourself. Either approach can help you make the right choice. Of course, your psychological state plays its own game with you — and here again the question arises: are you ready?
Aliénists (the old term for psychiatrists) were the first to offer help and to try to understand the structure of illness, obsession, and supposed otherworldly influences on a person. Later, we see how this evolved into psychiatry and neurology under the pressure of modern worldviews and the opinions of prominent figures such as Freud and his daughter Anna. The labels and definitions that mark humanity’s development are not stable; they always rely on past conclusions, reinterpreted in new ways. The state of the external and internal environment gives rise to or awakens the conscious and unconscious manifestation of M.L.R.D. — in whatever form you have prepared your body and mind to express it, within the environment you find yourself in. For example, imagine you are in danger of getting lost in a forest. What do you do? What are your strengths, knowledge, reserves of energy, and what time of year is it? This shows how your brain will search for a way out — and in doing so, you will unconsciously begin to fight against the force that your own worldview and knowledge of the possible consequences of being in that situation have given you.
Cognitive psychologist George Kelly emphasised the particular importance of the practical application of any action and of comprehending that action intellectually — even if one does not fully grasp all the consequences at the moment of acting. This perception of the cause‑and‑effect relationship begins to emerge with a deeper understanding of one’s own actions. Conscious problem‑solving and task resolution stem from the development of mental abilities combined with the growth of knowledge within the individual. This also demonstrates that M.L.R.D. itself is the foundation of the emerging body of knowledge — and this leads to neuroplasticity. The brain changes under the influence of the information it receives; consequently, cognitive capabilities transform in response to knowledge and life experience. Over time, some neural connections strengthen, while others fade away. By developing new connections and pruning weaker ones, the brain can adapt to a changing reality — and thus change the person themselves. This was convincingly demonstrated in the works of Paul Bach‑y‑Rita, an American neurophysiologist renowned for his research on neuroplasticity.
Brain research is carried out in every country — and this should allow resources to be allocated to science at an appropriate level, aimed at advancing one’s own understanding rather than supporting someone else’s agenda. We can note, for instance, that the Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain conducts serious research. Of course, it is not as publicly visible as the Esalen Institute in California — associated with psychologists Michael Murphy and Richard (Dick) Price — which helped launch the human potential movement in the 1950s and 60s. That era also included rather crude interventions, such as drilling holes in the skull to reduce intracranial pressure. But all of this was just the beginning. Over time, we have come to see that the brain needs to be trained — not drilled.
Consider the works on the study of neuroplasticity. Michael Merzenich, in his research, demonstrated the real possibility of increasing capacity and improving cognitive abilities. It is important to provide explanations, detailed descriptions, and clarifications — rather than building theories on assumptions, as Freud largely did in his general framework. This is not to say that the foundations he laid were false. On the contrary, his reasoning made it possible to begin a structural analysis of pressing problems — problems that, at the time, lacked a clearly defined concept for addressing the challenges posed both by society and by the scientific community, given the specific way research was applied back then. Please do not mistake my words for dystopian, false, or anti‑conceptual tendencies — they are in no way meant as a sign of disrespect towards Freud.
The development of our inner world forms the foundation of the entire world. To understand our perception as a whole, one can turn to philosophy. Psychology, as the study of the soul or as an indirect exploration of human nature, is connected to most sciences. The term psyche comes from ancient Greek and means “spirit, soul”, while logos translates as “teaching, knowledge”. In scholarly works, yoga, Zen Buddhism, Sufism, Islam, and Christianity, this knowledge contributes to the concept of personality. Anthroposophy (from the Greek ἄνθρωπος — “human” and σοφία — “wisdom”) is a religious and mystical doctrine that emerged from theosophy. It was founded in 1912 by Rudolf Steiner with the aim of offering a wide audience methods for self‑development and spiritual knowledge through human thinking. At that time, humanity did not yet possess the colossal level of development, social interaction, and ability to rely on past conclusions with adjustments for the modern world and its structure. This interaction and the knowledge gained allow us to assert that, unnoticed by ourselves, we have made an evolutionary leap — predetermining the new designation Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing person”. And the M.L.R.D. framework remains a supportive tool to help structure your knowledge in its final expression.
Norman Doidge (who studied neuroplasticity) observed real improvements in practice, based on experiments. Notably, he himself was initially a sceptic and believed that the brain was incurable. Yet the brain’s ability to change its functional structure through a person’s own actions and thought processes has been demonstrated in real cases: patients who had suffered a stroke learned to move and speak again. Elderly people managed to improve their memory, and children raised their intelligence levels and overcame learning difficulties. This is possible at any age — provided a person has the desire to apply their knowledge not under external influence, but driven by their own inner motivation. Of course, if we start taking joy in dreams without turning them into reality, it smacks of a certain lack of resolve and an unwillingness to move forward. It’s not enough to feel happy about something in your thoughts if you take no action. Looking at it more broadly, if we do nothing but make plans and rejoice in their imagined realisation in our minds — substituting real, lived joy with contrived, unnatural satisfaction — this tendency borders on delusion. Even if it grants the right to transgress society’s accepted norms, it does not always lead in a negative direction. This leads to utopian thinking — but where, then, do we find the intellect and reason we truly need?
Simply put, the basal ganglia are clusters of grey matter located at the base of the cerebral hemispheres. And feeding them with certain types of mental work — involving complex variations in the essence of representation — trains and strengthens them. Of course, many people today will argue the opposite, but time will be the ultimate judge. What I am offering you will not harm humanity — just as the “aqua” pill, which worked on the power of suggestion, may or may not have produced results after use. But that was a treatment method; what I propose is development — an expansion of your abilities. This will give you the opportunity to express yourself, demonstrate better performance, and thereby attract attention to your person. That, in turn, opens the door to growth in all directions. The more you know, the more money you can have; the more people will want to interact with you; the more respect you’ll earn, because others can rely on you in a moment of need; the greater your confidence that you’ll leave a better legacy… This list could go on and on. There are only advantages — and no disadvantages. In the end, the choice is yours.
Take Steve Jobs, who died at the age of 56. Before his death, he said: “Yes, I achieved great success in life, but apart from work, I had little joy. And now, lying here sick in bed, all the recognition and wealth I have are meaningless in the face of inevitable death. Make sure you build warm memories while you’re alive — they’re the only things that will warm your soul. The older we get, the better we understand that a watch costing 30 thousand dollars and one costing 30 dollars show the same time. A wallet worth 3 thousand dollars and a wallet worth 3 dollars hold the same amount of money. In a house of 3 000 square metres or 300 square metres, you can be equally lonely if the people you love aren’t by your side. I hope you understand where your true, inner happiness lies — and that it doesn’t come from the material values of this world.”
There are many life stories worth discussing. Let’s take one of the most striking examples of intellectual labour: the ordinary man, the mathematician Grigori Perelman, who withdrew from scientific collaboration and refused the Clay Institute’s million‑dollar prize. He stated that if the Poincaré conjecture had been proven correctly, he needed no other recognition. His achievements may seem tied to loneliness from your perspective — but not from his own. He chose to live a simple, isolated life, free from imaginary problems and imposed stereotypes. But think about this: presidents may vanish, perhaps even entire states will disappear — yet humanity will come to value different kinds of achievements. Perelman will remain in history; he will be remembered for centuries, like Achilles, with poems written about him and films made, much like those about the Pythagoreans. Everyone talks about rulers and countries — but few remember them, and even fewer connect a particular discovery to a king or president, or link a statesman to the breakthrough of a great scholar. That is the axiom of life, with a concrete tie to the event itself.
Continuing the understanding of M.L.R.D.: the world is a natural foundation for models and theories — it emerged deep in the ages. Despite our understanding, our universe does not have strictly fixed laws within society itself. This means flexibility can shift the very notion of things — in the direction chosen by whoever interprets it correctly, relying on experience, knowledge, power, fame, and so on. In this way, one can become a gravitational centre of thought and spirituality within a certain circle or level of influence — shaping the environment around them in the fullest sense of the word. A person’s ability to live and exist in disharmony with themselves, society, and nature does not negate the very act of their life. It merely reveals a lack of education in terms of spiritual, material, and scientific perception of the world order and life organisation. Our task is to find the right path: to help penetrate the depths of human essence, to reveal the hidden abilities that nature itself has embedded in every person, and to comprehend the fundamental basis of everything we consider most powerful in our conception — that is, water, ice, steam, fire, earth, air, life. We should give free individuals the opportunity to move from mysticism to a fully real, exoteric direction — to understand the very M.L.R.D. system, which encompasses matter, energy, space, and time. Within this framework, the forces of relativity and many others create the harmony of a complete picture — multiplied by space in motion and the flow of time. To achieve balance, or a harmonious world within oneself, one should resist rudeness, insolence, and coarseness, etc. The very core of this essence lies in the knowledge of substance and the eternity of matter — contained in the inexplicable notion that “everything is in everything.” Only those initiated into the depth of truth are capable of comprehending the unknown — cause and effect, space and time for the human being — to give motion in emptiness and create motion everywhere. For even a single insignificant substance provides a connection to all that is invisible; yet this does not give one the right to doubt its action — the interaction of particles — nor to overlook the concepts of discreteness and continuity.
This notion and its application allow us to comprehend the very thinking of the world — to represent it through mechanics and physics as an illustrative example of the world’s structure, offering a clear model of humanity’s development. On the one hand, there is the ability of one part of the brain to move forward and its development, followed by further progress through logically irrefutable scientific research. On the other hand, there is a non‑logical explanation: the esoteric direction. This is simply not recognised by society as scientific research, precisely because it yields no tangible fruits from which a state or corporation can derive profit. Hence, judgments in this direction are deemed illogical — built instead on inner, intuitive knowledge. Yet, at the same time, the foundation of thought remains essential for invention or for expressing one’s inner desires. A person is able to substantiate their thoughts — translating them into a capacity to understand speed and mass through inner human knowledge. Not everyone knows that a person spends up to 50 % of their waking time in thought — and much of this time is spent aimlessly, lost in fantasy. Now, imagine replacing this activity with purposeful, intelligent mental work. The benefits are obvious: increased brain activity, improved memory, a clearer life strategy and plan for achieving set goals, better ways to solve problems, and more effective interaction with society.
Abilities expressed in formulas simplify the order — but you still need knowledge, since humanity has spent centuries building foundations and is able to express thoughts within the frameworks accepted by society itself. Now you might start doubting again, saying you’re no longer at that age, that it’s too late. But I’ll say: no, never say “no”. You are capable of much — you simply don’t believe in yourself, or in me. I’ll prove it later. Daniel Levitin and James R. Douglas have confirmed neuroplasticity in people across different age groups. We should discard the notion of “interdisciplinary sciences” as something separate and instead see everything as a unified whole. The act of dividing and isolating creates a limited understanding of science and the world at large.
And this is where M.L.R.D. comes in: it is the part that can develop a person through the integration of everything — yet in a concise, digestible form. Later on, this makes it impossible to control the individual. Those who are interested in exploiting personalities show this in many ways: work for money, work for the promise of future growth, work in exchange for connections, the coercion of the weak by the strong, unequal marriages where a woman has no rights and a tyrannical man hides behind the established rules of the society they live in. In short, you can endlessly draw parallels with real things happening all around us. The creators have substituted values as a primitive means of controlling society — an unconscious manifestation of influence wielded by those who shaped the very essence of our world’s structure. Dividing the indivisible leads to misconceptions and complicates the true essence. What we need is a different kind of resolution: a reverse addition, a multiplication that increases potential — even though it makes control and subordination more difficult under new understandings.
Esoteric and psychological directions represent sacred knowledge held by a narrow circle of people who have reached it through long‑term study and trials — a desire to comprehend and know that rises from the depths, like a volcano erupting upwards. The foundation of it all is M.L.R.D., and it should be studied as a whole. Could a person from the past have gathered all of this together? No — only a few could do so. But now, many people possess such knowledge that those from the past would be astonished by the scale of this potential. Thus, it becomes obvious: we are a new kind of humanity — Humanae cognitionis, “the knowing person”. In the modern world, one should have the desire to explore the unknown, the drive to expand one’s horizons, and to awaken one’s own motivations — without resorting to a Pavlov's experimental situation with a dog. Right now, we are like those dogs: instead of food and light, we get work and money, awards and titles. In the global sense, these things weaken brain function due to their ultimate futility — a reordering of priorities lies ahead. But public consciousness is beginning to realise that money is merely a tool for realisation — a means to illustrate possibilities — while leaving the inner, spiritual part of oneself untouched, so it can grow and give birth to new ideas steeped in beauty and tranquility. A person without a spiritual world becomes a person without world or spirit. Their movement leads into an infinity of misunderstanding. The notion of mysticism points to branches of culture laid down in the past but lost in the present — and at risk of being forgotten in the future, buried under misconceptions. Attaching significance to oneself without morality, conscience, ethics, aesthetics, or the fundamentals of world order leads a person to destruction and delusion — not only of themselves but also of those who fall under the influence of false understandings. Such interpretations can be propagated by society in opposition to the true essences of the universe itself.
We also know an example where humanity variously exalted itself, asserted its own superiority, and denied that the Earth revolves around the Sun — and the outcome was Giordano Bruno, burned alive at the stake for his true beliefs, which were not recognised at the time but have become a foundation for us today. The description of the very essence is obvious: it is enough to look at the essence of reality itself, to try to put into words the essence of one’s own life through the deepest study of oneself — exploring the most hidden, sacred views and desires. One can also look at the Dunning‑Kruger effect. This is a hypothesis put forward in 1999 by the American social psychologists Justin Kruger and David Dunning. It states that people with low competence in any area, field, or type of work imagine themselves to be the greatest experts. At the same time, they make mistakes but regard their own actions as correct — failing to notice the errors they have made. The core of such behaviour is this: a person possesses natural intuition and gut feeling, yet lacks the necessary knowledge in the field they are moving in — thereby harming themselves and perpetually holding themselves back. In simple terms, a person speaks and acts in a poorly understood area like a child who is taking their first steps: they fall and make mistakes, yet they do so with enormous confidence and a sense of being right. On the other side of this effect, there are those who are intellectually highly developed: they tend to underestimate their knowledge and capabilities, downplay their abilities, and remain uncertain about their conclusions and actions.
From this, we can conclude that everyone possesses the knowledge of M.L.R.D., yet they lack a certain internal influence to the necessary degree — either intellect or confidence. In other words, some believe people value them highly because they hold a high opinion of themselves, while others think the opposite — that they are valued lowly because they assess themselves so. You can clearly see and know that confidence and uncertainty each bear their own fruits; only an understanding of the structure and essence of the movement will enable you to unfold as a person in society and become an individual in the sphere of observation and realisation.
Let us now examine everything that happens around us in greater depth, taking as our foundation A. V. Mudrik’s quote: “The world is a concept denoting the collective human community existing on our planet.” I will understand S. L. Rubinstein’s notion of the “human world” as a set of things and phenomena correlated with people — an organised hierarchy of various ways of human existence. In 1986, J. S. Bruner identified the paradigmatic mode of understanding the world. In its most general form, he emphasised that in the process of transitioning from content (meaning) to sense (understanding), not only the conscious logical components of reasoning are realised, but also the unconscious ones — those rooted in the motivational and need‑based sphere of goal formation and meaning generation. Thus, relying on A. R. Luria’s conclusions, we can say that “meaning is a stable system of generalisations standing behind a word, identical for all people.” Hence, we are on the right path, yet scientific understanding alone is insufficient — we should also look to the spiritual roots within us. As M. Foucault put it: “The knowledge that drives you towards truth expresses you as a subject.”
The transformation of the subject (transformation) in psychology is a process of profound changes in the personality structure, leading to a new perception of oneself and the surrounding world — and thereby to a changed perception of the world as a whole. The cognitive aspect involves a change in mindset, mental attitude, and analysis. The emotional aspect entails control and self‑regulation, managing one’s state. The behavioural aspect consists of actions that do not contradict generally accepted norms, while effectively manifesting new images. The spiritual aspect encompasses spiritual development and growth, moral development to embrace new understandings and reflections on the world. This also divides into various types or subgroups to facilitate a swift transition to new worldviews and to simplify the understanding of your personality as the transformation of an energy subject in its relation to the world.
The inner dimension is a stable understanding of the world and of your place within it — an openness to society, accepting others as they are, with their own individualities. It also includes the strength to perceive your position in society as a transitional period — one you are preparing for. The outer dimension is about redirecting your capabilities towards society: without harming external opponents in the surrounding world, you accept changes in your place of residence, job, or position as part of the movement towards self‑realisation. It is about being oriented towards set goals and tasks, about the ability to gather yourself, make an effort, use all your capabilities, and move forward — changing yourself and relying on every resource you have. Any person’s structure is very complex, and there are various objective and subjective situations that hinder a person’s ability to realise their plans. At this point, you should turn inward again and understand the mechanisms that simply hold you back. There are many such mechanisms; let us focus on some of them — they form the core set of inhibiting factors, cause significant harm to you, and act as a brake on your path to being reborn in a new perception of yourself.
Cognitive dissonance creates a contradiction within you — between your old knowledge and the new. Emotional triggers are situations, words, smells, sounds, or memories that can suddenly change your behavioural response in a way disproportionate to the current moment. Experience in overcoming problematic situations — coping strategies — is a set of conscious or unconscious psychological behaviours and emotional methods that lead to minimal losses, helping you cope and restore balance. This includes the conscious adoption of new values and meanings, and commitment to the principles that truly matter to the individual.
Neuroplasticity of the brain means the ability to change its structure and functions over a certain period of time by creating new neural connections and reconfiguring existing networks. This allows you to increase cognitive abilities and acquire new skills. Anything can be achieved through specific actions: some have a greater impact, others a lesser one, because every person is unique — and you should understand what will work for the initial understanding of yourself as an individual. Examples include psychotherapy, meditation, self‑awareness through literature, religion, trainings, seminars, and interest groups. However, I believe that all of the above — this entire operating structure of understanding — stands at a lower level, because creativity in all its diversity offers far greater opportunities when combined with the aforementioned methods. My own approach is based on drafting, mathematics, physics, architecture, anatomy, and biology. This prevents me from getting stuck in a single field and from falling into the trap called “detaching yourself from the root causes of knowing yourself as a person.” This kind of development leads to fundamental changes in personality. The M.L.R.D. framework brings stable income and manifests in various effects: fame, money, love, alcohol, adrenaline, and so on. Everyone has their own inner demons — those personal quirks that act as a catalyst, pulling you off course, preventing you from achieving your goals, and stopping the process of global self‑transformation.
Various researchers have carried out studies. For example, the psychotransformative approach of M. Sh. Magomed‑Eminov produces a change in the desired outcome: the mental state, together with brain activity, alters the essence of the subject, followed by practical application and realisation in material reality. In psychology, there are different approaches to studying the transformation process. The research of V. A. Petrovsky explores how new “surplus” capabilities appear and accumulate — and, in the course of a person’s life organisation, change the subject’s behaviour, thinking, and abilities beyond situational activity, releasing internal phobias rooted in a heightened sense of self. This leads to many unknowns throughout the life cycle.
The very essence of life grants the opportunity to live, to coexist, and to find a point of tranquillity — a point that is an inseparable whole of two principles (white and black, yang and yin). The impossibility of abusing the power of mental insight — achieved through self‑control — gives one a concept, but not an actual realisation, where white becomes black and black becomes white. This relates to the notion of wave‑like movement (a quantum concept), where chaos and order together develop the very system of beginnings on a global scale — yet it is so subtle that one should look closely to see, in reality, the essence of the entire universal scope, or to understand the brain’s operation in all its aspects. Find your own niche, the first step of cognition, the reference point from which you will begin the movement — the enlightenment of yourself as an individual. Yet this is inconceivable in the face of those fundamental pillars of existence that you dare to touch. The beginning allows your own foundations to manifest: whether you wish to be someone within the structure of knowledge, or to be the structure within knowledge, with subsequent enlightenment. It helps you grasp the non‑emotional understanding of the world itself and the orderly calm of your entire state — without rejecting the essence in which you do not merely exist, but truly live. As your systems of perceiving life and your way of living evolve, they can change the environment around you — the very environment in which you will continue to live.
The concepts of philosophy and theology provide insight into the depth of the soul’s state and one’s wholeness in this world — where one does not contradict the other, but instead helps to comprehend the inexplicable through the enlightenment of one’s mind, soul, and heart. The convergence of wisdom through the humanities and natural sciences — where the M.L.R.D. direction serves as a foundational principle — aims to give scientific concepts meaning by encompassing the totality of the inexplicable, to understand the depth of nature and the essence of our knowledge. The drive for knowledge is inherent within every person’s inner world, and their cognitive abilities are capable of revealing and manifesting the essence of their aspirations — whether these rest on acquired knowledge or innate, natural understanding. In particular, knowledge within each of us cannot be nullified; its differentiation occurs spontaneously and independently. The ability to manage knowledge and expand its scope allows one to see new pictures within the plane of the world — pictures that can be reproduced in various spaces, not only in three‑dimensional ones.
The notion of a five‑dimensional space presents a difficult concept, especially when it comes to describing it through an individual’s own assumptions. Human movement can change; yet, by the very nature of things, human movement is constant — regardless of whether it is mental or not, for space itself is in motion irrespective of one’s actions. Therefore, your personal sense of calm does not grant calmness to the world you live in. Consequently, to “see what is happening” is not the same as seeing in the very moment of action. It is impossible to fully grasp an action as it occurs, because the development of movement and time can create an effect: if the action unfolds around you with sufficient speed, then, at a certain level of perception, the eye and the mind will be unable to see or comprehend it due to its velocity. This means the action exists, yet you do not see it — you believe everything is fine, but in reality, you may be in danger or on the threshold of a new interpretation of future actions that do not reflect your true essence in the process. Different interpretations of any sciences, religions, mystical, or esoteric traditions — when treated as isolated concepts — lead to disorder, isolation, and the fragmentation of the very essence (of the Universe). M.L.R.D., by contrast, unites what has been divided for centuries — yet within the context of certain sciences, these have been developed in different directions from one single whole, drawing an invisible line that marks a new reference point. In fact, this reference point has a zero baseline — moving either into the positive or the negative, much like the weather outside, on the street or across the land. At the same time, life adapts and continues to thrive, while for you, this is merely a comfort zone — a space for rest, work, and so on.
Manifestation — that is, the key concepts — can be understood either through the theory of relativity or through the flow of time in space. The use of methods to grasp these concepts relies on the self‑sufficiency of the worldview system itself, drawing on both the humanities and the natural sciences. In this context, the addition of targeted knowledge is not superfluous; rather, it remains invisible due to a rather weak understanding of M.L.R.D. — with its clearly structured scale or sequential formula for action. At the fundamental level, there is a duality of concepts referring to the same thing, yet perceived from different angles — a different way of “touching” the hidden knowledge that actually exists. Such knowledge often lies right on the surface, not subject to any particular structures in the world. Yet there is a restraining factor in how these concepts are accepted within the global community.
Let us turn to the statements of Aron Abramovich Brudnoy:
“A person begins to think when they feel the need to understand something.” This is what has led us to the evolution of our understanding of the brain and our abilities.
“People’s attitude to nature is a transformed form of their attitude to one another.” The very essence of human beings and nature is one and the same, for we see ourselves as an entire system, while nature is a fragment of something greater. Understanding nature will help a person draw closer to the common origin, uniting everything into a single whole.
“European culture, to which we all owe so much, is, in essence, the fruit of the self-awareness of the former provinces of the Roman Empire.” Reflection and inquiry are possible only when there is a tool for carrying out thought processes—processes built on the ability to conduct scientific work in the surrounding environment, work that brings certain benefits to society.
“Experimental psycholinguistic analysis shows that language has unequal capacities in relation to reality: it describes the succession of events in time with great ease, whereas describing spatial relations and figures usually causes considerable difficulty.” The ability to describe the structure of the world is possible when knowledge is based on the systematisation of scientific works into a unified whole, and then conveyed in such a way as to generate new understandings—expressed in a simplified descriptive language. This facilitates the development of society and allows us to advance into unknown realms at the everyday level.
“Any message can be directed either to a precisely known addressee or to an indefinite and unlimited circle of recipients.” The development of a new scientific understanding will initially be linked to certain individuals who will be able to explain the very essence of the structure of the world, grounded in M.L.R.D. To lay the foundation is a difficult path, but it is possible—and many are already, even without realising it, creating the groundwork for universal development.
Let’s take P. N. Johnson-Laird. This researcher into cognitive concepts put forward the hypothesis that to understand a fact, event or phenomenon is to possess a working model of it. Such conclusions laid the foundations for the study, exploration and understanding of psychological cognition within oneself, with a view to expressing knowledge of reality through systematic conclusions based on phenomena in life as experienced by the individual. Becoming aware of every fragment of life as it unfolds, with all the inferences and understanding that arise in the process of reflecting on the whole picture of the structure of life—through problem-solving and practical application in reality within a cyclical delay involving various unknowns, yet repeating in meaning across time and space, the expression of the concept of the whole picture is facilitated by the ability to understand certain processes and influence them yourself, which alters the very meaning of your existence; consequently, you should go beyond the horizons of understanding, first and foremost expanding your own understanding, which is capable of steering these processes.
We create the complexity of understanding ourselves, even though the objective and the subjective are always with us — they shape reality and, at the same time, express who we are. When a doctor, a stylist, or anyone else “runs an experiment” on us, we go along with it consciously: we want to understand something, to take part, knowing that we’re an individual piece of something new or special. But what if our whole life is an experiment — one that’s written out as the realisation of some greater design? We might be taking part without even realising the process. Yet we also have the ability to step out of that experiment, either subconsciously or consciously, and change reality within the vast variety of experiments happening all around us. We can start running our own experiments or move with an experimental model, getting ahead, outpacing the original outcome. That gives us the chance to shift the result in the direction we need, while still staying embedded in the heart of what’s going on. Then, for you, there’s no difference.
Whether you’re ahead of your time or lagging behind, you see the process as it unfolds specifically for you — and that means the outcome of events depends on you. But the key question is: at what level does this happen? On a subconscious level, or in real, tangible action? This matters a great deal for you as an observer who has the power to put the outcome into practice in any situation. That ability lets you bring change to other structures — ones that feel huge to you, even if they’re barely noticeable within the larger system, like a tiny glitch that doesn’t shake the whole thing. And a small glitch, a bit of chaos, can actually be useful for your growth. Think of a single drop of water landing on well‑oiled gears: it won’t stop them from turning, but for the drop itself, the experience becomes surprisingly interesting.
Infinity itself has no notion of beginning or end — it only knows movement, whether things are shrinking or growing. The self‑sufficiency of the system creates a complex idea, and we grasp it through perception and understanding. The distortion of the space‑time factor lets us assess how we affect ourselves. Our ability to comprehend space and the very nature of spatial existence, to perceive the Universe, is limited by the fact that we don’t have the full picture. This lack of a complete view distorts everything around us: misconceptions and narrow focus hold back development on a planetary scale, affecting every individual. The mind’s capacity for perception that seems to work even beyond conscious effort — reaching down into billions of neurons — measures its own self‑development as an extra layer of awareness. This deeper understanding shapes personal qualities and helps reveal the bigger picture of our shared existence.
And M.L.R.D. gives society the knowledge of the principle of complementarity — acting as a guide that brings everything together into a single whole, helping people unite around something complete and understandable by clarifying what is happening. Sensation and reflection reveal the essence through the self‑organisation of a person’s inner world. This happens via gaining an understanding of the complete picture of the world, with the individual clearly identifying themselves through self‑control — so they can integrate the complex image of the system of world order and worldview. With such a shared outlook across humanity, the world can move forward in intellectual, spiritual, moral, ethical, scientific, and religious dimensions. It opens the way to building a new society through a natural evolutionary transition into M.L.R.D.
The worldview that exists now has outlived the order that is built within the moral‑aesthetic paradigm through the abstract perception of the system as a whole, which leads to chaos, degradation, and destabilisation through the distortion of society’s morality due to unreflected actions and consequences — as a fact of destruction, delusion, and leading to uncontrolled chaos, in which new foundations of life organisation will begin to emerge, as a glitch for self‑development having a protective mechanism that limits self‑development. But those who will use M.L.R.D. will be able to avoid the root of the problems created by ignorance and denial, for a person will always gravitate towards warmth, knowledge, and peace for the fullest self‑development and control of public space in all its forms through all possible aspects of life activity or organisation in the world, where one can continue their form of influence through scholarly works, expressing the entire surrounding space, which is capable of changing the course of events, concepts, and illusions of everything that is happening in the vast world. A person is capable of changing it by moving to the next level with the help of artificial intelligence, which, under human control, creates global opportunities. You will be able to act with AI, but to become the one who pushes the boundaries of understanding, you should enter the next stage of self‑development, which exerts fundamental beginnings of the unknown in everyday life, yet is quite real in the vast world of information and its application.
Benjamin Libet suggested that a person becomes aware of the desire to perform an action (for example, to raise their hand at a random moment) only after the “brain’s already decided” to perform it. This called into question the concept of free will, since it turns out that the conscious “I” isn’t the initiator of the action but only becomes aware of the decision already made by the brain. To reflect on what’s happening in life shows that if there’re those who’re already able to change their lives, then we’ve already got the opportunity to change the structure of life organisation at the everyday level, which contradicts the creator’s system, and thus the observer’s left us the choice for self‑development, for improving interaction in the future for us, without changing the outcome of the foundations as a whole, in a global sense. And the vast majority remain without free will due to the natural interconnections for perceiving the picture in its full form, not wishing to change the outcome of what’s familiar, due to a program glitch — let’s call it what’s familiar to people: laziness, apathy, fear, uncertainty, shyness, etc.
Varieties of developmental glitches are inherent, but the approach of calculation, measurement, and conception merely gives the opportunity to discover what we understand or see. Niels Bohr insisted that some properties of quantum objects are fundamentally incompatible within a single measurement, and an attempt to measure one of them inevitably destroys the other. Then, from the principle of complementarity that the scientist proposed to describe quantum phenomena: for a complete description, two mutually exclusive sets of concepts are necessary, each of which is applicable only under certain conditions and can’t be used simultaneously with the other; the exit or entry into the structure provides a comprehensive perception at the boundary of converging structures. And thus, the form should be plastic, changing and mutable, capable of existing simultaneously in several states, with hidden parameters not described by current knowledge, at the boundary of exit for entry, changing the structure of penetration. Nature at this level is arranged differently, as is the case with knowledge: applied perception and fundamental understanding, control, comprehension of the melting of ice, the boiling of water. But there’s always a transition boundary from solid to liquid or from liquid to vapour: without changing the structure, ice won’t enter water, and water won’t enter steam. The answer’s simple, but giving an explanation’s much more difficult: to show the middle, to comprehend this moment, but the meaning is obvious.
Let’s look at the brain from another side. It needs a certain environment, warmth; it operates on 12 watts; it can hold millions of gigabytes. The clock frequency of a neuron’s about a kilohertz. Thus, the brain produces dopamine: the generation of neurotransmitters called dopamine. They transmit the nerve impulse in the cells of nervous tissue — neurons — due to ageing, and neurons need warmth. Thus, two types of processes are created: the axon transmits the impulse to another cell; it’s long, and the dendrite, which receives it, has a short process. And at the moment of connection, a synapse is created. Each neuron has a synaptic vesicle that contains mediators: the release, that is, the work proceeds strictly in a controlled and dosed process. Excesses can cause both harm and well‑being; impulses are transmitted along the entire nerve chain, forming a flow of information. Mediators are dopamine, along with glutamine, histamine, and serotonin.
I won’t go into depth, but I’ll say right away: the entire organism depends on this substance; introducing it artificially is useless. There will be no increase in the structure of capabilities, as the brain blocks any penetration. And if you thought of introducing it through the blood, you will only get a hormone. The entire structure of the human body, the functioning of all organs, sleep, movement, mental abilities — all of this is dopamine. By the way, if you train the brain to work correctly at the necessary concentrations, there will be no problems. However, the habit of the brain producing more dopamine leads to problems. The side effects include drugs — I won’t list all types — smoking, excessive fantasies accompanied by joy. The outcome may be dire: schizophrenia or simple addiction with degradation and difficult recovery. Incidentally, these are side effects of a large amount of dopamine, so you should understand what your brain is and what your understanding of the brain entails. I repeat: do not try to understand everything at once; time is needed for processing and assimilation of information. It is better to stop and weigh it again: are you able to digest and implement the information received, realised in terms of possibilities?
If, nevertheless, you have stayed with me and are reading, understanding that you are ready to go further, let’s look more deeply into our brain structure and begin to understand through comparison. Moving into new understandings, we turn to a visual comparison. Does this mean that the Universe is like the brain, or the brain is like the Universe? Franco Vazza and Alberto Feletti identified a similarity between the structure of neural networks in the human brain. The role of connections is performed by the axons of the object; they’re organised into networks with nodes, similar to the network of galaxies in the Universe — galactic filaments.
Composition. In the brain, it’s liquid (77 %), and in the Universe, it’s dark energy (73 %). The brain and space have a similar structure of connections, which differs from random networks due to the physical principles of development, despite the obvious difference between the forces that govern galaxies and neurons. Thus, volume and space play a role, but the lack of understanding of the interconnection now doesn’t mean it’s obvious; later, the brain processes information using complex electrochemical signals, which allows it to think and form consciousness. Cosmic structures, on the other hand, are formed under the influence of gravity, dark matter, and dark energy, but this is literally difficult to understand — which means it’s debatable and can’t be considered the truth in the present, though there’s the possibility of realisation and comprehension in the future. Similarity. Galaxies and neurons create nodes and connections; information in the brain is transmitted via signals, electrical impulses, while in the Universe it’s most likely through the interaction of gravity, which possesses colossal capabilities.
Incidentally, the ability to write a book over a long period makes it possible to insert new scientific discoveries, as demonstrated by the work of Franco Vazza, an astrophysicist from the University of Bologna, and Alberto Feletti, a neurosurgeon from the University of Verona. The fluctuations in the density of matter and its distribution in the cosmic network are the same as in the network of neurons in the human cerebellum. The comparison is interesting: micrometres versus billions of light‑years, yet the essence is the same.
Look further. The number of nodes per 1 mm³ of the brain’s cortex is 100,000 neurons, and in the Universe, calculated at 300 million light‑years per side, there’re about 100,000 galaxies; in the brain — cerebrospinal fluid, and in the Universe — dark energy. We know about cerebrospinal fluid: it’s produced daily at a volume of 50 ml, constantly exchanged and reproduced, maintaining a volume from 140 to 270 ml, creating pressure, density, a special environment, chemical composition, and colour.
If we assume that dark energy may have its own structures, we’ll discuss that a bit later. Thus, we use these as new possibilities for the evolution of the human species — by manifesting evolutionary capabilities within the short span of the human species itself, placing it on a new level: Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing human”. This’s based on morality and ethics, not on subordination or elevation, but on sacrificing time, material goods, consumption, and family happiness in order to achieve set goals. This doesn’t provide full certainty in the realisation of what you’ve conceived, if there’re no opportunities to apply knowledge multiplied by experience.
Thus, seeing the future doesn’t mean moving into the future. The brain’s capable of seeing the future by understanding the very situation it finds itself in and anticipating outcomes. For example, you’re a strong person, and someone provokes you into a fight. In your head, you can calculate the outcome of the event — but how far ahead you look is the very basis of the future. For example, you weigh up your strength, experience, skills, and your opponent, and you conclude that you’ll win the fight, and you’re inspired by your victory. You’ve won the fight by overpowering the other person, and you console yourself as the winner. But you miscalculated — you actually lost, because the person you beat went to the police, you were detained, and you’re forced to go and apologise to the person you beat. In the end, you lost: you won the battle but not the war. But if you’d realised that your strength shouldn’t be wasted on such a trivial person, you would instead call law enforcement officers, who would reason with the person who was taunting you. Then you remain out of their reach, there’re no problems, and life goes on vigorously. The same applies to the rises and falls in the price of gold on the stock exchange: when to buy, and why are you doing it? To preserve value, or to make a profit? Knowledge plays a key role, but primitive actions can be carried out on Earth, taking into account the difference caused by the change in dates — and thus, it becomes possible to “move” back to a previous date by applying motion, but this would involve time, not place. Therefore, it remains to understand the meaning of the global perception of knowledge transfer, if time’s merely a structure of change, and in the global cosmos it differs. It becomes possible to transmit information from the past to the future and vice versa. The main thing is to understand how to do it.
Prolonged reflection on the nature of matter leads to prolonged learning and the self‑improvement of one’s inner world. It’s possible to comprehend the very essence of M.L.R.D., but only through movement and time. Striving allows one to know and understand the beginning, but not to grasp the end — or to be aware of the end without truly knowing the beginning, the prime cause of the system. And if everything’s much simpler than we could imagine, asks Nick Bostrom in his book Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? (2001, first version). Let’s be brief. The meaning of the book touches on three main points, which may be true:
There’s a possibility that humanity, as a species, may not survive until the moment when it can understand itself and explain its hidden capabilities — until the “post‑human” phase. Striving and knowledge increase the possibilities through M.L.R.D. to create the conditions for its realisation.
It’s possible that a post‑human civilisation will run a significant number of simulations of its own evolutionary history (or something similar to it).
There’s an assumption that our world exists within a vast simulation or multiple simulations, which can’t be understood or explained with our current knowledge and capabilities.
And in 2003, Bostrom suggested that we’re probably not living in the real Universe, but in a global imitation — a computer program created by a highly advanced entity. At the same time, Robin Hanson’s work How to Live in a Simulation, published in 2001 in the Journal of Evolution and Technology, expresses his view on the practical approach if we’re in a simulation and realise we’re in it, yet don’t fully understand it: 1) live for today, 2) strive for well‑being, 3) maintain an active life stance, 4) be interesting to society, 5) exert all efforts to make people happy.
Of course, this is his vision of how to create successful growth, but in life everything is much deeper. You have to live for today, solve all problems, don’t put them off until tomorrow, but at the same time create a platform for tomorrow. You need to strive for well‑being, but understand well‑being as a tool for the environment of development. You should have an active position, but don’t rush into active development through revolutionary changes, because there’s a society that should be prepared. You should be interesting to society as a structure for the transmission of knowledge and opportunities. You should put all your effort into making people happy, create conditions for sharing knowledge.
In short, it’s getting easier to figure out our brain process, but there’s still a lot of complexity. Let’s look at what we see anyway, but we don’t dig into the essence. And everyone in life knows what déjà vu is — when we’ve seen a certain part of life before and we’ve ended up in it, living our full life. How do you explain it: a glitch in time, a time gap, the effect of foresight, when two realities come together in one, where you from the past saw what will happen in the future? You end up in a foreseen reality, and it really unsettles you: did I really live this, or in the past did I see how the future reality is being created? We have the effect of a poorly spliced filmstrip; maybe these are special markers created for segments of life, where this déjà vu effect is just the end and the beginning of a new segment, because it’s hard to create an entire life given that the program can be adjusted by someone or by the person themselves. Maybe these are points where they check you, what state you’re in, and who controls the structure of your life — you or the one who sees you.
Or it’s like a placebo with an aqua tablet, where self‑suggestion restores your activity, influencing your body. There’s a substitution of information in the brain itself; you rely on what was said or what you yourself built to increase physical capabilities and not only that. It’s like reality and fiction built on belief — that is, a thought physically changes the structure of the material. In short, the non‑material influences the material under the influence of a certain force, a desire. It remains to create a formula: non‑material, material equals the force of the desired. We get the understanding that in reality everything can work, but there’s no way to understand how it happens; the depth of understanding remains deeper than our capabilities.
Let’s continue. The sense of presence: many have felt that someone’s watching them. Or the feeling of the presence of a living or dead person. And such facts are often told by scuba divers and pilots. Yes, there are many situations, especially during stressful moments. What’s happening — a close contact with the energy of the parallel realm, a strong energy of something unseen, the person’s own protection from something, fear, support, or the flows of two realities? There’s the possibility of a window, a glitch in the structure of the universe, where, like a bubble, it has a beginning and an end. There are many situations, and when you have dreams where you live through a life, foresee the future, create new discoveries, write poems, we can’t understand what’s going on, and we can assume all sorts of things: the brain’s glitching, it’s opening up the future, writing a new reality, you’re moving into a structure where your world is being created… Everyone has their own answers, but what is the truth — that’s the question. Since we can’t tell the difference between another kind of dream and reality — all the receptors and sensations were so fully engaged, while there was no gravity, and what you desired came true according to your mental commands. Maybe this is how the brain shows its independence.
These reflections push us toward the moments when we can see ourselves from the outside: some see themselves during surgery, some while meditating, some under the influence of various stimulants. But how do we explain the ability to see ourselves from the side or from above? It becomes mysterious, since our eyes are the only factor of perception, yet we see from an external viewpoint. This means energy can transmit an image to the brain without the eyes, rendering the picture inside the brain itself like a remote camera. This suggests either that you’re being monitored by invisible energy connections, or that the brain can expand the reach of its own energy, moving points of control beyond the body as a safety mechanism — when the brain itself decides it needs to obtain some information.
Here, of course, we can unfold various concepts, for example, the matryoshka doll effect. A person may consist of different layers that create a certain kind of protection and the capacity for development. As an example, the brain protects itself with cerebrospinal fluid, the skull, flesh — even the hair has a protective effect. And if there are invisible layers to our eyes, and maybe more than one, the core meaning remains the same. Either your brain does this on its own, or someone gains access through your brain.
The brain and our world are complex. And, of course, when we lose a part of our body, we experience phantom pains. But why does the brain react this way, when the reality of the missing part after surgery or for other reasons is obvious? It’s a denial of accepting reality, or the body itself isn’t made of material but of energy, and the essence of that energy pulsates within its usual boundaries — but, given our perception, they’re invisible. We expose that structure to uncontrolled influence, and glitches lead to the emergence of phantom pains. Maybe, of course, the body is rebuking itself for the loss of a body part, reminding itself that the consequences of that loss bring suffering — to assert the integrity of the organism as a defence against its own inability to control what’s been lost.
It’s hard to describe, but, for example, how a person can see through another person’s eyes. What’s most interesting is that you don’t just see a picture — you realise you’re seeing it in different, brighter or duller colours, because everyone has their own colour perception. You’re looking at the same image from different angles, since a person might be taller or shorter. How does a person connect to another person’s consciousness or brain without even knowing it’s happening? Is it a glitch of the material within the immaterial? The possibility of being controlled by another observer of the program — another watcher? Did the brain’s power grant you temporary access, and if so, for what purpose — by accident or not?
Life itself is a very complex factor, especially if you consider meditation: slipping into a state of conscious movement driven by the strength of your will and understanding, all the way up to taking substances into the body. What is this state where you can disconnect from the world, not really knowing where you are in space, having no weight or volume, experiencing the highest kind of pleasure, turning away from any sense of empathy or sensation — transforming into immense power or fading into something invisible? The brain opens new horizons, letting a person experience something they never encounter or understand in everyday life. Take this example: when you walk around in heavy boots and then take them off, your feet feel like they’re flying. Whether you change the pressure in your body by diving underwater or climb a mountain, the bodily sensations are completely different. For pilots, pleasure walks the edge with tension; a sailor longs for endless emptiness…
In short, entering that state through the mind itself, without using drugs, is the highest expression of what the brain can do. Life then follows new rules, even if only for a while. This shifts a person’s entire worldview, showing that the power of possibility means a person can become stronger and faster. We all know how someone can lift enormous weights to save another, jump over a huge wall, or run away from danger. How does the brain stop registering the weight of a dumbbell that, say, weighs 10 kg? When you start lifting it, bending your arm toward your chest and back, at first, you feel tired — but at some point, you simply stop noticing its heaviness. You can do it a hundred times, a thousand times, and everyone around you will wonder how you manage it.
Is it the brain’s way of protecting itself from something, or can the brain simply be tuned to subordinate physical capabilities to serve certain goals — either the brain’s own or the person’s? In this way, the brain might influence gravity or the perception of gravity. I think we won’t delve into the physicochemical processes, since the brain itself decides how much, what, and when to produce in order to maintain the desired capabilities. It might take a whole lifetime to explain everything, especially when the brain generates false memories. There’s plenty of literature on this topic; I won’t list the authors, since I’m not aiming to explain the underlying nature of it — but we all understand that it’s better for the brain to build its own protective mechanisms than to endure the discomfort of an unprepared consciousness having to accept what is. You know how we can project those grandmother’s pancakes from childhood — in reality, just ordinary, simple ones baked in a stove. But you had been out playing all day and were so hungry that this became a distinct flavour cluster, imprinted in memory.
A person’s utterance, which at the right moment produces the effect of an exploding bomb, turns that person into a bearer of information — information that you believe and trust. Or a singer might sing about something that has been troubling you, and her voice will acquire a certain value. Or women and children who have endured suffering in the family or harassment in the street develop a protective effect that they are deprived of in ordinary life. So, one can imagine that the brain constructs thresholds of values, problems, and life stories depending on your capacity to live within the system that is created in reality by the brain itself and by you — as a blocking mechanism. What is the role of brain activity, and why is it that we understand some things but not others? Hypnosis breaks into our brain, creating the possibility for a certain individual to enter your mind, connect to it, and begin to manipulate it against your will. This shows that it is possible to connect, to transmit data to an external structure, to see what is hidden from the bearer themselves, or to compel the bearer to do something under influence. This demonstrates that the brain is a structure within a larger system, closed off from external interference — yet there remains the possibility of it being edited from the outside by someone.
The conclusion that the brain is a shared structure is worthy of reflection. For instance, the herd effect on the brain — or, as one person put it: “Even a clever person grows dull in a crowd.” This has both a positive and an undesirable aspect, depending on how one looks at it. One can believe in something, collectively passing on certain attitudes by inheritance; or one can resist someone, having the desire to eradicate what one disagrees with in any given case. People unite and change the essence of things, but these possibilities should be united in the knowledge of oneself and the surrounding world — in this way, we can transition into a new realm of understanding and perception. Why do we use the power of persuasion on the masses only to instil belief and ensure compliance, rather than to foster free and universal development? The question is not open — it is quite clear. Although the temporary state always plays a role in life, it raises the question of why the brain can produce a deformation of time, or a dilation of time, even if only on a smaller scale. For example, during moments of fear, danger, the loss of a loved one, joy, or pleasure, time may pass differently for you: it may stretch out or fly by quickly, altering your physical reality and suppressing the temporal reckoning — though this does not affect the time experienced by other people, the observers.
As an example, a person may see bullets flying and dodge them. No, this is not a scene from The Matrix, the film. I was told this story by someone about the distant year of 1995, when there was a shootout between two opponents, and one of them dodged the bullets, seeing them in flight — and it seemed as though time had stopped. He was still wounded, however, because seeing is one thing, while controlling the body at high speed is another: it comes down to the body’s plasticity and the level of control. Does this mean that time is merely a unit of measurement, introduced for the convenience of calculations — from the earliest counting tools onward? Or can you, by virtue of your own volume and mass, have your own temporal measurements, creating your own magnetic and electric fields? Does it mean that the brain, through the sense of perception, transforms your emotions into a different form — shifting them from one structure to another — and uses these capabilities as a means of protection, development, or as a kind of system failure? Or is it simply a random reproduction of the system outside the established rules — something that goes unnoticed? Yet, if one could manage the very essence itself, treating it as one of the control structures…
Then it becomes unclear why the brain needs pareidolia — the visual illusion whereby we perceive images and silhouettes in clouds, foliage, or sand. What is this — are we searching for something, or explaining something to ourselves? Perhaps the brain simply constructs a limited form of freedom of thought as a protective mechanism, giving the impression that the mind is free to make choices. Or perhaps reality intersects with fiction because the brain cannot distinguish the set parameters, and so it projects what it understands, outputting something structurally similar to those parameters. Ultimately, recognising the margin of error, it justifies this as freedom of choice, ‘filling in’ the world — which suggests that the brain independently implements a structure for world‑building, but only within certain boundaries. It is difficult to answer many of these questions, yet in cases of collective hallucinations or collective actions, the brain still bears responsibility — there have been various such instances.
The laughter epidemic in Tanganyika in 1962: three schoolgirls broke into uncontrollable laughter, which rapidly spread throughout the school and soon affected more than a thousand people. The dancing plague of 1518 in Strasbourg: around four hundred people danced in the city streets for several days without stopping, until they collapsed and died from heart attacks, strokes, and exhaustion. People see halos in the sky, ships, cities that do not exist… And thus, the processes underlying these phenomena appear to lie beyond the scope of our individual brains — as if a kind of ‘supermind’, responsible for us, has its own structures, malfunctions, and margins of error.
Nevertheless, in one way or another, our brain is connected by invisible threads, which points to a system of overall integrity — a unified structure that creates a shared reality and synchronises the illusion. And since this does not harm the system, it does not disturb anyone. How does the brain influence synaesthesia? It is not a disease, merely a rare phenomenon whereby a person perceives reality differently. Such a person can lead an ordinary life — just as a bat perceives the world in its own particular way. Grapheme‑colour synaesthesia: letters, words, or numbers are associated with specific colours; for example, the letter M is associated with blue, while the letter L is associated with yellow. Spatial‑temporal synaesthesia: numbers, days of the week, and months are perceived as arranged in space in a certain order — as a line or a three‑dimensional structure. Music‑colour synaesthesia: people may see colourful images when they hear music. Olfactory-taste synaesthesia: words are perceived with specific tastes and aromas.
The essence of these phenomena lies in the inter‑neuronal connections within the brain, influenced by genetic predisposition or change. The root of such influences is usually found in early childhood: trauma, psychedelic substances, or the experience of losing one’s sight. During development, the brain may fail to separate certain pathways, discard some, or create new neural connections under the influence of the environment, the demands of learning, and the pathways responsible for the senses. Thus, you may gain an advantage in information processing through associative thinking — this makes memorisation easier — or you may face ridicule. The outcome is the same: the brain can completely alter your way of understanding and perceiving the world, how you live, what you strive for, and how confident you are. As a matter of fact, you can change yourself and uncover new meaning through a complex architectural construction — one that you yourself can lay the foundations for. With a plan, a project, finances, materials, mechanisms, labour, time, strength, knowledge, and practical application, all of this and much more brings about change within you.
Here, you should understand and reflect: the pressure is immense, and the brain will create an artificial state. Psychologists write about this: many people depend on the opinions of others, on surrounding influences, imposed values, stereotypes, and generally accepted norms. For example, the blue‑and‑black dress: at the end of February 2015, a photo of a lace dress by the designer Roman Originals was posted online. A debate erupted over its colour — did it appear blue with black stripes, or white with gold? Each person had their own truth. Thus, the illusion of colour representation is highly complex, especially when factoring in its presentation online and the deceptive nature of visual perception. Or consider Schröder’s staircase — a two‑dimensional optical illusion in a drawing. We may perceive it as a staircase where a person is constantly climbing if they move in one direction, yet if they go the other way, they will always be descending. The illusion is named after the German naturalist Heinrich G. F. Schröder, who published it in 1858.
It’s getting harder to perceive and understand everything. How the brain creates the tunnel effect during the transition to the afterlife: people see a light at the end of a dark tunnel. What is this — a release, a transition to a new energetic state, the activation of releasing energy with subsequent transmission, a drop in blood pressure, a lack of oxygen and glucose in the nutrient medium, or simply a disconnection from this world — a chance to influence the essence of the structure within this space? It’s impossible to understand the incomprehensible without gradually explaining all the possible factors within our knowledge — factors that can lead to a gradual perception and understanding.
Let’s recall the fairy tales where characters spoke and interacted with water, earth, wind, moon, and sun, accepting them as fairy‑tale figures coming from the depths — not as a scientific work, but as a fable, a tale, an entertainment. Only later do we begin to provide explanations for the unknown capabilities of humans. Look at the concept based on the Dyson sphere. In 1960, physicist Freeman Dyson proposed a hypothetical astro‑engineering project comparable to the radii of planetary orbits: a spherical shell around a star with a certain radius. In this way, a technologically advanced civilisation could have such a structure, able to harness the energy of the central star to support the existence of living matter, other forms of matter, and invisible energy flows for life in various forms. No, this isn’t the basis of Olaf Stapledon’s novel Star Maker, although the sense of his reflections unknowingly touched upon a structure of information that lies beyond our current understanding — yet might be fully objective later. The Dyson sphere is a hollow sphere within a solid shell, with a centre that draws in stars and planets. It receives influence on its orbit from other orbits as it revolves around the star.
In 1997, Robert J. Bradbury put forward a new idea — the “matryoshka brain” — where the core concept is to build a vast computer the size of the Sun. A star with several spheres: the inner one draws energy from the star and ejects spent fuel as immense heat; this is how computations and control happen. The next shell receives the spent energy and processes its own computations, then ejects its own spent energy. And so on: each subsequent sphere consumes energy at a lower temperature, processes the information, and passes similar processes further along. But what if this whole version holds some truth, yet with certain inaccuracies?
The Sun is immense, and it can execute vast decisions across all spheres. Meanwhile, a human, with their own brain‑structure, displays their own decisions — and within a person’s field of action, various objects and individuals always appear. And the sphere of influence depends on the person and on who they interact with. So, the Sun, as the star that maintains stability in the Solar System, also has its own structure of governance. The Sun is arranged like a layered cake or a matryoshka: the inner shell concentrates all the knowledge that is constantly being transmitted and that exists all around us — you just need to connect to it or learn to read the information. Imagine the Sun as a supermind, where neurons carry information within energy flows. The immense temperature makes it possible to expand the capacity of knowledge flows to unimaginable levels — since, on Earth, energy and knowledge still move along separate paths. But imagine entering the system of solar influence and trying to connect your brain to it. Suppose you’re granted the chance to pass through the visible shell of the star and reach Observer Number One in the Solar System — though this observer isn’t significant on a galactic scale, let alone a universal one. The knowledge you’d connect to would change you and your world — but only for you, not for the surrounding world as a whole.
Thus, one should find an intermediate layer between the human and the star — or build a bridge. After all, the space and time required for the connection will still take some time, even if it’s negligible. But this only works if you’re reaching out and the star is willing to accept — and that’s precisely the question: a person, being connected to the star, generates certain actions. If one can find that intermediate state, a swift transition and exchange become possible — or the chance to alter one’s essence while connected, and to make use of the structure’s own capabilities. It becomes unclear: are we all just people, or are there programmed solutions at play? Perhaps people lack free will due to a weak grasp of their place and of how the world is structured, along with an unclear sense of their purpose or a new kind of perception. We know people as part of the crowd — those we don’t know personally but see constantly without interacting; we hold information about them. Objectively, numbers have grown more important than people: we’re measured in figures; our capabilities, needs, desires, consumption, interactions, and movements are calculated. We’re pushed into a standard mathematical model that’s tied to the living.
The core lies in understanding the system: does humanity even need so many people to live within a simulation? Perhaps there simply isn’t enough room for everyone to manage the simulation while simultaneously controlling the system — in which case you’d be generating false simulations, leading to a glitch in the simulation. This would trigger a kind of natural selection at the level of simulation control — the result being the removal of part of the simulation. And free radicals create aggressive particles with unpaired electrons, damaging cells; the result is disease and accelerated ageing. In a simulation, this is akin to the computer term “bit flip” — data corruption via electromagnetic waves, a bit changing (cooling, antivirus, data correction). In reality, it’s a glitch in brain activity, a suppressive biological process: treatable with antioxidants, or reflecting DNA damage.
One can speculate at length, but let’s look at the global spatial concept: the system’s transformation in our world, with its narrow scope of application. For a program, there’s no difference — it operates according to a preset system of obedient execution. Or there’s a takeover of control: the program, together with the observer, continues its action with new inputs. This doesn’t alter the core foundation on a global scale; instead, it creates competition, spurring new algorithms to produce and introduce the creator’s new data — data that might even have been pre‑inserted as a form of added complexity. It could represent a transition to a new observer level, or a removal of observers. The structure of observers is changed by an observer, without altering the rules established by the creator.
Our entire life is a search — for knowledge, for one’s other half, for money, for food. Perhaps an observer who’s slipped out of control, amid the mass of observers, should seek out their own kind to expand their capabilities — or to engage in an unspoken adjustment of the essence of the observers who remain in another plane of illusory existence, governed by parameters set by the creator. In short, it’s a transition to a new level — the notion of a fifth dimension or other dimensions, or of space as a whole. Then we can put forward the hypothesis that the brain is a computer — but what kind? A quantum one, or a biological computing centre? This idea was proposed by scientists from Trinity College Dublin. The study was published in the Journal of Physics Communications in 2022. And the depth of the connections doesn’t lie in the neurons, but far deeper, at the quantum level: neurons, cell lattice, microtubules, and individual proteins (tubulins) perform several actions simultaneously, altering their structure and having the potential to function as qubits — the basic unit of computation.
The essence of understanding a computer lies in the difference between perceiving it as a machine for calculations and creation, and perceiving one’s own capabilities at a computational level — something you do constantly. This doesn’t allow one to truly recognise oneself as part of a computational mechanism, especially as an independent unit in making decisions about one’s own living space, let alone in influencing one’s world in any broader sense. Of course, the term “quantum consciousness” sounds, one might say, rather trivial. Naturally, our brain consists of elementary particles, neurons, heat, and runs on electricity — thus activating neural networks through the neurons’ activity, which act upon and shape brain function. Matthew Fisher’s theory on the influence of quantum effects on brain function, developed by scientists at Cornell University in 1986, explores creating conditions to increase coherence and elevate consciousness. The entanglement of qubits exerts a chemical influence throughout the brain.
Is our organism psychologically prepared to cope with such challenges, which would affect the entire central nervous system? Even though vital activity depends on quantum coherence. In 1979, physicist Alexander Davydov described the quantum dynamics of proteins, cell membranes, bioenergetics, muscle contraction, and electron transfer in biomolecules. In the book Life on the Edge, by Jim Al‑Khalili and Johnjoe Macfadden, it’s suggested that some enzymes operate on the basis of particles dematerialising in one location and instantly materialising at another point in space. A. Chenu and G. Scholes proposed that bacteria implement a quantum search algorithm (quantum walk), transferring electron energy by moving simultaneously in different directions — thus finding the shortest path through chlorophyll to the reaction centre. V. Loewenstein used high‑resolution spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and detected signs of quantum coherence in the protein molecules of rhodopsin — the main visual pigment responsible for photoreception in rod cells. These are one of the two types of photoreceptors, the peripheral extensions of light‑sensitive retinal cells — responsible for converting photostimulation into neural impulses. They enable vision in low‑light conditions (night, twilight) thanks to their high light sensitivity. Van Naters and H. Bokil described ephaptic transmission — a special mechanism of intercellular interaction between neurons and the olfactory system, enabling the detection of even the faintest aromas and scents.
We can see that research into understanding the brain and its capabilities is progressing rapidly, yet everyone seems to be circling around the core issue without truly grasping it. This is because our brain itself isn’t ready to immediately embed into the structure of its own processes and thus control them fully. It remains to structure everything into a unified essence to realise oneself as an individual, relying on the brain’s own data processing to expand its working capacity. New connections will help resolve the core issue through the gradual study of ever more new structures. Take the multi‑layered nature of knowledge itself, like the Earth from its core to outer space. Imagine how many layers there are: the exosphere, thermosphere, mesosphere, stratosphere, troposphere, atmosphere, then the Earth’s crust, mantle, outer core, inner core… Now it becomes clear that understanding the very essence of how things are structured is a highly complex process — but it’s entirely solvable. When this will happen is still an open question, but that doesn’t mean the search for truth is closed off.
The Hameroff‑Penrose theory highlights the role of microtubules — intracellular protein structures that form part of the cytoskeleton. With their symmetry and lattice‑like structure, microtubules are proposed as the carriers of quantum consciousness. The non‑algorithmic nature of brain processes suggests that the act of consciousness, from a neurophysiological standpoint, is realised as quantum‑gravitational effects within microtubules; quantum processes are considered possible there. The hidden capacities within a human being reflect the integration of information, subjective experience, and also free will. In 2013, experiments showed that the brain doesn’t exhibit quantum effects on the scale required for Orch‑OR — but this may simply reflect a lack of understanding of how the underlying mechanism actually works. This means that further discoveries in this field still lie ahead.
Recall Kurt Gödel’s work on the incompleteness of mathematical logic, published in 1931, which addresses the fundamental limitations of formal axiomatic systems. It shows that a human can prove mathematical calculations in ways a modern computer isn’t capable of doing. Computers hold vast amounts of knowledge — with speed of processing, storage capacity, and orderly organisation. Yet a human can go beyond invisible, unimaginable horizons of concept, logic, and conjecture — things a computer formally cannot do. But this doesn’t mean a person isn’t a structure with brain activity that exists beyond what we understand as a computer.
Roger Penrose wrote about this in his books Shadows of the Mind and The Emperor’s New Mind. We can again hypothesise that the brain is a quantum computer, even though we still can’t fully describe the processes in the brain that go beyond our current understanding. In their work on “Orchestrated Objective Reduction” (Orch‑OR), Penrose and the anaesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff proposed that microtubules — structures within the cell cytoskeleton — play a key role: they could store and process information via quantum effects and exchange data with each other through biophotonic coherence. In 2022, a team of physicists from the University of California, Santa Barbara, detected signs of quantum coherence in microtubule proteins at room temperature. This finding supported the possibility that quantum states can exist in brain structures. At the same time, researchers at the University of Alberta in Canada reported that microtubules are able to temporarily trap light, and anaesthetics significantly reduce the time it takes for that light to be re‑emitted. This quantum effect may be directly linked to the mechanism of consciousness — since anaesthesia temporarily suppresses consciousness.
We can conclude that an increase in brain activity lies ahead of us, while the means to boost it already exist today. And our understanding of these processes is becoming clearer and clearer. Take the work of psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover. In his 2002 book The Quantum Brain: The Search for Freedom and the Future of Man, he argues that quantum effects could accelerate computational processes at a microscopic level, and that non‑linear chaotic dynamics might amplify quantum fluctuations. Thus, even a scientific community that tends to deny such ideas, in its own individual way, can see and acknowledge the brain’s capacity for new kinds of action — actions that aren’t fully explainable within conventional psychiatric frameworks. These actions involve “modulating large‑scale mesoscopic and possibly also macroscopic neuronal activity.” This ties back to the idea that non‑linear chaotic dynamics can amplify quantum fluctuations, shaping large‑scale neuronal activity. This was put forward by psychiatrist Jeffrey Burke Satinover in his 2002 book The Quantum Brain: The Search for Freedom and the Future of Man.
In the 1990s, Carl van Vreeswijk and Haim Sompolinsky proposed an explanation for the seemingly random activity of neural networks through an elegant model. It turned out that in large networks (around 10,000 cells) linked by random excitatory and inhibitory connections, chaotic activity can emerge spontaneously under the right conditions. Haim Sompolinsky put forward a new approach to the origins of free will, linking it to quantum physics and chaos in the brain. He highlighted how even the smallest events in life can have far‑reaching consequences for our decisions and actions. The awakening of chaotic actions and excitations can influence decisions, reactions, and counter‑reactions — showing the possibility of making independent choices, while also revealing our inability to control vast processes, which blocks the full awareness of all underlying mechanisms. This, in turn, demonstrates the effectiveness of M.L.R.D. in practical application: it operates without stepping beyond the brain’s controlling segment as a structure of vital activity, yet it exerts a real influence on certain structures related to quantum psychology, philosophy, healing, wealth, strength, leadership, poetry, art, vocal performance, meditation, and so on.
The quantum nature of consciousness cannot be explained by classical physics; understanding it requires a grasp of quantum mechanics, given the multitude of hypothesis groups. Accordingly, the brain itself may categorise information as innate, organised, or channeled; complex or collective; spontaneous or intuitive; or insight‑driven or inspirational (sudden illumination). It relies on the patterns that come to people — and this reflects the manifestation of free will. These five types influence the very structure of human self‑regulation.
Thus, we see an ordered structure for dividing information — but in reality, behind this apparent calm lies an ordered chaos. Most people live within clear rules and established frameworks, while only a few are capable of creating chaos that they themselves control. This doesn’t mean they break and overturn everything; rather, it’s about stepping outside the system of rules in a way that allows them to change their own lives and, in effect, manage the system around others. In everyday life, everyone does something that goes beyond rules and norms — but these deviations are usually minor and do no harm to the system. So, if many people are able to introduce small amounts of chaos, this can effectively balance chaos and order. This means that one person, or a small group, can genuinely bring change by completely transforming themselves. Perhaps the global essence won’t be harmed by this — which is why we experience déjà vu, can sometimes seem to predict events, or appear to perform “miracles,” and so on. The point is that controlling the spatial state is possible, but one should grow into the necessary level of understanding and practical capability.
When a person realises that joy and sorrow are two sides of the same whole, and that apparent weakness and strength follow the same principle of unity, and understands that many different straight lines can, in fact, form a twisted line — an interwoven, non‑linear structure resembling multiple doughnuts nested inside each other — the ability to control everything becomes impossible at this stage. But controlling certain specific structures remains within reach. So, the change in your life lies in your own hands — but the scale and nature of that change depend entirely on you. In simple terms, you step beyond what we might call the “program” of your life, and this leads to transformation — for better or for worse.
The model of integrated and excitatory neurons — this model describes the dynamics of the potential of ion channels and membranes, and it simplifies the description of the dynamics of the potential of ion channels and membranes. The ability to integrate and trigger actions is included in the concept; we do not take the reality of complex neurons into account, and as a result, the mathematical model yields a transformation of impulses, or of the input and output of information. In 1995, Andreas Herz and John Hopfield demonstrated that models of self‑organised criticality (SOC) for earthquakes are mathematically equivalent to models of integrated and excitatory neurons. Here, SOC — a property of dynamic systems — has a critical point acting as an attractor. Neural oscillations and brain waves facilitate feedback between neurons; subsequently, loops form, and these loops excite oscillatory activity, creating an activity that is inversely proportional to the delay time.
As an example, the connection between the cerebral cortex and the thalamus can generate thalamocortical or recurrent thalamocortical resonance. Cortical neurons may be activated with each oscillation, with a periodicity linked to alpha waves. The brain is capable of achieving amplification and synchronisation during sleep, meditation, or heightened neural activity — in other circumstances, it can create rhythmic electric fields across the same neural networks. Thus, our control structure, as it develops, tunes itself positively after a period of calm, moving steadily toward criticality — constantly approaching the peak, or the edge of chaos.
Understanding the mechanisms of brain function can lead to new approaches in neurophysiology and neuroinformatics. In 1995, Dimitris Stassinopoulos and Per Bak proposed a simple neural network model in which criticality is a normal state. Then, in 2003, at the National Institute of Mental Health (USA), John Beggs and Dietmar Plenz obtained experimental confirmation that neural networks are able to generate complex patterns of collective activity. So, actions that were incomprehensible 50 years ago are becoming quite clear today, given the progress and deeper understanding of how brain activity processes interact — thanks to the efforts of many curious people. This leads to significant advances in self‑awareness and in the ability to influence one’s own life processes, provided there is the will to do so.
Let’s look further at Dante Chialvo, who in 2010 proposed the critical brain hypothesis: brain activity oscillates between two phases. In the critical state, activity increases — this corresponds to neural avalanches expressed in brain activity. That means a normally quiet state wouldn’t lead to discoveries or human development, nor would it support long‑term plasticity in light of incoming information. This gives us an answer regarding chaos, regularity, and evolution. The meaning of this application is very subtle and profound, yet entirely real for a certain kind of perception. When it might become widespread is hard to say — division will always exist. Just as in school, you cannot remove a part from a measurement scale: there should be a clear structure where each part complements the levels above or below it. Scott Aaronson created the “freebit” theory: the chaotic dynamics of the quantum brain can amplify the effect of an arbitrary bit — a crisis state between order and disorder — self‑organising everything the brain comes into contact with. It’s like a clock with a pendulum swinging left and right, thereby turning the gears that show the time on the dial with the hands. The essence is that a small part of our brain always remains a kind of rebel against the system itself — expressing free will.
Michael London and Michael Hausser, while investigating the computational capabilities of dendrites, concluded that the excitation of certain neurons can trigger disturbances on a considerable scale. At this stage, synapses and neuronal connections within the network play a lesser role — but this raises the question of what proportions and possibilities are feasible or impossible in computation. This also reveals the boundaries of closed possibilities, for instance, in spontaneous insights or in the failure to comprehend societal norms. This kind of perception is reflected in many real‑life examples. Let me remind you that the concept of neuronal avalanches is relatively new and hasn’t yet been fully understood. Jack Cowan from the University of Chicago only began to grasp the essence of discharging neuronal cascades in the 1970s: here, a cell goes through critical moments and then returns to a state of rest. This is widely known as the “edge of chaos” — it maintains a healthy balance, preventing a chaotic influx or overload, and creates a kind of selection from the flow.
Many readers cannot understand why such an in‑depth notion of the human brain’s structure is needed, or how the brain might react. It’s actually quite simple: it’s about understanding the basic systems of interaction and influence. You might say that everything seems inexplicable, incomparable, and drawn from different categories of knowledge — but that’s precisely how we’re structured. Let me step slightly aside so you can see what our organism really is. I’ll show you the structure of ourselves — not the familiar anatomical framework, but something deeper: what we’re actually made of. Then you’ll understand how everything is interconnected and bound into a single structure.
So, our body is a set of different systems and structures, brought together into a unified interconnection. It exists as an autonomous structure, expressing actions and manifestations that are independent of one another and that shape our lives — changing the body’s spatial position depending on the decisions we make and on the decisions and actions themselves. The divisions and boundaries run along our bodily structure or energy structure, and they never merge with similar ones — this emphasises the clear boundaries defined by the structure itself. Thus, the physical field does not intrude into an alien structure. Genomics, quantum physics, microbiology, and other systems all describe aspects of the human structure — and yet, at the same time, they form a single, cohesive whole within the global system. If we examine the human organism in detail, we’ll see a complete incompatibility at various levels: different structures where seemingly foreign elements have created a common system — a unified structure built from the atomic, cellular, and genetic levels.
Let’s consider the structure of the atom, which gives rise to molecules — and in a similar way, Earth and the other planets revolve around the Sun. The same process occurs in an atom: electrons orbit the nucleus. Meanwhile, the nucleus accounts for more than 99.9 % of the atom’s mass, yet its size within the atom is negligible. The distances between the nucleus and the electron shell are vast, and the overwhelming part of that space isn’t filled with nuclear matter. The internal volumes are neither solid nor empty: everything is arranged along a specific trajectory of motion. The resemblance to our Solar System is perfect — and it prompts ever deeper reflections. With this perspective, we can speak of a kind of firmness or structural integrity at the core of what a human being is, manifested in biological terms through symbiosis (we’ll discuss that later).
The uncertainty principle was formulated by Werner Heisenberg in 1927. Its essence is that it’s physically impossible to simultaneously determine both the exact position and the exact momentum of a particle. More precisely, you can know the momentum with high accuracy, but then you cannot know where the particle is located. In quantum mechanics, an electron is described by a wave function. According to the wave‑particle duality, a material object localised in space (a particle) moves with certain energies and momenta along classical trajectories in some contexts, while in others it behaves as a wave — which is evident from its capacity for interference and diffraction, reflecting the pure quantum state of an isolated quantum‑mechanical system. Given this structure, we ought to be able to pass through walls and any obstacles. But that doesn’t happen because of complex quantum configurations made up of fields and other forces that act on us — and on which we act in turn. Electromagnetism is one such factor: it prevents us from freely interacting in that way. Electrostatics, meanwhile, influences our sense of boundaries upon touch. To make it clearer: think of two magnets. Once you understand their polarities, you can’t bring them together without effort. We perceive this through our biosensory capabilities, whereas a magnet has no such function.
In short, Wolfgang Pauli described this essence in 1925 with respect to electrons, and later extended it to all fermions in his spin‑statistics theorem in 1940: two or more identical fermions (particles with half‑integer spin) cannot simultaneously occupy the same quantum state within a quantum system. This further reinforces the structure: on the level of the nervous system, it underpins the “firmness” of space and fields. If you think the solution is to switch off the electromagnetic interaction, consider what would happen: as a structure, you’d turn into something akin to jelly and completely lose your ability to interact with the surrounding world. That’s why the human system integrates a biological factor of mutual operation: in classical terms, an anthropocentric model can be seen as either pathogenic or as consisting of insignificant satellites.
In 1972, microbiologist Thomas Luckey hypothesised that there are roughly 10 times more bacterial cells in the human body than human cells. However, in 2016, researchers from Canada and Israel refuted this hypothesis. According to these scientists, Luckey’s mistake lay in taking the entire volume of the digestive tract (about 1 litre) as his basis, whereas in fact most bacteria reside in the large intestine, which has a volume of only 0.4 litres. For an average adult weighing 70 kg, standing 170 cm tall, and aged between 20 and 30, the number of human cells is about 30 trillion, while the number of bacteria is approximately 39 trillion. The ratio of human cells to bacteria is roughly 1 : 1.3. This means the number of human cells and bacteria in the body is approximately equal. Consequently, bacteria contribute a vast array of biochemical tools to our organism — tools that the body itself does not possess. Metabolic integration refers to the interaction between the human organism and the microorganisms in the large intestine. Human enzymes are unable to digest many types of complex carbohydrates and plant fibres; this function is carried out by bacteria. Thus, the task is delegated to another component, yet the entire system works as a unified whole.
For example, short‑chain fatty acids (butyrate, propionate, and acetate) are products of the fermentation of dietary fibres by the gut microbiota in the large intestine. Human enzymes cannot digest various complex carbohydrates and plant fibres, and this role is fulfilled by microorganisms and bacteria. They also synthesise biologically active substances needed for blood coagulation, as well as B‑group vitamins (including biotin and folic acid), which are critically important for cell division and nervous system function. This occurs through the interaction between the gut microbiota and the human body: bacteria supply the body with vitamins and metabolites that it cannot produce on its own. In other words, a specific part of the body creates the conditions for producing substances that the organism either lacks or cannot generate independently — yet this part is fully integrated into the body, dividing it into sectors much like departments in a factory. This sets up a structure for the body’s safe operation, or alternatively, it can give rise to certain problems — again illustrating distinct actions with clearly demarcated spheres of influence.
In medicine, the “gut–brain axis” refers to the two‑way communication pathway between the gut and the brain. It involves neuronal, humoral (hormonal), immune, and even microbial mechanisms of mutual interaction. The gut has its own nervous system — the enteric nervous system — often called the “second brain.” What’s particularly interesting is that while the brain produces its own serotonin, the gut synthesises its own as well, accounting for up to 90 % of the body’s total serotonin production. Yet the brain does not allow the serotonin produced in the gut to enter the brain. What might this suggest? That at least two distinct structures coexist within the body’s envelope, complementing each other. The holobiont concept was proposed by Lynn Margulis in the 1990s; she popularised this idea in her book Symbiosis as a Source of Evolutionary Innovation.
Accordingly, our genetic heritage appears as a complex mosaic, with viral influences leaving their mark. Genome sequencing of various organisms is a method for “reading” DNA — it allows us to determine the sequence of nucleotides (adenine, guanine, thymine, and cytosine, denoted as A, T, G, C) in a DNA or RNA strand. Take a look at who humans share similarities with, or what fragments we carry from animals to plants. Humans and primates both have four blood groups, and their DNA shows considerable similarity. Mammals: the young develop in the uterus, connected via the umbilical cord to the placenta; they have mammary glands, and newborns are fed with milk. Monkeys: they have a skeleton suited to upright posture, and an opposable thumb. Rats: they are similar in blood composition and tissue structure, and they exhibit abstract thinking. Dolphins: they possess one of the most highly developed brains. Fish: fish collagen (a protein that forms the basis of the body’s connective tissue — in tendons, bones, cartilage, and skin, providing strength and elasticity) is similar to human collagen at the protein‑molecule level.
Plant structure: the root system absorbs water, much as intestinal villi absorb nutrients. Plants respire through stomata — microscopic pores that take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen; in humans, the process is reversed, occurring via pulmonary alveoli (the terminal, bubble‑like structures of the respiratory system that participate in gas exchange with the pulmonary capillaries). There are also parallels in reproductive systems and disease‑defence mechanisms. There is also significant similarity with fungi and yeasts, indicating genetic kinship within the human genome. Half of the genome that is vital for yeast can be replaced with human genetic material. You can even draw a comparison with a banana: a large portion of its genetic regions are analogous to those in humans. This reflects similarities in the functions and processes governed by genes — such as respiration, cell growth, and protein synthesis.
All these comparisons do not mean that a human is a banana, a fish, or a plant. Rather, they illustrate the opportunities available at early stages of evolution to enhance one’s capabilities. Similarly, an increase in brain activity — in the form of a deeper understanding of the essence of being an observer — grants the observer new possibilities, perhaps multiplied by time or by genetic transition. In 1981, Maurice Cohen studied HERVs. For example, the work of Malcolm A. Martin shows that various viruses integrated into our genome in the past and have since come to play a beneficial role in our lives. For instance, the genes responsible for the formation of the syncytiotrophoblast — the placental layer — are of viral origin. In the evolution of primates, some genes involved in cell fusion during the development of the syncytiotrophoblast originally derive from retroviruses. Essentially, today infants are given medications to protect them against rotavirus diseases.
In the modern understanding, we recognise and know that ancient viruses and microbes successfully helped humans evolve: they integrated into the organism throughout the body (hundreds of millions of years ago) and today are located throughout the human structure; they were able to aid in survival, with a reference to the initial integration of an infectious agent. Giardiasis is an infection of the small intestine caused by the parasitic protozoan Giardia. It was described in 1859 by the physician D. F. Lambl. And when the first primates appeared, the process accelerated. The so‑called jumping genes, at a crucial moment in brain functioning, contain a regulatory RNA molecule. Varieties include single‑ and double‑stranded DNA viruses, retroviruses, double‑stranded RNA viruses, and single‑stranded RNA viruses with plus and minus genomes. The replication mechanisms themselves are very diverse, and it is not entirely clear how one type could have evolved from another. At the same time, several characteristic genes are found in all classes of viruses.
Thus, much becomes obvious yet remains incomprehensible. In 1875, the philosopher George Lewes introduced the concept of “emergent property” — a quality inherent to the system as a whole but not to its individual components. In simple terms, the properties of the system as a whole differ from the mere sum of the properties of its individual elements, yet this does not deprive the elements of the ability to exercise their own capabilities. Thus, our capabilities, hidden from ourselves, become evident and understandable: the biological chain sets things in motion, much like gasoline powers an engine. The hypercycle theory, which describes possible pathways for the self‑organisation of molecules in the prebiotic world, was proposed by Manfred Eigen and Peter Schuster in 1977. If we consider all the data globally, in aggregate, all independent structures initially unite into a single structure to manifest the volitional expression of brain activity — issuing commands to carry out certain actions and to define oneself as an independent structural unit. This means that if initially foreign structures can interact to solve tasks of common purpose, then the host itself can also change the essence of the tasks set by the host. The main thing is to find a common structural framework of concepts and definitions for their implementation.
Of course, we should not confuse this with complete control and subjugation of the universal mechanism, since one would have to manage digestion, walking, metabolism, cooling — in short, every visible and invisible working process. From such a system, we can choose what we need and what we do not — that is, what we wish to change in ourselves for our own benefit, and what we are able and capable of controlling, altering for the better. But, of course, not everyone will be able to take control, even while experiencing an amplification of their capabilities, providing support precisely to what already exists within them. Yet, due to limitations, this cannot fully manifest itself. However, given one’s skill, desire, and knowledge, the possibility becomes a reality for a short period — a structure that will alter the foundations of one’s influence at the molecular level, manifesting in the essence of what is desired. This occurs while being on the edge of critical states, between chaos and stability, within the bounds of quantum control structures, grounded in coherence during this manifestation of one’s desires.
Thus, in 2014, Gábor Vattay presented his conclusions and confirmed human capabilities with calculations showing that, in iterative hierarchies with nonlinear dynamics, small fluctuations do not average out but can be amplified. Quantum fluctuations, descending to a lower level, can influence the formation of the state at a subsequent level; meanwhile, higher levels establish the boundary conditions for the lower levels. This makes it possible, in a state of criticality (on the edge of chaos), to increase the computational capacity or productivity of the brain. Of course, you may ask: where are the facts, the confirmations? This is a difficult process to prove in reality. Yet the human execution of complex processes underscores the brain’s influence on the process itself. And modelling the quantum and classical effects demonstrates the brain’s capacity within a biosystem to realise coherence as a special, potentially feasible process.
Many people have been able to demonstrate the effectiveness of their hypotheses in practice, thereby giving us the opportunity to open new horizons in various fields — which, in principle, are united by their capabilities and properties. For a deeper understanding, I will mention those who enhance our capabilities; and if you wish, you can look into their work and, without difficulty, find studies that, in my view, have made a significant contribution to understanding the brain and its activity. Here are some examples.
V. I. Vernadsky, Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon (1930). An analysis of scientific thought, its influence on planetary functionality, and the impact of scientific thought on vast processes in the biological potential for controlling technology, creating new technologies and materials through the energy forces generated by humanity for the development of the species itself — leading to a new state, the noosphere. As an analysis of idealistic philosophy, ranked alongside religion, the essence of these judgments contains a seed of reflection: after all, everything that is unknown to us may also reveal itself in dreams.
The Interpretation of Dreams (1899). Sigmund Freud proposed a three‑component model of the psychic structure, in which the personality consists of three interacting components: the “Id” (“It”), the “Ego” (“I”), and the “Superego” (“Over‑I”). Here, the unconscious is an extensive, crucial, and indispensable structure of the psyche, where impermissible desires, impulses, and childhood traumas originate. One simply needs to strive to alter the influence of consciousness on the unconscious.
His favourite student, Carl Gustav Jung, wrote The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (1934). He sought to generalise the common principles and features, asserting that, from an evolutionary standpoint, everything progresses systematically towards the development of the human being — specifically in terms of brain activity.
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, The Phenomenon of Man (1955). The evolutionary processes are directed towards the evolution of the human in terms of mental capabilities, increasing the potential for societal integration in order to expand horizons, followed by an increase in burdens, tasks, and decisions. The creation of an informational space of thought and informational flows will lead to the unification of all informational flows and knowledge — grounded in love, understanding, compassion, and mutual aid — to a mutual fusion of informational flows into a powerful force representing the concept of the “Omega Point.” The fusion of the religious and the scientific forms a single structure, conceived by the creator for the future evolutionary transition of Homo sapiens into Humanae cognitionis — “the knowing human” in Latin. It remains to understand the meaning of our existence: the inner part, the genome, determines much in shaping who we are, but the process of genomic development rests with us in the course of our own lives.
Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (1976). He presented his conclusions that all living things are complex machines built by the gene; therefore, the gene has no compassion in its origination. Yet the opportunity to improve and develop one’s subspecies remains within your own conscious power — in the reproduction of an improved version of yourself, increasing your capabilities and subsequently passing on your prototype through the thought process. We have already laid down the muscles and primitive skills; what remains is a small but crucial step: enhancing the thought process, creating various interpretations of reality to further strengthen one’s genetic interpretation in the future. By constructing complex situations for the evolution of the body — as a protective cocoon in which we dwell — we think in consciousness that we are the foundation of everything, yet we do not consider that we should come to an agreement with our subconscious through joint development. Then the question arises: what are we, and what surrounds us? What is within the power of our brain? What are the boundaries of its influence?
The Extended Mind — Andy Clark and David Chalmers. Any information we leave behind exerts influence: a phone, a computer, a book, a note — all carry information that impacts others and will bear fruit in development. Thus, we exert influence across space and time, which leads to a form of control within space. In this way, television, radio, and cinema also exert influence.
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (1964). The delivery of information plays a central role — it should be found. Yet the information itself then gives rise to changes, influences, and the capacity to be understood not merely as an interface or a book, but as future carriers of the informational flow of knowledge. These carriers are capable of influencing a person’s self‑development, leading to a kind of genetic reconstruction within the individual: vast amounts of knowledge become embedded at an unconscious level, with the subsequent possibility of using that knowledge at the conscious level — by virtue of acquired understanding and skill.
As I think, and am even certain, we will be able to harness scientific and energetic potential for the informational control of a new type of human — the Humanae cognitionis, the “knowing human.” In a word, one could say that different personalities live within the brain; let us call them “trusted agents” — they are responsible for different actions, questions, problems, answers, situations, and so on. They maintain connections and contact with one another, much as people do in life: relatives, friends, acquaintances. Only here, in the brain, they have no inclination to betray, deceive, or let one down; they are always ready to help, working as a team. They create a society inside the head, simulating the kind of social support we experience in real life.
Marvin Minsky, The Society of Mind (1986). He had his own approach: cognitive systems as communities of simple processes, where interacting agents create multiple possibilities for solving assigned tasks. From this, we see the expression of our will, thinking, and calculation. It is about learning how to accept inputs, draw conclusions, and build further paths and directions for self‑realisation — to minimise errors and cause the least possible harm to oneself, while simultaneously developing, navigating around problems, calculating and training oneself. This involves virtually living through issues without inflicting physical or moral damage. It enhances one’s capabilities and consolidates the organism into a unified structure of coordinated action — taking intuition, emotions, logical explanation, and reasoning (based on knowledge and capabilities) under control.
In a similar vein, Daniel Kahneman discusses these ideas in Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011). He writes about how one can improve one’s life by using two modes of thought. The fast mode is intuitive and emotional; the slow mode is logical and deliberative. The point is not that this works like a fixed formula, but that it offers a way to harness one’s abilities and skills for realisation. People always want an immediate solution or answer — impatience is in our blood. But look at how humanity has developed: the evolutionary trace shows how long genetics has taken to shape us, leaving its imprint on the historical record of humankind.
Yuval Noah Harari, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind (2011). This work traces the connection between the past and the problems of the present, from the development of Homo sapiens to the emergence of objective science. Thus, we can remember everything intuitively, adapting it to modern frameworks. In this way, we can also translate our desires into the will to realise ourselves. Many people can accomplish something, and then be surprised by how many different books offer material for reflection or for setting oneself on the path of conscious development. You yourself should consider whether this is what you need.
In 2009, the work of Gerald Hahn; in 2012, that of Gustavo Deco and Victor Jirsa. The Institute of Psychology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing (Zhou Wen); Japanese neurophysiologists led by Professor Yuichi Iino of the University of Tokyo (Japan); and Professor André Bastos of the Department of Psychology at Vanderbilt University.
The reasoning about the essence becomes quite real if one has the necessary understanding — and from this, a rather interesting conclusion emerges: no matter how a stream flows, whether long or short, it ultimately ends up flowing into either a river or a lake. This means the brain decides for itself which path to take on our behalf, having the capacity to “know” what lies ahead and to develop its own trajectory of movement through space — with or without problems, depending on the brain’s own configuration. The goal you set leads to certain prioritised outcomes on a smaller scale. If there was an opportunity to become wealthy, but you did not seize it — even though you genuinely could have done so — this suggests that wealth along that particular path would have created problems for the ultimate goal. As a result, the path might not be completed due to incorrect practical application. However, this also means that in the future, you will gain not only wealth but also experience — which will lead to the right outcome, provided you do not yourself halt your own forward movement. For example, I clearly understood and even stated what needed to be done to obtain certain benefits, yet I did not do it, driven as I was by what seemed like caution. In reality, that period provided the opportunity to learn how to cope with the emotions that arise when going through such events — preparing you for something even greater than what you might have initially gained. But this is only true if you continue moving towards the peak. Otherwise, the brain will not allow you to acquire anything that would serve to slow yourself down, since this would place the brain itself at risk.
Of course, it is difficult to watch an opportunity you had set for yourself pass you by when you chose to turn it down. The point is not so much what you will get, but how you will learn to use it later in a multiplicative process — delivering such rational actions consistently, even in defiance of the prevailing structure. In a sense, you can integrate the possibilities of your desire — multiplied by knowledge and foresight — into a unified system that will not contradict the brain itself. Then brain activity will begin to work in concert with your desires, which becomes evident on its own. The functioning of the large intestine and the brain are different structures, yet they serve a single overall function. All that remains is to choose a direction in the initial action and then smoothly transition to various orientations — this reflects your personal world order. Do not forget: your desires can affect the surrounding space, impacting objects that do not belong to your structural framework. This is where the danger of your desires lies — in the need to be ready for the safe practical application of whatever you are able to understand and master in reality. The foundation of desires lies not merely in encoded texts or rituals that one might apply — but such acts are not within everyone’s power. It is the ability to use these approaches, multiplied by true understanding, that matters.
Sometimes I wonder whether the very essence of this notion might bring harm to society, and whether these observations should even be shared with people. My inner world tells me that humanity should evolve, and the cognitive abilities of any individual should not be constrained by closed‑off topics. The capacity for insight levels the social hierarchy itself, opening up a vast, boundless system for the application of humanity’s new skills—a development which, in principle, once led to an evolutionary leap in the very essence of life on Earth, and perhaps beyond. The ability to explain things and to create comfortable conditions for the individual will not lead to the mere accumulation of resources for their own sake. Instead, it will turn them into a tool of opportunity — with due consideration for the skill to realise those opportunities, either for oneself or for mutual benefit with others. Any understanding of the desire for health leads to an understanding of how to look after it and preserve it in a way that achieves real results. The simplicity of changing oneself — even through plastic procedures — can lead to the attainment of goals in love and sex. Then the question arises: if love is the driving force, how can one deceive one’s partner by substituting the very essence of altering one’s appearance — ultimately risking rejection after a certain time? This leaves not just a bitter aftertaste but also troubles that complicate your further movement towards your goal, or even undermine your intention to move upward. In such cases, one should learn to stop at the level where you can live in reality.
Changing partners gives rise to several possible interpretations. Either you do not understand what you truly want and are still searching, or you desire something far beyond reach, without realising who you are and what you are doing to achieve it. The desire itself is simple enough: you just need to build and project it in your mind. But what have you actually done, and what do you truly have — not to mention the spatial and practical dimension of it all? Seeing a mountain in a picture and climbing it are not the same thing: merely ascending a mountain you saw in an image does not mean you have realised the essence of what you conceived. Understanding, multiplied by knowledge, gives only the possibility; realisation is like training before the final performance. As the saying goes, why would God need gold in chests — He already owns everything. Proving to oneself that it belongs to Him makes no sense; it would only reveal His uncertainty. From this stems the foundation of your possibilities — they lie within you.
Dr Chris French, from the Neural Dynamics Laboratory at the University of Melbourne, was able to understand Dr Brett Kagan’s work and bring clarity to it. A critical state of neurons arises in the network only when tasks are being performed — and only when the motivating stimuli are aligned through reciprocal interaction. It is only within this alignment that informational decisions about the safety of the original decision can be formed. This means that free will exerts control via an implicit agreement between a spontaneous action and its realisation. Living together with a partner over a long period demonstrates the symbiosis of different individuals under mutually beneficial conditions for each of them. This also leads to a sense of community and enables the resolution of difficult tasks in society — even at the most basic level of assigned problems. It reveals the identity of relationships as a large‑scale structure in relation to brain activity. What happens when many individuals unite into a single structure is clear enough without my spelling it out. The analogy of “everything in everything” follows a consistent structural logic that underlies the concept of it all. Whether we wish to see and understand the model is a matter of your own abilities and possibilities — and this ultimately leads to the initial decision.
The capacity to combine human capabilities with artificial intelligence provides food for thought, though not full understanding, and reflects the realisation that many factors influence both you and the surrounding space. The slightest influences can trigger “avalanches” of brain activity. In 2023, using stem cells, researchers grew another brain organoid called Brainoware — a large cluster of neurons with a stereotypical structure of neural connections similar to those in the brain. It was trained to recognise voices and solve differential equations. This raises the question of just how nonlinear the dynamics of a real brain’s operation are — and whether it makes sense to embed a similar mechanism of sensitivity to quantum fluctuations into artificial neural networks.
John Beggs and Dietmar Plenz, from the National Institute of Mental Health (USA), investigated neural activity in the rat cerebral cortex in 2003. They used a 60‑channel invasive multielectrode array to continuously record spontaneous local field potentials. They discovered that synchrony in the spontaneous activity of neurons was maintained over relatively long time intervals. Yet the core idea remains: the tiniest influence of a quantum fluctuation deep within the brain may give rise to free will. This amplifies deterministic chaos and, consequently, leads to the observer’s behavioural choice.
Christof Koch holds to a similar line of thought, pointing to comparable capabilities among different people — albeit operating via different systems. An example is Paul Glimcher and his book Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain (2003). Other key figures include Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, and Russell Poldrack — co‑editor of the textbook Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (2013). From his conclusions: “The data indicate that membrane voltage is a product of interactions at the atomic level, many of which are governed by quantum physics and are therefore genuinely indeterminate events.” And the number of scholars who share these views is growing. For instance, Johnjoe Macfadden and Jim Al‑Khalili have proposed the mutual influence of quantum events (at the level of ion channels) and extracellular electric fields — fields that are generated at the level of neurons and their networks. Electric fields can modulate the activity of ion channels, govern the behaviour of multiple neurons, and excite and synchronise them — which subsequently affects cognitive functions and behaviour.
Johnjoe Macfadden himself suggested that cognitive processes or motor functions in the brain — those responsible for planning and controlling voluntary movements — are mediated by the motor cortex of the cerebral hemispheres. At the same time, motor functions are also influenced by other brain regions and depend on the dynamics of individual membrane proteins. These dynamics are crucial for the initiation of activity and will subsequently affect nondeterministic quantum dynamics. The key is to clarify exactly what quantum actions and processes are at play in brain activity. At every interaction of elementary particles, in every quantum measurement, there is a component of irreducible, true randomness. With an unimaginable frequency, such events are capable of triggering a neuronal avalanche.
At the same time, we should not overlook ephaptic transmission of signals between neurons — a phenomenon with a quantum‑level dimension. Back in 1940, Bernard Katz and Otto Schmidt investigated the electrical interaction between two adjacent nerves in the limbs of a green crab. They studied the phenomenon of ephaptic coupling generated by nervous tissue. Later, Angelique Arvanitaki, when describing any mode of neural information transfer that differs from synaptic transmission, found that electrical oscillations can periodically increase in magnitude. She showed that a single nerve can produce rhythmic and spontaneous activity without requiring a neural circuit. When two nerve fibres lie close together, the activity in one fibre can generate activity in the neighbouring fibre — a phenomenon she termed ephaptic coupling.
Alan Hodgkin and Andrew Huxley advanced the field further than anyone else: in 1952, they carried out experiments with the squid giant axon. An increase in axon thickness raises the speed of nerve impulse conduction: the larger the cross‑sectional area, the lower the resistance. In this way, they were able to describe the interactions within a neuron by representing it as a simple electrical circuit, where the membrane acts as a capacitor and the ion channels serve as conductors for the gradient of sodium, potassium, and chloride ions across the membrane. The difference in ion concentration inside and outside the cell gives rise to voltage sources. From such findings, one can infer the existence of a kind of wireless communication and interaction that enables the transmission of informational signals throughout the body. As an example, when an axon delivers auditory, visual, or tactile information, this leads to synchronisation into a single, cohesive informational structure — from the initial input through to the grey matter. This is captured by oscillating electric fields that excite neurons, enabling the subsequent processing of received information and the making of decisions. Quantum tunnelling effects influence brain function at the neural network level.
Meanwhile, the identification of non‑synaptic signalling reveals that signals between neurons can be transmitted via various mechanisms. In such pathways, errors in transmission may occur — manifesting as noise, or simply serving as a backup channel in the event of a failure. Noise can be regarded as a negative phenomenon in the functioning of neural tissue; it should be suppressed to minimise logical errors or to prevent the generation of chaotic disruption. Yet the brain may intentionally create controlled chaos and allow certain errors to arise — much like mutations in the genome. Most mutations are immediately corrected, but some errors do become fixed, playing a key role in the mechanism of evolution or in the transmission of nerve impulses with occasional inaccuracies. And creative solutions in critical situations lead to development: in effect, to a self‑amplification of abilities through competition within the brain itself.
Hence, the capacity of consciousness to perceive spontaneous information depends on the individual carrier — their goals, tasks, desires, and ultimately on the observer’s own ability to expand their possibilities. A critical state carries within it both the potential for development and the risk of disruption, depending on the brain’s preparedness to accept change. It is impossible to force someone to understand or change themselves without the brain’s own willingness to move towards that change. Thus, a structure in which initiation—the individual’s transition to a new stage of development—is possible within a given framework through stimulation (money, love, fear, biochemical factors) yields results. Yet natural interest in self‑development is incomparable to anything else, since its very essence is rooted in inner‑driven growth. One may possess knowledge but lack the desire to apply it; this creates a kind of “noise” — a superficial appearance — while the real work lies in the actual connections between neurons that both receive and transmit signals.
In this sense, practical application is often absent in any broad, systemic sense; what remains is merely a facade, a showy presentation of fundamentals rather than the underlying structure of substance. More concretely, work by Costas Anastassiou and colleagues in 2010 showed that local field potentials in cortical neurons can serve to synchronise neuronal activity during periods of heightened excitability or depression. Quantum‑level brain activity leaves room for free will — albeit within a minimal margin. Efforts to increase this margin, in concert with the brain itself at the quantum level, could alter the very process of brain activity, enabling the realisation of intentions formulated by the observer. The challenge remains to consciously reconcile the quantum properties of the brain’s physical organisation with both the biological and psychological levels of influence — including the notion of consciousness (of immaterial or non‑local nature) acting upon material reality. If the material structure influences the brain, then why should the brain not, in turn, be able to influence the material structure?
We know that psychophysical dualism stems from the assumption that our consciousness has a different nature: consciousness and matter exist independently of one another, and a mental event possesses a certain subjective quality, whereas physical actions do not have such a quality. The dualists’ thesis is that such phenomena cannot be reduced to anything purely physical. All cases and connections — including mental and spiritual ones — are manifestations of physical mechanisms and logic, expressed in the principles of practical application based on reasoned decisions. Thus, both reductive and non‑reductive variants of physicalism hold that all mental states are ultimately identical in their origin to certain physical states, leading either to an increase or a decline in activity. Non‑reductive physicalism, for instance, accounts for the mental characteristics of an organism’s experience: pain, desire, hunger, visual experience, tactile sensation, and so on. Yet this division does not bring clarity: there is no universally accepted solution to the mind‑body problem today, which indicates that work in this area is still ongoing. We do, however, have the theory of psychophysical parallelism: body and consciousness do not causally influence each other, but evolve in parallel.
Causality is the philosophical term for a necessary, genetic connection between phenomena, in which the cause forms a chain leading to the effect. Here, the past influences the present, which means that the future’s outcomes depend, in one way or another, on how the past and present affect future processes — taking into account the objectivity of the carrier and the subsequent perception of the cause. Free will, or the manifestation of free will through a random effect, expresses unconscious actions or the ability to create competition — and this is what drives self‑development. It pushes the brain to enhance its capabilities through the transmission of possibilities, generating growth or learning and allowing the brain to move to new levels. Without the transmission of possibilities, it is impossible to increase activity; this influences the evolution of atomic interactions and gives rise to the butterfly effect, which in turn self‑develops the essence of the structure and expands its capabilities. The perception of what we become conscious of shapes the very essence of our existence: it reflects our informational actions in space and our realisation of ourselves with the information at our disposal.
Going beyond the boundaries established for defining cause‑and‑effect relationships in space expresses purely informational capabilities and intention. Otherwise, one remains within the same essence of the individual — an entity that does not influence the essence of space, localised within a generalised format of a primitive event as a whole. This helps to understand the structure in terms of the unification and interaction of informational capabilities and the enhancement of one’s own potential. It remains to build a structure of interaction, moving into a unified part that will lead to a powerful synergistic entity — one that, in one way or another, will begin to influence the space and matter around you. This means that influence, or free will, is possible when the observer (or a group of observers) possesses structured capabilities at the stage of cognition. This can lead to revolutionary developments, changing the very essence through evolution under the influence of information and its processing for practical application — and the subsequent management of the structures of your capabilities.
From the above, each of us draws our own conclusions. I merely summarise by saying that we are capable of activating our abilities. But we should use our opportunities to activate these capabilities — expressed in practical application at the right phase of our everyday life. This includes the ability to steer events in the desired direction, producing a new starting point for the dynamic development of what we wish to achieve, in the right direction of consciousness. This reflects the psychological interaction of yourself in reality, in your own existence: applying the abstract reproduction of what you desire, but within controlled behaviour, achieved through focus, attention, and information processing when choosing a particular action. We rely on our inner world and on our body as a supportive tool — a reserve of strength for the possible realisations of yourself as a person, transforming a new reality.
If you are ready to take a step forward, I invite you to open a new chapter. But even if you cannot yet grasp the meaning and move into a new chapter — where I change the essence but not the meaning of perceiving the new — do not worry. The knowledge you have gained in the first part is capable of changing you beyond recognition. The time will come when you will be able to understand the deeper meaning — when time itself tells you it is time to move on. The choice remains yours. But know this: without the knowledge from the first part of the book, you will not be able to fully grasp its essence. And if you understand the second part of the book, be sure to read and try to understand the first part as well, for the complete picture is necessary for the third part — where you will be able to comprehend the self‑evident and the simple application of it. Whether you will be able to reach that point is a question directed at you.
But we will not get ahead of ourselves. Let us begin by reflecting on what the fruits are — and they will not keep you waiting, once you see the self‑evident, which is the foundation of the fruit‑bearing tree. To take a bite does not mean to be sated; yet it is impossible to restore the integrity of what has been bitten off. I ask you to taste the sweet words, transformed into textual structures that offer a perspective on the ordinary. Continue to delve deeper into the very concept and the realisation of possibilities — which involve a purely physical perception through profound self‑knowledge: knowledge transformed into the brain’s desire to move in this direction. In doing so, you will see that a new expanse of possibilities is indeed possible. I urge you to move towards a more complex system of understanding and realisation.
Part 2.
Gaining insight into the depth and perceiving it through an external perspective on the “simulation virtualisation” (S‑V) of life, together with the possibilities of M.L.R.D., forms a concept that describes capabilities via understanding and practically applicable actions — achieved by expanding scientific potential through a new mode of interaction between science and the human being.
Our entire life is interesting and unique, and mine, like everyone else’s, unfolds in different colours and interpretations. I have been given, through my own lived experience, a wealth of interesting and inexplicable things to contemplate. At a young age, I became fascinated by the task of making sense of all the processes that, while quite obvious on the surface, are difficult to explain. Initially, M.L.R.D. was conceived as a way to describe brain processes and the cognitive possibilities of one’s desires — or the capacity to change possibilities through the power of thought. But merely wanting to understand is not enough: one needs a substantial body of knowledge, the accumulation of which inevitably stretches over many years of comprehension and familiarisation. What I have managed to understand, I wish to share: my own assumptions, grounded in productive work. At the same time, I simply want to engage in philosophical reflection, to try to find what is true within a particular direction. I hope that the knowledge humanity already possesses, combined with hypothetical ideas, can open up an expanded horizon of understanding — in a form that matches the extent of our capabilities and the ways they interweave.
Let’s place these ideas within the framework of ontology — the doctrine of what exists, of being itself. This is, in essence, philosophy: the study of the fundamental principles of all existence, of structures and patterns within the diverse unity of logic and theoretical knowledge. Much has changed since the waning days of the Enlightenment, but I am a person of older traditions. For me, the natural and human sciences remain within the purview of philosophy. I don’t claim to be a celebrated physicist, mathematician, biologist, psychologist, or programmer. I simply have an interest in these fields — a desire to broaden my understanding of humanity’s capabilities, to expand my horizons. In short, it is curiosity, the same curiosity that dwells in every person on Earth. It may be seen as a flaw or a weakness, and my views may diverge from those of eminent scholars — but that doesn’t justify discarding my assumptions outright. My worldview, my hypothetical reasoning, and the practical applicability of my ideas preserve my right to have a place in future perspectives — across various structures of global space and understanding.
Philosophy is, at its core, any theoretical reflection on the theoretical organisation of the world; it’s your inner judgement on many things. Judgement, reflection, and a philosophical approach delve into the depths of the cosmos. For instance, Pythagoras conveyed his understanding orally — likely based on assumptions and intuitions. At that time, such imaginings carried a distinctly esoteric quality. His followers formed an entire mystical cult, embracing doctrines such as the transmigration of souls — as attested by Herodotus, Xenophon, Parmenides, Empedocles, and Pindar. His disciple, Philolaus of Croton, was able to set down Pythagoras’ doctrine and his system of the world in written form. Philolaus placed a central fire — the universal Hestia — at the centre, for fire was deemed more perfect than the Earth, and thus it became the origin of all that exists. He arranged six planets — Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn — along with the stars, the Sun, and the Moon. All of these bodies shone with the reflected light of Hestia and orbited the Central Fire (Hestia). To reach the sacred number of ten spheres, a sixth planet, the Counter‑Earth (Antichthon), was posited.
To grasp the very essence of our place in the cosmos, our purpose, and what might alter the fundamental nature of existence within an infinite perception of everything in everything — this remains hazy. Yet the very act of seeking is what defines the human spirit: to offer an explanation, to draw closer to knowledge. Plato, in his work Timaeus, explicitly states that his reasonings are merely probable and do not lay claim to absolute truth, underscoring that views cannot be final or complete. Timaeus is one of Plato’s most important treatises, addressing cosmology, physics, and biology. Written around 361 BCE in the form of a Socratic dialogue, it reveals the depth of inquiry across the ages. The participants in this dialogue are Socrates, Timaeus of Locri, Critias, and Hermocrates.
Moreover, my perspective isn’t meant to replace existing knowledge or perceptions, nor do I aim to overturn established canons — let’s not even speak of redefining the concepts of mathematics, physics, computation theory, theoretical biology, or the many scientific works I’ll address within my philosophical outlook. Yet the seed of this reasoning may, in the future, reflect a rational viewpoint for new generations of seekers. It might even offer an approach that systematises and simplifies understanding through a straightforward synthesis into a unified structural framework. Let’s recall the works of Leucippus and Democritus, which gave rise to atomism: a natural‑philosophical and physical theory asserting that sensibly perceived (material) things consist of chemically indivisible particles — atoms. This later evolved into the broader doctrine of atomism.
My reflection is directed toward the systematisation of information on a global scale, integrating theories that reveal similarities and allow us to view various scientific works from the angle of an ordinary person. This perspective highlights theoretical approaches through a global examination of the structure of everything. In my conclusions, the reasoning is grounded in the M.L.R.D. framework, drawing on the insights of many outstanding thinkers. These form the foundation for deep understanding and offer a new philosophical perspective that strives to simplify the exposition of all the processes surrounding us, even when they involve the most complex scientific conclusions. Noticing that many people don’t possess a profound grasp of knowledge, I aim to describe our existence in a simple, accessible way — as something material and substantial, yet at the same time, an energetically living substance.
One could consider our life as a realised computer game with vast possibilities, where the creator’s fiction draws us in and fills the space with small details, bringing events closer to reality. In this light, we can examine life from a scientific standpoint, juxtaposing scholarly works under the metaphor of a game with immense possibilities — a game in which we become aware of ourselves as individuals. The pieces of life fall into place under circumstances that may not be immediately clear but become understandable later. This suggests we might exist within the limited conditions of an imitation, a simulation, or a model — one that creates a false impression. There are many ways to phrase this understanding, but I settle on the hybrid term “simulation virtualisation” (S‑V). It signifies the merging of different goals and tasks into a single core of understanding. Here, simulation recreates the behaviour of an object and its external and internal environment, controlled by specific code or command‑driven manifestations of physical and programmatic states. Virtualisation, in turn, creates and fills a physical resource with a data repository or a network, enabling scalable possibilities.
In short, virtuality operates as a guest‑launch system within a host‑system language, while simulation requires a software bridge or interpreter. Together, they form a unified structure for realisation within material, physical space. We can call this by many names — a craft, an imitation, a copy, an emulation, a model, or simply virtualisation or simulation. But the precise definition of this action leads to a result, and you can see how wordplay can convey meaning. It describes the very idea of what you plan to talk about, and a single word often carries multiple meanings, thus expanding the scope of thought through the M.L.R.D. framework when communicating with an interlocutor engaged in this “game” of words and knowledge. It follows the same format of presentation in the explanatory section, which uses the term SIMULATIVE VIRTUAL (S‑V) for simplicity in the text — perhaps also for future use. In its full sense, “simulation virtualisation” (S‑V) denotes the representation of a set of computational resources. It provides a logical explanation through the integration of “simulation virtualisation” (S‑V), allowing several operating systems to run simultaneously — thereby increasing complexity and creating the projection that is being built.
Naturally, simplicity relies on a single explanatory framework, where each individual contributes to the operation within a mathematical set — within the chain of actions being created. This suggests that whoever constructs a virtual world is trying to build a system where, at first glance, one can simply play and participate, experiencing events beyond the game itself and gaining the effect of real action. But if we take the “simulation virtualisation” (S‑V) of one’s imagined world to a new level — if we create the possibility of truly penetrating it, of moving oneself not just by putting on a headset, but by immersing oneself directly into the structure — then you cease to be merely a player outside the system. You become a player inside it, with all the emotional experiences and the capacity to alter the very patterns that shape the space around you. You can change what is within your own power to change: the everyday environment, the space you inhabit. This may be difficult to grasp now, but it could well become conceivable later. Many well‑known concepts were once described clumsily and incompletely; they only acquired clear meaning years later, once the structures could be articulated in simple terms. It shows what we are capable of knowing.
In 1911, Ernest Rutherford completed his famous planetary model of the atom. According to it, an atom consists of a heavy, positively charged nucleus and light, negatively charged particles — electrons — that orbit the nucleus much like planets around the Sun. In 1913, Niels Bohr refined Rutherford’s model. He developed the Bohr model to describe electrons orbiting the nucleus. This model ultimately paved the way for an atomic model grounded in quantum mechanics. Looking at recent developments, the American fusion startup Marathon Fusion has announced a method for producing a stable gold isotope by decaying a mercury isotope. From the standpoint of the “dream theory,” creating gold from another material is possible: humanity has already achieved many such transformations (for instance, the discovery of phosphorus), meaning we can turn one material into another. For example, in 1902, Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy worked at McGill University in Canada and made a remarkable discovery: the radioactive metal thorium, through spontaneous decay, produces the radioactive gas radon.
This suggests that gold could be created from neighbouring elements by removing one or more protons. For instance, an atomic nucleus contains a specific number of protons: a lead nucleus has 82 protons, a mercury nucleus has 80, and a gold nucleus has 79. The method relies on using mercury‑198 (the Hg isotope). Under the influence of fast neutrons from a deuterium‑tritium plasma, mercury transforms into an unstable isotope, which quickly decays into stable gold‑197. To produce it, you need blanket materials capable of withstanding intense neutron irradiation and of working with a lithium alloy and liquid mercury.
Thus, fusion could yield gold as a by‑product — though it would require a cooling period of up to 20 years and a gradual reduction process. Still, theoretically, it’s all possible. This means that both the cosmos and software systems could be seen as a unified whole in terms of how they’re structured and how they can be influenced and changed. It’s just that we lack a language that can fully describe the vast range of possibilities for realising such ideas. We already have Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, published in 1931. It states that any effectively axiomatised theory rich enough to define natural numbers via addition and multiplication is either incomplete or inconsistent. Incompleteness means there are statements that can neither be proved nor disproved from the theory’s axioms. Inconsistency, on the other hand, would allow any statement — true or false — to be proven. This opens up broad possibilities for theoretical diversity, helping us grasp the true nature of the surrounding space and its impact on us.
Let’s try to understand and unpack the structure that’s been recreated in our lives. That is, the entire space should correspond to the purpose set by its creator. We can think of it as a SIMULATOR‑VIRTUAL (S‑V) world, where certain laws of mathematics, physics, computation theory, and theoretical biology should hold true — while also accepting that the Universe remains unknowable. Still, everyone is searching for a “theory of everything”: vast amounts of data loaded into computers, quantum gravity, equations, and the behaviour of matter. Ultimately, calculations can predict particle decay, a spacecraft’s orbital trajectory, and the future path of an approaching meteorite. The potential for a future virtual world is already taking shape today, drawing on the information created in the past. In time, this will generate possibilities that go beyond our current understanding.
In 1969, Konrad Zuse revealed an innovative concept in his book Rechnender Raum (“Computational Space”). In this fundamental work, the scientist proposed a revolutionary idea: physical processes are, at their core, computations, and the Universe is essentially a cellular automaton. Later, researchers such as S. Wolfram, E. Fredkin, T. Toffoli, and Viktor Zakharovich Aladiev went on to establish scientific groups focused on cellular automata in the USA, Germany, Japan, Hungary, Italy, France, and the USSR. There’s also the potential to go further and apply, for example, the works of E. S. Shcherbakov on curly operations of parallel substitution and the unary algebras they generate. These help to investigate the properties of algebras with operators, where the internal states of such an automaton are considered as states, while the operations act as input signals — offering a rich source of examples and counterexamples.
For instance, this applies to curly operations of parallel substitutions and blockchain in unary algebras (see Computing Technology and Cybernetics Issues, Leningrad University Press, issue 10, 1974). In this way, the logic embedded in algorithmic structures, along with the study of the magnitude of effects and their influence, can be calculated. This can be modelled via a vector of mathematical values representing the intended object, where the automaton itself builds the structure of its own developmental path. Meanwhile, the external control system for editing is adjusted as the processes evolve or become more complex. Thus, the binary numeral system can make the initial task or the set parameters more complex when an informational goal is introduced through individual channels of influence on multiple processes. This happens while preserving the initial input data for comparison and objective recognition, enabling the resolution of issues of inequality or incompatibility. Such problems can be addressed through various sets of incompatibilities within the scope of the automaton itself, via a continuous cycle of interaction between different structures. This helps to understand the growth of the structure, the strengthening of its inherent nature, and the original movement towards the realisation of the system’s own actions in increasingly complex operations.
Recreating a fantasy‑like reality may be hard to grasp conceptually, but it’s entirely feasible in practice. Its foundation is a space made up of adjacent cells — what we call a cellular automaton. The cells of the system are represented as 1 and 0, and the entire structure can be either finite or infinite. For each cell, a set of neighbouring cells is defined — this is called its neighbourhood. So, in a single step, the automaton goes through all the cells, determines their state, and then moves to the next step. As its capabilities grow, the automaton gains greater algorithmic flexibility and increased problem‑solving capacity — and thus can independently address the task set by the system’s creator.
Take the game Spore, which lets you go through five stages of development — from a single cell to the space age. Or Cell to Singularity — Evolution Never Ends, where you speed up the evolution of single‑celled organisms into complex forms, creating evolution on your computer in an accelerated process multiplied by time and your own desire. There’s also Osmos, where, as a single‑celled organism, you absorb others, develop, and grow. There are many such games, but the essence of our real life differs from that of a game both in quality and in scale. Still, computer games aim to create an imitation of life beyond life itself, to achieve a real sense of similarity and immersion in the very structure.
So, with a global computer, you could program anything the creator imagines. We can turn to Tarski’s theorem, proved in 1936, on the undefinability of arithmetic truth in mathematical logic. No system can determine the truth of its own statements: to verify the truth of a complete program A, you need a more comprehensive program B. And even this more powerful program will have its own limitations relative to itself. In this way, self‑sufficiency turns into an endless process of self‑realisation. This applies to any sufficiently strong formal system: it shows a collection of abstract objects unrelated to the external world, where rules govern the manipulation of a set of symbols in a strictly syntactic way, without regard to their meaning. I can’t say whether observers relied on all known facts and arguments, or whether some notions emerged spontaneously, taking into account side effects we call intuition. It’s like the interplay between logic and knowledge, or simple, seemingly unthinking actions that are still logically sound — yet entirely correct in terms of spontaneous, subconscious acts that appear from nowhere but turn out to be perfectly valid and even innovative for building a logical approach to solving urgent problems.
Many outstanding people laid the foundations and collectively made it possible to realise ambitious ideas — but all of this began in the mid‑20th century. In the 1940s, Norbert Wiener and Arturo Rosenblueth created a cellular automaton model of an excitable medium and the propagation of an impulse, and they described these mathematically in their research. By the 1960s, a connection had been established between these models and the field of symbolic dynamics. G. A. Hedlund later described a set of cellular automaton rules that led to a variety of continuous endomorphisms in shift spaces. In 1969, engineer Konrad Zuse published Rechnender Raum (“Computational Space”), where he suggested that physical laws are discrete and that the Universe itself is, in effect, a vast cellular automaton — reflecting our drive to build our own global game. Today, this line of thought is known as digital physics.
This reveals the multifaceted nature of what remains unexplored. A single book can spark a new direction or a flow of new data about things we don’t yet understand, yet somehow subconsciously sense. This may point to spontaneous disruptions in the very essence of what’s happening within the “simulation virtualisation” (S‑V) framework — revealing the underlying algorithms and programs embedded when cellular automata are used to build a system. At the moment, it’s impossible to prove we’re living in a simulation using the language of computation. Here we can refer to Gregory Chaitin’s “algorithmic incompleteness theorem.” Imagine a situation where the complexity of the proof system exceeds the mathematical object it’s trying to describe.
So, we’re dealing with a mix of reality, abstraction, and fiction all at once. Stephen Wolfram, the developer of the Mathematica computer algebra system and a knowledge‑extraction framework, claims that cellular automata are capable of virtually anything. A program — or, as we now say, an artificial intelligence — can, over time, reshape our perception. It can offer explanations that grapple with vast, unstructured concepts carrying significant global informational value. The program itself can open up new possibilities. Our task is to study and describe things, compressing them into a single, cohesive system of sequential knowledge — a structured chain of meanings expressed in the language of science, ready for practical application. To grasp the core idea, we should start with the obvious, using known capabilities and fitting the puzzle pieces of knowledge together in a certain order, even if some pieces are still unknown.
We should begin with something simple: the two‑dimensional cellular automaton model with two cell states, widely known in the 1970s as the Game of Life, created by John Conway. The setup is straightforward: on a square grid, each cell has eight neighbours. If a cell has exactly two live neighbours, it stays in its current state. If it has three live neighbours, it becomes alive. In all other cases, it dies. This constant fluctuation between order and chaos mirrors what happens in the human brain — a point I explored in my book M.L.R.D.: The Hidden Philosophy of Life, or Open Life in the Philosophy of M.L.R.D.
The fascinating thing about the Game of Life is the emergence of gliders — specific patterns of cells that move across the grid. These can perform simple computations and interact with other static or moving structures. We shouldn’t overlook hypervisors either: they let us run multiple operating systems in parallel, which in turn simplifies the overall picture. It was later proven that the Game of Life can fully emulate a Turing machine — meaning it’s capable of executing any computational algorithm. As early as 2002, this was demonstrated with a configuration of 268,096 live cells on a grid measuring 4,558 × 21,469 cells, achieving 20 generations per second using Life32 by Johan Bontes on a 400 MHz AMD K‑II processor. This shows how speed and time in the simulation are balanced within a single action — or, more precisely, follow a clear structure of defined operations within a unified framework governed by rules. What we’re left with is a space that sketches a picture of the world’s structure on a global scale — as a set of probable actions.
For easier communication and understanding, the information is freely available; all it takes is the willingness to comprehend it and piece it together for a major collective step forward. This brings us to the Born rule (also known as Born’s law), a postulate of quantum mechanics that defines the probability of obtaining a particular result when measuring a quantum system. In its simplest form, the Born rule states that the probability density of finding a quantum‑mechanical system in a given state upon measurement is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the wave function for that state. Named after its discoverer, the German physicist Max Born, who formulated it in 1926, the rule expresses the probability as the square of the modulus of the probability amplitude.
The Schrödinger picture is one way to describe quantum‑mechanical phenomena, proposed by E. Schrödinger in 1926. In this picture, the time evolution of a system is described by the change in the state vector, while the operators representing physical quantities remain constant. The operator of a physical quantity in the Schrödinger picture is: As(t) = As(t0).
The state vector in the Schrödinger picture is given by:
where U(t,t0) = e^(-(iH(t – t0))/h) is the evolution operator, and H is the Hamiltonian.
Accordingly, the Schrödinger equation takes its standard form — and this lets us connect ideas and understand them by building on existing knowledge.
Let’s take a simple explanation through Euclidean space: it’s a space whose properties are described by the axioms of Euclidean geometry. In this case, we assume the space has a dimension equal to three — that is, it’s three‑dimensional. If we look at it more broadly, we can expand our horizons and explore different paths — and this also leads us to decoherence. Decoherence is the process where the coherence of a quantum‑mechanical system is disrupted due to its interaction with the environment, via a process that’s irreversible from a thermodynamic perspective. As this process unfolds, the system itself starts to exhibit classical features that align with the information present in the surrounding environment. This is harder to grasp compared to the straightforward terms we use in everyday life.
Many outstanding people contributed their knowledge and made it possible for others to draw on it like water from a well — the task now is to understand it. They grasped the very essence, using the information in their environment at a subconscious level, relying on what they knew. Take Andrei Nikolaevich Kolmogorov, one of the greatest mathematicians of the 20th century. He was one of the founders of modern probability theory and made fundamental contributions to geometry, mathematical logic, topology, classical mechanics, statistical physics, turbulence theory, function theory, algorithm complexity theory, information theory, trigonometric series theory, set theory, measure theory, approximation of functions, differential equations, dynamical systems, functional analysis, and many other fields. He also paid attention to methodology, philosophy, and history in other sciences.
The question arises: how? What becomes clear is that he managed to access hidden sources that surround us. There’s a possibility to use the unconscious in conscious actions — to spontaneously devise or apply one’s capabilities within the M.L.R.D. framework, combining them with theoretical conclusions at an intuitive level. As a consequence, one can realise their own assumptions, which later turn out to be truly valid — and this opens up a global opportunity to calibrate one’s perception. For example, another remarkable figure, Grigori Yakovlevich Perelman, solved the Poincaré conjecture — a problem that had remained unresolved for about a century. It’s one of the seven Millennium Prize Problems, and his solution shows what’s possible.
Computational human phantoms are models of the human body used in computer‑based analysis. Starting in the 1960s, the first anthropomorphic phantom was developed — it represented an adult hermaphrodite for internal dosimetry and included 22 internal organs and more than 100 subregions. The goal was to obtain raw data using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or direct visualisation via photography. Second, the body components need to be segmented — that is, identified and separated from the rest. Third, the density and composition of each component should be determined. Finally, all the data should be combined into a single three‑dimensional structure so it can be used for analysis and further development.
You might wonder what this has to do with the broader picture. The answer is quite simple: our knowledge is limited, yet it’s comparable to the idea of a “theory of everything,” and we can transfer insights from one knowledge system to another. This can influence our subconscious, though it’s not a crude mapping of achievements. In this way, the diversity of knowledge enables the constructive application of different fields to spontaneous assumptions when solving specific problems. It helps us understand how information flows can be divided, or how a concentrated “clump” of knowledge — expressed as energy — exists all around us. Then comes the question: does speed relate to an information field, or do the numbers themselves carry information in a certain state? And what should we consider familiar to us, yet ordinary in terms of the underlying essence?
We’re used to measuring and understanding speed in everyday terms: we can calculate how long it takes to travel somewhere on foot, by car, or by plane — and anyone can do this without much effort. But as soon as we talk about gravity, electromagnetic fields, radio waves, electricity, the bonds between atoms, nuclear decay of particles, visible light (which the brain perceives and processes via the eyes), infrared, ultraviolet, X‑rays, microwaves, alpha, beta, gamma, neutron radiation, and so on, the situation changes. We can measure the speed of light, but we can’t truly grasp it, let alone feel it or make an object move at that speed. That’s a reflection of our current level of development — and of who we are in a practical, applied dialogue.
But what exactly are information and knowledge? Has anyone ever given a clear explanation of what they consist of, how they flow, and where they come from — born from the energy of impulses? Or is knowledge an ocean we can’t see, yet we live within it? Like fish in water, we assume that our perception of the world is all there is — just as fish take water for granted. We don’t see or understand that there are vast, boundless expanses out there. But if we do grasp this, then it turns out we can, like drawing water from any spring, take a drink and quench our thirst. That means we can draw on knowledge, move it around when needed, and use it to expand our capabilities.
What if these invisible flows of information are hidden in heat and light — sources that provide activation and possibilities? Or will we keep doing things in a primitive way — just writing, reading, listening — without striving to develop our potential? Start with the speed of light: trying to master it, to make something move faster, becomes utterly confusing when we think about Earth’s environment. But if we turn our attention to space and weightlessness, what could stand in the way? In theory, endless acceleration in a vacuum is conceivable. After all, space is a real, tangible expanse — it has boundaries defined by the neighbouring visible objects within it. And we know the Universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. We can suppose that expansion in a single direction proceeds at the speed of light. If we imagine the Universe having up, down, left, right, backward, and forward, then simultaneous expansion in all six directions could, in theory, amount to six times the speed of light. This may be impossible to fully describe in a way that’s easy to grasp, yet it can still be understood even without a clear description. It’s similar to a game: each cell is influenced by its neighbours, and in turn influences them. This forms the basic structure. In this sense, cells possess a certain invisible speed in space, creating an imitation of temporal and spatial meaning. Just as games have fundamental rules and laws, so does real life. But in a SIMULATOR‑VIRTUAL (S‑V) setup, you can define any rules or tasks, and you can embed changes in the speed regime right from the start. So, does altering the structure and speed mean we can change the very essence of things? Take photons as an example: they’re a fundamental particle, or a quantum.
In a narrow sense, a quantum of electromagnetic radiation is the light of the internal structure of transverse electromagnetic waves — and it’s the carrier of electromagnetic interaction. It has no size or internal structure. From the standpoint of classical quantum mechanics, it exhibits wave‑particle duality: waves and particles exist simultaneously. Quantum electrodynamics, built on quantum field theory, describes the photon as a gauge boson — the particle that mediates the electromagnetic interaction between other particles. In this role, photons act as carriers of the electromagnetic field, which makes the photon the most abundant particle in the Universe. Roughly 20 billion photons correspond to one coulomb of charge. They change the very nature of what’s happening: they have zero rest mass, travel as waves in a vacuum, yet interact as particles. This invites us to consider their similarity to a cellular automaton — albeit on a miniature scale. In both cases, the underlying behaviour is the same; they couldn’t function any other way. A cellular automaton can operate at different scales, and photons, with their varying wavelengths, eventually collide, touch different objects, interact, and trigger reactions. This sets off processes like diffraction — a phenomenon where waves bend around obstacles, essentially stepping beyond the rules of geometric optics. Then there’s the spread of wave fields of various kinds — what we call phase structures — and interference: the mutual increase or decrease of the resulting amplitude when several coherent waves overlap, triggered by external sources that set things in motion across the Universe.
To grasp the speed limit and the direction of motion — which can manifest in any direction, moving forward and having different widths — is to see how this leads to the division of various waves. We can classify what’s happening into a clear structure of calculations and transform it into a strictly structured action. These actions are fundamentally dependent on the observer’s speed: the construct of a photon “cell” will split into different reactions with the observer. Entering into an intense interaction, it leads to a strong gravitational shift — a redshift in the frequency of electromagnetic waves as they move away from black holes or massive objects, changing the shifts in spectral lines. Conversely, there can be a blueshift in regions with a weaker gravitational field. In this way, we can obtain either an acceleration or a slowing down of time through gravitational effects — and we see this in all periodic processes, not only in electromagnetic radiation.
Of course, each of us understands the scale of the Universe, but it’s impossible to truly comprehend or visualise such a vast space — constantly expanding yet somehow maintaining the same mass, and still having a kind of finitude. Trying to describe it to fit some incomprehensible laws feels either beyond our grasp or like a closed loop of infinite energy transforming from beginning to end and back again, producing a negative effect of rebirth in the dark part of matter. Understanding the essence of what’s going on is as difficult as seeing light that originated 13.8 billion years ago or observing the waves and the number of proton‑neutron particles. Yet the finitude of particles is undeniable. As an example, imagine feeling yourself both tiny within this enormous space and, at the same time, somehow connected to the whole of it — without having any clear notion of where you are or what truly belongs to you as a conscious entity. In that moment, you seem to pulsate to great sizes and then compress by millions of times, creating a sense of wave‑like oscillations back and forth. There’s no clear reference point, yet the experience feels like gentle tingles permeating your body — a feeling of supreme satisfaction unattached to anything. This is one way to express the human sensation of reaching ultimate peace, pleasure, or withdrawal into a calm state apart from the world. But in the Universe, everything is far more complex. Meanwhile, the rate of the Universe’s expansion, according to leading scientists, is about 73 km/s per Mpc, which equates to a time span greater than that of the Universe’s creation — approximately 45.5 billion light-years. It’s hard to understand, but it can be explained.
One might want to say that, in our understanding, everything began in a single super‑point or bundle of energy. If it were all simple, we could just describe it as a straightforward explosion at the starting point. But according to theories of such a global process, there’s resistance to the expansion, creating a uniform effect in all directions. In this picture, any point can be considered the centre of expansion — so all directions are equal. Thus, the waves and circles touch each other radially and provide stability in their interaction. This creates a chaotic capacity to act simultaneously, producing an effect of globality. At the same time, it simplifies the interaction between photons and, later, larger structures as the Universe expands. Dark matter cannot disappear: it’s the reverse side of finitude within an infinite process, which leads us to the very idea of measurement itself. Dark matter accounts for about 95 % of the total; the remaining 5–6 % is baryonic matter. Everything around us — the Sun, stars, planets, people, and the oceans of gas clouds in galaxies — is the tangible matter of the Universe. At the atomic level, all of this makes up just a small fraction of the Universe’s total mass.
So, let’s try to consider how atoms formed in that first second. There’s a vast, still‑unexplored timescale at play — and within it, something that doesn’t exist in the same form today could have been created, something more global in scale, such as picometres. For context: a hydrogen molecule is about 106 pm across. At that time, matter existed in different structures, laying the groundwork for dark matter and enabling the birth of the first elements. This happened through a wave‑radial principle of collision, setting off a chain of events triggered by those impacts. We see many gravothermal collapses in the EMDE era, shifting from blue to red. The density fluctuations begin to grow under the influence of gravity. In the interval of the purple halo (where primary clouds form), a full collapse occurs at the red stage, transforming matter into ultra‑dense objects with parameters like х = 10х¹, T_rh = 100 MeV, a_rh/a_i = 10¹х, arXiv : 2410,18948 [astro-ph.CO].
Density fluctuations are always present in any matter, and gravity amplifies density or pressure, pulling material inward. Energy redistribution takes place, and in a vacuum there’s no friction or contact in the terrestrial sense — but there are invisible processes, like oceans of energy existing in space. It’s similar to how gas behaves on Earth: the entity that gains more energy effectively “wins.” Like a bubble in boiling water, it releases energy and leaves the halo’s core in an unusual state, continuing to utilise that bubble. It’s akin to a coffee maker: a structure with negative heat capacity becomes even hotter as it loses energy. When we consider gravitational fields, compression occurs, increasing density and the speed of internal motions — making everything denser and hotter. This self‑reinforcing reaction gives rise to a gravothermal collapse.
From this, we can hypothesise that mass might grow to exceed the total mass of dark matter in the Universe. Black holes may have taken on their initial form of interaction in space as a kind of exit or entry point, allowing for annihilation: four particles collide and transform into two new ones with greater energy potentials within the halo itself. The rest mass of the particles turns into kinetic energy in the form of intense heat, generating pressure. This creates a tension with gravitational compression, and many stages unfold under various influences. The birth of the Universe could have followed a similar pattern: multiple simultaneous collisions, which would help explain the uneven expansion we observe.
Then stabilisation sets in, and several different hypotheses might operate at once due to continuous interaction. For example, we get an ultra‑dense object that starts generating high temperatures or gradually consumes itself. On another front, quantum pressure might come into play — preventing particles from getting too close and also generating pressure. This leads to a new concept: the boson star. It currently lacks confirmation, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t present in the early stages, only to later change structure. It could represent the other side of dark matter — a framework for creating other parallel universes that are invisible to us yet entirely real, not just in three‑dimensional space, but possibly in five‑, seven‑, or more‑dimensional spaces. If we imagine that the baryonic matter density decreases faster in an expanding Universe while dark matter remains, filling the newly vacated space, we can suppose a similar process is occurring within dark matter itself — though it remains incomprehensible from our perspective. This could be why dark matter dominates.
Of course, extra‑spatial structures can exhibit torsion, forming a soliton configuration — a structurally stable, solitary wave propagating in a nonlinear medium. In 1834, John Scott Russell observed a phenomenon on the water surface that he called a solitary wave. Then, in 1895, the Dutch mathematician Diederik Korteweg and his graduate student Gustav de Vries provided the first mathematical explanation of the effect. This can be linked to spontaneous symmetry breaking or to the influence of dark matter in parallel dimensions. An effect forms in each dimension, meaning that spacetime action impacts all interactions, shaping the constant expansion and the processes that arise. Thus, the processes can be explained through geometric actions — the remaining task is to describe them in mathematical language, encompassing the hundreds of directions humanity has already uncovered.
Such knowledge, with its descriptions of specific physical scenarios involving quantum fluctuations and the behaviour of matter, creates a language for describing the world in geometric spacetime according to the laws of quantum physics. It describes configurations with changing topology and subsequent changes in metric — including transitions between Euclidean space and Minkowski space. Any gravitational wells and the curvature of spacetime around supermassive bodies show how photons are distorted depending on gravity. Similarly, in a cellular automaton, different structures appear as graphs, giving rise to the concept of discrete mathematics — one branch of topology. In this way, a multitude of points highlights a multitude of expansion points: vertices and nodes that connect many lines via photons, creating invisible “stiffness edges” and arcs that provide stability for the Universe and guide its growth toward designated points. Fundamental systems in number theory remain closed off, yet at the same time, we’re able to express them simply through numbers.
Thus, the Universe exhibits a uniform action and a kind of finitude. Just as in a SIMULATOR‑VIRTUAL (S‑V) program, it turns out that whoever understands how to control the structure can change the rules in the source code of a given action. Since there’s no central point, this wouldn’t disrupt the essence of what’s happening. We move through the Universe along an imitation spiral, striving for a kind of software‑based supremacy that mirrors the Universe itself. Or we might change the essence of the self within the Universe, bypassing software imitation. The helper in manifesting cognitive abilities and gaining control is the SIMULATOR‑VIRTUAL (S‑V), which can shift the very foundations within the Universe itself — leading us to the core of the matter.
Continuous action or the flow of time, according to deterministic laws, is tied to the collective behaviour of elementary particles, down to the micron scale in our calculations. With the right combination of mechanics and universal gravitation, we can easily calculate everything. Given a specific velocity, we can determine where any object in the Universe will be in the future or where it was in the past. We understand and can calculate the measurement of time in space relative to a particular object, given its mass in space and the balanced action of the structure in motion. But when it comes to calculations at the picometre scale, everything becomes far more complex. The fundamental connections between elementary particles have a stepped or quantum‑discrete character. Electrons in atoms can have specific energy levels. At this scale, Newton’s theory of relativity becomes hard to reconcile: in his framework, any change in an object’s momentum occurs only under the influence of external forces. This seems to contradict the conservation of momentum for an object in the absence of external forces. Yet gravity and friction are always present in our everyday experience and in the Universe. So how can we describe a law that’s free of external forces — one that would make an object change direction on its own? This is why the first law had to be refined, giving us the concept of an inertial reference frame, which completely changes our understanding.
Then we should turn to the concept of syngony (or “similar‑angle” structure) and then to crystallographic symmetry groups — this helps us understand crystal lattices and leads us to elementary cells, with a detailed notion and description of a solid body. Within the framework of crystallography, this lets us see the solid body itself, which means the ability to grasp the tangible lies in simplicity. Thus, looking at the classification of groups in multidimensional spaces — from four‑dimensional through five‑ and six‑dimensional spaces — we see how the number of groups grows with increasing dimensionality. Initial concepts were laid down by Christian Weiss and Friedrich Mohs; later, their limitations were supplemented, which speaks to a deeper understanding of the whole essence that our knowledge encompasses.
If we look at how things are depicted in drawings or schematic, visualised projections, we see that the structure itself is non‑uniform: it has an irregular pattern and differs from Bravais lattices. But the works of Weiss, Mohs, Breithaupt, Naumann, Hausmann, Miller, Gadolin, and many other scientists helped broaden the very concept and expand the horizon. Then, on the scale of the Universe, it becomes possible to apply the seven basic syngonies — which means the structure of the Universe might be varied. As an example, a complex manifold is a Hausdorff topological space covered by explicit sets, each of which is homeomorphic to a domain; neighbouring regions do not overlap, and any two points can be enclosed in subsets that display the boundaries.
At the intersection of two open sets, the transformation of local coordinates ωi=ui(z1 ... zn) is complex‑analytic. Thus, the ui are holomorphic only when they are the zero locus of homogeneous polynomials, and the functional determinant does not vanish. A Kähler manifold is a manifold with three mutually compatible structures: a complex structure, a Riemannian metric, and a symplectic form. If we take into account the possibility of simultaneous expansion while moving parallel to sets of dimensions, new constructions of spacetime models within a discrete approach, along with new singularities, reveal the role of complex numbers in describing physical quantities. They define the dynamics of the system, where quantum phenomena — as a branching of spacetime — have a single point in “life” (history), from which several alternative futures emerge. This allows us to suppose that the Universe could be born from nothing, as in the Hartle‑Hawking model, and to describe the picture geometrically: a particle moves along a closed path around an odd cone, then turns around and begins to move backwards in time — that is, in the reverse direction in mathematical calculation. It has no physical action in that sense, but it opens up broader notions not in a smooth plane, but in non‑standard cone‑shaped schemes in gravity theory, classified by even and odd types.
The singularity itself is a special marker of our knowledge, and not everyone can grasp its essence. Some consider it a “mistake” of the Universe because they cannot imagine or understand how a massive structure can be compressed by gravity into an infinitesimally small point that occupies no volume. Naturally, this sounds bewildering and almost fantastical — but it reflects the reality of what lies inside black holes. Mathematically and physically, we still cannot fully describe it, so those who don’t understand tend to dismiss it. But there’s no need to rush: we simply lack a language capable of explaining what’s happening. Yet, in Einstein’s theory of general relativity (GR), gravitational and inertial forces share the same nature. It follows that gravitational effects are not due to force‑based interactions between bodies and fields existing in spacetime, but to the deformation of spacetime itself — a deformation that is linked, in particular, to the presence of mass‑energy.
This brings us to the theory of gravity and the two types of singularities: true singularities and coordinate singularities. And here, things get tangled — but with deeper exploration, they can be understood and explained. For example, coordinate singularities appear when an infinity arises in one coordinate system but disappears in another. You might ask, how can that be? It’s like a landscape painter depicting a tree in their picture, while at the actual location where they painted from, there is no tree. Either it was their imagination, or the tree was cut down while you were walking to that spot to help with the finishing touches. Then the question arises: does time even exist here? In this case, what’s hidden within quantum theory cannot be detected directly.
Karl Schwarzschild explained the core idea — and he did much more than that. He introduced the concept of radiative equilibrium into the theory of stellar atmospheres: according to it, energy transfer in the atmosphere occurs via radiation, while convective transfer and thermal conductivity are negligibly small. The mathematical theory of radiative equilibrium matches the model of stellar atmosphere structure. Using his formula for calculating the optical density of photographic material — known as the Schwarzschild law — he also found the first exact solution to Einstein’s equations. This solution describes the gravitational field around a massive star and reveals a critical boundary known as the Schwarzschild radius. The two singularities he identified were located in different places: one at the very centre, and the other at a certain distance from it. For a long time, everyone considered this an error in general relativity (GR), but the situation turned out to be much simpler. The singularity at the radius was a coordinate singularity. GR was “saved” by changing the “map” of coordinate systems — and suddenly all the inconsistencies fell into place, and the misunderstandings disappeared. Meanwhile, the singularity at the centre of massive objects did not vanish. This is where we start to grasp the issue: if an object is compressed to a size smaller than its radius, its own gravity can keep compressing it—driven by the object’s own force—down to an infinitesimally small point. Then the question arises: how can this happen? What other or external force could possibly do this?
But let’s think outside the box and replace our usual picture with something unimaginable yet strikingly obvious. In a non‑standard description, singularities remain non‑removable when flat pieces approach zero. Einstein’s classical theory cannot describe the peculiarities of the spacetime fabric itself: these are inherent, unavoidable features of a singularity. There can be many conical singularities arising at the joints or seams of Minkowski spacetime. We can use “gluing” of flat spacetime fragments not as a simple rotation, but as a Lorentz transformation — a symmetry for moving observers in space and time. A conical singularity appears where different Minkowski planes, separated by light rays, are joined together: imagine cutting out an angle and gluing— you get a V‑shaped vertex. If you add an excess angle instead, you obtain a saddle‑shaped surface. This is the principle underlying Regge calculus. It creates a straightforward model of spacetime curvature from flat “pieces.” The approach proposed in 1961 treats spacetime curvature as a mosaic of simplices — small pieces of flat space. In this picture, the joints between them create conical singularities.
General relativity deals with large objects, while quantum mechanics describes the microworld — and this splits our understanding into two different realms. Richard Feynman wrote in 1957 that a single object in quantum superposition could interact via gravity. A simple example with a cezve (Turkish coffee pot) brings up the idea of a single bubble — but gravity makes the underlying essence hard to grasp. However, if we move this process into space and create certain conditions, we see the conventional rules change. For instance, the integral parameters of boiling are different there, which means convection behaves differently as well. In space, we can get a bubble that grows larger, but it won’t detach — so the entire process unfolds in a completely different way. On Earth, even a geothermal source can bring us closer to understanding the core mechanism, but the release process will still occur. This shows that the time factor plays a central role. As a result, the gases themselves will have their own internal structure within the bubble. The bubble then expands, taking into account thermocapillary convection along the boundaries of influence. This leads to stable growth at the base, reduces the intensity of condensation, and promotes more intense evaporation.
If we look at the fundamental principles of thermodynamics, the behaviour of neutrinos—subatomic particles that interact almost not at all with matter, passing right through the planet without leaving so much as a trace—plays a significant role in understanding the origin of matter and its predominance over antimatter in the Universe.Tens of millions of such particles pass through each of us every single moment, and we feel nothing; there are no noticeable effects. We can’t detect them because they’re effectively invisible. It’s similar to radiation, or the sensation of heat or cold: we may perceive these, but the underlying processes can lead either to expansion or to crystallisation.
Let’s look at the classification of neutrinos: electron, muon, and tau neutrinos. Grasping their essence means tracing how the entire space and world came to be. The point isn’t just to understand matter and antimatter — it’s about having the knowledge to see the deeper picture. Many might ask, “What’s the point?” Yet this is an important discovery. Let’s dig deeper into the temporal phase. Consider the physicist Miguel Alcubierre and his idea of a warp drive: a craft in free fall, looping through time, moving inside a bubble that compresses the fabric of reality ahead and expands it behind, while within the bubble, the craft itself remains stationary. The big question here is: where do we get the negative energy density required to make this work?
Of course, everything we’ve discussed so far is always open to criticism. Let’s take, for example, the theory of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz — his monadology, a philosophical concept written in 1714. He believed that the world is based on an infinite number of simple substances — monads. Each monad has a spiritual character, is immaterial, and is in a state of constant change. It is independent and exists on its own; its changes occur spontaneously. There is a connection between them: a pre‑established harmony. Together, these substances form a harmonious whole, which allows the world to be what it is — like countless mirrors, each reflecting the entire world, but from different perspectives. These are simple substances that have no parts. In this framework, something that exists on its own cannot arise or disappear through a process, because a self‑contained process implies composition and decomposition. But something absolutely simple cannot be composed of parts, nor can it be decomposed into them. At the same time, the monads are isolated and not subject to external influences. They possess qualities that distinguish one monad from another — no two monads are absolutely identical. They are capable of changing their state, and all natural changes stem from their inner principle, the “pre‑established harmony” of the inner world of the infinite multitude of monads. It may be possible to know — or perhaps there is a Supreme Monad, God, who sees the world as it truly is: as the totality of an infinite multitude of monads. The synchrony of perceptions unfolding within the closed monads is determined by the will of God.
Of course, everything we’ve been discussing is always subject to criticism. Take Leibniz’s monadology: on the one hand, Leibniz asserts the simplicity and closed nature of monads, yet on the other, he contradictorily insists on the infinite internal dynamics and development of each one. In the hierarchy of monads, the higher ones are said to include the simpler ones — and this clashes with the very idea of monadic atomism, with its notion of a reference frame or inertial system. Then there’s the atom itself — “indivisible, not cuttable” — a particle of matter of microscopic size and mass, the smallest part of a chemical element that carries its chemical properties. All these theoretical explanations create the opportunity to grasp the complete picture, or to look at the whole from different angles.
You can compare resolving or addressing this kind of issue to the Arago–Poisson spot. This is a bright spot that appears behind an opaque body when it’s illuminated by a directed beam of light — right in the region of the geometric shadow. It became one of the strongest confirmations of the wave theory of light. Simeon Denis Poisson showed its existence theoretically in 1818, based on the theory proposed by Augustin Fresnel. The calculation suggested that behind a large circular opaque body, right in the centre of its geometric shadow, a small bright spot should appear. Poisson intended to use this seemingly absurd result as a key argument against Fresnel’s diffraction theory. But Dominique Arago carried out the experiment — and it confirmed the prediction. In the end, this result, now known as the Arago–Poisson spot, turned into a powerful argument in favour of the new wave theory. It shows how initial assumptions may seem far‑fetched, but later turn out to be perfectly real.
So, we can keep reasoning further, and I can share my own perspective on how I understand what’s going on around us. What’s needed is simply to look deeper and unify everything into a single essence — like, for example, an apple. You could describe it in so many ways: how it grows, how its life cycle ends, what substances it releases, what it was made of, its colour, composition, taste, volume, mass, properties, history, purpose, where it grows, how it comes to be, and so on. Imagine the sheer scale of a work that would capture all the characteristics of an apple. No one on the planet could list them all, except perhaps a handful of people who’ve truly immersed themselves in the topic. And the reason is simple: the apple’s influence on humanity and our development is relatively minor. But understanding the essence of us and how that essence is governed — that’s a far more delicate question. We must, and indeed are obliged, to dig deeper into the core and bring all the questions and answers together into a coherent theory of fundamental interactions. This is about the accumulation of information: a property whereby, over time, the amount of information grows, it gets gathered, systematised, evaluated, and generalised. And already in this very process, identifying and isolating it as facts gives rise to a certain concept — a foundation for analysing the world.
It’s hard to explain the meaning of probability, or quantum entanglement in a closed system, or even what “measurement” really is. But we should keep striving, analysing things together, and systematising the underlying structure of how things work. What if time doesn’t exist? What if reality and matter aren’t “real” in the usual sense, but are instead an illusion of motion — an invisible substance, a whole spectrum of potential values at a given location, which, at that moment, are perfectly visible and tangible in spacetime as the fundamental essences of objects that are real? The invisible connections between them in that space could lead us to string theory: the theoretical physics idea that reality consists of tiny vibrating strings. Deformation occurs, slowing down spacetime. The object has a one‑dimensional extent, and elementary particles appear as vibrations. In science, space and time are the coordinates we use to organise and describe the interactions between strings. That’s why it’s so difficult to describe the entire cosmos, or everything as a whole. Information, then, has its own language and can have an overall structure. The structure of the world itself can be arranged in a certain sequence, even if it includes many unknowns.
So, we currently recognise several levels:
Macroscopic level — matter.
Molecular level.
Atomic level — protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Subatomic level — the electron.
Subatomic level — quarks.
String level.
Now, imagine that light and heat might have a different, invisible kind of plasticity in other dimensions — and could move like water does in our familiar state, only with entirely different structures. There’s plenty here to ponder. But if we take what we already understand and build new connections on top of it, that can lead to new solutions. The interactions of quantum ultramicroscopic strings, and their fundamental interactions, arise from vibrations and relationships at the Planck length — 1.6 × 10⁻³⁵ m. The processes at that scale are completely different from what we see in our everyday world. So, a change in scale actually changes the structure itself. Which exact level marks the transition boundary? It’s like ice, water, and air in our world — a familiar idea. But where are the boundaries, and what actually happens at the transition point? There should be an intermediate interval.
The concept emerged in 1968, when Gabriele Veneziano described the strong interaction of hadrons using quantum strings in his theoretical work. Veneziano discovered that the amplitude of pair scattering for high‑energy pions is described extremely accurately by one of the beta functions introduced by Euler. This amplitude — now known as the Veneziano amplitude — is currently interpreted as the scattering amplitude for tachyons corresponding to four open strings. Describing the procedure to reduce string theories from 26 or 10 dimensions down to low‑energy physics in 4 dimensions involves a vast number of possible compactifications of the extra dimensions on Calabi‑Yau manifolds. A Calabi‑Yau manifold is a special type of multidimensional mathematical object: a compact complex manifold with a Kähler metric for which the Ricci tensor vanishes. In superstring theory, it’s sometimes assumed that the extra spacetime dimensions take the form of a six‑dimensional Calabi‑Yau manifold — and this led to the idea of mirror symmetry. The name was coined in 1985 in honour of Eugenio Calabi, who was the first to suggest that such dimensions might exist, and Shing‑Tung Yau, who, using methods from the theory of partial differential equations and algebraic geometry, based on orbifolds, calculated a manifold with singularities that appear as a factorisation of Euclidean space by a finite group and interactions on scales of the order.
Of course, there are sceptics — and I’ll mention them so we can grasp the difficulties in this area, which create real problems for the field. One major issue is the string theory landscape (also called the anthropic landscape): the idea that string theory allows for an enormous number of false vacuum — somewhere in the range of 10100 to 10500. This vast number comes from the freedom to choose different Calabi‑Yau spaces, which are responsible for compactifying the extra dimensions in string theory. As we dig deeper to describe the meaning of the anthropic principle, Leonard Susskind’s landscape idea becomes problematic from a scientific standpoint: it risks being unfalsifiable. Each false vacuum corresponds to its own low‑energy (observable) physics. Choosing the one variant that matches the known Standard Model and the observed value of the cosmological constant is, in effect, an NP‑complete problem. That means it cannot be solved more efficiently than by sorting through all available possibilities — something that’s simply impossible with current resources. So, while we can describe the structure within the theory, truly understanding and “feeling” how it works remains extremely difficult. Still, the point of no return has been passed: even amid subjective disagreements, patterns and regularities will eventually emerge.
Despite these divergent approaches, the development of string theory has strongly stimulated the growth of mathematical formalisms — especially algebraic and differential geometry, and topology. If we look more deeply at the meaning of topology, we see that it doesn’t concern itself with metric properties (for example, the distance between two points). From a topological viewpoint, a mug with a handle and a donut (a solid torus) are indistinguishable. Topology is often applied to objects far removed from traditional geometry. Interestingly, the foundations were laid by Leibniz and Euler. I think if Lomonosov had access to the knowledge we have today, he and Euler could have pushed the global understanding of science to a new level. However, the term “topology” first appeared in 1847 in a work by Johann Benedict Listing. In his book, he described topology as the study of modal relationships of spatial forms — or the laws of connectivity, relative position, and succession of points, lines, surfaces, bodies, and their parts (or their totality) in space. Regardless of measures and magnitudes, modal properties are those geometric features that remain unchanged under continuous transformations. Today, we call them topological properties.
So, depth and meaning go hand in hand, though they’re understood in different ways — and our task is simply to bring them together. As knowledge deepens, understanding inevitably follows. We need to push our level of knowledge to the point where two lines, which for a long time ran side by side with an almost imperceptible deviation toward each other, finally intersect. Everything around us is comprehensible; what lies beyond, blocked by spatial barriers, remains hypothetical — but still reasonable, grounded in what we’ve already studied. And if we imagine that we’re inside a huge black hole…
In 1972, Raj Pathria and Irwin Good put forward the idea of black‑hole cosmology, and later, Nikodem Popławski developed it further. Perhaps our Universe is inside a black hole. Or perhaps black holes exist to stabilise cosmic spaces — acting as a supporting mechanism that controls fields and influences electromagnetic forces. Then let’s call the Universe a closed structure based on cells — a cellular automaton, like in a computer, but on a global scale, operating within its own sector and subdividing into ever smaller sectors with similar essence and processes. In this view, the galaxy, the Solar System, and eventually Earth itself could all be seen as cellular automata. What do you think of this picture of the world’s organisation, with its successive downward scaling?
You might ask: where are the facts? But the facts are right before us — in time itself. Time is an abstract concept: at the boundary of the Universe, it exists; beyond it, it may not exist at all, or it flows differently. It all depends on what we’re capable of knowing right now. To create motion — to sustain the structure itself — and to draw energy seemingly from nowhere, processes unfold that go from the large to the small. Each cell, each unit, each structure is supported by smaller ones beneath it, thanks to differences in time within each cell, unit or structure. At the same time, every structure, from the largest to the smallest, has its own division principles or boundary edges: dark matter, invisible radiation, fundamental forces, gravitational fields, electromagnetic radiation, spatial zones. Each contributes to the overall energy system of the setup. And because the energy itself is invisible, we don’t see the process directly.
If we draw an analogy in space and time, it’s a simple living process — whether it’s a person or a plant. Cells grow from small into a larger whole, supported by a nutrient medium — in everyday terms, energy. The way energy expresses itself can vary depending on the structure, but the Universe’s chain is, at its core, a process of growth across both spatial and temporal dimensions. It’s like a film showing accelerated growth — except here, we also have the factor of physical decomposition over time, and we’re observing a process where a “freeze‑frame” is theoretically possible. The changing frames are so imperceptible to us in the grand scheme that our individual perception is negligible. Yet, thanks to the properties of X‑ray radiation and the capabilities of telescopes, we can peer beyond spatial horizons. Infrared and gamma‑ray telescopes, in a sense, see through time — expanding our knowledge and sharpening our ability to hold multiple concepts at once. It’s an intriguing tangle: there’s a beginning and an end, and this pattern repeats to infinity. Consider all the rotations: the Universe turning within itself, galaxies spinning, the Solar System moving through the Milky Way, Earth circling the Sun, and Earth itself carrying us day after day. In the end, we’re part of this motion — and that motion can speak volumes.
The structure of an atom and its inner workings don’t unsettle us; so, what keeps us from thinking on a truly global scale? We already know that time behaves differently on Earth versus in space, and it differs between Earth and beyond the Solar System — but what about within the galaxy’s boundaries? There are many questions, and you ask, where are the facts? The answer is simple: time itself might have multiple meanings and could even move in different directions simultaneously. For example, in Thomas Guff’s work The Core of Memory, a time‑discontinuous multiplier ensures the preservation of temporal symmetry. At the quantum level, this changes how we conceive of time itself. So, controlling or understanding time may ultimately come down to straightforward knowledge.
So, the concept of time is, first and foremost, about overcoming space. The transmission of information already traverses space, connecting us via invisible bridges. A phone call between the USA and Russia is commonplace. And in December 2024, a message was sent from a distance of over 307 million kilometres — that’s almost three times the distance from Earth to the Sun. Live video streams are now normal; the next step is learning to teleport matter, and then to move structures through time. It’s all a bit like a computer game: the beginning of the end, levels unfolding. In that sense, a board game on a table at home shows that there’s a world in which the game itself was created.
You might say, “What kind of comparison is that? Where’s the reality?” And I’d answer like this: in 2013, Daniella Sanvitto argued that light could be both solid and liquid. Then, in 2025, Dimitris Trypogeorgos from the National Research Council of Italy (CNR), building on her work, turned photons into a superfluid solid. This state simultaneously has the properties of a solid crystal and a liquid with zero viscosity. It changes how we think about matter and the very essence of its use, shifting the foundations of what’s considered “real.” People move away from the ordinary, the primitive, and the narrow‑minded, opening up to broader horizons of possibility. They used gallium aluminium arsenide semiconductors. The surface, shaped with a special pattern of narrow ridges, was irradiated with a laser. This interaction created hybrid particles — polaritons — that were able to self‑organise into a supersolid state. Could we ever have imagined that something with no conventional mass, something that seems to have no “body,” could turn into a superfluid solid?
So, there’s another angle: light and electricity as a single whole, if we bring different sciences together. Chemist Hugo Bronstein and physicist Richard Friend created a class of molecules with highly efficient luminescence. In these molecules, a single unpaired electron behaves like a magnet, allowing light to turn into electric current without the usual division into acceptor and donor. If we think about it, why couldn’t reality change under the influence of certain algorithms we don’t yet know — but that might already exist, perhaps even built into us? The task is to understand the nature of these transformations and the possibilities for control: properties, temperature, time, the ability to maintain stability. Or, to put it another way, control within the reality we inhabit — that is, space as an information flow expressed in matter. This could be a new concept within the information structure itself: a biological process of influence, one of the systems that transforms everything into everything else, under control — not only from the outside acting on us, but also from us acting outward.
Perhaps time itself will begin to reshape reality in different directions, driven by the notion of information as a new mode of perception. So, here’s the answer to any seemingly unthinkable assumption: just because you don’t understand something doesn’t mean it can’t exist. The concept of matter is still far from fully understood. Take graphene and its possibilities. For example, the “Hofstadter butterfly” — predicted by Douglas Hofstadter in 1976, and only observed as a fractal pattern in 2025. Or a mesh with a graphene sensor embedded in cardiac tissue: it registers the electrical and mechanical signals of the cell. That’s a response to any pessimistic reasoning. Time and mind, multiplied by the potential of cognitive abilities to amplify activity — as I wrote in my 2026 book M.L.R.D.: The Hidden Philosophy of Life, or Open Life in the Philosophy of M.L.R.D. — point to the capacity of both human beings and matter‑energy itself to evolve. This drives the development of everything through controlled chaos, ordered within brain activity as a tool connecting the Universe and our minds, forming a consistent informational structure of knowledge and possibility. I’m laying out all these circumstances so you can see what you are and what you’re capable of. Nature itself doesn’t oppose development and evolution; it supports the pursuit of universal knowledge, sustaining the very beginning of a collective insight.
Because I’ve been writing this book for a very long time, new discoveries keep changing the very essence of how we approach the goals I set. For instance, in autumn 2025, the quantum ceiling was broken. The team led by Kiyotake Aikawa found that the uncertainty in the velocity of a nanoparticle was lower than the limit set by the quantum compression of the nanoparticle’s motion. This opens up a theoretical framework for the ground state and offers enormous potential for precision and for testing quantum mechanics. We’re getting closer to macroscopic scales, where the laws can be verified with atoms and photons. With these shifts in how we perceive and structure information, you and I will see things we could once only dream of — transforming knowledge into a unified structure. And perhaps even matter that, taken in small doses, could activate a new structure within the body itself through our cognitive abilities. For now, you’re still an incredibly complex, self‑sustaining geometric and logical sequence — temporarily embodied in protein form, with an expressed free will, capable of changing your own essence.
Of course, the theoretical picture I’m describing is hard for most people — in their protein‑based form — to truly grasp. But when it comes to matter, the question that arises is about its volume, mass, and structure within the very framework of a cellular automaton. And here, looking at light as an example, we see that everything is actually simple — if you know how. The key is to understand the essence. In physics, a construct helps resolve these issues. It can refer to non‑observable entities that are hypothetically deduced through logical reasoning based on observable features. A construct can also mean a theoretical framework or concept used to represent such an entity — one that can be transformed into something material by changing its structure under the influence of new capabilities. So, dear friends, we live in a time when we, as humans, are beginning to change and reshape the world around us. The transformations we achieve through brain activity, grounded in knowledge and backed by material and technical capabilities, create the conditions for us to act as creators of remarkable possibilities. We can build the entire surrounding world anew, using material changes to craft new masterpieces of the unimaginable — yet entirely possible — when there’s a collective desire to create.
The depth of my text aims to offer a broader view of what’s happening around us — much of which remains invisible to most people, simply because it’s not widely understood. And with that deeper understanding comes a certain responsibility, one that’s inherent to the very essence of what we are. To miss the opportunity for such understanding is to condemn oneself to long periods of inner turmoil and ignorance of the obvious. It means missing the chance to reveal new colours, to reach toward a beautiful new reality that has the potential to exist within us — but can’t be unlocked unless we grasp what we already possess. So, friends, understand the core idea, and you’ll gain a new sense of yourself and your capabilities. You won’t need a long time to realise the computational process: self‑learning structures will remove the time constraints, helping to build an information framework that improves both the individual and their life in society. I’m not trying to persuade you of anything; these are my reflections — and they resonate with the views expressed by people such as:
Peter Thiel, co‑founder of PayPal, who at a 2016 conference suggested that the simulation hypothesis could explain many highly unlikely events that shaped history;
Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, one of the most vocal proponents of the idea — in 2016, he estimated the probability that we’re not living in a computer simulation as “one in billions”;
Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI (ChatGPT);
Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson;
Paul Gilding.
Each person, each individual, is unique in many respects. But mental abilities can dramatically reveal a person’s cognitive potential and their capacity for practical application — from everyday matters to productive work within the employment system where they must deliver a useful output in order to receive compensation for their efforts. When two people with different cognitive potentials — measured, for example, by IQ (intelligence quotient, which reflects a person’s intelligence level relative to the average for their age group) — meet, the individual with the lower potential often becomes acutely aware of their own perceived uselessness or inadequacy. This clashes with their own inflated internal standards, and they end up comparing themselves to the other person. In such situations, they usually try to pick up on the other person’s thoughts and grasp opportunities for growth by observing them. Or they make their intellectual weaknesses more visible through hatred, anger, hostility, or even breaking the law in various ways — acting deliberately to create problems. They want to demonstrate their competence and capabilities by leaning on a certain status. In doing so, they reveal that the position they hold doesn’t actually meet the demands of the role. It shows, in fact, that their presence in that role is rather pointless — as a representative of a system that appointed them, itself appearing as an incomplete structure overall, managed by an equally limited individual who is shielded by their particular standing in the society itself as a vertical of subordination‑based management systems.
So, draw your conclusions about the environment and about those who’ve been given certain opportunities to create for the benefit of society, for its development and stability. Only when the responsible part of the structure actually uses these opportunities to improve daily life, laws, governance, development, and so on—in short, the well-being of the individual as a whole— whilst understanding the actions delegated to them, that this structured mechanism will develop and foster progress. But as long as this ideal remains nothing more than a wish, unrealised within the larger system, corruption, nihilism, preferential treatment, and indulgences will steer so‑called democratic transformations in a way that deprives the collective mind of realisation and blocks the evolutionary leap our species could make — ultimately slowing down progress.
And you, my dear opponents, who’ve revealed your true nature in how you’ve engaged with me and people like me over the decades: don’t ask someone else to let you glance at the book, hiding your own admiration and your understanding of where you stand on the scale of your own intellectual threshold. Have the courage to buy my book — it will lead you to genuine understanding. Read it several times and turn to it when you need to strengthen your mental capacities, to grasp the essence of what’s happening, and to feel capable of changing anything and everything. To reveal yourself means to understand the essence of what’s going on, so that you yourself become the author of the source code of your life’s path.
The ability to change your own structure, essence, and intellect gives you the chance to transform: the abilities you uncover will grow into lasting skills and remain with you forever. And the attraction you radiate, like the fragrance of a flower, will draw the right things to you, allowing you to decide what to do next by weighing the options and choosing the outcome you truly desire. You are, at your core, both the bearer and the transformer of your own world, carrying an identity that is unique to each person. In the world of the future, opportunity will be an inseparable part of your successful life — a future whose shape you can predict everywhere you act. The boundary that holds you back from this is you yourself: not wanting to or not knowing how doesn’t mean you’re unable. You display your qualities every single day, yet you think they’re trivial. In reality, they’re the dormant foundation; you simply aren’t developing it, instead hoping for a miracle or for fate to bring change.
In reality, fate is you: it’s what you were given at birth. But at some point, your psychotype faltered for one reason or another, and you simply chose to adapt to the mainstream — to fit into the imposed horizons of certain established patterns that shaped your unconscious, supposedly carefree world. In the model that exists in the world, in its various interpretations, there’s a logic of looking after you, of controlling the harm that unconscious individuals might cause. Yet most people don’t truly manifest their own “I” in action, simply because they don’t know how to independently manage the criteria of their lower boundaries and the endless upward flight. Understanding the essence of the information that’s been laid out leads you to that turning point where your self‑development can begin — where you become an independent unit in the vast world, in reality itself. Or you remain just a simple unit in the prewritten source code of a global action structure.
To step beyond boundaries doesn’t mean growing wings and flying off to some fantasy place built from your dreams. Stepping beyond boundaries means gaining the ability to fully express yourself right where you are — and then transforming that very place. Take the example of someone who once was “nothing,” or felt like no one — and yet managed to achieve everything. That’s precisely the action of M.L.R.D.: the unconscious unfolding of a particular individual’s potential. So, the choice of how you express yourself remains yours alone. Your capabilities will only reveal themselves under pressure — either the pressure you put on yourself, or the pressure someone else forces upon you. But always pause to consider what you truly want for yourself. Don’t just think, “I want to live so well that I walk on money.” Otherwise, life might play a cruel joke on you: you end up working as an electrician at a bank, and when you go to change a lightbulb, you step onto a pallet of cash. Yes, large amounts of money are stored on pallets. And then don’t say that M.L.R.D. didn’t deliver what it promised — simply because you never realised you were already walking on money all along.
Opening the energy channel of your possibilities is a simple sequence of actions, yet at the same time, it’s profoundly difficult. Read carefully. Don’t rush just to mark the text as “read.” To absorb means to understand; to understand means to apply; to apply means to make the right choice; to make the right choice means learning to change your life; learning to change your life means stepping beyond your perceived limits; stepping beyond your limits means opening the energy channel of possibilities; and opening that channel means developing your inner world so you can authentically express yourself in the real world — bringing positivity, spiritual balance, understanding of what’s happening, and the ability to gain benefits in all their forms.
A simple cherry on top to help you grasp what you’ve read: the number Pi (π), a mathematical constant, is approximately 3.14 or 3.1415926535. It represents the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter. But consider an alternative perspective introduced by Bob Palais from the University of Utah back in 2001: shift the understanding by taking the ratio of the circumference to the radius instead. Suddenly, the fundamental constant becomes roughly 6.28318 — a value now denoted by the letter τ. To put it in context: circles are naturally built around the radius, and the circumference is currently expressed as C=2πr. If you use τ, everything becomes visually simpler. A full rotation equals τ, half a circle is τ/2, a quarter is τ/4. The difference is clear: 3.14 versus the more logically consistent 6.28.
To change the constants means rewriting all the textbooks, articles, conclusions, notations, and explanations. It gives a new foundation. All that remains is to find the unknowns that will lead to a deeper understanding of the processes and events unfolding around us — and to stepping beyond the established boundaries. In a word: keep exploring, seek out what was given to you at birth. I wish everyone happiness, goodness, and the positive energy of the cosmos — grounded in life, reason, and spiritual strength.
I’m sharing my poem with you — please give it your assessment.
Through Kobrakov, the M.L.R.D. truth unfolds,
Awakening spirit, lighting up life’s roads.
Touch inspiration’s core; to teacher’s word be true,
For knowledge given, pledge your faith anew.
Visit “Mudrets.rf”, explore the channels, see the mail,
Write down your thoughts — let insight never fail.
In open talk, true progress takes its rise,
And from debate, new texts will materialise.
The same good soul will stand beside you, strong and sure,
To help you master self, to make you pure.
Confidence and health, success and kindness, too,
Are words that show the path — they’ll see you through.
They’ll tame the peaks you long to scale with pride,
And help society’s burdens be defied.
But only Kobrakov’s M.L.R.D. book can give
The full, clear vision — let it make you live.
Draw wealth and blessing, dwell in peace and joy,
Life’s deepest meaning, let your mind employ.
Let cosmic truth flow through your being, bright and clear,
Find all that’s hidden — cast out every fear.
Support each seeker’s road to happiness and light,
But first, within yourself, the sacred knowledge ignite.
Fear not the science; dive in, bold and free,
Promote M.L.R.D., and let your spirit soar, my friend, with me.
I’ve had to stop writing my book because in Russia it’s impossible to work or even think freely. I, like many others, constantly face corruption, arbitrariness, pressure from the authorities, and outright provocations. My elderly mother was beaten several times — clearly to provoke me, so they could arrest me and get rid of someone who stands up for human rights. The courts never punished those who assaulted my mother. In response to our attempts to seek justice and uphold the law, criminal charges were brought against me. I went through 26 court hearings, dragged back and forth over distances of 1 000 km, subjected to deliberately awful living conditions — all while it was obvious there was no guilt, no corpus delicti. Judge Morozov from the Neklinovsky District of Rostov Region ignored everything; he’s still working today, which shows how in Russia the authorities can do whatever they want. Then there’s Judge Kirelenko from Novorossiysk, Krasnodar Krai: he refused to take the expert opinion into account and simply didn’t reflect it in the court record, even though it was presented and read out in court. It’s as if no one cares about the law or basic norms. Or Judge Ilarionova in Tula, Tula Region — and all the subsequent appeals. I spent nine days standing in a solitary picket near the Tula building of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, trying to defend the truth. This was because the authorities themselves issued me a fake criminal record certificate, listing fictitious articles. As a result, I’ve been forced to appeal to the UN: my complaint, CCPR No. 4417/2023, is expected to be considered in 2026, as I understand it. So, draw your own conclusions about what real life is like in Russia if you’re an opposition figure. Even when I tried to run for deputy of the Tula City Duma in the Tula Region, I faced a wave of slander spread across social media and community chats. The police and the prosecutor’s office did everything to make sure the case was quietly shelved. Now, in 2026, after finishing the book in a hurry, I’m once again forced to seek justice because the same pattern is repeating itself: more slander. The media in Russia don’t talk about anything meaningful; they approach human rights in a selective way. I’m not needed; I don’t fit into the new Russia because I speak uncomfortable truths. So let the whole world know what it means to live in Russia: they don’t let you focus on your work. You’re constantly forced to switch gears and fight. As an opposition voice, I keep writing to the authorities, but there’s mostly just unwillingness to address urgent problems. That’s when I write poems criticising the authorities. But the public either doesn’t understand or simply turns away. This is the reality of our time. It’s hard, so very hard, to do anything at all when you stand up against the prevailing lawlessness in the country. I don’t know when I’ll be able to sit down and continue working in depth on what I started. But I can say this: humanity is holding itself back because of old stereotypes — the primitive desire to control people through pressure and disempowerment, all in the name of keeping various levels of power and particular individuals in place. Even as a father, I wasn’t allowed to sell my daughter’s children’s book at the book fair in Tula on 30–31 May 2026. The goal was for her to become the youngest author in the world, surpassing a boy from the Arab Emirates who had written a fairy tale. I managed to publish the book myself, without any help or support, overcoming all the obstacles. And in doing so, I realised that in Russia, the authorities only pay lip service to supporting those who want to lead the country forward. I could write a book about what it’s like to live in Russia — about how ordinary people are persecuted through the legal system. I’ve already filed a complaint with the UN (CCPR No. 4417/2023) and proposed introducing a new term: “legal genocide,” because human rights in Russia are being systematically violated. Things need to change, and I’m ready to show the world what’s happening.
Taking this opportunity, I’d like to introduce you to my daughter’s channels — you can access them via the QR codes (Quick Response codes) and share in her joy. Also, check out my website: “Mudrets.rf”. I’ll be glad to welcome everyone.
Лайк, Likee Ютуб, YouTube «ВК», «ВКонтакте»,VK
You can order my works and books only on the “Mudrets.rf” website or on the official book distribution platforms — the full list is available exclusively on “Mudrets.rf”. The bank account in the Russian Federation for ordering my signed books and signed reproductions of my paintings is in the name of my wife, Svetlana Nikolaevna Filatcheva. Here is her account number for transfers in rubles and in foreign currency. Please check the details on “Mudrets.rf” — payments and orders are accepted only in Svetlana Nikolaevna Filatcheva’s name. I do not authorise any other individuals to represent my interests. As my authorised representative and the sole person entitled to sell and distribute my works on my behalf, all communication with me, requests for consultations (to help you decode your life’s information flows and inner world), and media inquiries must go through Svetlana Nikolaevna Filatcheva.
I am working on the development of AI, robotics, and renewable environmental energy. I am also engaged in the design and implementation of modern, affordable housing, as well as the development and implementation of legal mechanisms to protect against corruption and nepotism. I am creating an animated film about GreBoRuk and launching the production of toys, fairy tales, and children’s clothing; thus, there are many opportunities — all that is needed is the desire to jointly create our future by realising our potential through the alignment of goals, tasks, and capabilities. I am also producing special pure water, opening an online gallery to support young artists and enable the sale of paintings by any person, and selling goods via the Internet using a new system that will compete with established and widely promoted online retail networks. Additionally, anyone wishing to jointly develop a city of the future, encompassing all aspects of everyday life organisation, to foster a new society built on intellect, and to develop a tourism‑focused cluster, should write to me via email (keep the message brief); this can be done only through the “Mudrets.rf” website. At present, the opportunity for investment participation is limited and is considered on an individual basis. Investments will be offered in two forms: “preferred” — this refers to an investment made for the long term; and “named” investments, which are repurchased (returned) annually, after which the investor’s continued participation is reassessed. This approach is designed to ensure transparency and stability, facilitate reporting to the state, and help avoid conflicts of interest. You can learn about everything on my online platforms, which are listed exclusively on the “Mudrets.rf” website, where I, K. A. Kobrakov, am the only person who releases information — this is to prevent fraudulent actions by third parties and to protect those who wish to build a better future for themselves and those around them.
This is the basic model used by BlackRock, Inc., an American international investment company. My goal and objective are to create an equivalent organisation with its headquarters in Russia, provided the authorities do not obstruct the creation of this future‑oriented project. I also plan to develop an internal messaging platform for communication. So, friends, there are many plans. If you have the desire, let us build our future together.
I will continue to work as the Chief Editor of the media outlet “Knyaz’ Kobrakov” and as the head of the Interregional Organisation “M.U.D.R.E.T.S.” (“International Management of Affairs for Russian‑Speaking Individuals of the Eurasian Centre”), without the status of a legal entity — so that I can focus on getting things done rather than paying tribute just for the sake of maintaining the structure itself. It is registered in Tula with the Ministry of Justice on 11.11.2016, according to the extract from the Interregional Public Movement of Dissenters. A new party for the people is also being created — the Social Democratic Party of Freedom — so I have plenty to do, and all of it aimed at being useful. Together, we can build a world of beauty and goodness. For your convenience when ordering books by K. A. Kobrakov, here are the accounts listed below in the currency of your choice, or you can check the details on the “Mudrets.rf” website via Svetlana Nikolaevna Filatcheva, my wonderful wife.
Perhaps a joint solution to all pressing problems, working through me, Konstantin Alexandrovich Kobrakov, could open up new opportunities, connections, and alliances. The ability to work together on difficult issues will lead to the overall well‑being of peoples and strengthen domestic political foundations. The consolidation of society and states creates enormous opportunities in our multinational world for the realisation of the individual — serving as a foundation for the future potential of humanity itself. And the understanding and reverence for the nature of the world we live in is a fundamental principle for everyone. The formation of an environment of opportunities lies within you. All that remains is to unite, to join hands in consolidating our energy and historical potential, transforming life itself into an ordered essence that rests on simple understanding and faith in something vast called the Universe — which accumulates and shapes everything. All we have to do is start approaching any challenges and negative influences on us and our lives in a united way. Russian legislation allows for the creation of religious associations. They can take the form of religious groups or religious organisations: a religious group is a voluntary association of citizens for the joint practice and dissemination of faith, and it does not need to be registered as a legal entity. A religious organisation, by contrast, is an association that is registered as a legal entity. The activities of religious associations are governed by Federal Law No. 125‑FZ of 26.09.1997 “On Freedom of Conscience and on Religious Associations.” So, friends, if you hold views that go deeper than ordinary existence, there is something here to reflect on. But I believe we do have a future. The desire to live in our own distinct way exists, and the laws are there. What you and I will do, what decisions we will make, will be determined in the future. Right now, I am searching for a place to realise a society of the future — based on the free cities of the past and equality before the law. This opens up enormous opportunities to live happily in this beautiful world.
For backers (those who provide financial support without charge and wish to help make the world a better place) and for those visiting for the first time, either individually or as a group, there may be an opportunity to meet the author, K. A. Kobrakov, in person. I may offer a unique personal interaction and discuss the book face to face, if time allows — perhaps for about fifteen minutes. All meetings and visits to the residence must be arranged in advance. Following the meeting, a decision will be made to determine what kind of person you are and whether the topics discussed in the book are relevant to you. After nine days, we will share the results either online or in person.
Those who wish to understand the world and themselves may have a meeting with the author, K. A. Kobrakov. I may offer a unique personal conversation and give some advice, discussing the book in person if I have the time. There will be group informational discussions about how the book can be useful to an individual, as well as individual meetings — during these, we listen and come to our own understanding. After nine days, we will share the outcomes either online or through another meeting.
For those who grasp the meaning and depth, there may be a meeting with the author, K. A. Kobrakov. I may offer a unique personal interaction, give advice, and discuss the book in person, if time permits. We will conduct an in‑person group exploration of the book, focusing on the practical application of cause‑and‑effect relationships to the individual’s life. The duration is not fixed and will depend on available time; individual meetings are also available.
Different groups correspond to different numerical patterns in nature: luck and spirituality — 7 people; success, wealth, money — 8 people; change, freedom, personal relationships, with separate groups for men and women — 5 people; personal growth — 6 people; for those who understand the past, present, and future — having gone through the beginning, middle, and end — the group consists of 3 people; resolving couple/family issues.
Numerology is connected with information that transforms into the essential. These are the basic foundations and the exploration of oneself within one’s own directions. You don’t receive ready‑made formulas; instead, you develop your own answer based on your inner state, building up your resource base, removing barriers, and applying what you learn in work, in life, and in relationships, while taking responsibility for the outcome. We look and analyse what the blockage is connected to, what problems we wish to solve, what skills we have, and how to develop insights (understanding, clarity). The possibilities for solutions lie in using the book as material; after nine days, we will share the results either online or in person. Meetings take place in online spaces, outdoors, and indoors. We are not constructing fundamental scientific conclusions — we are examining the vision of a person’s potential, drawing on existing knowledge.
For those who have decided to supplement my work through joint expression, we can always describe things together in collaborative effort, using my excerpts, views, works, reflections, and, of course, the practical applications — while certainly not forgetting to indicate my co‑authorship in your work. Together, we will change the world; all that remains is to unite and realise our capabilities.
I AM WAITING FOR EVERYONE WHO WANTS TO CHANGE THE WORLD AND THEMSELVES — FOLLOW THE QR CODES (Quick Response codes) to the website “Mudrets.rf”.
All up‑to‑date information is available on the website “Mudrets.rf” or by phone: +7 999 781 7009. The number is accessible via various messengers. Calls are accepted strictly according to Moscow time, from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Argumentation
of the legacy
of Tamga's history and sacred identity
The work itself, the work, the book is called for a reason, and the essence of the title reveals its meaning.Although I wanted to put it another way, "It's hard work to live and it's even harder to prove the truth," but I decided that since I'm writing this, I can find it and say it, so it's not so hard.
Argumentation makes it possible to convince the interlocutor to understand or accept the point of view that you are stating, the word itself comes from the Latin word argumentatio, which means "making arguments." It includes a thesis, a judgment, the truth of which is substantiated with a subsequent argument, manifested in the initial fact or theoretical position, with the help of which the thesis is substantiated. The following is a demonstration of the logical connection between the arguments and the thesis. Deductive inference is derived from arguments according to the rules of logical inference or the logical confirmation relation, which includes induction, analogy, and some other types of reasoning. The non-demonstrative nature makes conclusions that are partially justified and uncertain plausible or probable. Contextual — it is based on historical traditions, opinions of authoritative figures, intuition, common sense and similar arguments that need further analysis.
Heritage is an original, cultural way of life of people from famous former times, expressed in cultural heritage, which is contained in the material and spiritual culture created by past generations in the material heritage: buildings and structures, samples of engineering and technical solutions, urban planning facilities, architectural monuments, historical and cultural landscapes, archaeological sites, monuments, sculptural monuments, memorial structures, ways of life in the structure of the world of peoples, nationalities, ethnic groups.
History, events, archival documents, monuments are evidence of bygone eras, telling about civilizations in cultural images of the past, individual buildings, structures, territories (churches, bell towers, chapels), designed to remind of a historical event, the study of which is the human past.
Tamga gives a concept in languages and culture. The name is used in a simple sense in the Slavic languages: "family", "genus" — the root rod- (genus-). The ancient Greek lexeme yévoç. patra — "family", oικογένεια ("ikogenia") comes from the ancient Greek roots oίκος ("ikos") — "house" and γένος ("genos") — "genus, origin", "Tribe" (English tribe, French tribu) comes from the Latin tribus — "part of the people", in ancient Rome — "genus" (gens, many gentes). The tamga was used by the Russian Rurik nobility throughout the early Middle Ages as a definition of the tribal composition and its vertical. Among the Nogais, "tamga" means "seal", "imprint". Among the Kipchaks, "kos-alip" means "two alips". Kazakhs have "oik". The Adygeans are called "tamigye". Kabardians are called "damigye". Thus, tamga is, one might say, a surname or a more simplified understanding of an INN.
Sacred — having a special value, forbidden, or transcendent content. The symbolism of the sacred is often interpreted as hidden knowledge or concentrated energy, accessible through special methods and signs.Identity is the feeling of belonging to a social group or individual identity. The historical approach is based on an analysis of what distinguishes, for example, ethnic — through knowledge, language, culture, territories; national — as the self-identification of a civic community of citizens in a certain form, belonging to the historical past and historical memory, reflection in historical consciousness, collective identity, awareness of their belonging to the history of conceptual systems that seem to be They are more acceptable by expressing different points of view to connect the past with the present and the future. By creating conditions, in some cases, historical identity supports the subjects of development, and in other cases — the consolidation of society with subsequent development.
Everyone wants to know who they are in this complex and diverse world, laid out through a multitude of concepts and criteria. What is your personality in all its diversity? You can have many specialties, diplomas, degrees, but how to sort out your heritage is a very difficult question. Although, as you know, the legacy is not only of material importance, it is much broader. For example, I call the ability to do something well and understand something a legacy. For example, I place my merits in painting, architecture, poetry, etc. as the basis of my genetic capabilities, laid through the centuries, created in its practical format by my predecessors in the tribal structure, due to their development, I strive to learn, learn, practice, and generally live in this, communicating in different sciences.
And when I mortgage a new house for myself, I come up with it completely from scratch, first in my thoughts, remembering different architectural forms, then I develop a project on paper, calculate all the main nodes for the load in the distribution of mass, followed by the repayment of excess energy weight. At the same time, I build by myself, alone, relying only on myself, on my own strength and skill, without taking into account outside forces or help, enjoying the process of creating from natural materials (approaching the natural beginning), concrete with various architectural forms, statues, artistic modeling and mosaics (which I also do myself to make the task more difficult for myself), creating fabulous ideas in reality for the subsequent embodiment of what I conceived as realizing myself in the space of my thoughts, realizing myself, which makes me satisfied.
Defending your rights, starting to study, you make mistakes and with the subsequent receipt of information you begin to understand the basics. With the subsequent transfer of positive energy into this world through architecture, beauty, law, literature, history as the basis for communication of oneself and one's realization, protection. Everything lies in our hands, capabilities, it can be done, everyone would have a desire. Do you know the proverb: "The only tool I possess is that God has given me the ability to use my abilities as a reward"?
Thus, when I am not busy writing my research, books, paintings and fighting injustice, corruption, protecting the disadvantaged with the right, I immerse myself in creative architectural designs bordering on a fabulous dream, I immerse myself in a beautiful fantasy space to make the world more beautiful, kinder, better, simpler, to leave the imprint of the past in the present, combining, using modern knowledge. People passing by see my creative embodiment into reality, they always rejoice, even change their usual routes, walk with friends and relatives, showing the beauty in architectural expression, take pictures to see unusual beauties, expressing the style and images conceived from stone into a beautiful structure with clear lines, shapes emphasizing airiness, elegance, uniqueness and luxury. And luxury is synonymous with individuality, created by human design through geometry, drawing, mathematics, physics, materials science, floristry, landscape, artistic transformation, diligence, perseverance in the embodiment of human hands with the desire to create, to reach the end, testing their strength of spirit.
Such opportunities are given by nature for a reason, they are given from the past: you inherited them from your numerous relatives in the past through numerous sciences, studying and improving, repeatedly embedding your capabilities into your identity code not as a reasonable person, but as Humanae cognitionis, a "man of knowledge". I think this is a new stage in the evolution of the species itself. My family left an imprint of my refined approach to everything over the millennia of the evolution of many generations before I appeared in this beautiful, bright, positive world with my own view of practical possibilities for subsequent transmission into the future. No amount of difficulty or suffering can destroy the beauty created by nature, the riot of colors, the uniqueness of everything. They show us such possibilities that we cannot even imagine or invent them. Our whole life creates — it is the most beautiful thing that a person can only imagine, and its hidden possibilities, laid down to transform this world.
Here I want to share this with everyone who wants to create a world of the future right now, to teach you how to live in harmony with yourself, nature, and society, creating beauty and positive energy around you. But in order to learn how to do this, you must know yourself, know your inner being and one of the ways to see yourself in all natural reality. Your changes give you a sense of yourself.
And let's start with a simple one: let's talk about the last name and the very identity of what defines and identifies you. But I will not combine descriptions of everything in global terms into a single structure, I will leave thinking about the world, its possibilities, our possibilities and how to use them for other conclusions in clear manifestations, in scientific research accumulated by mankind. But this is discussed in all its concepts, laid out through philosophy, theology, physics, biology, etc., in my other work with a clear understanding in a practical spirit.
Reading various books, for example, "Anti-Semitism in the Ancient World" Solomon Lurie (first published in 1922 and published in Germany, Russia, and Israel), I try to understand, reason, think, apply, and converse with you, turning to historical events to unfold meaning. Of course, it is difficult to convey what I feel inside myself, but I will try to contain everything that, I believe, will create a picture of the events described.
I must say right away that I do not have doctoral degrees, since I did not defend my dissertation and did not present to the scientific council my thoughts on which it is possible to obtain such a degree when you enter a certain structure recognized by control structures. I have been forming all the information for my entire adult life, for decades, to be able to understand, draw conclusions and, most importantly, begin to remember, discard misunderstandings and conflicts. In an accessible, simple, concise form of historical events, structured in a single sense, interconnected, for any person who is not knowledgeable in history to understand the essence of the events taking place, in order to perceive them, understanding what is at stake. I decided to provide my work to a wide range of people for their assessment, including the scientific community, namely my conclusions based on historical facts, family stories, documents stretching through the centuries and the thick of events.
Everyone can express themselves in different aspects of life and its historical structure in life itself, which reflects us in work, family, health care through sports, expressing their arguments through scientific research. As an example, I communicate with you in this material or in my other works, not only in Russian, but also in English and German — especially for my wife's relatives (here are some works: A collection of fairy tales and poems, by K. A. Kobrakov. BBK 83.8, UDC 087.5, K55, ISBN 978-5-4492-0960-3). Either a scientific approach in the form of a book, or poems that I plan to publish, legal twists and turns, architectural and construction surveys, etc. as a book. I post my work for free on the website "Sage.rf", as the main thing is to provide an opportunity to acquaint as many people as possible with information for universal development. I take money for my books only when a person wants to have my book with my signature as the author in their library. There are many advantages of the printed version: I personally will individually sign each book, leaving not just an autograph, but, if you wish, the text is legible, moral and decent.
But not more than one hundred and fifty characters (not inBut what exactly to write from your text is up to me, if you send it. Russian Russian is the language of all information you send in a language other than Russian. Please indicate which language you used to translate it into Russian (required). By e-mail only rf.pravo@mail.ru (what is indicated in the book, duplicated on the website of "Sage.rf"), attaching a photocopy of the payment receipt and the date and time of departure to the account, indicating the purpose of the money transferred and from whom. The invoice is listed only on the website of "Sage.rf", prices may vary depending on the quality of books: softcover, hardcover, leather-bound, gold-embossed, etc.cluding my data) provided by you.
The book will be sent by mail to the full postal address you provided with the zip code and to whom; the postage costs, namely the forwarding of the book, are borne by you; the cost of postage is individual and depends on the mail, this does not apply to me. If you do not receive it, it will be sent to this address again with additional payment for the courier's work and repayment of the mail costs. The autographed book itself is free as a gift, the cost is 3,000 rubles. It is courier delivery to the postal service in an individual nature for work, namely 3,000 (three thousand rubles) for courier services to the post office. Check the price for the book on the website of "Sage.rf". The goal itself is to convey information, and selling a book is secondary. Personal communication, reception, telephone consultations only by prior arrangement, watch only on the website of "Sage.rf" how everything happens.
Friends, there is a domain structure in Russia where the website "Sage.rf" is located, and search engines in other countries have a hard time issuing this site for other countries. It's better to score in the mudrec.rf kobrakov search engine, so you will access my channels and be able to enter the zone of limited opportunities, since the Russian platform does not transmit all information in global capabilities in Russian. There is also my website in the com domain zone, where you can also go through http://kobrakov.com go to all my channels and "Sage.rf" and contact me. But all my works should be read for free on the Internet on my platforms.
There are many approaches that we form ourselves, but there is one important essence of understanding ourselves as an identity through a surname, and this aspect must be sought in the depths of history and its treatises of life, regardless of you, relying not only on the past, but also on the reality of the present for the subsequent formation of the future. Thus, to understand what the history of the surname means, what it is, and what it means, and where it came from. Few people are interested in accepting it as a normal condition or component, but people can't even imagine the difficulties associated with finding it and the various factors that will affect you. Many people have asked this question, but as soon as everything comes down to years, money, knowledge, search, and the desire to understand who you are, your goal quickly changes priorities.
How can you help your life for the prosperity of your family name and the veneration of your ancestors, if you learn the basics of your tribal significance? No matter which tribes or unions you belong to in the past, it doesn't matter in the present, since racial division through segregation is a thing of the past. But your ancestral history exists in the present. So it's stupid to look into the direct part of the unwritten, we must proceed from the semantic meaning that the writing itself carries, and what will change in your life if you learn about your ancestors exclusively in a certain spelling is a question. To remember them, even if not by name, but to carry their ancestral tamga, the ancestral family mark, the seal that was placed on the ancestral property by the identifiers of the tribe, clan or ancestral family, and add an additional part to it or modify it and find the beginning becomes more difficult with each round of the search.
And for what purpose you want to know your story, it also depends on you. Many small-minded people start laughing when someone starts looking for their historical identity, they say why, it's better to buy sausages. But you understand, everyone's concept, education is different, and everyone's values are different: someone needs a sausage, someone needs a position, they don't understand what's going on around them. And there are people who value not only themselves, but everything that surrounds a person. Believe me, I've heard a lot, seen gestures and grins from small-minded people who don't know history, don't have knowledge, even primitive ones, but at the same time feel comfortable in this life, holding different positions. As they say, having a position does not mean that they have the perception to understand what they are being told. And I used to ignore it, because in Russia an intelligent person is always considered to be narrow-minded, since he does not have a "portfolio", and the "portfolio" is more important than all smart people, since they look only at their own advantage, hiding behind their position, and often confuse their wool with state wool. It is not possible for everyone to process the information received, and this is again the merit of evolution — to understand what various kinds of mental work are. If we discard those who do not understand why history is needed at all, then there remain difficulties in identifying information, understanding, and searching.
Look, over the past hundred years, how the name of the territory has changed with the people: the Russian Empire, the Russian Republic (1917), the Russian Democratic Republic (1918), the RSFSR (from 1918 to 1922). In 1922 — the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). On December 5, 1936, the Kazakh ASSR was withdrawn from the Russian SFSR, and it was granted the status of a union republic called the Kazakh SSR. In 1939-1940, the territory of the Ukrainian SSR was enlarged due to the annexation of Western Ukraine and Northern Bukovina, in 1945 — Transcarpathian Ukraine, etc. On December 25, 1991, the Russian Federation was formed. And this is not counting the fact that all this time there were republics, and now there is the CIS — the Commonwealth of Independent States. Not counting the various political, economic, and military alliances, for example, the SCO, the CSTO, and the BRICS.
Imagine if we start to associate something with one of them, then we can see from history that Kazakhstan (Baikonur) sent the first man into space, went into space, sent him to the moon, etc. In a word, it's like a space power, if you put aside the USSR. And if you look at the names of the fronts in World War II, then the main victory was forged by the Belarusian and Ukrainian fronts, while Russia was defended by completely different military formations. Some people think because of her lack of literacy that she did not participate in the 1941-1945 war, and the wars during that period were different, but what can we say about the past, where time has gone far and there are simply no eyewitnesses to the events.
And if you look at the fact that close relatives began to bear different surnames, moved not just to another country, but to another continent, began to express their thoughts in a different language or adopted a different faith? It is extremely difficult to connect kinship. For example, there was such a huge family, the legacy of Attila, the son of Munzduk from the Balamirid family, whose vast tribal ties were in all the clans of the past, since to strengthen the union they were always sealed with a family tamga, a family marriage, and this in no way freed them from attacking their relative. To be honest, the relatives were in grave danger if they could somehow claim territories and power. And in order to save themselves, they left with their small army away from places where they could be killed. And so there was migration, they joined other clans, but this does not mean that when they became stronger, they did not go to war against the offenders. They either became merchants in distant lands, defenders, or simply as Achilles' father arrived on the island of Aegina, subjugated the islanders and began to rule, although Achilles (Achilles) was born in Phthia in the Saronic Gulf. ΦθίΑ) is a city and region in the south-east of Thessaly in Greece, used as a base for its security, training of its soldiers and accommodation. Many used this army for their own purposes, for example, the island is mentioned in Homer's Iliad as the homeland of the Myrmidons.
In general, in the past, for famous children to be from the family is a sign of danger. In my opinion, it's good that there is some kind of order. It's just like ours: relatives are fighting for real estate, inheritance, regardless of their connection, and a famous family can pose a threat to the way of large countries in the opinion of the rulers or those who govern the ruler. In general, you can see for yourself how you can attack or defend any country.
There is a lot of talk in history about different peoples who shaped the essence of the present, but where are they in reality? They either disappeared or remained in minimal importance and are protected as small-numbered peoples. Thus, those who remember the history of the people, and they are not on paper, do not say that they have disappeared. And it can reappear in court in the country, and the state's concern for its preservation becomes a priority.
For example, the territory of modern Smolensk was inhabited by peoples, inhabited by several ethnic groups, characterized by a complex interaction of Baltic, Slavic, Finno-Ugric and other ethnic groups, which was reflected in the culture and traditions that left their mark on the toponymy and ethnography of the region.
The Balts inhabited the Dnieper-Dvina Upper Dnieper region, the Baltic tribes. The Slavs borrowed river names from them: Serteya, Vop, Nadva, Gordota, Ugra, Kasplya, etc. By the 10th century, the Baltic population was finally absorbed into the formulation as Slavs.
Finno-Ugrians. who occupied the upper reaches of the Western Dvina, Dnieper and Volga.Slavs-Krivichi. At the turn of the VI–VIII centuries, the Krivichi Slavs appeared on the territory of the Smolensk region, who came from the north, from the territory of Pskov region. They formed a single sub-ethnic community with eastern Belarus, "krivichi" is not Slavic, but came from the Baltic "krieva".
Radimichi. At the end of the first millennium, the lands of the chronicled Vyatichi lay to the east of the Krivichi, and the lands of the Radimichi and the Northerners to the south.
Thus, the history of the settlement of the Smolensk region and the toponymy of the region are very different, but the state does not classify small-numbered peoples due to the difficulties of the formation of the most ancient state. Thus, there are ancient indigenous peoples in the Smolensk region, and in my work I point out that the state needs to review the basic criteria and recognize certain circumstances in a historical format.
So in ancient times there were many families, but deep down they are all relatives one way or another. Let's take Attila. In European sources, he is known by various names, one of them as Mundzuk, in Hungarian legends — Bendeguz, a descendant of the great biblical king Nimrod, mentioned in the Tanakh of Jordan as Mundzukus by Theophanes the Confessor, by Priscus of Pania as μουνδίουχος, by Cassiodorus as Mundiukus, in many Haggadic legends and legends of the Middle East. According to the genealogy given in the Book of Genesis, Nimrod, the son of Cush and the grandson of Ham, is mentioned in various sources, for example, in various writings. that he is one of the three sons of Noah, the brother of Shem and Japheth, and Noah is the son of Lamech, the grandson of Methuselah, a descendant of Seth, from the family of Cain through the female line from the third son of Adam.
So we are all brothers and sisters. The story is complicated intentionally or not intentionally, but we won't look so deeply for now, but let's look at Attila's family. He ruled a vast territory, went on military campaigns to the modern territory of France or Ancient Rome, Greece, Byzantium, his state included Turkic, Germanic, Slavic and other tribes. Munzduk, through one of Atilla's sons, has one of his great—grandchildren, Khan Kubrat, the Bulgarian tsar, a patrician who ruled in what is now Ukraine, Russia, the North Caucasus, and Bulgaria, which he inherited. As a rule, in the past, the tribal structure had tribal rule on the land, followed by division into separate tribal communities. Throwing someone out of the family is stupid and unfair. In the past, Kubrat had a kind of family sign in the form of a cross and various symbols, signs combined into a single system, indicating his personal direction from the main family, but with additions. Thus, the manifestation of your identity shows in a simple way who you are dealing with, what kind of person you are, and what this person carries, based on his tribal structure. The concept itself is very interesting in all aspects of understanding. To begin with, it defines the tribal component in its historical, cultural, social, biological, and shows hereditary information in all its glory. For example, there is such a belief in our Kobrakov family. If you betray to the public, show, expose your tamga (ancestral sign) to others, and it is accepted, then after that you will rule for forty years, and it should reflect not only what was written by your ancestors in the form of a sign, but also any manifestation of identity.
In the past, this sign from above was considered a meteorite fall, an eclipse, or a mark on the body. An irregular deformed skull in the past could be a symbol of divine origin. Motives are social status, belonging to an elite stratum or a certain caste, ethnic or tribal identification of a certain tribe, beauty and nobility, religious or mythological connection with the cult of God, with the world of spirits, so do not condemn people in their past understanding. In the modern concept, for example, the dollar sign indicates American money, five rings — for the Olympics, the coat of arms — belonging to the country. But, for example, Yemelyan Pugachev showed his supporters a sign on his chest, white spots in the form of an eagle. Now we are not going to argue that it is from a burn or not, I just gave an example, but, of course, a sign is something plausible that does not question its origin.
You show an attribute of the sacred, a mark by some kind of force, or just a sign, or a sign, but also some hidden sign that carries this information, and other observers should see it. Only then do you have the right to be accepted, to accept your true chosen higher status, the sign of a dominant family in relation to others. After forty years of being in the highest position, you pass it on to another of the family and become an elder, that is, a sage, and you tie a yellow cloth or a specially made crescent made of metal, as they say, yellow, that is, gold, around your neck, and the ancestral symbol is indicated. Such a person is revered, respected and revered. So saying that you are the one who should come, help, unite everyone is not as easy as we want, just saying, thinking, declaring on the Internet that you are the main one or the one we have been waiting for. Just like in the state, everyone or the majority must agree that one person will be at the head of the clan structure.Here, friends, get acquainted with my ancestral tamga, which was passed on to one of the family so that there would be no hostility. My father gave it to me, his grandfather, great-grandfather, and so on. Their mark, and now mine, may not have been widely known in historical records and documents as a great and powerful dynasty, but I think it will now be known to many, even if it does not have such a significant aspect in the wide range of definitions of my family. But still, I will try to show what your modern surname can carry by my example with all the structures of deep research and family information.
Of course, the two main intersections are not questioned, but the point or circle and the one that has a bend... I'm worried about how to write a point or circle? And the crossed bottom line, does it have an oval bowl or a check mark? I think this is not so important (the essence, the basis conveys and has the information structure of the image itself), given that now the basis is the achievement of the person himself, who honors the history of his kind, but at the same time manifests himself as a person. I still haven't found the identity of the sign with my tamga of our kind — it's exactly the format that I'm showing you, but there are some similarities, but I don't see it clearly, and I don't want to adjust it to something. And the work itself that you are reading is built to convey the basics, without delving into all the essence of understanding each of the facts and doctrines described by me as an integral, reasonable part of the work or in the accepted history — this gives you the opportunity to see alternatives, if you want.
All the subtleties of historical vicissitudes are now clear to you, they have information in a simple basis, but for me, specifying all the subtleties would lead to an increase in the very concept of generalizing this material by hundreds, if not thousands of pages, which would make it difficult to understand the basic essence at the initial stage of the essence itself. If necessary, you can write a more in-depth work in all the subtleties, nuances and about what I did not write now. Of course, such a job can bring me not as a job, but even more in a certain status.
So, friends, there is always time for me and you to think. In the meantime, I appeal to you: if you can explain the origin of the very concept of this generic tamga Kobrakov, why it was isolated from historical events in our world, as well as your comments, notes, criticism, and just your perception of what you read, please write to e-mail rf.pravo@mail.ru or look at the website of "Sage.rf" e-mail email address. I would appreciate it if you would express your thoughts, support or denial on my channels and social media pages.
How I like to talk about knowledge: "Learn for a century, live for a century, you will not learn all the knowledge, but you must strive." And together, we can build a more serious scientific work for the general perception of history as a full-fledged basis of life. And many people disagree with me that it's stupid to poke around in history without having the status of a professor or researcher, to tell something without coordinating with the ruling structure, to change accepted paradigms of history without coordinating, to talk about something with someone's permission - this is for formality. But I have a different concept.: "Those who are not interested in history have no history in the future." And those in power do not need new U-turns, they need peace and their own accepted coordinates of their peace, to sit in their place until old age.
Thus, our blood carries information as a material for genetic research, but the transmission of genetic information through blood does not provide a description of the facts of the historical essence, if you do not have a significant surname, it will tell everything and is contained in DNA. The method is based on a comparison of genetic markers between prospective relatives — more distant relatives. The higher the index, the more likely the relationship between the participants is, depending on which chromosomes they inherited from their common ancestors. Thus, this is a valid way, but you need to know who to compare it with and whether they will let you do it. Your reasoning about the connection is becoming questionable. What really works is, for example, if a person's blood was found in a building, for example, on the floor or wall. The banal killing of a mosquito on the ceiling gives a clear indication that the object of interest was in this place. And, even if thoroughly washed off, luminol is used — a powder of oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen and carbon. When it reacts with hemoglobin, it begins to glow blue. Sometimes it gives false reactions and can glow not only from blood, but also from contact with copper, urine, or even horseradish sauce, even if years pass. But you should understand that this is not always possible.
Not everyone can afford to turn to the search engine that specifically searches for ancestral signs in history, since this is a very expensive pleasure, which determines for a particular individual a very complex, long process of searching for information about your ancestors, but carefree if you have a lot of money. Subsequently, the observer himself determines his identity, originating from a certain person, the initial course of events, multiplied by years, laid through time in historical realities. Opportunities are being created for future generations to develop the collected information into energy and transform it into human progress as the basis for fundamental changes and transformations in public space. But in order to do this, you need to know what is given to you by nature. And knowing the main directions of your ancestors, you can easily solve the problems that your ancestors once dealt with In this way, the surname is complemented by your name and the patronymic is emphasized. To tell the family tree and track the interaction of the surname and personality with personalities — not everyone has such information, and it gives great opportunities, the main thing is to be able to apply the practical actions of your knowledge.
The origin of the surname is from the Latin familia — "family". The surname did not immediately take root in our everyday life, and there were simply tribal structures with a huge number of people, and in most cases the identity was blurred. Initially, they had only high-ranking people of the past as an attribute of power and nepotism, indicating the clan, over time they received a prefix to their nickname as determining who they belong to by tribal ownership. And first they called the name, and then they said, from the genus (for example, Attila is the name, and the genus is the Barrel, which many historians also interpret). And thus, the surname became fixed as an understanding of tribal nobility and belonging in writing, indicated by scribes in their own interests — territories, property, slaves, dependent people from a powerful family.
In the past, the modern surname itself defined the very understanding that carries information to the name, the designation, for example, "noble family", "warrior", "artisan" or simply "property". It consists of a root and a base. In addition, prefixes appeared to increase the concept of a surname, and later — suffixes, endings. For example, in Russia by the 21st century, the widespread attachment of a surname as a hereditary family name to a personal name. But you can imagine how it appeared, taking into account that serfdom was abolished in Russia on February 19, 1861, according to the old style, and on March 3, according to the new style. Everyone probably remembers that we started living in modern times on July 1, 1918. The decree prescribed that, according to the new (Gregorian) style, the number should be indicated in parentheses according to the old (Julian) style. And thus, with the ease of the pen of the authorities, we have changed the very concept of "time calculation", what can we say about some surname of a certain person or family. Emperor Alexander II signed the manifesto "On the Most Gracious granting to serfs of the rights of free rural inhabitants" and "Regulations on peasants emerging from serfdom." So few can find their ancestral identity in the depths of the centuries.
In most cases, the root of the surname provides a designation in the simplicity of the answer for the uninitiated, since the information of the surname sometimes carries the threat of revealing inconvenient information to those who do not want to show the true story, which is hidden behind a thick layer of age-old confusion for the sake of mercantile interests in the past and unwillingness to show in the present the geographical understanding of the belonging of peoples and territories, which often contradicts the official historical chronology for the sake of political conjuncture, the dominant structure in the spatial essence of the location. Thus, the surname reveals the tribal chronology and is a contradictory factor in the established historical sequence.
So let's try to speculate first, and how you will begin to perceive the information that I will say. You know that any date symbolizes an event, and at the end of the numbers they always put either an abbreviated concept in the form of the letter "g", meaning the year, or the entire word "year", indicating a date consisting of numbers and letters. And let's imagine that the year itself as a concept was indicated not from the back, as is customary now, but from the front of the date, which did not contradict in the past, but causes a misunderstanding in the present. And thus it is possible to interpret a number of three digits of an event with a prefix in front of a certain squiggle, over time it can be interpreted as a four-digit number, substituting values and information for the benefit of certain individuals, which will lead to a distortion of information in time space, but also give a description.
Similarly, the reckoning of time by different kingdoms also creates different chronicles of Christ in 1704, Georgian in 392, Tatar in 1116, and the recording of the same events can be repeated. You will say that it cannot be so, but as an example of your understanding and the recent past, I pointed out to you the adoption of the law on the abolition of serfdom, where there was one style of calculating time, and it became another, and you draw the conclusion. There may be a substitution with the calculation and indication of the year in front or at the end. We know many different actions, and change is a fact of our lives.
Take this, as it is pointed out, Spanish originated from Latin as a branch of the dialect in the 5th century (indicated as spoken), and writing only began to be developed in the 13th century, and Portuguese as an Old Galician language has been widely used since the 3rd century BC. And the most interesting thing is that the word "cobra" comes from Portuguese, where cobra means "snake". The Portuguese noted the broad meaning of the cobra as a snake when they arrived in India for the first time in the 14th century on the ship of the navigator Vasco da Gama. They named it Cobra de Capelo, which means "snake in a hat" in Portuguese, namely the modern cobra snake. Of course, the hat was gone. The formation of languages in that area proceeded from Proto-Indo—European, Proto-Italian, Latin-Faliscan languages, old Latin, Latin, Romance languages - as everything changes and it becomes unclear how to understand.
Slavs can read the Etruscan language with its similarity, although they created it long before the creators. Brothers Cyril (Constantine, 827-869, died in Rome), the youngest in the family, Methodius (815-885, died in Velegrad, Moravia) the eldest in the family, the creators of the Old Slavonic alphabet and the Church Slavonic language. The year 863 is the date of the appearance of the first Slavic alphabet, an alphabet of 38 characters. The saints of the Orthodox and Catholic Churches were born in the Byzantine city of Thessalonica (modern Thessaloniki, from Slavic — Solun).
The Slavic alphabet itself was based on the Greek statutory letter, and there is still a dispute in the academic community about which alphabet Cyril and Methodius created, Cyrillic or Glagolitic, but over time Cyrillic replaced Glagolitic everywhere. The Psalter, the Gospel, and the Apostle have been translated. The place of creation is supposed to be Mikulchice, a fortified settlement, where, according to some ideas, the capital of the state of Great Moravia was located (the ruler in 863 was Prince Rostislav). In modern history, excavations have been conducted there and about a thousand graves with rich contents have been discovered. The now famous Gadoni area near the Morava River. Mikulcice 738 — Ramparts between Luzhenets, Tynets, Josefov on the border of the Czech Republic and Slovakia, from the southwest Vienna, the capital of Austria, or Luzice railway station.
You know, when you start digging, you come across a lot of things, the main thing is to structure them. If you believe the Byzantine historian Menander the Protector, you can learn a lot about how the Slavs fought and what happened among the Slavs. So, as I understand it, everyone has their own story with their own bias. Here's something else, for example, remember and think about it, and then compare it. Bulgarians and Russians were previously not allowed to enter the Etruscan Hall in the Vatican, due to the fact that they freely read and understood what was written there. One letter can mean both a word and a syllable. And there were more letters in the alphabet at that time. The reform of the Russian language has played a cruel joke on us in terms of history: thinking has become less flexible, but has shifted to a flat understanding, discarding the meaning and globality of understanding. In this format, there is a Coptic alphabet, similar to the Cyrillic alphabet of 32 letters .
An in-depth study of history reveals many things that are difficult to explain at once and to understand the division of the world into different influential structures, especially when empires and huge countries are being divided. Take the USSR, what happened after its collapse? It seems that one nation has become isolated in its own state format. Similarly, in the past, the processes of division and the formation of a dynasty took place (from the Greek δῠναστεία — "power, domination"). Take the rule of the Agilolfing family, the merger with the Duke of Alemannia (German: Gunzo; 7th century), as well as Himiltrude, Paul the Deacon calls her a "noble girl" from the Carolingian family.
The monogram of Charlemagne
We got it as a result. Guillaume I the Pious, Duke of Aquitaine, founded and built the monastery of Peter and Paul in early 910. In modern terms, Leon is from the south, Geneva is from the east, Corbigny is from the northwest, Clamsy district, Burgundy-Franche-Comté, and is sandwiched between the Saône and Loire rivers, built in a valley, one might say, in the middle, but the small rivers Medason, Grona helped for life. But why did such a decision made in the past prompt the duke? It's simple — this is the outskirts of the great past of the Hunnic state. Attila's influence, opportunities remained, and the experience he saw in the destruction of an influential religious city. I made my own conclusions, but the knowledge and opportunities remained.
We see that the construction of a huge building by those standards is... the 11th century, and people are building such colossal buildings! Think about what it is. Do you know when a state like the Russian Empire ceased to exist, how many assets remained outside of Soviet Russia? A lot, and someone used them. So it is here. Duke was originally a position, and then the status appeared in the Roman Empire at the beginning of the II century AD. e. and was a position of a government official responsible for the borders of the empire.This speaks not only about knowledge and wealth, but also about the sacred significance of the building itself. Yes, the church was constantly being rebuilt, but the main building began in 1063 and was consecrated by the end of 1125, and further additions were no longer of great importance. As usual, everything we see in this picture is not saved, and there is only a small piece on the side. In short, you can look into the depths and not see anything, or you can look and see a lot of things, it all depends on what you can understand, and not what I understand.
But my job is not to tell you in depth how family opportunities were created, applied, and used in history, but to tell you how, using your last name, you can create a clear reality of the past, your genealogical tree, origin, and tribal ties, and learn the history and deeds of those from whom you originate with understanding. established facts, to understand the essence. For ease of understanding, and to avoid legal consequences for spreading information that belongs to a person unknown to me, someone else, or an outsider, I will take my last name and my relatives with their consent, but I will not disclose their full details. And using my own example, I will clearly tell you how to create your own tree and increase the opportunity to communicate with your loved ones and relatives, go beyond the horizon of ordinary aunts and uncles, but at the same time see what factors influence the formation of events, of course, if they themselves want to communicate with you.
Well, friends, let me call you that, let's get started. I was born in 1977 in the year of the Snake (when the symbol of the Fiery Red Snake) from the fourth to the fifth of August. Right at eight minutes to twelve (midnight), the first sip in this world, and at thirteen minutes past midnight, I freed myself from my mother's body, entered the light of God like a real Lion in the Smolensk city hospital. Now I officially live in the city of Tula for the last twenty years of my life, the city of gunsmiths, as it is commonly believed. And my name is Konstantin, which my mom and dad gave me at birth.
Since my parents were husband and wife, my father had the surname Kobrakov, consisting of eight letters, and my mother Kulikova, also of eight letters, but the wife takes the male surname in marriage and gives the father's patronymic to the born child, as is customary in a full family. And there were no questions about which surname to assign to me, and it is now customary for us to transfer through the male line (Salic law, according to which titles were transferred through the male line). And I was born Konstantin Alexandrovich Kobrakov, where the name defines me as a person, the patronymic is given from the creator in the male line, and the surname conveys my tribal affiliation. Thus, I received a birth certificate indicating my father and mother, but this does not mean that the tribal component of my mother is interrupted, far from it, it remains in the shadow of the paper factor, but not the human factor of knowledge and reverence of other relatives. As you know, the tribal branch is considered to be in the male line, and if this branch is terminated by a man, they say, it is suppressed. That's how it was in history, but there's always a but.
For example, in France, Belgium, Sweden, Italy, Denmark, and Prussia, in the past, a woman had the right to the throne. As an example, in Spain in the 1500s, women had the right to inherit titles and land independently of their husbands. But later these rights were abolished by the Salic Laws, which were introduced to prohibit the daughters of Isabella I of Castile from inheriting the inheritance in Aragon. And now we have returned to equality, just prescribed in the law. First, the Swedish succession system, which was first introduced in Sweden in 1980, and then since 1980 has been operating in the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Luxembourg.
Since 2011, the UK has passed legislation to resolve the problems of monarchs in the future, and before that, the constitutional crisis changed royal history and forced Elizabeth (later Elizabeth II, born April 21, 1926 in London, at the residence of Earl Strathmore) to become queen. On June 2, 1953, she was crowned Queen Elizabeth II at Westminster Abbey. And what preceded it? After all, she shouldn't have had the right to the title at all. On January 20, 1936, George V died, and Elizabeth's uncle, Edward VIII, became king of Great Britain, but he stayed on the throne for only a few months. December 11, 1936 Edward officially abdicated, and the crown passed to his brother, George VI, Elizabeth's father. On February 6, 1952, King George VI died at the age of fifty-six after a long illness.
Thus, belonging of one kind or another to the heritage is the decision of those who are at the helm of writing the rules for governing society and the rules by which to live. But what about the true, predestined life? This question goes beyond the brackets, thus the communication between both sides of the parents, as a rule, goes deeper, transferring contacts to cousins, second cousins, and so on. At the same time, it may be that dozens of different surnames are combined into one incredibly large tribal structure, which may or may not be accepted, imposing the truth, the one that those who decide see.
And here, if you have no idea what surname you have, you turn to your family, because your ancestors (fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers, etc.) did not tell or did not know what, and who, and where your surname originates from. In this case, you will have to write queries to the archive of the city or country, depending on what stage of the search you are at. This is very troublesome and difficult, it involves time, official documents and certain amounts of money, where the archive will accept from you only official documents confirming your relationship at a clear level (from me to your mother or father) with confirmation of marriage certificates, birth certificates and, unfortunately, death certificates.
It is impossible to skip over or bypass, but I can tell you right away that in Russia it is difficult to find a clear archival reference of your last name, as you will be told that there was a war, revolution, Napoleon, Peter the Great.… And all these events carried the threat of data non-preservation. But from experience, I will reveal to you the main limit where you will reach in the search for your kind. This is the 19th century (from 1800 to 1900), then you will be told that there was a persecution of the church and the books themselves are questionable whether they exist or not, and whether they will give an answer. They were called in different ways over the years and centuries, for example, the basic ones for everyone are the Metric Book or the Three-Part Book, since it consisted of three parts: "About those who were born, married, and died."
But remember that these books began to be created only in 1722, after the death of Peter I. There is also something to think about. The year 1917 dealt with parishes, churches, in a word, religion was the opium of the people, and not only temples and icons burned in the fire. I am telling you this, in particular, for the people, where to look, since people of a certain respected, noble family in the history before the revolution were published at different times. Boyar books were written, Synodic of the disgraced Ivan the Terrible, The Velvet Book, Acts of landowners who served, Notebooks of patrimonial books, Local orders, The most authentic lists, Family tree paintings of the end of the XVII century, Genealogical book of princes and nobles of Russia and exiles, Noble families of the Russian Empire, the General Coat of Arms of noble families of the All-Russian Empire, Lists of titled families and persons of the Russian Empire, letters of sale, bonded charters, ecclesiastical charters, laws, decrees, petitions, petitions. "The husband is honest" ("wonderful husband", "the husband is noble") — a title that was in use from 1300 to 1600. "The Tsar's Genealogist" (1555-1556) and many others. And such books are always kept respectfully, even during revolutions. Apparently, the necessary, profitable high-ranking nobility always remains the nobility, and they are copied and stored, since their surname carries the history of events. Historians were able to assemble it into a single structure in a new way. Fyodor Ivanovich Miller and Anisim Titovich Knyazev were presented to Catherine II (1784).
But you should immediately understand that your inclusion in a great, distinguished family will in no way affect your career growth, promotion, honor and respect from current high-ranking officials or states. As a rule, the origin from the powerful of this world, which are no longer such, on the contrary, plays on neglect, denial of you as a person, since people are afraid of strong people in reality, they want to offend your ancestors and descendants, expressing their loftiness and disregard through you for the powerful of this world (past), showing their superiority in the present, but in reality they are changing their worldview. As soon as a person from a distinguished family in the past begins to reach the heights in the present, everything immediately changes and neglect is replaced by reverence, respect, as long as you remain the right person. Hypocrisy is the engine of reality, especially in the servile soul, which is accustomed to fawn and bow down, it is difficult to deduce this from the genetic layer of the servile, dictated by centuries. And in most cases, people who know history simply treat them with respect and understanding that genetics or the ancestral imprint remains in you, and you will be able to manifest yourself, having the power in genetics. And your offspring, for the sake of the genetic predominance of certain genes, improved over the centuries, remain a force, a threat and a really serious opponent in all skirmishes and battles.
So I've told you briefly how people usually search for their roots through a primitive search engine, having no idea who you are. But the second way of knowing historical events, which was passed down to you from father to son, contains information about a fundamental understanding of you and who you are, what you can count on in the vicissitudes of court and life difficulties, having the opportunity to apply the experience gained by previous generations.Now they are just beginning to understand what genetics is, interfering with the structure, trying to change it, accelerate the processes, creating something perfect. But in your case, it was done naturally through time selection, multiplied by the opportunity to go through difficulties, tempering the very ancestral structure through difficulties, making genetic transformations, subsequently gaining dominance, towering over their descendants due to their ability to adapt and evolve in many ways. A temperamental and characterological feature is determined, multiplied by mental resourcefulness, practical action in critical situations, leaving cold calculation and confidence in their actions, giving confidence in their actions, solving problems in the future, minimizing shocks to a minimum.
It's not like playing chess, where you soullessly participate in the game without exerting mental, physical, or material losses if the outcome of the game is incorrect. As they say, to live a life is not to cross a field. But it is very difficult to understand all the twists and turns of historical chaos, unwinding the process of decomposition, which has a factor of human influence in the historical chain of events. For example, we can see the process of destroying a house in different ways, as it is deliberately destroyed.
For example, the 14th building of the Kremlin was demolished in 2016, deliberately demolished. People like Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin worked in this building. Why it was demolished is another question. I can describe it if necessary, but I think many people are not interested in going into it, and there is no need to talk about it. I think the authorities also understand that everyone has benefited from this, because historical parts have also been excavated there. Previously, it was replaced by the Maly Nikolaevsky Monastery, the Chudov Monastery and the Voznesensky Monastery, which were demolished in 1929-1930. With the demolition, of course, we lost something, but we won something.
And here, for example, is another building. The inter-Union prison of Spandau, located on the territory of Berlin, the British sector, had four directors at once. From 1947 to 1987, it contained:
Baldur von Schirach, prisoner No. 1, former head of the nazi youth movement "Hitler Youth" and Gauleiter of Vienna, sentenced to twenty years in prison, released from prison on October 1, 1966.;
Karl Doenitz, prisoner No. 2 — former commander of the U-boat fleet, commander-in-chief of the German Navy, Hitler's successor since May 1, 1945, sentenced to ten years in prison, released from Spandau upon expiration of his sentence on October 1, 1956;
Konstantin von Neurath, prisoner No. 3 — former German Foreign Minister, Imperial Protector of Bohemia and Moravia, sentenced to fifteen years in prison, released for health reasons in 1954;
Erich Raeder, former Commander—in-Chief of the German Navy, Admiral Inspector of the Navy, sentenced to life in prison, released from prison for health reasons in 1955;
Albert Speer— former personal architect of Hitler, Minister of Armaments and Military Industry of Germany, sentenced to twenty years in prison, released from Spandau upon expiration of his sentence on October 1, 1966;
Walter Funk — former adviser to Hitler on economic issues, Minister of Economy, General Commissioner for the Military Economy of Germany, sentenced to life in prison, released for health reasons in 1957;
Rudolf Hess, prisoner No. 7 (April 26, 1894) — Hitler's former deputy in the party, wrote a book with him, was sentenced to life imprisonment. He suffered from gout and arthritis for many years, which caused his fingers to be covered with knots and he could not dress himself. He committed suicide at the age of ninety-three in the garden of Spandau prison on August 17, 1987, on a cord from a light bulb.
You can look at that place and the alleged lamp and speculate about its possibilities in the prison itself and beyond. He applied for release five times. Three parties (the USA, France and the UK) were ready to satisfy them. But each time, the USSR vetoed it. After 1966, he remained one of the prisoners, had the right to walk freely through the corridors of the prison, order any books, watch TV and read the press of his choice, eat well twice a day, was allowed to walk in the prison garden and was not restricted in visits with relatives. Fifty—nine people were served: janitors, stokers, cooks, orderlies, four doctors - one each from the USSR, the USA, Britain and France. He was guarded by twenty-seven people. After that, the facility was completely demolished, leaving not even memories of the building itself, and the body was cremated.
But when an unnecessary building collapses before our eyes, and over the decades only a pile of garbage remains from the house and some fragments that only resemble elements that have lost their former beauty, it becomes impossible to recreate from a pile of junk without facts, photographs, drawings, sketches, and stories from people. And if this is not the case, then it is almost impossible to reconstruct, or you can only restore fragments of what has survived. But if you knew what the building looked like from people: height, volume, color, material, finish — it says and shows that the house can be restored. The same is true with the surname: if your family told you the basis, then the chain of exact dates does not matter to you, given that they may vary, transferring the same event to different years.
As an example of how simple and confusing everything is at the same time, but the facts of the story speak for themselves, and for this experiment, let's take me, let's see my last name Kobrakov from the word "cobra", the snake is so venomous. I'm sorry not to confuse it with stress, since I was different in sound in different structures, and only one out of ten people could pronounce it correctly. As an example of how your last name is distorted, you probably know yourself and have come across your last name.
Let's start with a simple one. What I think, and what my ancestors say, and what my father, grandfather, great-grandfather, and other relatives passed on. It has always been said that our family name is from the ancients, refers to great rulers, as they said, princes, kings, generals, rulers. We immediately begin to think why everyone in the family says all this on a rampage, but it is not really visible in history that there were such Kobrakovs in history. So it's not so easy to find what kind of prince, what kind of generals, what kind of rulers.
I looked at what my last name meant, "cobra, snake." I look at what it means at the state and allegory levels, that the serpent represents evil, the enemy, and there is a struggle against it at all levels, the struggle against the serpent in coats of arms, religion, and history. It must be a terrible person to have such a name, a snake, almost a devil sent to earth, and everyone who fights the snake protects the Orthodox. But you know, when I dug deeper, it turned out that initially there was a crocodile instead of a snake.
Horus, in the form of a Roman horseman, impales a crocodile with a spear, representing Seth, to avenge the death of his father (Egypt, IV century A.D.), is kept in the Louvre (Paris).
In general, there are many similar plots, here's another one. In Sumero-Akkadian mythology, there are stories about fighting a snake. Tiamat is the female personification of the primeval ocean, the chaos of salty waters from which everything was born. She was supposedly depicted as a dragon or hydra with seven heads. Or the god Ninurta, armed with lightning, strikes the monster Anzud, the abductor Tables of destinies. A sketch of the relief from the temple in Kalhu. But George, defeating the serpent, appears in Christian culture only at the end of the X — beginning of the XI century, that is, a warrior fighting a serpent ("The Miracle of George about the Serpent"), in George's homeland — in Cappadocia, modern Turkey, pierced the serpent with a spear, pinned it to the ground, and the horse trampled the serpent. with my feet. Before that, he ordered the princess to tie the snake with a belt and lead it into the city like a humble dog. And then they began to replicate this symbol in many cities of Byzantium and different nations. In Ancient Russia, it appeared with the spread of the symbol by Yaroslav the Wise, and it was Mstislav Vladimirovich who introduced the first images on princely seals in 1130. Remember the date, and I'll come back to it later.
Sometimes in my life I say this proverb: "With one hand he gives life, and with the other he takes it away." But there are political intrigues and situations for everything, but inside the cats are scratching, and they always try to disguise them with good deeds. All that I immediately found more similar in the official history of famous surnames of the past was Khan, Prince Kubrat. I remember more from the history of the school curriculum. I looked and found information.
Kubrat. Kubrat's alleged grave was found near the village of Pereshchepino Poltava region in 1912. Among the Bulgarians, this surname or nickname is interpreted with the following meaning: Kubrat, Kurbat, Krobat, Kurt, Kort, Krovat, Kovrat, and among the Greeks — Χουβρατις. You will say that there are many different names for one person, and I will give you, as an example, the name of the country Iran. In modern Persian, the word Uran comes from the Middle Persian Uran, which appeared in the third century and originally meant "belonging to the Aryans." It denoted lands inhabited by Aryans and had derived forms used in different languages at different times (Irinya, Orina, Irinia, Yarina, Erin, Arina, Irinka, Rina, Irisha, Ira, Irunya, Irusya, Irusha, Irena, Rena, Ina, Inulya, Arinka, Arisha, Aryukha, Aryusha). And I'm not taking the name Persia. Now you understand how everything is interpreted.
And no matter how hard I searched, it was simply impossible to find the direct surname Kobrakov. I also found out that Kobrin (or Kubrin) he was and studied with Mikhail Vasilyevich Lomonosov (in the parish register as Mikhailo, Vasily's son, nicknamed Lomonosos, since his father was the first to go to sea when the ice was still on the ice, and he broke the ice, and was considered hot, brave, fearless) in the preparatory class "Farah" at the Spassky Monastery on Nikolskaya Street near the Moscow Kremlin. So it's hard to say that there was no such surname, and it gave me even more confidence to think about it. It is necessary to understand your surname not as written specifically now, which suggests that either it was created intentionally and something is embedded in it, as a deep meaning of the surname itself for the future, or it was changed under the onslaught of changes in the linguistic application of the language itself through various kinds of reforms. But in any case, everything can be the same: both. Back then, someone had very great mental abilities and titanic knowledge. Not everything is so clear and simple.
I started looking at what I could find, reading, and, of course, thirty years ago I hit the wall to back up my knowledge from my family with knowledge in the documents. Then I started looking again, and all my life I couldn't put everything together into a single puzzle. As the years passed, there was more and more information, but I had the knowledge of what to start from and what direction to look for, how to link and connect everything. It was a very difficult task, but I did not give up. It was good that I knew the basics and began to find more and more dynasties, cities, and facts in open sources. Indirectly, as it seemed at first glance, but in fact it has a deep meaning.
There are many different meanings, examples, and references. For example, Kubra, common among the ancient Slavs. Translated into modern language, the name means "brave". There is also a surname Kubrin, which, according to one version, originated from the nickname Kubra. In Novgorod dialects, this was supposedly the name of a naughty boy, but I did not immediately consider this version, since there were different surnames in my maternal ancestry.: The Morozovs, the Romanovs… And Naughty, because the name itself says that he amused and pleased people. And to adjust this surname is equivalent to taking the city of Kholmogory from the word "Kholmgardia". It's absurd, so let's not play tricks. There is also an opinion that the surname Kubrin could be a "geographical" nickname, which was fixed for a native of the village of Kubrino in the Tarsky district of the Omsk region, but this is all a novelty (recently created), created for the sake of modern understanding, moving away from the true interpretation of the great surname. Since Kubrat lived in the 7th century and had territories that are now occupied by dozens of modern states, including Russia, then there is something to think about.
And I realized: we need to look deeper! I came across such surnames that had noble origins, titles, and each one is based on a large family line of the ancient royal family of Kubrat or further Attila. By the way, the latter had hundreds of wives, and all the famous families of the fifth century sought to give their daughters to his wives. And you can imagine how many children were born. And all of them are from well—known clans, so civil strife is just a strengthening of the primacy of one tribal branch in favor of another, even in different peoples and countries.
And thus, if we consider genealogically or the transfer of genes, then Attila's heirs gave such a great branch as Kubrat, which was under the supreme power of that time. And there are only a few left in his particular branch, but as the seed passed down by the Attilov family is so huge that I'm afraid to even tell you that all the courts of Europe known to you now, and not only have the blood of Attila, it means Kubrat. And if we assume to have his version of origin, then they are distant relatives, imagine how many families have joined there during the time we are talking about! Cousins, second cousins through second cousins, aunts, grandfathers, great-grandfathers… And I will not list them, I will just give minor examples of how a well-known generic structure was formed, which had the opportunity to influence the course of history and had the opportunity to write it with its participation through generic structures, cities, buildings, incidents, etc.
Now it has become clear to you: if you have money, a close—knit team, desire, and in the modern value system, scientific degrees, then you will be able to change the structure of understanding both in the past and in the present, which will lead to a strong stable accepted doctrine (Latin. doctrina — philosophical, political or legal theory, religious a concept, a teaching, a system of views, a guiding theoretical, political principle, accepted without evidence, based on any theory. Directs the decision-making process and actions in certain areas of official government regulations in the country).
So my modern surname may or may not have recognition, it all depends, as in the past, on the powerful of this world or the universal recognition of the people. Let's look at a small number of those who have the basis of the name from the khan, Prince Kubrot. How they were built is another matter, as legitimate from this branch or illegitimate (in the common people — baystryuki). Take the Bobrinskys, a Russian count and noble family that originates from Alexei Grigoryevich Bobrinsky, the illegitimate son of Catherine II and G. G. Orlov. You see, her last name before her marriage was Sophia Augusta Frederica Anhalt-Zerbst, after her marriage — Romanova. And Orlov, why Bobrinsky? It is not clear what they bet on later, having the opportunity to replace the letter B with K. And thus we will get Kobrinskys. There is a huge historical trace that was interrupted at that time, as the desire to have an ancient root system, stated, would have been a desire and an opportunity at the right time under certain circumstances. To talk about who is where and where was always a matter of politics at that time. what is it about.
The Kurbatovs are a Russian noble family, known in Astrakhan (1675).
Stefan Ivanovich Korbutovsky joined the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth regiment of the Smolensk gentry and was granted an estate in 1661.
The Kobyakovs are a Russian noble family, from the boyars of the Grand Duchy of Ryazan.
Kurbsky is an extinct princely family, a branch of the princes of Yaroslavl, Rurikovich.
Kobrin is a princely family of the Gediminovich dynasty. They were descended from the Grand Duke of Lithuania Algirdas.
Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld dates back to 1680.
Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, who married Queen Victoria of Great Britain. Her first representative to the British throne was in 1901.
A city in Belarus (bel. Kobryn) is a city in Brest region of Belarus, the administrative center of the Kobrin district at the junction of the Kobrynka rivers.
The city of Kubrat (bolg. Kubrat is a city in Bulgaria. It is located in the Razgrad region, part of the Kubrat community.
Kubratovo (bolg. Kubratovo) is a village in Bulgaria. Located in The urban area of Sofia.
Kobra is a village in the Darovsky district of the Kirov region, the year of the village's foundation was adopted in 1701.
In short, I would not have found all the data of the modern estate with the surname Kobrakov, as I later realized, since the changes and transformations took place long before the formation of modern writing and history. Everything goes back to antiquity, and here we must remember the upheavals: in 1917 there was a revolution and workers and peasants came to power, and all of the ruling elite were persecuted and destroyed as an unnecessary layer in the new historical realities. Accordingly, your ancestors could have been persecuted or forgotten, but no laws can forbid them to remember and talk about them in the family. Then, after weighing the pros and cons, you begin to take a cursory interest in open, publicly accessible history books. You know: the Vorontsovs, Vasilevskys, Potemkins — yes, great names, but you are not there, and it becomes unclear why all the relatives speak, but you are not seen in history. Of course, we don't give up, we look deeper and understand that most of the princes are either very young compared to the very concept of "prince" or lack in-depth knowledge. And in modern books after Peter I, as I call it, everything is rewritten in a new way for the created empire, and not some tribal aspects that made up the country before Peter, no, they point to fragments, pieces of past history or the redistribution of the world.
But can they be considered and how are the works of the Italian Iovan de Rubertis interpreted now? The article "Slavic settlements in the Kingdom of Naples" reports that in 1468 AD the Slavs founded the following cities in Italy: Montemiro, Sanfelice, Tavenna, Seritello. We read, we think. He became more and more deeply interested and indirectly looked at Italy. The traces of the Attila family led me to Venice, which, in principle, was created under the influence of Kubrot's brother. The first historical information about the settlement on the site of present-day Venice dates back to 452: several houses that do not represent a specific settlement. Its origin is associated with the invasion of Northern Italy by hordes of Huns led by Attila.
I also looked through Italy. He found the tribe of the Obrovs, from Latin — Avars (cf. Greek. Abbasαροι; Lat. Avari; obry — others-rus. Obr., ed., obr.), and I saw: either something is wrong with the chronology, or someone does not want to say something, but I will not, and I will just continue: "A smart person will not say, a fool will not understand." And I found a description that "Great Britain" was created from the words "great Britain". "Italians", "Italians"... In general, Italy was formed by the Sabine, Oscan, Picene and Umber tribes, similar to the Obri, descendants of the Etruscans.
Or another version. Great peoples of the Franks and Italians settled on the island, which created the universal concept of the tribes of the British. As we all know, the lands inhabited by the Britons consisted of many unstable territories subject to various tribes (Katuvellauns, Kornovi, Korieltauv, Koritans, Dobuns). Pytheas first described this country around 325 BC, exploring the coast, but the original text of his works has not been preserved. Fragments paraphrased or taken from the writings of other classical authors. For the first time, the word "Great Britain" was officially used in 1474, in a letter proposing marriage between Cecily, the daughter of Edward IV of England, and James, the son of James III of Scotland. And in official state documents — only in 1604, when King James VI proclaimed himself "King of Great Britain, France and Ireland." But the word "England" was first mentioned with Alfred the Great (871-899). It's a familiar date, but we're looking further. He became the liberator and organizer of the state and the first king of Wessex, began to call himself the king of England. It comes from the German tribe of Angles — they were natives of the Angeln peninsula, located in the eastern part of Jutland in the Kiel Bay area (now the German land of Schleswig-Holstein).
Etymologists dispute in linguistics the assumption that it originates from the shape of the Angeln Peninsula, similar to an angle. You can say a lot when you have some degree or recognition. It was first mentioned at the end of the 9th century in Old English in the treatise "The Church History of the people of the Angles" by the Venerable Bede. And the modern spelling of the toponym "England" was established only by 1538. And then we see: Britain. They added the prefix Great, because it doesn't bother anyone that she calls herself that, but why not, if history says that earlier, especially in the western part of Europe, names were given from tribes to localities.
And how to divide the tribes of the Franks and Italians? They took it and united it, because no one is worried that there was Kievan Rus. Russian Russians became Russians, and even the sea was Russian. It can be assumed that there is a lot to think about, but I did not go too far in this direction, since my question is to find my last name not from the beginning of time, but at least in the depth of the formation of our historical part. Let's return to more modern reflections on the historical plane.
And let's look at the times of Rurik, Princess Olga, but let's remember what my relatives said. We will understand that the prince had a more serious concept than before the 1917 revolution. And you'll say, "Well, I've bent over!" And again I looked at where all my ancestors had lived, as the Kobrakov family nest lately, and then I saw again that my ancestors were right, that some serious political changes and transformations had indeed thrown our family back into the dark time of oblivion, since my grandfather is his father, great-grandfather, etc. They were born and raised in the Smolensk region, region, province, county, principality, kingdom, etc. (at different times named) in a village near the old Smolenskaya road, at the intersection of the Dnieper River waterway "from the Varangians to the Greeks" and the old Smolenskaya road, a tract that connected the west with the east in the settlement Sukhorukovo, near Gololobovo, is a village in the Kardymovsky district of the Smolensk Region of Russia. It is part of the Netriz rural settlement (a very rare name). At that time, it had a key opportunity to be located 21 km from the Nikolskaya Tower of the Smolensk Kremlin.
And asking your family what you did, how you lived, you will find out that after the revolution, they began to distribute land and the great-grandfather moved to Sukhorukovo a couple of kilometers from his birthplace, the village of Gololobova, where they lived before, that is, the whole family lived in Gololobovo, and began to disperse, and there was nothing left of the former large center. Not enough. And all over the country and the world, you can see many different people who indicate that the village of Gololobovo was born. And their last name is Kobrakov, which shows that the family is interesting.
And, of course, the first thing I started looking for was what does the name Gololobovo mean? There are many concepts, but the main thing that I noticed was the "bare forehead". It seems like everything is simple, if not for some facts that I realized later. And thus, looking ahead, they handed over to our family a place where they could live and breed under constant supervision, and gave the name itself for edification. And at the same time, in order to understand who is being talked about in certain circles, like a bare forehead, that is, a person who lives without an object on his head or without what he has lost. As an example, a crown that was taken by force.
Of course, we understand. As Ivan the Terrible used to say: "Pray for you know who" to his patriarch, when he dealt with his opponents for those he killed, who could not even be talked about, but could not be forgotten. And there will always be those who will disobey orders and hide the unwanted ones out of sight. Whether by accident or intentionally, it is difficult to answer now, but the fact is a fact, and many thanks to that person or people.
And the city itself or its territory is under a different name, but now we know it as Smolensk, a very famous city for everyone. It can be said that the modern key wars of the last centuries have shown its importance: Napoleon, the Second World War. And if you look back centuries, it belonged to the territory of Attila and Munzduk's father, it was located in the middle of the empire of that time, which dates back to 390-434 years. A small remark: the shortest route from the Black Sea to Lake Ladoga operated long before the formation of Kievan Rus, but it is not customary to say why these events took place. Or before the formation of Kievan Rus, there were stupid people who did not know how to trade, write, like the whole world at that time? It's even hard to imagine, much less believe. Why then did Attila, Munzduk, keep these territories in the middle of his kingdom and value them? The control of trade routes in the Smolensk region was not only a key object and a pearl, controlling the north, south, as well as the west and east.
As an example, in the modern concept, the Strait of Hormuz, Gibraltar, the Suez Canal, and the Panama Canal are well known and widely known — they provide fabulous profits and geopolitical control. So, in the past, as we know, "from the Varangians to the Greeks" had the same concept and meaning, but also had religious significance, the administrative structure of the most ancient empire. The fact that relatives are forever unable to divide property, you yourself know how it happens. Later it collapsed and the territories came under the influence of modern Smolensk to the Lithuanians and Poles. And an independent kingdom or an independent princely state before becoming part of Russia may turn out to be a much older territory, the current part of the territory that is part of modern Smolensk.
As a city, the city of Smolensk itself was first mentioned in the events of 862. Prince Oleg the Prophetic marched on Smolensk and incorporated it into the Ancient Russian state (from the chronicle of the Tale of Bygone Years, written at the beginning of the 12th century, the Kiev chronicle, attributed to monk Nestor the Chronicler). The Radziwill (Konigsberg) chronicle mentions that in 882 Smolensk was captured by Prince Oleg the Prophetic. And in 863, in the Ustyug chronicle, Smolensk was mentioned by the Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, who wrote a treatise on the administration of the empire in instruction to Constantine's heir, Roman II the Younger.
Milinisk (Greek: ΜιλινίΣκα) — Smolensk (905-959) was located on the site of Gnezdovo, 12 km downstream of the Dnieper River. The toponym was represented by the Scandinavian words namas (numas) — "family house, manor" and gardas — "fence, city". Thus, the meaning of Nemogard is "a fenced, fortified house (castle, ancestral estate, inheritance)." Or "nest" in different languages, if you look at it etymologically in the modern concept. Russian — "nest, nest", Belarusian — "gnyazdo, gnezdavazza", Ukrainian — "gnizdo, gnizditsia", Polish — gniazdo, Slovak — hniezdo, Slovenian — gnezdo, Bulgarian — "nest", Czech — hnizdo, Croatian — gnijezdo, Serbian — "nest". If we take the root words (the root is Mr.-Z, meaning "to keep"): Georgian - shenakhva ("to preserve"), Irish — choinneail ("to keep"), Armenian — khanayel ("to preserve"), Hindi — ghonsala ("nest"), Hebrew "neot" ("shelter, habitation"), Latin — nidus ("nest; a place where spores or seedlings develop"), English — nide ("nest"), French — nid ("nest"), Ancient Indian — ndas ("resting place, parking lot").
Thus, one can interpret the same city in different ways: the one that was destroyed, and which people began to call. By the way, according to the ruling structure, he is four years younger than Novgorod (859). according to the first mention of the city in the late Nikon chronicle, written in the XVI century. In the "Tale of Bygone Years" — in the 1110s.
On the right bank, and on the left — Rurikovo hillfort, on the Sivers Canal. By the way, between Gnezdovo and Smolensk, the first saints in Russia, Boris and Gleb, were killed in 1015 on the Medyn River (they may be princes of Volga Bulgaria, how do you like that?). Both princes are the sons of Vladimir, who baptized Russia, and the Byzantine Princess Anna. This marriage was the seventh for the Kiev ruler. A wooden chapel began to be built on the site of Gleb's death in 1072, and in 1101 a wooden temple was founded on the initiative of Vladimir Monomakh, and only in 1191 it was completed, and in 1195 a stone church. It is unclear why it is so late, it has not been preserved to this day.
Nearby, directly opposite, slightly to the side, if you swim across the Dnieper River, there is a historically significant Gnezdovo object — an object of cultural heritage of the peoples of the Russian Federation of federal significance. This follows from Resolution No. 1327 of the Council of Ministers of the RSFSR dated 08/30/1960 "On Further improvement of the protection of cultural monuments in the RSFSR" and Article 64 of Federal Law No. 73-FZ dated 06/25/2002 "On Cultural Heritage Sites (Historical and Cultural Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation". In 2015, the administration of the Smolensk Region put forward a proposal to include the archaeological complex among the UNESCO World Heritage Sites. It has not been submitted yet, but I think that after my work, the international community will consider Gnezdov's status in more detail. Recently, he has gained new fame based on some information made by modern scientists.
In the middle of the 10th century, part of the ancient burial mounds in the Gnezdovo archaeological complex near Smolensk was purposefully destroyed. Scientists suggest that this happened on the orders of Princess Olga — to remove from the memory of the ancient rulers, to impose new orders and ways of life in the population and the nobility, which at that time rigidly united the lands along the way from the Varangians to the Greeks under the rule of the Rurikovich. The purpose of such actions is the symbolic destruction of the "sacred bond" of the local nobility with the land. It was a way to eliminate the memory of the former rulers and the right of their descendants to this territory. In beliefs, the connection of ancestors and the real world, giving symbolism to the transfer of succession.
We will not go far and see what happened to the royal family in the Ipatiev house (07/17/1918), which was demolished in our time in the night of Yekaterinburg. It was by decree of Yeltsin that Boris Nikolaevich, being the head of the Sverdlovsk region in the 1970s, gave the go-ahead for the demolition of an "undesirable historical monument" — the Ipatiev House, in which a cold-blooded massacre took place. Here is a list of those who took part, who received special services to the Soviet country, and what happened to the participants of the beneficial action at that time.:
Yakov Mikhailovich Yurovsky (40 years old) — commandant of the Ipatiev house of special purpose, member of the Board of the Ural Regional Cheka, Comrade Commissioner of Justice of the Ural region, Chairman of the Investigative Commission of the Ural Regional Revolutionary Tribunal. He died in 1938 in the Kremlin hospital from a perforated ulcer. Years later, his family was overtaken: three of his children died in the 1970s and 1980s. The next generation — all of Yurovsky's granddaughters died in infancy, and the grandchildren tragically died, cutting off the line of this family: he died driving a car, one suffocated in a fire, the other crashed, fell from a height;
Grigory Petrovich Nikulin (23 years old) — assistant to the commandant of the DON, head of the Flying Squad of the Military Police. For his good work, he received a large apartment in the center of Moscow. He worked as the manager of the Mosgaz Trust, head of the Moscow Housing Department.… Before the war, he was appointed head of the Eastern Water Supply Station. He was repeatedly elected a deputy of the Moscow City Council, a member of the Moscow City Executive Committee. And after his death in September 1965, the honored communist was buried at the most prestigious cemetery, Novodevichy.;
Ermakov Pyotr Zakharovich is the military commissar of the Verkhny Isetsky plant, and later in prison. Due to his lack of literacy, it was not possible to build an impressive career. Until the end, he worked at the Sverdlovsk Regional Museum of the Revolution, and as a result, the drunk was placed in the regional committee hospital, which was located just opposite Ipatiev's house. So death came in 1952 — I looked at the house in which he was killing;
Mikhail Alexandrovich Medvedev-Kudrin is a member of the Board of the Military Intelligence Committee, assistant to the head of the 1st department of the Special Agent Department of the NKVD of the USSR. He rose to the rank of colonel, and in his old age even sent a request to the archives of the Sverdlovsk Regional Committee with a request to confirm his direct involvement in the execution of former Tsar Nicholas II and his family. Shortly before his death in the winter of 1964, he bequeathed as a gift to the head of state of the USSR Nikita Khrushchev his Browning No. 389965, with which he allegedly killed the tsar. He was also buried at Novodevichy Cemetery, near the town of Nikulin. Under Khrushchev, he received a large personal pension. He was buried at the Novodevichy cemetery with military honors.;
Pavel Spiridonovich Medvedev is the head of security at the Don. He died of typhus in a prison cell in 1919.;
Kabanov Alexey Grigorievich is a member of the Military Training Committee, the head of the DON machine gun team. He worked in party, legal and economic positions in the Crimea (in particular, he served as the prosecutor of the Feodosiysky district), and was in charge of the Khabarovsk Canteen Trust. He died as a personal pensioner of national significance.
Thus, I have shown you the historical trends, the concept and a certain conjuncture for that time, how the task is solved by those in power, and the ways of implementation, and what to say about the gravity of a century-old history.
Next, I suggest we look at how our family knows the history that our relatives have passed down from generation to generation. I do not insist on its official version, I do not have a doctor of history, and I did not defend my dissertation so that it would be recognized as one of the officially recognized ones — yes, this is how truth is created at the state level. I will come back in more depth about other events that our family kept through me as the sole heir to the truth, transmitted to preserve it.
Kiev was founded around 634-641. Kubrat ordered in addition to the Gnezdovsky hillfort. And just on the right bank, and not on the left, as Smolensk stands, to control the great transition from the Varangians to the Greeks, the Bashtu fortification (meaning "tower"), the Golden Gate, was erected. Bashta was built and led by his younger brother Shambat, who also bore the nickname Kyi, so later the fortress was called Kyem. There was only a fortification, and people settled around and understood that if they took tribute, there was control, there was a military, then their lives would not be subject to raids, and not only large armies could raid, but they simply gathered, attacked, took valuables and rode away, and the river gave a cordon.
So, in 634-641, the city of Kyi, modern Kiev, was formed, but it was small and insignificant for a wide understanding, the main interest arose only in 880, and became the main structure in 882 with the desire to change the mentions of the Nest (ancestral nest), removing from the memory of those peoples who remembered and believed. But, for example, the official date of the city of Kiev, which was integral to the historical events of that time, was indicated on the basis of the already modern arguments of the political elite of the USSR. "It was founded in 482 and is 1,500 years old," said Vladimir Shcherbitsky of Soviet Ukraine. As Valentin Arsentievich Zgursky (Hero of Socialist Labor, Doctor of Economics, Professor, academician of the Academy of Environmental Sciences of Ukraine) recalls, Boris Evgenievich Paton proposed a compromise date between 2200 and 1100 years. We have reached a compromise.
"By 1980, I had managed to attend the celebrations of the City Days of several capitals: Yerevan, Berlin, Kyoto (the ancient capital of Japan), Prague. And Kiev didn't have its own anniversary celebration. We were on a big rise after the Olympics-80 in Moscow. In Kiev, the idea of arranging such a thing in our country was maturing."
And in the "Tale of Bygone Years" Kiev is mentioned under the year 854 (Nestor the Chronicler). Nothing earlier than the 10th century has been discovered on the site of Kiev. And it is difficult to even call what has been discovered a village. I pointed this out to you to understand how history is formed.
An excerpt from The Tale of Bygone Years, where there is a mention of Kiya, Cheek and Horeb: "There were 3 brothers, Kiy, Cheek, Horeb, who had a degree, and a bend, and we gave birth to them, paying tribute to Kozar. Askold and Dir stayed in the city seven, and many Varangians bought up, and began to own." If translated, it sounds like: "There were three brothers, Kiy, Shchek and Khoriv, who built this city and disappeared, and we are sitting here, their descendants, and paying tribute to the Khazars. Askold and Dir stayed in this city, gathered many Varangians and began to own the land of the glades."
The translation speaks for itself, but it seems to me that we are reasonable people and understand that if those who have left are waiting for them, I think that no one will wait for 400 years. There is also something to think about here, but I will not, but will continue to show how and what history is. Here, for example, Smolensk. Basically, the antiquity of Smolensk is not much talked about even in the modern world, as I assume, due to the fact that Smolensk and the territories near Smolensk preserve very serious historical knowledge. Even the full-scale excavations in Gnezdovo were stopped. Why? Maybe because of some important historical facts that can give us a different look at history. And Smolensk itself and its history are interpreted in different ways in different countries. I can't say what the reason is, maybe it's a certain conjuncture of the facts themselves.
So you realized that there is a story, as it is interpreted. But now we return to Smolensk and its name, understanding, and the name itself speaks volumes in a historical way. According to some, more accepted ones, the name Smolensk occurred… There are many hypotheses, I will list the recognized ones and the one that I will indicate under No. 7, as it was said in our family.:
1.The trade route "from the Varangians to the Greeks". Residents were engaged in smoldering.
2.The name of the river is Smolnya.
3.O. N. Trubacheva. with the ethnic name of people who were engaged in slash-and-burn agriculture in ancient times, clearing the land in this way.
4.The geographical term "resin(b) is a type of soil, black, swampy land."
5.The version of Hieromonk Shupinsky. The name of the city originated from the name of its founder, Smolig.
6.Religious and cultic. In pagan times, there was a temple especially revered by local tribes, where sacrifices were made and joint prayers were performed, that is, "prayers".
7.In ancient times, a prince decided to take over the territory, because in Gnezdovo (as the ancestral place used to be called, revered) high-ranking people, the vicegerents of God, who subdued everything and everything, were deceived, killed, and the bodies dumped into the river. And the settlement itself was destroyed, as, for example, Suzdal stands in place after the destruction of the old city. And they built a new one with a new name, and this did not bother anyone at that time and was a sign of ordinary affairs.
So, after the murder, I can supposedly tell you how it was, based on what I've been told since childhood. Boats were deceived into crossing the Dnieper, all forces were thrown into the river passage, and at that moment an attack was launched from the land against the supreme power based on the religious concept of that time. I will not go into the pagan subtext, I can tell you in more detail if you have such a desire. In Russia, they tried not to give children the names of those who died as martyrs: they were afraid to repeat the fate and persecution of those who wanted to remove history. The people who were in the destroyed settlement, some survived and moved 12 km from that place to a small village that previously served Gnezdovo, on the right side, and there they began to read and pray for the murdered kings of the great family. And so it went among the people: "Where are you coming from?"—"From Smolenya to the kings who were innocently killed." Over time, they began to interpret tar. And over time, both the name and the city of Smolensk became, which grew in population on the right side, and people flocked to the left and stayed. Over time, the entire main building of the city was moved to the left side, and so it went.
Of course, if your family knows this, there is something to think about, and it is doubtful to question the stories of your ancestors if you can read, and in-depth reflection on your family name, multiplied by the stories of your ancestors, becomes a matter of honor to find and understand. By the way, when I picked up the documents, I saw many trips to Smolensk. For example, when one brother was in Novgorod since 879, as Oleg the Prophetic, and in 882 he went to Smolensk, and introduced it into the Old Russian state, and also the Novgorod prince Oleg captured Kiev in 882 (that both stand on the river). The Dnieper was completely navigable at that time, by the way, Gnezdovo is also on the banks of the Dnieper.
The significance of a place in the past speaks of respect and reverence, in the modern sense Gnezdovo also has symbolism, but in other projections of historical reality. Air Force One crashed there with the Polish government and the president. The Tu-154 crash in Smolensk occurred on April 10, 2010. The plane of the presidential delegation, 88 passengers and 8 crew members. Among the dead are Polish President Lech Kaczynski and his wife Maria Kaczynska, as well as well—known Polish politicians, almost all the highest military command, and public and religious figures.
Prior to that, over 4,000 Polish officers who were taken to Gnezdovo were later found murdered in Katyn graves. For the first time, information that NKVD officers shot Polish officers in the Katyn forest near Smolensk appeared in 1943, two years after the occupation of the Smolensk region by German troops. And in 1944, after the liberation of Smolensk, Katyn, located 14 kilometers west of Smolensk, mass graves of prisoners of war were discovered for the first time near the Gnezdovo railway station by the Soviet group "Special Commission to establish and investigate the circumstances of the shooting of Polish officers by Nazi invaders in the Katyn Forest."
After exhumation and questioning of witnesses, the commission established that the executions were carried out in 1941 by the Nazi invaders. The Fuhrer's headquarters, the Bear Den, a German bunker built by Todt's organization near Smolensk during World War II, was also built one kilometer from Gnezdovo. Construction was carried out from October 1941 to August 1942. It was planned that the bunker would be used as Hitler's field headquarters, and in parallel, excavations of ancient mounds were carried out by the famous Ahnenerbe structure (German Ahnenerbe — "Ancestral Heritage").
In Soviet times, excavations were also carried out, but for some reason all excavations were stopped when they began to find a large number of birch bark letters. This shows that the settlement was highly educated and suggests reasoning about who was there, who ruled, or what was there, that there were so many literate people and literacy was everywhere, which could indicate the more ancient origin of Gnezdovo. What if it's not just an old castle, but a temple? 1,500 mounds remained unexplored, and there were about 5,000 in total. Can you imagine such a burial of the nobility? What can he say? Such a number is unthinkable, this is the place as the basis where the decision was made on who should be kagan and for how many years, and which cities should pay how much tribute. In a word, the center of decision-making and burial. I'll leave it for your understanding. In the past, the native nest began to be used almost in the modern world (and before that it was not used and was not in honor), replacing ancestral, reserved and mayoral, state, specific, military (Cossack) estates.
So it is possible to understand the past, understanding their values, and maybe great knowledge was stored that could be compared with the libraries of the past: Egypt — Alexandrian, Mesopotamia — Ashurbanipal, Ancient Greece — Aristotle, Rome — Vespasian, Ulpian.
Thus, it becomes clear: excavations were carried out, and a large number of birch bark letters were found. But the birch bark letters found in Gnezdovo are not on display in museums. The question is, why and why did such a battle unfold in Gnezdovo near Smolensk that they forbade digging and threw all their forces into Novgorod, higher up on the way from the Varangians to the Greeks? By the way, so that you understand, Gnezdovo, Gololobovo, Sukhorukovo are also located on the right bank of the Dnieper River, but the city of Smolensk itself was originally built on the left side. Do you understand the difference of that time? And Gnezdovo is located 12 km from Smolensk, and Gololobovo is 21 km away. But don't look at the numbers, what do they give? The number is added 3, and they have the same concept back and forth. I don't think it makes any sense.
But in a straight line from Gnezdovo, it just goes through Smolensk, even the house where I used to live and study in Smolensk, Sukhorukovo and Gololobovo, by coincidence, on the same straight line, so the subtext is interesting. You say, what's the big deal? I don't mind, but historians and archaeologists draw such parallels, the lives of some peoples. For example, the Karnak culture is associated with prehistoric monuments in the Karnak region and the vicinity of the Gulf of Morbihan in France (province of Brittany). The world's largest collection of megalithic structures. Big broken menhir — province of Brittany, France. It once had a height of about 20 m. The Table de Marchand dolmen (French: La Table des Marchand, Bret. An Daol Varchant is a large dolmen in the French commune of Locmarjaker[, Morbihan department. The name comes from the Marchand family, with whom the area is associated. Gavrini (fr. Gavrinis, bret. Gavriniz is a small island in the Gulf of Morbihan, Brittany, France. The landmark of Gavrini is the megalithic corridor tomb of the Neolithic era, rich in monuments of megalithic art. All these historical monuments stand on the same line and carry a semantic essence, but still we look further and delve into the depths, we do not take indirect coincidences.
Smolensk was mentioned in 862 and 863. The Smolensk settlement itself is one of the oldest cities in modern Russia. Here, for example, is a list of the oldest cities for comparison and understanding of history, I will give you in contrast to my judgments. Let's continue the list of old cities in Russia. Derbent (Dagestan), founded in 438 AD, Kerch (Panticapaeum in the 7th century BC). In 862, it was in Staraya Ladoga, which is located a few kilometers from Lake Ladoga, that the Varangian Prince Rurik was invited. This is followed by the oldest cities. Novgorod (859), which was formed as a new city (translated). It can be assumed that it was built on the old city, like Suzdal. Novgorod is described as Rurik's vocation in the Sofia First Chronicle, in the Novgorod First Chronicle, and in the Tale of Bygone Years, but again by the state itself, which Veliky Novgorod later proclaimed itself (just like the British).
Kiev, with its St. Sophia Cathedral and the Pechersk Monastery, was not considered the spiritual center of pre-Mongol Russia. Perhaps it is a coincidence, perhaps not, but Smolensk is mentioned in all significant descriptions in the past by other states and in significant places of the Kremlin of Moscow. In 1820, the Earthen Rampart was completely demolished, and an area named Smolenskaya was formed on the cleared space. In 1524-1525, in the center of the monastery courtyard of the Novodevichy Monastery in Moscow, the Cathedral of the Smolensk Icon of the Mother of God, the Spassky Icon of the All-Merciful Savior of Smolensk, erected on the facade of Red Square, named after the icon of the Savior Not Made with Hands, placed in 1658 in a kiosk above the entrance gate of the main tower of the Moscow Kremlin. Even the construction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Smolenskaya Square has a meaning, in St. Petersburg Smolenskoye Pole is on Vasilyevsky Island, the Smolenskaya Church was built in the cemetery.
Why do the capitals of the state honor history so much, but do not go into the truth of Smolensk is also a question, what do you think? But then I looked, and an in-depth interest in the history of my city awoke in me, I was prompted to move away from the family name and at the same time read, knowing the history that I was told. And I saw that the outskirts of Prince Kubrot's domain exactly passed through the territory of Gnezdovo, on the right side of the Dnieper River was their city, which controlled the river crossing from the Varangians to the Greeks. And it can be assumed that the massacre was not with Smolensk, but with the Gnezdovo governors (if we compare how many excavations were done in Kiev and in Gnezdovo, then in Gnezdovo, for example, coins of that time, the 8th century, were found ten times more than in Kiev. This is so, for a reference that can show the level and status of those who have been there), and then the city of Smolensk is described exactly after the capture and disappearance of Gnezdovo as a city that has the basis of the former kingdom.
Another oddity: Smolensk itself is built on the left. Under Rostislav, the fortifications of Smolensk were built (1130s), including temples, fortresses of the settlement, but three churches were built outside the city. Peter and Paul Church on Gorodyanka (Peter and Paul Church) is the oldest church in Smolensk, (Kashena St., 20) built in 1146 under Prince Rostislav Mstislavich of Smolensk. Prince Smolensky, Novgorod, Kievsky built about 2 km outside the city at a distance from the nearest part of the fortifications of that time. And at the same time it is divided by the Dnieper River. The church itself was built of thin flat bricks of various sizes and shapes. Initially, the church served as a princely residence, but at the end of the 12th century it was transformed into a parish church.
We look further. The second church is Archangel Michael on the Pier (4A Parkovaya St., Smolensk, Svirskaya Church). The stone pillar-shaped Orthodox church (1180-1197) in honor of Archangel Michael, built at the end of the 12th century outside the fortress, is located 2 km from the Smolensk fortress wall. The 6.5 km long Smolensk City Wall consisted of 38 towers, it was built of stone only in 1595-1602. By the way, one part of the fortress wall passes through the fortifications in the form of a star-shaped structure, now this part is hidden very skillfully, and if you do not know where it is, you will not be able to find it, but those who understand maps can easily find it, since several of its parts are clearly visible, but many do not even know this. The Smolensk Kremlin is one of the largest surviving brick fortresses in the world, and the people of Smolensk lived in the citadel itself, but the stone church was built 2 km from the protected city.
The third church is St. John the Theologian (1160-1180s), the church of St. John the Theologian on Varyazhki, on Vrazhka (Bolshaya Krasnoflotskaya str., 15A, p. 1). I remember it as abandoned, I climbed into it myself and saw a partially lost painting. And it also stands outside the fortress, and again it is being built outside Smolensk itself from the fortress wall. All were built in the southern part of old Smolensk or in the direction of Gnezdovo, in short, the churches themselves that were built, they were supposed to give a reference to the tragedy and veneration of the Gnezdovo rulers. And I'll tell you one more thing: the churches themselves give the letter G and point the direction specifically to Gnezdovo, not to Gleb's grave, it is much lower. I'm just talking about hidden symbols. For example, you can see what Smolensk looked like in the past on the old maps, even there there is a reference to three churches in the lower right corner. What did those who created the hail mean by the hidden meaning? It's up to you to think. But still, think about it, why is there such a huge construction of stone churches outside the city itself?
Here is another one that has also been preserved. St. Abraham's Transfiguration Monastery, built between 1210 and 1219 (Smolensk, Marshal Zhukov St., 24). It was originally called Bogoroditsky, because the first church in it was consecrated in honor of The temple of the Robe of the Blessed Virgin Mary, built inside the fortress, is located near the fortress wall between the Avraamievskaya and Zaaltarnaya towers on the other side of the fortress from all three churches. I will not draw parallels, I will leave it for you to think about why at that time they built from stone in such quantities and meanings as the symbolism of what.
about the life and death of Oleg from the Rurikovich family in the Russian chronicle "The Tale of Bygone Years", where I was again alarmed that he died of a snake bite in 911-912. Strangely, the Rock Snake is present in our story. Let's look further. By the way, Oleg and Olga are a pair name for a man and a woman. From Scandinavian, the masculine Oleg is Helgi, and from Old Russian it is Volga or Volga. There is something to think about here too. About what Olga and Oleg did, but history cannot be rewritten, and there is something to think about.
But back to the snake that bit, as it was said. After the extermination of Gnezdovo (or Gnezdovo), the son of Khan Karadjar (the snake, which was a symbol of the clan descended from the ancients) survived and subsequently dealt with Oleg. Then I thought, "It's strange, but my last name is snake, cobra." By the way, friends, cobra is translated from Portuguese as snake, I already wrote to you above. Thus, we have the first name, the second the story that was passed down by word of mouth, the third the locality, and the fourth the historical events, similar to the version of my ancestors, but vague. Everything fits, but it's not enough, we need facts, and this doesn't mean the end of the search — it's the beginning. So, we look deeper and make sure that our relatives are right, which they told me as the history of our family.
Let's see what the last name Kobrakov means. We searched and saw that the ending-s in the surname is a modern division, just like in the past, into a certain ethnic group that was divided in the USSR, but in the modern binding—s for Russians, and for Belarusians, for example, end in -ich, -uk, -ik, - Come on, come on. Thus, I will give you a template structure, I will not give you examples of everything, but I will show you the meaning of the formation of a modern surname and its concepts, if you understand, then we will proceed further.
So, continuing about the structure of the Kobrakov surname, we dropped the attributed ending from the modern fret and got the surname Kobrak. It scares me and it seems that this is some kind of nickname, but no, Kobrak sounds and reads in a modern sound, but previously it sounded differently like Kobrat. It's just that over time, scribes who write on sound, illiteracy, or something else… But now we see in passport offices what obvious typos people make, they write the wrong letters, even though we live in the modern world. But imagine about a hundred years ago or three hundred years ago, and I just read it wrong by candlelight (there was no electricity in ancient times and the lighting left much to be desired), and if it was written in clumsy handwriting? In general, it is very easy to change the ending from T to K, accidentally or intentionally — it is impossible to establish.
Below I will state the fact that it is possible to state unreliability in our time, such cases occur, and to reason without thinking that there are no mistakes is a delusion. I will give only two surnames and again my relatives, I will take my mother's own father, Pavel Ivanovich Kulikov, and my father's father's own sister. Grandfather's own sister — we'll get a great-aunt. There was Nadezhda Aleksandrovna Kobrakova, born in 1923, a native of the Smolensk region (Kardymovsky district, Sukhorukovo village), who was awarded, according to one information, the Order of Glory of the III degree (08/09/1944, 312 sd 3 of the Belorussian Front. The East Foundation. information: 33. Inventory of the ist. information: 690155. Case east. information: 5255), the Order of the Patriotic War II degree (document date: 06/01/1945, No. 53/n dated 06/01/1945. Published: 61 sk. Information about the archive. Archive: TSAMO. The East Foundation. information: 33. Inventory of the ist. Information: 686196. Case east. information: 5417. Case: cabinet 40, drawer 21).
And let's see how the information has changed after the name change at the state level. Married with a different surname by her husband: she was Kobrakova, became Galeeva Nadezhda Alexandrovna. The document in the jubilee file no longer displays all her awards. But in fact they are, and how can we prove that it is wrong to deprive historical documents of merit? Wouldn't it be easier to write her maiden name and the one she bears after marriage, or to indicate all her merits both ways? But no, apparently no one needs it. Look further and compare: even the storage boxes are different, which indicates complete disrespect or confusion.
Date of birth: __.__.1923.
Place of birth: Russian Federation, Smolensk region,
Smolensky district.
Name of the award: Order of the Patriotic War II degree.
Document number: 74.
Document date: 04/06/1985.
Archive information.
Archive: TSAMO.
File cabinet: anniversary card file of awards.
Document location: cabinet 9, drawer 10.
It clearly shows a distortion of half a century, but you might say it happens.And now let's look at my grandfather. That is, my mother's father, my grandfather Pavel Ivanovich Kulikov, served in intelligence throughout the war. Which was simply multiplied, as in the "Matrix", turning into a multitude of independent Waders. Date of birth: 1921. Place of birth: Russian Federation, Smolensk region, Kardymovsky district, Lyubkovo village. And compare what I found out in the search. I made a journalistic request, as I am the chief editor of the Knyaz Kobrakov media (E-mail no. FS 77-64118, registration date: 12/18/2015, domain name http://www.kobrakov.com ).
By the way, I've also been to the archive in Podolsk more than once, and it's a complete mess, you can't take pictures, only after transferring documents to a special room, at unthinkable prices. And in the card that they gave me for my grandfather, there was an award document for the Order of Glory of a completely different person. They adjusted it to their full name, but where they were born doesn't matter to them. I was looking for the Order of Glory, and here it is. I asked how this could be. They just took it and left, and in response they said: "Why are they driving, they are looking for. Can't stay at home?" So in the search, you will understand what it is to search for the truth, how it is presented, and what you will get in the bottom line.
Next, I go online to find out what they say officially: "Pavel Ivanovich Kulikov, Smolensk, Kardymovsky district." And that's what comes out.
__.__.1921. Place of birth of the Russian Federation, Smolensk region, Kardymovsky district.
The place of conscription: Kardymovsky RVK, Smolensk region, Kardymovsky district.Military rank: Senior lieutenant; senior lieutenant; Lieutenant.Military unit: 3rd Guards Rifle Regiment of the 4th Guards Rifle Division, 3rd Guards Rifle Regiment, 31st Guards Rifle Corps.
Awards: Order of the Patriotic War II degree (2), Order of the Red Star (2), Medal "For the Victory over Germany in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945", Medal "For the Capture of Budapest" (2).
In addition to the very ardent fighters with me. Here is the link for you: https://pamyat-naroda.ru/heroes/person-hero81975588 /.
And here's what I found when I delved into reality.
The record file, if you look for it, displays a lot of my grandfathers P.I. Kulikov on paper in 1921, but in reality he is the only one, but it is necessary to connect what was or whether it was necessary for someone, but why they had to do it, we can guess. Let's see what happened.
Date of birth: 28.09.1921. It's different everywhere, maybe without a date or month. Place of birth: Russian Federation, Smolensk region, Kardymovsky district, village Lyubkovo, Lybkovo, where it's just Lu(...). Everywhere it's different, where Pervomaisky village is indicated, New Life village, where it's just New Life village, and where there's no name at all. Date of enlistment: __.01.1940, and where 05, where 10, and somewhere at all ...10.1941. Complete irresponsibility in the archives and on the website pamyat-naroda.ru , which is taken from the archive of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, but is contained with our money, the state. Military rank: where is without rank, where is a Red Army soldier, where is a corporal, a sergeant major, a second lieutenant, a guard second lieutenant, where is a lieutenant or a Guard lieutenant, where served in the headquarters of the Military Academy of Sciences, where in 180 azsp, where in 814 sp, where in 1137 sp, 339 sd, where is the 589th infantry regiment of the 216th infantry division, 180 army reserve an infantry regiment or military unit: 3rd gv. sp, 22nd survey, etc. End of service date: 11.11.1946.
The names of awards also vary, and there are not enough awards in the service record, awards that are scattered across various archival cards, for example, and Orders of Glory that were awarded to ordinary soldiers, but not to officers. Yes, it was possible: a scout could come to serve as a private soldier, and go to the reserve as an officer. We are looking at the archives where his merits are stored, I do not write the entire list of full names to each item. Oh, and so on, as above with my grandmother, I'll go straight to where the information about the archive is stored.
Source of information: TSAMO. The East Foundation. Information:
a) 7803. Inventory of the ist. information: 72089c. Case east. information: 1;
b) 7237. Inventory of the ist. information: 27757c. Case east. information: 5;
c) 8472. Inventory of the ist. information: 19164. Case east. information: 67;
d) 33. Inventory of the ist. Information: 686196. Case east. information: 3498. Information: 3096;
e) ...information: cabinet 48a, drawer 2, awards, Order of Lenin dated 01/20/1943, 1;
The other card also links to information: cabinet 48a, drawer 2. Order of the Red Star, Order of the Patriotic War, 2nd degree, Order of the Red Star, medal "For the Victory over Germany...", medal "For the Capture of Budapest": cabinet 48a, drawer 2.
When I asked in the office of the Podolsk Archive, the employee told me that I should bring the order books and that I should confirm that my grandfather was a Hero of the Soviet Union. I can't say for sure that my grandfather is a Hero of the Soviet Union. My grandfather said that he had a child who was holding orders in his arms, and the most expensive one for him was in the form of a star, as my grandmother used to say (it glittered in the sun). I guess, "Yes, a Hero." In response, they said that the Order of Lenin was given to the Hero of the Soviet Union, but since there was no order book, they could not help in any way
My grandfather died of wounds, being disabled in 1979, when I was 2 years old. Payments for the Hero of the USSR have been given monthly since 1967, when they were first set at 20 rubles per month. For reference: in 1968, my grandfather received at least 200 rubles as a foreman. And as he said, they know him: "They appreciate him, they give him firewood, they give him equipment for his needs. I built a new house, they gave me the forest, the management comes to me, stays overnight, they invite me to various events in Smolensk. So they know that there is more fuss to restore the lost reward." And after 1970, when the payments were increased to 50 rubles a month, when they were paying 250, he had already died. Even if I wanted to get involved in recovery, my health began to fail, and I faced a lot of inquiries, requests, and confirmations. I needed trips, and four children, and a job.… It's not right now: I typed in the schedule on the Internet, got into a taxi and went.
.Thus, as the heir, I cannot know how my grandfather defended the country, the state did not consider it necessary to leave his memory in full after his death. Maybe after this publication, the authorities will understand that it is necessary to be able to appreciate and preserve memory as a whole, and not to collect relatives in pieces.
Years passed, and as a result, by 1979, he had not achieved the ends of the search for justice, he died from wounds received during the war during intelligence operations (taking languages, extracting information, changing the history of the course of the war). You know what it's like to live in a village in the 1970s of the USSR. You can't do much living in the countryside. Now the village of Lyubkovo does not exist at all, and no one has lived there for a long time: fields, swamps and trees. It's up to you to draw a conclusion, but I'm showing you how the work was going then, as it is now. I don't need orders made of gold, but historical justice. If the authorities want, I will pay for the cost of all his orders at market value and transfer them to the museum, just don't crumple the truth.
Let's look further. The most interesting thing is that the award lists indicate the end of 1944, 1945, that there were no previous awards. Although he was already a second lieutenant on December 20, 1944, there were allegedly no awards, given that he joined the war as an ordinary Red Army soldier in 1940 and became a scout from the first days of the war. And we can see from his wounds that he was seriously injured just at the time when he was being awarded, and that he was a sergeant major on 01/20/1943 and was awarded the Order of Lenin. They are silent. Cool! No one goes into what they were before, and was treated on the Sochi coast for a serious wound. We look at another archive, where he is again under item e), and it remains to find where his awards of the Hero of the USSR are, in which cup or archive;
f) Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Council dated 20.01.1943. The Order of Lenin. Fund 682525, storage unit 4, record number 12049339. The place of service is still the same: 3 GV sp, 4 gv, sd 68, sk 3, Ukr.
F.;g) cabinet 111, drawer 3;
h) 33. Inventory of the ist. information: 690306. Case east. information: 1875.
How much do I not know about my grandfather? And why I, my grandson, was not given any information confirming the relationship is not just a question. But then they say that I don't like my country, even though I'm just telling the truth, which is inconvenient for the same country and those in power. They need to tell good statistics, and here Kobrakov demands the law and the truth again. Of course, the president gives awards to certain individuals, personally to those who shed their blood for their homeland and a bright future, but it's not that the award was handed over, it's not on the list, and it's thrown into the historical landfill as an unnecessary element. Is this really my revenge?
I have clearly shown you how lists and documents are formed, and I have told you only a small part of the inconsistencies. I have made photocopies of different Kulikov, Kulikov, etc. in Lyubkovo, Lybkovo, but all about one person. This is if suddenly a state called the Russian Federation wants to sue me or bring me in for insulting the authorities. As I am always told, I am always ready, not for the first time, to defend my honor and dignity, although it took time to understand that if you do not stand up for yourself, the state will simply grind you to powder, blacken you, smear you with mud as a dissident, interfering in their interests, forgetting about those who have done or are doing.
Remember the years of mass political repression, especially by Order of the NKVD of the USSR dated July 30, 1937, No. 00447, how many innocent people were shot and sent to camps. In our country, they easily take out all the dirt on a person and shoot them, and then apologize, as with a Belarusian, that he was innocently shot for Chikatilo. An employee came to the mother of the innocent victim and said, "There was a mistake, I'm sorry," and she replied, "The Germans killed my father, you shot him by mistake, and who's going to dig potatoes?"
I think that the Solovetsky stone should have stood longer, and eternal fire was beating out of it, like the cry of the innocently tortured, their voice, spilling out into the world of suffering. And a resting place surrounded by giant sculptures innocently tortured with the size of Dzerzhinsky. Then, for the edification and memory of those who are in the Lubyanka and in the state, I would not just remind them how they worked and what they did when they had power. The entire Lubyanka should also receive flowers every year, and not only wear them. Maybe in the future, according to my project, such a memorable memorial will be built and the country's leadership will gain the courage to admit their mistakes, creating conditions for them to be remembered on a larger scale, as an integral part of history in a broad sense, but as a conscious act and a warning for the future.
But the "Wall of Sorrow" in Moscow should be supplemented with an installation immediately for a complete picture and a universal understanding of how to live, where the announcer should talk and talk about terrible times day and night, and their names, faces, and fragments of horror should be shown on the screens. Then we will remember what the government has done.
And with such suggestions, I will write to Putin after I publish my work and send him my books, so that there is a comprehensive understanding of the problems of society. I never give up. However, she is the strongest of all. Apparently, the genes speak. So my case at the UN (RE: CCPR case No. 4417/2023) will be considered at the session in 2026. It's also the hard work of fighting for your rights in the country. If necessary, I will write a book about how I fight for my rights, which must be respected by the authorities according to the Constitution, if people want to read my work. But I always say, whether you're ready to defend your name or not, the choice is yours.
The government does not want to negotiate, real steps are needed, we are nobody, but they are everything, they know better. Maybe after the publication of the participants of the Second World War, their memory will begin to be remembered, something will change. By the way, that's the most interesting part. In Kardymov itself, where my grandfather worked all his life, he was also the chairman of a collective farm, and with the consolidation he became a foreman. In that collective farm, which was disbanded and enlarged, nowadays there is a Book in memory of the Smolensk region, very much advertised on the Web. But my grandfather is a hero, a scout, who was in intelligence from the very first days and, as he said, crawled through the whole war on his belly, and changed the outcome of battles. And they, the leaders, destroyed the country in peacetime after the war. He threw a party card in his face, which he earned with blood when the brat-the head of the party committee said that they primarily protect party workers, not the people. And this was already in the seventies, when wounds did not give a quiet life and the years were not those to resist arbitrariness. But they didn't take away the party card, but brought it back with apologies, since the awards and fame, while he was alive, did not allow anything to be done with my grandfather.
And, apparently, someone remembers the truth-loving Kulikov, since even the Book of Memory of the Smolensk region, consisting of fifty-one volumes, consisting of four sections, was not included in the book "Soldiers of Victory" in the Kardymovsky district. I've studied all four sections. Apparently, they are read selectively or for statistics, although there is such an inscription on page 65 in the letters K section. It says from the book "Soldiers of Victory". Under No. 903 in this book, you can compare awards and where you served with a fictional person. Copied from a book on the Internet. Please note, Sergeant, but not a word about the orders stored. Especially in cabinet 48a, drawer 2 and fund 682525, storage unit 4, record number 12049339. The place of service is still the same: 3gV, sp 4gv, sd 68, SK 3, Ukr. F. sergeant. and even more so about the true title.
Pavel Ivanovich KULINOV, born in 1921, Lyubkovo village, Kardymovsky district, Smolensk region. Drafted in 1940, he served as a sergeant in the 4th Guards Division. Awards: Order of the Patriotic War II, Red Star, medals "For the capture of Vienna", "For the capture of Budapest", "For the victory over Germany".
The truth is that Pavel Ivanovich Kulikov ended the war as an officer. It is still in the Podolsk archive under the heading "secret". As a grandson who provided all the required documents, I was not given, citing secrecy. I should have realized when I came to Podolsk that I was not a well-known leader in the country. It just became clear to me that what they say on TV and reality are just different understandings. Apparently, my grandfather's fame and honors still bother someone so much. Or maybe it's my fault? Truth-lovers cannot have worthy ancestors. And by the way, in the village of Lyubkovo, where he was born and lived and my mother was born, there have never been such culinary people as in the Book of Memory. In general, there was a small village, and who needs it to delve into the history of some person who once lived, he is not one of those who sits at the top.
Now tell me, there's a K and N typo in the last name. Kulikov and Kulinov — and different surnames. Insignificant, I agree, if only in the last name. And the rank? The difference is a private and an officer. And the rewards? I personally called the military enlistment office, and they picked up the cards, which indicated that he was an officer with an incomplete list of awards on a personal matter. It's a pity that not everything about my grandfather is indicated, he's not from power, besides, he's dead, and I'm an oppositionist who fights against arbitrariness. Why show that Kobrakov, carrying out the decrees of past generations in spirit and conscience, is fulfilling them? And my grandfather Kulikov's wife, my grandmother Alexandra, received a pension, having carried out the same military actions in peacetime against corruption and arbitrariness, that they remembered the truth-loving grandfather.
Here is the answer to how difficult it is to find information, although only a little has passed since the death on 06.10.1979 in the village of Lyubkovo, Kardymovsky district. I lived with a passport just a little bit when they gave me passports. August 28, 1974 The Council of Ministers of the USSR adopted Resolution No. 677, according to which all collective farmers began to be issued passports. Full certification of rural residents began on January 1, 1976 and ended on December 31, 1981. Where there is a toilet on the street, water in the well and stove heating... And the 2nd disability group was given shortly before death. You probably know how it is, especially then. And my grandfather was forgotten in less than fifty years, the hero scout was thrown out of the country's memory. By the way, all archival information about his injuries and illnesses was destroyed by the archive. He also made a request why his memory was being erased, it is unclear. I hope that after this work they will feel ashamed, and they will put things in order, find awards, and merit everywhere
Now imagine what a surname is, especially if it is Kobrakov, and to whom it refers, and what it means. I am deliberately showing that the truth is not always true in official sources. We hear words when they say that history is being rewritten, and what the country of the winners has done to a particular person and his family, you can make the conclusion. The most interesting thing is that my grandfather's wife, my grandmother... Kulikova Alexandra Ustinovna (maiden name Petrova) also lived in the Kardymovsky district, in the village of Lyubkovo, where my grandfather worked. After her husband's death, life was just as hard, and she wrote a complaint: her pension was incorrectly calculated. I complained to the Kardymovsky district office that I counted it incorrectly. Unsuccessfully. She went higher, to the regional council. Also to no avail. I lived without a pension for a year, and then I wrote to Man and the Law. In 1981, there was a scandal when Man and the Law explained it to the party structures by publishing it in the magazine itself. Shame on the whole USSR! She was counted and paid. And in 1983, she went to Odessa in Ukraine, because life had become unbearable, because no one likes truth-lovers.
I am writing not just statistics, but the reality of the lives of people who care about their country, regardless of the system and times. But do you know what the most interesting thing is? During his lifetime, my grandfather was invited to various events. There was no official celebration of Victory in World War II, but there always was in a narrow circle, at the top, and it was at such events where heroes are honored that my grandfather Pavel Ivanovich Kulikov, who was invited to such party events in Smolensk itself, met Mikhail Alekseevich Egorov, the one who hoisted the banner over by the Reichstag. By the way, there were people in the villages who were older in rank, and the awards were different, the Red Banner and foreign countries, for example, my grandfather's neighbor, almost the same age, also left as a private, came as an officer (Alexey K.), but they were not invited, and my grandfather was seated at the same table with Egorov, which speaks volumes for his services on the fronts of the Second World War. But as I see it, it was then, he was needed, now he's gone, and he's been thrown out of history. But at that time, friendship, intimacy.
My mother's cousin, Dina Kulikova, met Igor, the son of Egorov's own sister, and took the surname B. I will not disclose the data. And so it happened, the wedding was held on July 26, 1975, coincided with the day of commemoration of the death of M. A. himself. Egorova. He crashed his car (I don't want to go into tragic events), he was in a hurry, it happens. It's easy to cancel now, but it used to be difficult to cancel a wedding that was planned almost six months in advance. So there is no need to condemn: life is life. The wife of M. A. Egorova congratulated and informed that the commemoration of her husband and father, daughter M.A. Egorov came, congratulated and left, after all, a father is a father. This has often happened in history: 17 (6 in the old style) On May 1727, Empress Catherine I died, and a week later, on May 23, Tsarevich Peter II married Menshikov's daughter.
So to say that my grandfather was not known, and he was an ordinary man from the village, you can not say, and those orders that he had, for some reason began to disappear in archives, in official documents. If there is no information here, maybe the data was preserved in full in Ukraine, since my grandmother went to live in the Odessa region from the lack of rights she faced, and received a military pension as the widow of an officer.
Then someone in the courts says the words "lackeys, scum, corrupt officials, crooks," and such words are interpreted as an insult, disrespect, irrelevant, without delving into the meaning of what was said, directed at certain individuals who violate the law with impunity, moral, moral, ethical, official, professional action, etc. But there is always a problem, and the law in the form of Themis must make decisions independently, and not just close its mouth to the truth of inconvenient nihilistic facts at any cost, using the power of the court.
Thus, I have clearly shown you how the information field is organized, which is based on official information with the human factor in all its manifestations and is not taken from the sky. The way of modern life is clear to us, let's move on to in-depth forms, a deeper concept and reasoning about my last name Kobrakov (and find fault with me with the understanding of the letter K in my last name in the suffix changed from T). As one person who talks about history tells me, my last name was deliberately changed from the letter T to K, allegedly cobra translates to "snake", K symbolizes "prince, kagan, kaan" ("great khan"): to hide and preserve the Kobrakov family to those who still help and protect me as the heir of a great family. Of course, it sounds flattering, but I got used to arguing with facts and became interested further, taking into account all aspects of history and regarding my last name as a kind of sign of the struggle for the truth for me.
And you'll say, what does that have to do with it, and that's where a new round begins. So, we already understood, either a typo, we didn't make it out in the dark, or a deliberate change to hide affiliation, or vice versa, to unambiguously focus knowledgeable people on a certain information orientation. You got an argument with my grandfather about how letters, titles, awards, etc. change, and how the letter could stand intentionally as a symbol of a certain powerful person.
And we move on.
Kubrat and Kobrak, Kobrat have the same concept. You will say how this can be, the second letter is Y and O, and there can be no common thing. There's no way to put anything in opposition, it can't be the same thing. And I would agree with you if it weren't for but. In 1748, a treatise on the spelling of Vasily Trediakovsky appeared, in which the author established the first norms of Russian pronunciation, and the letter U began to be replaced with O. And Mikhail Lomonosov introduced changes. I will give you some examples so that you understand the meaning of the interpretation and explanation. So, there was Bulgaria — Bulgaria became, front, front—line — obsolete "frunt, frunt", there were Russians — Russians became, bankrupt — obsolete "bankrupt", number — obsolete "number", exploitation - obsolete "exploitation". The changes also affect the pronunciation of throat and nasal factors.
O. Trubachev, including on the issue of alternating O/O (Trubachev O. To the origins of Russia, Moscow, 2013, p. 65). Yu. D. Akashev: the argumentation concerning the alternation of O/Y in the roots of words in Slavic languages (forging — forging, planing — planing, stroganina — shavings, foot — foot, midge — fly, variants of the words "ant" and "moravey", "murovanny" and "morrovanny" are given as equal in use. "cloudberry" and "muroshka". Vladimir Dahl, characterizing the dialects of the Russian language, noted, in particular, that in the Tver province they say "huvat" instead of "huvat", in the Kostroma province they say "ut" instead of "from", "udealo" instead of "blanket"; in the Ryazan province — "set" instead of "left", "uhota" instead of "hunting", "corners" instead of "shafts". Yu. P. Mirolyubov notes that in Antonovka, in the south of Russia, they sometimes spoke "cattle" and sometimes "skut" (Akashev Yu. D. The history of the Ros people: from the Aryans to the Varangians. Moscow, 2013, pp. 96-102).
In short, you now understand that Kubrat and Kobrakov (shown in the subsequent decomposition) are one and the same thing, and no one can doubt the explanations. You'll tell me again, I've lost track of where Kubrat lived and where I live. Now I live in Tula permanently, before that I lived in Rostov-on-Don, Smolensk, Moscow and many other places. For example, I'll stay in Taganrog for a month, go to Tula or Smolensk, and for fifteen years I've been traveling back and forth thirty times a year. Thank God, we have always lived in prosperity. Before that, I lived in Smolensk as a child and youth. In Soviet times, we had two cooperative apartments in one building that we bought ourselves, where the entire elite of that time, historical figures or their relatives lived. Accordingly, those who know our surname and have been helping for centuries always lend a helping hand, appreciate and honor, and, of course, there is the opposite in the form of envious losers who do not respect history. There always have been, I won't get personal.
Look at my life, and you will see how cowards and scoundrels are afraid of our family name. They tried to break our family, but divine providence punishes everyone, it's been like this all our lives — grandfathers, father, me. But I am with you, and the truth has won, which means that the tests have been passed. Of course, many who tried to harm our family ended up badly, some even killed themselves due to similar circumstances or died in various accidents. As an example, one traffic police officer decided, back in the USSR, my father's classmate, whom my father did not notice at school, decided to deprive him of his rights out of spite and opportunity: he could not survive that he lived in a cooperative apartment, had a Lada, even though he was eighteen years old. Imagine what it would mean in 1973 to drive a new kopeck! And the medic who checked for alcohol during the day had his own next to our garage. And they knew that my father wasn't drunk, they wanted money. So, the participant that lipu was actively doing was told: "So that you inhale and not exhale." And on the night, less than half a day after the events, the medic who said: "Everyone is drunk," he hanged himself: the punishment quickly overtook. I don't feel sorry for those who live and break the law: they must be punished. And the right hand of God always overtakes them. If you also help in exposing such people, then the truth will always prevail. However, the ways are not always exclusively in legislation. Of course, after sorting it out, they returned the rights to my father. And I can tell you about such cases, there are many of them, but let's not spoil the book, they are not worthy to remember them.
Let's return to our arguments about distance. Where I lived is not an argument for you, it is not a proof for you in the global expanses. And I'll give you a much more serious example of how fate can lead to certain actions. My grandfather, Pavel Kulikov, lived in Austria with a German woman until 1946, when he was conscripted, I don't know if there were any children left. My grandmother Vera, the sister of Alexandra's grandmother when she was a girl, Petrova, the wife of my grandfather Pavel Kulikov, got married in 1941 when the war broke out and Smolensk was occupied. She married a German soldier and went to Germany, raised their family cheese factory during the war, as Vera's grandmother was an excellent cheese cook in the USSR, she was a technologist at the cheese factory before the war. But her German husband was killed in the middle of the war and she left Germany for the USSR, although her new relatives were German, they offered to stay, they also had a son, but fate decided otherwise. By the way, no one put her in jail, and the authorities were loyal, both on the other side and on this side, I don't know what the reason is. I have a wife, her surname is Filatcheva on her father's side, and on her mother's side is Weber, she is from Germany. It turned out that there was World War II, and after World War II, my wife's grandfather, Albert E. Weber, created a cell there in the camps of the Yakut Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, and my wife's mother was born. And after the Second World War, my great-grandfather ended up, as they say, by chance for family reasons in Canada in Winnipeg, where he lived comfortably and died, felt great, had a yacht, a country house, a secretary. This is how history has spread one family across different continents, not to mention countries.
We will not talk about who my wife's grandfather and great-grandfather were during the Great War of nations (World War II), let the KGB look at their archives. After all, great-grandfather Yemelyan Weber, while in Canada in Winnipeg (order of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs No. 00576, issued on July 24, 1953, allowing correspondence with relatives and receiving parcels and money transfers to convicted prisoners of war and internees, as well as foreign citizens convicted by military tribunals), corresponded with his son Albert Yemelyanovich since the 60s. By Weber, who lives in Tula. The great-grandfather sent parcels to his son and granddaughter from another continent, Canada. I repeat, Lubyanka can check all this and find out if they are concerned. But the fact that Moscow allowed a former camper with German roots near Moscow to live in those days speaks volumes. He was needed nearby. And the city of Tula, by the way (it has a similar name to the "Tula Society"). Thule-Gesellschaft is a German occult and political society within the framework of the study of Germanic antiquity. Studiengruppe für germanisches Altertum), came up very well. Otherwise, I would have lived in Siberia or the Urals — there is a selective approach to this when it comes to living near Moscow. From the "former" — they gave me an apartment... it says a lot.
There are various similar people named Weber during the Nazi regime. One even headed the Ahnenerbe department. Ahnenerbe — "Ancestral Heritage", full name — "Society for the Study of Ancient German History, Ancestral Heritage"), and after his son was captured, he was removed from this project. I repeat, who the grandfather and great-grandfather were, we will not speculate, but I can just tell you that the Webers came from the ancient tribes of the Suebi, which was a very common surname in the Germanic tribes.
I'll insert a remark. In the past, Khan Attila married a daughter named Galia or Galiena (Galiena means "exalted" or "noble", and was rarely used), a representative of the Suebi to strengthen friendly ties through kinship and tribal relations. And Weber, if you look at the translation, translates to "weaver." But not everything is as simple as I want to simplify everything. For example, "prince" from German can be translated as "Knecht" (Knecht), "serf", and in this case you can easily confuse the essence. Here it is necessary to approach strictly not from the translation part, but from the interpretation of the language in which the concept sounds.
The Suebi were the population of multiethnic East Germany, which included mainly ancient Germanic tribes: Boers, Semnons, Hermundurs, Quadi, Marcomanni, Alemanni (Swabians) and others. The Suevi played a significant role in the ethnogenesis of modern European peoples: Austrians, Germans, Spaniards, Portuguese, and Western Slavs. The region of Schwabia (Schwaben), which, according to some researchers, comes from the Suebians. They are known in the territories: in the I century BC — II century AD, the Suevi occupied the basin of the rivers Elbe, Main, Neckar, as well as the upper Rhine. Thus, it is genetically cobra and Suebian, Suevi. Described for the first time Julius Caesar, who defeated the Suevi in 58 BC, led by Ariovistus, who defected around 71 BC.
I'm talking about how the structure of displacement intertwines and the tribal component of the genome that you carry becomes clear. But why it is so difficult to prove something in Russia, to find the truth, truth, and justice, remains to be guessed. I think you'll say it's not important, but I've clearly shown you how you can spread continents and be able to move in different geographical directions. Well, what can we say about the past movement of people who lived free and independent.
Let's continue to specify and analyze. Kubrat, if translated into other languages (it is of Turkic origin), is a "noble", a "unifier" in the territory of modern Europe and Asia. And from Iranian it means "strong", "brave". And this is also true, but you forget that it always takes more than one word, but a deep meaning in the word itself, to reveal who is true.
Here I will explain to you that in the chronicle of the Byzantine monk Theophanes the Confessor, compiled in 810-815, you can read in depth, but you need arguments. And the affiliation of Kobrakov and Kubrot was shown above, and putting a snake in the surname and designating the surname as the same is a work created in the past by smart people who managed to preserve the branch of goodness and truth.
And again we go back a little to the great-grandfather of Kubrat, Attila, Aybat. The connection of Attila (known as Aybat in the Turkic tradition) with the image of a snake or dragon is rooted in the mythology of nomadic peoples and medieval legends, the main reasons for this are totemism and ancestry. In Turkic and Mongolian mythology, the snake (or dragon) often acted as a totemic ancestor. So the leaders, the great rulers, are descended from supernatural beings. The image of the serpent symbolized wisdom, earth and tectonic force. Hollow stuffed snakes made of cloth were also used on standards and banners (draco), which fluttered on poles, whistling in the wind. For the Europeans who saw these banners, the Hun leader literally walked under the sign of the serpent. And in the legends, the name Aybat is associated with the concept of greatness and menace, which in the steppe epic was often intertwined with images of powerful reptiles guarding their lands.
I think the hidden meaning embedded in all concepts gives you a wide range to learn that the truth does not always lie on the surface of the open, and it must be found and taken. In Europe, on the contrary, the serpent is related to humanity, but it does not occupy a dominant role, but a motivating, tempting one for the sake of its priorities. And the separation from the Proto-Indo-Europeans. At the same time, it is well known that Europe was not the birthplace of mankind. But how some people want to stand out, abandoning the common past, into a titular society and do nothing!
Thus, those who understand that the Snake has brought good things will always stand guard over the well-being and development of people, and it will be easier to preserve identity and find out who carries the true grain of truth, since the similarity of the surname does not give an understanding of the whole picture. And only those who can show many different accessories to the one can show that the time has come to look at the world with new eyes, where wisdom will lead humanity into a new world of goodness, creating beauty and a world of endless knowledge. And the stage of forgetting the Snake and Cobra in history is a stage of formation and transformation for the future, to get away from the remnants of ignorance of one's capabilities as a person capable of living in kindness and understanding. We will bring back the heyday of humanity through knowledge, respect, kindness, and peaceful existence — this is the basis for the well-being of the people. And talking about history, taking it out of context, becomes disrespectful to the future, since those who do not appreciate history have no future.
We see that there are examples where you people honor those who give you the root -cube- from the great name Kubrat, without seeing many signs from the other. And this is your right, I believe that you should decide what and who you need, and my task is to inform you, as information must be understood, comprehended and only then draw a conclusion. And while you're thinking, I'll give you another argument about how sometimes, just by having one coincidence, thinking changes, and many people agree with this.
We look at Kubrat family trees. It turns out that with the prefix cube- (or as he gave an example of his belonging to his last name), by taking such a prefix, anyone who has can claim the heritage of the Russian and other historical structures. In this case, knowing just the history, he gives a logical explanation of his affiliation, kinship with the Rurik dynasty, although many dispute and disagree, and believe that his affiliation is not confirmed by authoritative sources on royal genealogy. But we understand how the monarchs wrote their branch, how they became monarchs, and we understand how the Romanovs ascend to the throne, for example, and how everything happened.
And as a result, the people themselves decide who is worthy and who is not, and which surname or person can represent their ancestors. As an opportunity to unlock the potential of people for the benefit of humanity, since the development of the world does not stop at titles and tribal affiliation, but gives an opportunity to those who can share with people, create conditions for a new development of humanity, and not just point to their titular personality, although this is also necessary to manifest an advertising opportunity, to give the status of conceived innovations in the development of mankind in the full ideological paradigm of public space. And thus, anyone with the prefix cube can claim almost the entire story. It is unlikely that this will happen, since you are not stupid, naive people, you can read and think, and the similarity of the root leads to a large number of people with such root surnames.
Take a look, I will indicate their small fraction of the possible ones: Kuba, Kubagushev, Kubagusheva, Kubadrov, Kubadrova, Kubaev, Kubaevskaya, Kubai, Kubaikin, Kubaikina, Kubak, Kubakov, Kubalev, Kubalov, Kubalska, Kubalsky, Kuban, Kubarikov, Kubarkin, Kubarkina, Kubarov, Kubarskal, Kubarskaya, Kubarsky, Kubartov, Kubar, Kubas, Kubassky, Kubas, Kubaskov, Kubasov, Kubatov, Kube, Kubeev, Kubel, Kubik, Kubikov, Kubin, Kubis, Kubko, Kublevsky, Kublikov, Kublitsky, Kubrin, Kubrinsky, Kubryak, Kubrikov, Kubrakov, Kubratkov, Kubratikov.
And this is not the limit, there are thousands of them, and if you translate them into languages, then even more. Imagine, they will all declare that they are descendants, heirs, there will be a real chaos, confusion. That's why a lot of evidence of the one who carries the foundation is laid in the name of the one who carries it. In 2020, the court of Krasnogorsk refused to exhume the remains of Tsar Ivan IV. Grozny (they rest in the Archangel Cathedral of the Moscow Kremlin). Kubarev requested in his demands that a procedure be carried out to prove his kinship with the tsar at the genetic level. You can even see his work by pointing out the tree, as he believes it belongs to the famous names of the past. And I do not condemn him in his desire to expose historical facts taken from history to the public.
My opinion is that one root, a cube, is not enough to express something. His rightness can be accepted or rejected, but the rational grain in the search points to history in an open form. But no matter what surname you have, it is extremely incorrect to demand anything from the authorities now, especially to claim everything that the current state called the Russian Federation and not only it has at its disposal. The Kremlin and many other things that we inherited after historical events show that everything that the ancient kings and princes had should belong to the people, and not to one person or family name, especially the Kremlin, which is protected not just in the Russian Federation, but in the international structure of UNESCO. Let's not divide or disturb, but simply honor our roots, increasing our opportunities to live for the future, creating in the present and the future.
I do not seek universal recognition as the king or the great prince, the patrician of any territories, I strive for truth, truth, caring for people, nature, and the enforcement of laws. And do not interfere with the created order. And the structure of power around the world as a stable human prosperity. It is necessary to create a revolutionary vision of man and an evolutionary leap in understanding oneself, a human being. The time has come to use the historical identity of a great family as a collective opportunity to form a single powerful foundation of the human essence of society to solve many key problems faced by the world's population on a global scale. Creating opportunities for people to protect themselves from the arbitrariness and impunity of certain individuals who were able to usurp the capabilities of the entire human species in the interests of an insignificant group unwilling to develop the human transformation of truth, the rule of law, and goodness everywhere. And history, like no other, shows the belonging of opportunities, having a connection with generations, and the opportunity to use it as an opportunity for everyone, not just for oneself.
But let's return to Kubrot (Kubrat, Kurbat, Krobat, Kurt, Kurt, Bed, Carpet, Kuber, Coover, Greek. Χουβρατις). His burial place is near the village of Malaya Pereshchepina, Poltava region. He lived 200 years before the formation of Smolensk. But the most interesting thing is that Kubrat is the son of Alburi from the Kipchak family of Dulu. Kubrat's ancestors: grandfather — Khan askal, grandson of Khan Masgut, great-grandson of Khan Irnik, who was the son of Attila.
Thus, the story shows the meaning of my last name. Next, I give an example that refers to itself as a Kubrat with a root system-kubar-, and this suits everyone as its side. But, I repeat, it's up to you people to judge, not me. It seemed to me that there was not enough time to demand and declare something. In contrast, I cited the facts of Kobrakov's connection with the ancient family, and I went on to look and changed my view of the western expanses in Belarus. There is a city of Kobrinsk, similar to my last name, as Kobrin (Kobryn) was once mentioned in the spiritual charter of Volyn Prince Vladimir Vasilkovich, year 1287, where this city bequeaths to his wife Olga Romanovna.
By the way, I completely missed the affiliation of the principality and the city: he belonged to the Kobrin princes from the Gediminovich dynasty, which shows that if we consider the Kobrakov surname in a modern interpretation and put it into a single structure based on the information I have collected over the years, we will see that Kobrakov has the historical connotation of his surname in full. And the non-recognition of this fact from the point of view of scientific inquiry puts the concept of evidence in the category of a selective doctrine of governance and obedience, rather than a subjective picture of a generalized fact. From different sides, it proves the complete belonging and deliberate distortion of the great dynastic family name in favor of the past: in the transformative processes of property, fame, and history into fragmentary pieces of those who destroyed the structure of the world order created by the labors of many millions of people in the historical paradigm of the past society.
Thus, it can be assumed that the collapse of the world order of the past led to global upheavals and tragic events. But the time has come to change, to transform society not by shocks, but by reasonable, purposeful actions of the most popular perversion in understanding life and its possibilities. Thus, the established world order should support the course of universal development and well-being, but in parallel with the great family, which can provide new foundations for the world order, based on the knowledge and experience of the past. It is in this symbiosis that society and the world of articles are capable of a new format of development as a type of the human race in its deep diversity.
Thus, you understand that a Snake, a Snake, a Cobra carry a sacred meaning. Don't confuse my last name and don't distort it, it comes from the word "cobra" — the snake is so venomous, but there is also a young genus in history, no more than 400 years old compared to global history. For example, Snakes are used to create confusion, laying confusion in the future, as they say. There is a Russian noble family in Russia, it was known and included in the VI, II and III parts of the noble genealogy of the book of Moscow, Voronezh, Ryazan, Smolensk, Tula, Yaroslavl provinces (Gerbovnik V, 91 and VII, 14). And they officially accept the spelling of this surname, the spelling in history is diverse: Serpents, Serpents, Serpents, Serpents, Serpents, Serpents, Serpents, Serpents, Serpents, Serpents in official documents.
I compared this to you, as one surname from the same root with a confirmed fact has a different spelling in the historical structure of the tribal origin with subsequent transformation, but at the same time emphasizes one whole. There's a lot to think about. The surname itself is placed in contrast to the story, the one that is unsuccessful, but at the same time has an indirect indicator of belonging to another family, who over time either did not know or heard something, but not exactly. And thus this name is reassuring. And why doesn't it apply, and then that this surname (Snake) is considered to be from a Pole, but Poles don't have this kind, but in Russia they do. It's weird, don't you think? The family is Polish, but there is no estate.
I understand that in the past, after the defeat and redistribution of territories, new nobility was needed, and they should be given positions for their service. Then what kind of rewards are these? A title, a land that they would fight for later. These unknown people become famous with the easy submission of the ruling dynasty, which claims new territories after the redistribution. As an example, let's recall Peter. Former princes and murzas from among the Muslim Tatars, who under Peter I, after the liquidation of the Tatar-Muslim nobility, did not want to change the faith of their ancestors and turned into peasants. The same deeds, but earlier, were with those who believed not in Christ, but in Slavic paganism (Old Slavic paganism is a system of Slavic pre—Christian ideas about the world and man, based on mythology, totemism, magic). But also transformation, if there is a desire to be reborn. Remember the story, maybe it will be changed, and the foundation will be removed over the centuries, and it will be difficult to say what is necessary, but look and understand what I mean.
Pavel Ivanovich Yaguzhinsky (Yagushinsky) is a Russian statesman and diplomat. He was born in 1683 in the villages of the Polotsk Voivodeship of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (now Ushachsky district of Vitebsk region, Belarus). Before he fell into the king's mercy, he tended pigs.
The Menshikovs are a Russian noble and princely family (since 1705). The Governor-General of St. Petersburg, Alexander Danilovich Menshikov, who was elevated to the princely dignity by letter (May 30, 1707), had previously been the son of a groom.
Teplovs, granted by estates in 1621 (Coat of Arms. Part VIII. № 52). Monument to the stoker.
Count Kirill Grigorievich Razumovsky as a child grazed cattle in the village of Razumikha. This acquisition of the title and title of Hetman of Ukraine was due to his elder brother Alexei, who in 1742 became a favorite of Empress Elizabeth Petrovna.
Andrey Semyonovich Shuvalov was a voivode (1616), and was mentioned during the siege of Smolensk (1634). Prior to this, there is no information about either the genus or the surname (as a great family).
By the highest decree (September 22, 1767), General-in-Chief Peter and full Privy Councilor Nikita Ivanovich Panin, a diplomat, were elevated to the dignity of count of the Russian Empire by Empress Catherine II. And his great-grandfather is mentioned in the story that Nikita Panin carried a lantern at the third wedding of Ivan the Terrible (1572). Title: P. Prize winner. Issued to Panin on December 23, 1786.
So history remembers all the different twists and turns of modern history. Or remember who was the cook, for example, the V. N. Lenin Prize winner. Did his descendants achieve something or not, and how are they honored in modern everyday life? So I don't need to tell you how history and opportunity can intertwine in a certain direction. Previously, it was necessary to hide the death of the right person, negotiate and look for a doppelganger, and he starts a branch, not having a family connection, but having similarities. Everything is fine, everything is calm. But now it's difficult to make a mistake with a surname: there is an INN. But even here you can cheat something, substitute the wrong person, but for a while, for peace of mind. Thank God, the tribal essence has departed from the identity, and the person manifests himself according to his merits, and the positions are not inherited. Accordingly, it is necessary to believe what is written, but sometimes it is written on the fence, and there is firewood. How to figure it out and taste it? It is difficult, but there is a desire for everything or there is no one who can give a hint.
I will not tire you and give examples of the past, since the goals are different, but the task is the same — to inform you how history can be changeable, in a word, a capricious lady, in the hands of the dexterous and skillful, expressed in necessary but specific cases, that uncontrollable events can manifest themselves. And the main thing here is to have understanding, and at the same time, support should be shown. Or a disagreement can lead to problems that are not necessary for one, but quite beneficial for others. Greed and shortsightedness, in my opinion, lead to deplorable events. Apparently, the history of the sovereign does not teach.
Forty people received 20,000 souls of mail as a gift after the coup of June 28, 1762, and Elizabeth II came to power. For what they had done, the Orlov family received the title of count. Or remember November 7, 1917, October 14, 1964, December 26, 1991, so let's not talk about much.
New gods provide new opportunities, and, accordingly, Kobrak has nothing to do with Snakes (they come from another branch). Of this origin, the Serpents include such as the Beklemishevs, Shchepotyevs, Shchulepnikovs, Knyazhnins, and Orlov. I will not analyze the surname of the Snake itself, since for me it does not have a definite reference to the indication of my last name, and it is inappropriate to give an analogy here, clinging to the name "snake". But the fact that the serpentine intersects in my surname in a clear manifestation of the word "cobra" (translated as "snake"), and the Kubrot family continued with birth in a noble place, which, on the one hand, was destroyed, on the other — a new city was built, the passage of a straight line from the place of Gnezdovo events in Sukhorukovo-gololobovo with a clear crossing the place where he lived in Smolensk and studied…
The knowledge transmitted by the ancestors, the mental and mental torments of finding the truth not only for oneself, which has not been openly said for generations, being persecuted... It is truly difficult to give this explanation in what I write and express, knowing that many people don't like it, but what we have been carrying for centuries, I must pass on to this review. By the way, I don't know if it's a coincidence or a pattern — it's up to you to decide, but ubiquity in the history of mankind has always been associated with a snake in significant events. Remember: Adam and Eve were searched for by the serpent, the Buddha who saw the light under the hood of a giant cobra, in Egypt the cobra on the crown of the pharaoh, and Amduat, the state of existence before the creation of the world, was symbolized as a serpent coiled into many rings, from which Ra arose.
Snake worship is found in the buildings of ancient American cities, for example, in Teotihuacan, Chichen Itza and Palenque. And Quetzalcoatl, the Feathered Serpent, was worshipped by the Aztecs, Maya, Zapotecs, and Oaxaca in the ancient cities of Teotihuacan, Monte Alban, Yaxchilan, Palenque, Uxmala, and Chichen Itza. And the Maya depicted the god Kukulkan as a feathered snake with a human head. Even in the history of Russia itself, Prince Oleg died from a snake bite, and in the fairy tales of the peoples of Russia, a fire-breathing snake flies. In Christianity, in Judaism, in the Torah, in Islam, "quickening."
In ancient Greek mythology, the snake represents wisdom, renewal of life, resurrection, and healing. For example, the goddess Athena. In Indian mythology, the snake (naga) is considered a demigod. According to Indian beliefs, snakes could take on human form; in Scandinavian mythology, a snake biting its tail (ouroboros) symbolized the sea as an eternal ring. The rainbow serpent in the myths of the aborigines of Australia is one of the creators of the world, associated with water and earth. The Chinese goddess with the body of a snake is the ancestor of people, the patroness of the earth named Nuwa. In the archaic cosmogonic myths of Eurasia and America, the serpent carries out the separation and connection of heaven and earth. Emungand (The World Serpent). Or St. George defeats the snake also in culture, in heraldry. In the context of alchemy, the snake symbolizes transformation and inner transformation — and many other facts. But I'm not drawing parallels, just reflections on what is and why such a connection in everything gives a grain of reasoning. It can be regarded as a sign of understanding and the universal beginning of a new era of humanity in understanding.
One pattern emerges from my writings. Cobra, the snake constantly flies out into the world, but after a while the elite again kills all the data about the snake's purpose. The essence of such actions is only one thing -they do not want to transform the whole of humanity, but only want to control humanity. But who gave the right to restrict other people, to enjoy the benefits created for everyone? Finally, snakes are a taboo subject that belongs to the evil section, but as I showed you above, everything that was good for a person is connected with a snake.
The giant cobra covered the Buddha from rain and bad weather to manifest unearthly wisdom. And you will say that this is evil? No, the imposed narratives have changed perception and reproduction in favor of a template for ease of regulation and management. But who gave the right to deprive a multifaceted device if the basis of knowledge leads to prosperity and a change in society for the better? Many different wars, redistricting took place over the years, centuries, but what is most interesting is that people who had a tribal connection, spread out in time, went against each other and in all ways eradicated one part of the history of their distant attachment in favor of their elevation.
The essence of names and surnames in different languages and the interpretation of history with its contexts torn out does not change the meaning itself, embedded from the past into the future. But then, it turns out, we see an ancient surname edited in a new way, with a sacred meaning, emphasizing the tribute of the past family with an indication of the semantic essence of the very beginning. This combination of the concept of the Kubrot genus and the mystical principle of the Serpent, expressed in a single whole in the modern surname, shows and speaks... I don't even know what to say, what to call it, but I'll try.
Maybe a legendary chronicle based on a mystical chronicle, in a modern sovereign saga, remembering the folklore chronicle, giving an ethnographic chronicle, exposing all the work in myth-making history, depicting a sovereign-everyday chronicle, an epic, or maybe just a mystical-historical story... But in any case, the works and knowledge that were passed on to me by past generations, which will be manifested not only in colloquial speech from generation to generation, but will also be recognized by those who did not belong to our family. Manifestations of justice or destiny always find expression. "Good conquers evil" speaks not just about changing someone or something, but the integration of a new one in a parallel movement with the current structure indicates the possibility of the existence of not only a state, religion, but driving progress in the scientific structure of knowledge on a global scale as sacred staples of the very life and structure of man on earth and not only.
This means that the Cobra, the Snake, enables the community to build a pillar capable of regulating the human concept through the foundations of human understanding and self-identity as a general structure of global development. Only you are able to take a balanced approach to a new constructive transformation of yourself and the world, but the decision whether you need it or not is yours. Building from scratch on the rubble of the past will give us strength and opportunities. Because it is impossible to build the truth on lies and murder, and that is how the fate of riots and attacks goes. And the very essence of the Serpent lies in justice, unification, gathering, and creating conditions for improving human life. Throughout the life span of humanity, we see what humanity goes through, and the horror of the experience and indifference from historical reproduction.
You can express both support and criticism. You can find out how to contact us at http://kobrakov.com : links to all my channels and "Sage.rf", where I can be accompanied by photos, videos with the information that is posted on the cover of the book, in the book itself and on the Internet, scoring my last name, first name. Or, for example, the Youtube channel "Opposition News, Konstantin Kobrakov", thousands of audio files. By the way, the website "Sage.rf" hosts all my social networks and all sites, as well as my work (so far in a free format).
The purpose of this work is to discuss and explain the history that we know, which should lead to understanding and rapprochement in controversial issues. And the most important thing is the reconciliation of the names of the living with the names of the surnames of the past. Stop forgetting facts that were, but inconvenient, and for actions in the past by other famous people, expecting to promote their interests in favor of trampling on the history of others. History is an integral part of our past and a cognitive part of our present life that reflects our actions in the future. So, the time has come to say that history should not spin some facts to please others, which leads to difficulties in understanding and explaining the story itself.
I must not only stand guard over the truth, but also ensure that no one dares to distort the story in favor of their personal interests. In this format and approach, it will not only guarantee historical justice in society, it means that the energy of the past will find peace, stop disturbing the present with their desires to show their negative energy to those who want to continue hiding tragic deeds committed in the thick of age-old vicissitudes that haunt neither the living nor the dead.
You and I have the opportunity to begin a new stage where the authorities, historians, and people will be able to reunite in a new form of life opportunities, manifested in the concept of understanding the processes themselves, as an inescapable action at the moments of the evolutionary process of society itself in the boundless vastness of the past understanding of human development. To condemn and point the finger at the processes of formation of any of the existing power structures in the distant past will not bring proper development, since temporary processes have managed to turn over in some cities and countries during this long period, if translated into human life, but at the same time short from the point of view of historical research, more than one form of government and property. For greed is not just a vice, but an enslaving virus of greed, insatiability, and cruelty, changing the mindset and understanding of one's destiny in this world to mercantile interests in favor of one, creating unbearable conditions for the other.
And such an understanding of oneself as a person will not lead to further transformation of people, such an understanding will slow down and open the development of society to universal enlightenment, where values and wealth do not matter, but have an extra opportunity to create even better amenities and greater opportunities for human development. I can be called a prince, khan, king, ruler — this will in no way change my human gut, I will remain a simple man like all other people on earth, made of flesh and blood, endowed with brain activity for the universal understanding and development of life itself. The opportunity that has been given to us from above gives the whole sane stratum of the world's population a chance to use this opportunity for charitable life, activity, and evolutionary development, and if this is the case and you agree with this, then let's not waste time creating truly heavenly conditions in this beautiful, but at the same time tough world for the improvement of life, the development of all mankind, in which work will be a thought process of integral life, the transformation of cognitive capabilities.
In one word. Friends, it's up to you to decide what you need in this wonderful life, where each of us should benefit not only ourselves, but the public space and society in order to pre-empt the very process of living and enjoying life. I can only become a center of rapprochement, give the opportunity to communicate to anyone who wants to see a new beautiful world that you and I can realize that there will be no borders, language and religious barriers — only authenticity that can unite, reconcile, create conditions for universal joy and love. The energy of kindness and understanding works wonders not only with a person, but also with the world, so I think an epiphany and understanding of what I write shows sincerity, but for now we will realize our goals.
And for this, there is a platform for communication "Sage.rf", which has no borders. I am waiting for everyone, write, we will create a universal memory, expressed in truth, capable of leading us into the free, clean world of the present, which will guarantee prosperity in the future. Let's look into our essence, into the depths of history, push the boundaries of truth, and draw truth and justice from the depths of oblivion for those who gave birth and created conditions for the prosperity of nations into a single whole management structure, for the benefit of peoples and opportunities, whose merits have been unreasonably erased from the memory of mankind.
And I'm asking you, friends, for help. I don't know how to read hand lines, I didn't do palmistry or fortune-telling, and I didn't catch anything by the look of my palm. And please, what does my palm mean in the photo? It can be considered in detail. Can you tell me about my world enclosed in my hands? What do the lines say? I would be interested to know what people know about lines. You know, curiosity is a vice of all mankind, and I am no exception.
I think after the publication of this work in the country, the world will pay attention to what is happening, where historical justice will prevail, and the forgotten great city in the past, Gnezdovo, will be included in the UNESCO list, and historians in the Russian Federation, at the suggestion of President Vladimir Putin, will begin a deep understanding of the formation of Kievan Rus, taking into account everything aspects that did not selectively approach the formation of the identity of the past in favor of the political conjuncture and the development of modern society.
Hard times, persecutions, civil strife, wars, repressions, riots are part of our past. To give an opportunity to know the history, to appreciate, to understand, to warn new generations of erroneous actions towards the peoples that inhabit the great state. Modern Russia and beyond has a much more ancient origin than we, the people of the earth, possess now. In the opposite case, after the disappearance of the USSR, the Russian Federation should have started its calculation in 1991, but we see that we are referring to the USSR, the Russian Empire, Kievan Rus. So explain why they don't want to tell the story before the year 800, the year 400, and so on, what is the country afraid of, pointing out the facts that keep the peace?
We have been living in a multinational, multi-religious state for a long time, and not talking about the distant past is simply blasphemous to history itself. And the way you appreciate it speaks to your attitude towards the country itself, which is built as an independent state based on the same history. So explain why history is becoming a selective tool rather than a paradigmatic foundation of life? There will always be confusion and misunderstanding until the past generations calm down, that they will not be able to find a place for themselves in historical formulations, descriptions, confessions that gave the opportunity to shape the future, to live thanks to them, but oblivion threw them out, breaking the chain of events for the general well-being in subsequent events.
For my part, I am already acting as the head of the Inter-Regional Organization SAGE ("International Management of Russian-speaking affairs of the Eurasian Center"). The charter can be found on the website of "Sage.rf" in the section "Public organization SAGE" (without a legal entity, it helps to work without financial reports, as it keeps at its own expense, and 10 years after submitting documents to the Ministry of Justice of Russia, it works flawlessly in the Tula region). In the context of this organization, legal issues were discussed with the late Andrei Vladimirovich Babushkin (a Russian human rights defender, public and political activist, poet, writer, and publicist). He was the chairman of the human rights organization Committee for Civil Rights, a member of the Expert Council under the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation, a member of the public Expert Council under the Commissioner for Human Rights in Moscow and other organizations. He invited them to joint discussions, and in part of their structures, and in the Moscow Public Chamber, they solved the pressing problems of society.
But not all people are so far-sighted that they think about the welfare of the country, the state and society. As well as multiple applications for holding rallies in Moscow to solve pressing problems in society, but the Moscow Mayor's Office constantly refused, with the exception of one time, and then for some reason the metro station was closed and the rally did not fully take place. I will not list all kinds of actions aimed at understanding the legal system's attitude towards society, but we must not forget historical events in the past that play a key role in the present.
I am ready to open a more focused structure specifically in the historical direction for the consolidation of citizens, society, government agencies and all activities in this area with a legal entity, where government agencies from different countries pay attention to the problems of historical identity and develop a unified approach to historical transformations. But there are always those who don't want the truth, consolidation. I have already written to the President of V. N. V. N. Putin was asked for financial support, and a letter was sent from the presidential administration to the Russian Ministry of Justice with a solution to this issue, but a man named Ulyukayev rejected the proposals with his shortsightedness, and we see that fate treated him deservedly for his actions, since he thought only of himself. I had time to work in the library and reflect. Thinking, he understood the meaning that the past will not give rest to those who ignore the challenges in the present.
Government structures benefit more from working together, and, by the way, understanding is reflected in those who do not see a solution to an old problem as an aggravation of various kinds of processes in the public consciousness in the future. I hope the government will listen and realize that the problem has been accumulating by the thousands, and a solution must be found. In my person as a guarantor of universal peace... I cannot remain indifferent to the consolidation of peace and stability. As a person who reads and honors the heritage of the tribal factor, I am ready to put an end to it if a compromise is found in the face of various states in the division of history, which belongs to the entire multinational people, both in the information field and in the material, since history cannot be traded. And the state, that is, currently, like no other, copes with the preservation of heritage better than anyone else, in joint monitoring of many issues, in solutions it is able to serve for consolidation in a difficult but quite solvable matter. As they used to say, the ball is on the side of government agencies and the president of the country.
Perhaps a joint solution to all pressing problems through me, Konstantin Alexandrovich Kobrakov, will give new opportunities, connections, and associations. The ability to work together on complex issues has led to the well-being of nations as a whole and the strengthening of domestic political foundations. The consolidation of society and the state creates enormous opportunities in our multinational world for the realization of man himself, as the foundation for the future possibilities of humanity itself, and the knowledge and reverence of the nature of the world in which we live is the basic postulate of everyone. The formation of an environment of possibilities lies in you, it remains to unite, join hands to consolidate energetic, historical possibilities, transforming life itself into an ordered essence, which lies in a simple understanding and faith in something huge called the Universe, which accumulates, forms everything and everything. All that remains for us is to begin to approach every challenge of a negative impact on us and our lives. The legislation of the Russian Federation allows the creation of religious associations. They may exist in the form of religious groups and religious organizations, voluntary associations of citizens for the joint profession and dissemination of faith, which is not registered as a legal entity. Or a religious organization is an association that is registered as a legal entity. The activities of religious associations are regulated by Federal Law No. 125-FZ dated September 26, 1997 "On freedom of conscience and religious associations."
So, friends, if you have views deeper than ordinary existence, there is something to think about. But I think we have a future. There is a desire to live in our own identity, there are laws, and what you and I will do will be decided in the future. Now I am looking for a place to realize the society of the future based on the free cities of the past and equality before the law, which opens up great opportunities to live happily in this wonderful world. As usual.
The lawyer does his job with his poems.
The story is huge and difficult in terms of global changes,
You let us know what times were like and who bears the answer.
For the good deeds done in the world and the horror of destruction.
Anyone will want to tell, but the essence of the story — Prohibition,
The whole truth is clarified after a year, without separating the necessary stages.
But tell me then, why not tell the whole truth?
To the end, in the selection of the right words,
When people want to know what's going on,
What was the story where the fact opens our eyes?
To know who we are, to create new benefits for the world,
Taking it to a new level, Everything that our ancestors created over the centuries for the prosperity of any nation.
Our home is the Earth, and history cannot be divided.
Take it away, Honor the times experienced by the people again,
For the wisdom of history, it is forbidden to tell the truth,
Let's see, let's remember our essence and honor our ancestors with honor.
The opening of the gates to the truth of nations in a single sense of existence,
A unicorn gives a miracle to the world, golden times will come forever.
Consciousness, the soul finds peace in the folk sense of celebration.
Taking this opportunity, I want to get acquainted with my daughter's channels, as well as my website www. SAGE. RF I will be glad to see you all
You can order my works and books only on the Sage website.In the Russian Federation, or on official book distribution sites, which are also listed only on the website of the sage.rf. An account with the Bank of the Russian Federation for ordering my books with an autotrophe, reproductions of my paintings with an autotrophe, is open to my wife Svetlana Nikolaevna Filatcheva, here is her checking account for transfer in rubles and in foreign currency, Please contact by phone 7 999 781 7009 and only for her, I do not notify any other people to represent my Interests. As an attorney and the only one who can sell and sell my works on my behalf. Contacting me, getting an audience to help you analyze your inner world through deciphering your vital information flows, channels, for the media, also only through Svetlana Nikolaevna Filatcheva.
A type of activity in the creation of AI, robotics, ecological renewable energy, the development and implementation of modern affordable housing, the development and implementation of legal mechanisms to protect against corruption, nepotism. Also, anyone who wants to jointly develop the city of the future with all areas of life, write to e-mail (briefly) also only on the website of sage.rf. The desire for investment participation is currently limited and is considered individually. Investments will be in two forms: "preferred" - this is when an investment is for a long time and "nominal" investments that are bought (returned) annually and the investor's participation is reviewed anew. You can find out about everything on my Internet sites, which are listed only on the SAGE website.The Russian Federation, where I only speak out, in order to avoid fraudulent actions by third parties, as I protect those who wish a future for themselves and others from influence and deception.
This is the basis on which BlackRock, Inc. ("BlackRock"), an American international investment company, operates. My goal and objective is to create an analog with a headquarters in Russia if the authorities do not interfere with the creation of the proje ct of the future.I plan to create an internal messenger for communication, so my friends have a lot of plans and a desire to create their own future together with the future.
You can also join the Inter-Regional Organization SAGE as an observer, and subsequently as a member of the organization, at whose request you can provide financial support by voluntary donation, and membership fees according to the charter for statutory purposes, but please specify. Konstantin Aleksandrovich Kobrakov, recipient of the personal account42307 810 7 5209 0128779 BIC 046015602 INN 7707083893 but check the website or call us +7 999 7817009
For the convenience of ordering K.A. Kobrakov's books, here are the invoices listed below in the currency of your choice, or you can check them out on the MUDRETS.RF website
Рекомендуем
Поддержи К.А.Кобракова рублём
Одноклассики моя стр, не являюсь терористом экстремисто
Facebookмоя страница данная организация признана экстремиской в РФ и запрещена ВКонтакте моя стр ня не признан терористом и экстремистом
Инстаграммоя страница организация признана экстремисской в РФ и запрещена ТВИТЕР моя стр
группа в ВКонтакте Телеграм моя стр ютуб новый доп канал ютуб
